| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | SENATE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, On September 17, 2008, the Electronic Products | ||||||
3 | Recycling and Reuse Act, Public Act 95-0959, was enacted, | ||||||
4 | setting forth procedures for the recycling and reuse of covered | ||||||
5 | electronic devices in Illinois; and
| ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, The Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act | ||||||
7 | banned the disposal of covered electronic devices in landfills | ||||||
8 | and incinerators beginning January 1, 2012; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, To provide adequate collection of discarded | ||||||
10 | electronic devices and comply with the disposal ban, more than | ||||||
11 | 300 collection sites statewide are currently registered with | ||||||
12 | the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to accept | ||||||
13 | electronic wastes; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, Local governments statewide have contracted with | ||||||
15 | electronic waste processors and recyclers for collection, | ||||||
16 | reuse, and recycling of discarded electronics, providing a | ||||||
17 | vital service to their residents; and | ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, A significant component of the discarded | ||||||
19 | electronic waste stream collected to date has been, and | ||||||
20 | continues to be, cathode ray tube (CRT) devices, including | ||||||
21 | televisions and computer monitors; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, CRT glass contains lead at a sufficiently high | ||||||
2 | concentration to meet the definition of hazardous waste, | ||||||
3 | necessitating handling of the glass in a manner that protects | ||||||
4 | human health and the environment; and | ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, The principal recycling market for CRT glass was | ||||||
6 | historically the production of new CRTs; and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, Demand for new CRTs historically provided an | ||||||
8 | economic incentive to recycle CRT glass for use in the | ||||||
9 | manufacturing of new CRTs, and recyclers received revenue for | ||||||
10 | the CRT glass provided to CRT manufacturers; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, New CRTs have essentially ceased to be purchased | ||||||
12 | in the United States, and there are no CRT manufacturing | ||||||
13 | facilities located in the United States; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, All CRT glass used in the manufacturing of new | ||||||
15 | CRTs is now exported to India, to the sole remaining CRT | ||||||
16 | manufacturing facility in the world; and | ||||||
17 | WHEREAS, There exist limited additional available outlets | ||||||
18 | for the legitimate recycling of CRT glass in the United States; | ||||||
19 | and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, The quantity of CRT glass collected far exceeds | ||||||
2 | current demand and available markets for the glass; and | ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, CRT glass processing and recycling now carries a | ||||||
4 | substantial cost, which constitutes a significant change since | ||||||
5 | the Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act was enacted in | ||||||
6 | 2008; and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, The increased cost to process CRT glass has caused | ||||||
8 | electronic waste collection programs operated by local | ||||||
9 | governments in Illinois to either bear the cost increases or be | ||||||
10 | discontinued to avoid accumulation of CRTs; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, Stockpiles of abandoned CRT glass have been | ||||||
12 | discovered at several former electronic waste processing | ||||||
13 | facilities across the United States, primarily due to the lack | ||||||
14 | of markets for CRT glass and the high cost associated with | ||||||
15 | existing markets; and | ||||||
16 | WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Glass Recycling LLC (Kuusakoski | ||||||
17 | Recycling) and Peoria Disposal Company (PDC), both | ||||||
18 | Illinois-based businesses, developed and permitted a CRT glass | ||||||
19 | solution, the KleanKover Recycling Solution, whereby CRT glass | ||||||
20 | is treated to reduce the leachable lead levels in the glass | ||||||
21 | (the principal environmental concern associated with CRTs) | ||||||
22 | below stringent federal thresholds, and is then placed as |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) in a permitted landfill; and | ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC have successfully | ||||||
3 | operated the KleanKover Recycling Solution since November, | ||||||
4 | 2013; and | ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, Given the lack of viable recycling markets, the | ||||||
6 | IEPA has determined that treated CRT glass used as ADC can be | ||||||
7 | counted towards manufacturer recycling goals under the | ||||||
8 | Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act, as documented in | ||||||
9 | IEPA correspondence to Kuusakoski Recycling on November 26, | ||||||
10 | 2013; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, Basel Action Network (BAN), administrators of the | ||||||
12 | e-Stewards Standard (a voluntary certification standard for | ||||||
13 | electronic waste recyclers) had previously defined any use of | ||||||
14 | treated CRT glass within a disposal facility, including use as | ||||||
15 | ADC, as a "last resort" option, effectively prohibiting use of | ||||||
16 | the KleanKover Recycling Solution; and | ||||||
17 | WHEREAS, BAN had expressed interest in considering | ||||||
18 | retrievable storage of CRT glass in permitted, monitored, and | ||||||
19 | contained designated disposal sites as a preferred CRT glass | ||||||
20 | management method; and | ||||||
21 | WHEREAS, In response to BAN's interest, PDC developed a |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | designated retrievable storage cell at its permitted Indian | ||||||
2 | Creek Landfill No. 2 to provide storage and future retrieval of | ||||||
3 | CRT glass, should markets develop to utilize the leaded glass; | ||||||
4 | and | ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, PDC has established a perpetual care fund for | ||||||
6 | Indian Creek Landfill No. 2, consisting of a trust fund held by | ||||||
7 | a third-party and available to Tazewell County (the host | ||||||
8 | jurisdiction for the landfill), which provides funding to | ||||||
9 | monitor and maintain the landfill in perpetuity, imparting a | ||||||
10 | greater level of financial and environmental protection than is | ||||||
11 | required under state or federal laws or regulations; and | ||||||
12 | WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC formally petitioned | ||||||
13 | BAN on November 18, 2014, to modify the e-Stewards Standard and | ||||||
14 | allow, as an additional preferred CRT glass management option, | ||||||
15 | the placement of treated CRT glass in a retrievable storage | ||||||
16 | cell within a permitted disposal site which has a perpetual | ||||||
17 | care fund established; and | ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, At least 10 units of local government in Illinois, | ||||||
19 | representing nearly four million people, sent letters to BAN in | ||||||
20 | support of the petition submitted by Kuusakoski Recycling and | ||||||
21 | PDC, and urging BAN's approval in order to maintain the | ||||||
22 | governmental units' vital electronic waste collection and | ||||||
23 | recycling programs for their residents; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, On March 26, 2015, the Senate of the 99th General | ||||||
2 | Assembly of the State of Illinois adopted Senate Resolution 184 | ||||||
3 | urging BAN to approve the petition submitted by Kuusakoski | ||||||
4 | Recycling and PDC and revise the e-Stewards Standard to allow | ||||||
5 | placement of treated CRT glass into a dedicated retrievable | ||||||
6 | storage cell at a permitted disposal facility; and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, On July 10, 2015, Public Act 99-13 amended the | ||||||
8 | Electronics Products Recycling and Reuse Act to allow CRT glass | ||||||
9 | placed in retrievable storage cells at permitted landfills to | ||||||
10 | be counted towards manufacturer recycling goals; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, BAN published Sanctioned Interpretation #5 to the | ||||||
12 | e-Stewards Standard V2.0 on April 1, 2016, recognizing | ||||||
13 | placement of treated CRT glass in lined, leachate-controlled, | ||||||
14 | and monitored solid waste landfills as a conditionally | ||||||
15 | allowable option for the management of CRT glass if all | ||||||
16 | preferred options have been ruled out based on established | ||||||
17 | criteria without requirement for further BAN approval; and | ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, Sustainable Electronics Recycling International | ||||||
19 | (SERI), administrators of the R2 Standard (a separate voluntary | ||||||
20 | certification standard for electronic waste recyclers) has | ||||||
21 | prohibited its certified recyclers from managing CRT glass in | ||||||
22 | any form within a landfill, including as ADC or in retrievable |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | storage; and | ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, At least 15 units of local government in Illinois, | ||||||
3 | representing over five million people, some of which | ||||||
4 | governmental units maintain among the most effective e-waste | ||||||
5 | recycling programs in the United States, petitioned SERI in | ||||||
6 | 2014, to reconsider its position on CRT glass management, | ||||||
7 | citing the need for additional CRT glass management options in | ||||||
8 | the United States; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, In June of 2016, representatives of SERI and the | ||||||
10 | R2 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC; a multi-stakeholder | ||||||
11 | group appointed by SERI to review and recommend revisions to | ||||||
12 | the R2 Standard) toured the Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC | ||||||
13 | facilities and received additional information about their CRT | ||||||
14 | glass management process; and
| ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, In September of 2016, Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC | ||||||
16 | announced a further enhancement to their CRT glass management | ||||||
17 | process which will segregate panel glass (which does not | ||||||
18 | include concentrations of hazardous materials in regulated | ||||||
19 | quantities) from leaded funnel glass; this enhancement will | ||||||
20 | permit Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC to utilize crushed panel | ||||||
21 | glass as construction aggregate at permitted landfills as a | ||||||
22 | replacement for washed gravel in the construction of leachate | ||||||
23 | recirculation wells and potentially landfill gas wells, while |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | continuing to treat leaded funnel glass and place it in | ||||||
2 | retrievable storage or utilize it as ADC at permitted | ||||||
3 | landfills; and
| ||||||
4 | WHEREAS, The option of beneficial use of CRT panel glass as | ||||||
5 | construction aggregate, beneficial use of treated CRT glass as | ||||||
6 | ADC, and placement of treated CRT glass in retrievable storage | ||||||
7 | in a dedicated cell at a permitted disposal site provides | ||||||
8 | needed environmentally protective, cost effective, and | ||||||
9 | immediately available capacity for CRT glass, resulting in | ||||||
10 | relief for residents, local governments, and recyclers across | ||||||
11 | Illinois and the United States to manage this problematic | ||||||
12 | material and reduce the potential for future discoveries of | ||||||
13 | stockpiled material that would pose a significant | ||||||
14 | environmental threat; therefore, be it
| ||||||
15 | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDREDTH GENERAL | ||||||
16 | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we urge SERI | ||||||
17 | (Sustainable Electronics Recycling International) and the TAC | ||||||
18 | (the R2 Technical Advisory Committee) to amend the R2 Standard | ||||||
19 | to create an option for management of CRT glass through | ||||||
20 | beneficial use, including in uses such as landfill construction | ||||||
21 | aggregate and ADC, and placement of treated CRT glass into a | ||||||
22 | dedicated retrievable storage cell in a permitted disposal | ||||||
23 | facility; and be it further
|
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be | ||||||
2 | delivered to the executive director, R2 technical director, and | ||||||
3 | the chair of the Board of Directors of SERI (Sustainable | ||||||
4 | Electronics Recycling International).
|