(725 ILCS 5/115-11.1) (from Ch. 38, par. 115-11.1)
Sec. 115-11.1. Use of "Rape". The use of the word "rape", "rapist", or
any derivative of "rape" by any victim, witness, State's Attorney, defense
attorney, judge or other court personnel in any prosecutions of offenses in
Sections 11-1.20 through 11-1.60 or 12-13 through 12-16 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012 is
not inadmissible.
(Source: P.A. 96-1551, eff. 7-1-11; 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)
|
(725 ILCS 5/115-12) (from Ch. 38, par. 115-12)
Sec. 115-12.
Substantive Admissibility of Prior Identification.
A statement
is not rendered inadmissible by the hearsay rule if (a) the declarant testifies
at the trial or hearing, and (b) the declarant is subject to cross-examination
concerning the statement, and (c) the statement is one of identification
of a person made after perceiving him.
(Source: P.A. 83-367.)
|
(725 ILCS 5/115-13) (from Ch. 38, par. 115-13)
Sec. 115-13.
In a prosecution for violation of Section 11-1.20, 11-1.30, 11-1.40, 11-1.50, 11-1.60, 12-13, 12-14,
12-14.1,
12-15 or 12-16 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, statements made by the
victim to medical personnel for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment
including descriptions of the cause of symptom, pain or sensations, or the
inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof
insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment shall be admitted
as an exception to the hearsay rule.
(Source: P.A. 96-1551, eff. 7-1-11; 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)
|