![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TITLE 35: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE C: WATER POLLUTION CHAPTER II: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PART 366 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINING LOAN PRIORITIES FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS SECTION 366.APPENDIX A WATERBODY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
Section 366.APPENDIX A Waterbody Specific Information
The waterbody specific information used by the Agency for the priority system is contained in the Agency's biennial reports required under Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1315(b)). The calculations for river reaches range on a possible scale of 0-100, where 100 indicates the most highly valued water quality resources and results in the highest priority for protection or preservation. Calculations for lakes and reservoirs are based on the Degree of Use Support Assessment (DUS) and expressed as the DUS points as a percentage of the maximum DUS points. The component categories of IBI, PIBI, and DUS are determined based on the following:
a) IBI – Index of Biotic Integrity The Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) is the priority metric of the Biological Stream Characterization (BSC) stream classification system. IBI values ranging from 12 to 60 constitute the primary basis of the five stream classes as follows:
When quality stream fishery data are lacking for IBI determinations, BSC ratings may be derived by a subjective evaluation of narrative fishery criteria. In the absence of fishery data, aquatic macroinvertebrate data may be used for Limited or Restricted Use Aquatic Resource ratings (Class C and D respectively) for stream segments five miles in length or longer. The actual index is used in calculating A2. The maximum number of points when IBI is used is 60.
b) PIBI - Predicted Index of Biotic Integrity The Predicted Index of Biotic Integrity (PIBI) was developed to predict biotic potential (as measured by IBI) from habitat metrics.
The index is determined from the following relationships of four (4) stream habitat variables:
1. Percent substrate as silt-mud
2. Percent substrate as claypan
3. Mean stream width
4. Percent pool
The following equation is utilized for prediction of biotic potential as defined by a predicted IBI (PIBI) value:
Predicted IBI = 40.1 - (0.126 silt-mud) - (0.123 claypan) + (0.0424 pool) + (0.0916 width)
For purposes of deriving A2 calculations, PIBI values are divided by one half. The maximum number for the PIBI value is 30.
c) DUS - Degree of Use Support – Streams Section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1315(b)) requires each state to prepare a biennial report which addresses, among other items, the water quality of its surface water resources and the extent to which these waters meet objectives of the Act. Surface water resources are described in terms of the degree to which they are attaining designated uses. The Degree of Use Support (DUS) for Illinois streams is described in terms as follows:
The DUS is reported at 2 assessment levels: monitored and evaluated. The monitored assessment level is based on current water chemistry, sediment chemistry, biological, and habitat data collected from various Agency monitoring programs.
The evaluated assessment level is based primarily on historic data (5 years or older) or similarity of the area to monitored waters within the same basins or geographic region.
For purposes of A2 calculations, DUS assessments are incorporated as follows:
The maximum number of points is 50. Aquatic life use impairments resulting primarily from point sources are given a higher priority. Full or Full/Threatened and Partial Minor assessments which are based on an evaluated level of assessment will be assigned 40 points.
For purposes of B2 and C2 calculations, the Stream Class A, B, C, D or E is assigned from the Biological Stream Characterization Summary as follows:
Biological Stream Characterization (BSC) summary.
d) US – Degrees of Use Support – Lakes & Reservoirs Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) and Predicted Index of Biotic Integrity (PIBI) information is not applicable to lakes and reservoirs. The A2 factor will be determined solely from the Degree of Use Support classification and point allocation contained in paragraph (c) above. |