(750 ILCS 36/207)
Sec. 207.
Inconvenient Forum.
(a) A court of this State which has jurisdiction under this Act to make a
child-custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any
time if it
determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a
court
of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum
may
be raised upon motion of a party, the court's own motion, or request of another
court.
(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this
State shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another state to
exercise
jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit
information and shall consider all relevant factors, including:
(1) whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and |
| which state could best protect the parties and the child;
|
|
(2) the length of time the child has resided outside this State;
(3) the distance between the court in this State and the court in the state that would
|
|
(4) the relative financial circumstances of the parties;
(5) any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume
jurisdiction;
(6) the nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation,
|
| including testimony of the child;
|
|
(7) the ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the
|
| procedures necessary to present the evidence; and
|
|
(8) the familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending
|
|
(c) If a court of this State determines that it is an inconvenient forum and
that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum, it shall stay the
proceedings upon condition that a child-custody proceeding be promptly
commenced in another designated state and may impose any other condition the
court considers just and proper.
(d) A court of this State may decline to exercise its jurisdiction under
this
Act if a child-custody determination is incidental to an action for divorce or
another
proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the divorce or other
proceeding.
(Source: P.A. 93-108, eff. 1-1-04.)
|