| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | SENATE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, A proposed educational pension cost shift, which | ||||||
3 | would shift the cost burden from the State of Illinois to local | ||||||
4 | school districts, community colleges, and institutions of | ||||||
5 | higher education, is under discussion; this proposal would | ||||||
6 | require all employers of members in the Teachers' Retirement | ||||||
7 | System and the State Universities Retirement System to pay the | ||||||
8 | normal cost of pension benefits earned; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, If this proposal were to become policy, for the | ||||||
10 | Teachers' Retirement System and the State Universities | ||||||
11 | Retirement System, it would potentially move $10.187 billion in | ||||||
12 | estimated normal costs of pension benefits earned from the | ||||||
13 | State to local school districts, community colleges, and | ||||||
14 | institutions of higher learning over a 10-year period; | ||||||
15 | actuarial changes recently made by these 2 systems will further | ||||||
16 | increase these numbers; and
| ||||||
17 | WHEREAS, This plan would move these spending commitments | ||||||
18 | from one taxing body, the State, to a group of taxing bodies, | ||||||
19 | the school districts and community colleges, while additional | ||||||
20 | pension costs would be shifted to State universities; and
| ||||||
21 | WHEREAS, A pension cost shift would lead to a massive | ||||||
22 | increase in local funding requirements on school districts; the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | cost shift would exacerbate the problem of adequately funding | ||||||
2 | our local schools by taking even more when districts, teachers, | ||||||
3 | and local voters are fighting to simply keep educational | ||||||
4 | opportunities open to our students; in addition, a pension cost | ||||||
5 | shift would likely lead to massive property tax hikes or to | ||||||
6 | classroom cuts that will harm our students; and
| ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, According to the Illinois State Board of | ||||||
8 | Education, 67% of school districts in the State are operating | ||||||
9 | in the red; and | ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, School districts already bear a large share of the | ||||||
11 | Teachers' Retirement System pension burden by paying a | ||||||
12 | statutory share of the System's total contribution costs, | ||||||
13 | constituting 0.58% of pensionable teacher payroll; districts | ||||||
14 | also contribute towards any locally-negotiated early | ||||||
15 | retirement options and for the pension costs of certain | ||||||
16 | increases in compensation, totaling $92.5 million in Fiscal | ||||||
17 | Year 2012; and
| ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, Representatives from Northern Illinois University | ||||||
19 | publicly stated that if the cost shift were to be covered by | ||||||
20 | increasing tuition on parents and students, each percentage of | ||||||
21 | payroll cost shifted to the university would translate into a | ||||||
22 | 2% tuition increase; this proposed cost shift would also | ||||||
23 | increase the liability of State-funded universities and all |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | community colleges, thus making higher education even more | ||||||
2 | unaffordable for students and their parents; and | ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, This plan would harm the interests of all | ||||||
4 | taxpayers, especially in downstate and suburban areas and would | ||||||
5 | sharply increase inequities created by the current school aid | ||||||
6 | formula between Chicago and the rest of the State; because of | ||||||
7 | the impact on institutions of higher education, Chicago | ||||||
8 | taxpayers, parents, and students would also be affected; | ||||||
9 | therefore, be it
| ||||||
10 | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDREDTH GENERAL | ||||||
11 | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we state our belief | ||||||
12 | that an educational pension cost shift is financially wrong and | ||||||
13 | would only serve to shift pension burdens from the State to the | ||||||
14 | status of an unfunded mandate.
|