|
| | 10200HB0836sam001 | - 2 - | LRB102 11349 BMS 38980 a |
|
|
| 1 | | below the 250% federal poverty level who choose a silver level |
| 2 | | plan; it also requires the United States Department of Health |
| 3 | | and Human Services to reimburse issuers for cost-sharing |
| 4 | | reductions. Cost-sharing reductions are important because they |
| 5 | | help low-income marketplace consumers afford out-of-pocket |
| 6 | | costs, including deductibles and copayments, and therefore |
| 7 | | keep them in the marketplace.
|
| 8 | | (2) On October 12, 2017, the federal government, through |
| 9 | | executive action, announced that it would be discontinuing |
| 10 | | cost-sharing reduction payments to issuers in the Patient |
| 11 | | Protection and Affordable Care Act marketplace. Illinois, like |
| 12 | | the majority of other states, took action to mitigate the |
| 13 | | losses that Illinois issuers would endure without the federal |
| 14 | | cost-sharing reduction payments by adopting a practice called |
| 15 | | "silver loading" or "cost-sharing reduction uncertainty cost" |
| 16 | | beginning in the 2018 plan year. Silver loading allows issuers |
| 17 | | to increase their silver plan baseline premiums to make up the |
| 18 | | costs lost from the missing federal cost-sharing reduction |
| 19 | | payments. Most of these premium increases are offset by higher |
| 20 | | advanced premium tax credits from the federal government.
|
| 21 | | (3) However, due to silver loading and resulting pricing |
| 22 | | of silver plans in the Illinois marketplace, it appears that |
| 23 | | the current metal-level premiums in the Illinois marketplace |
| 24 | | are misaligned and do not reflect coverage generosity of the |
| 25 | | plans. The fact that silver plans are now overpriced for |
| 26 | | enrollees ineligible for generous cost-sharing reductions has |
|
| | 10200HB0836sam001 | - 3 - | LRB102 11349 BMS 38980 a |
|
|
| 1 | | driven some of those enrollees into non-silver (mostly bronze) |
| 2 | | plans with levels of cost sharing that are a worse match for |
| 3 | | their needs. In other words, Illinois marketplace consumers |
| 4 | | could be currently paying more than they should for low value |
| 5 | | plans and less than they should for high value plans.
|
| 6 | | Section 15. Premium misalignment study. |
| 7 | | (a) The Department of Insurance shall oversee a study to |
| 8 | | explore rate setting approaches that may yield a misalignment |
| 9 | | of premiums across different tiers of coverage in Illinois' |
| 10 | | individual health insurance market. The study shall examine |
| 11 | | these approaches with a view to attempts to make coverage more |
| 12 | | affordable for low-income and middle-income residents. The |
| 13 | | study shall follow the best practices of other states targeted |
| 14 | | at addressing metal-level premium misalignment and include an |
| 15 | | Illinois-specific analysis of: |
| 16 | | (1) the number of consumers who are eligible for a |
| 17 | | premium subsidy under the Patient Protection and |
| 18 | | Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148) and the relative |
| 19 | | affordability of the plans;
|
| 20 | | (2) if the plan is in the silver level, as described by |
| 21 | | 42 U.S.C. 18022(d), the relation of the premium amount |
| 22 | | compared to premiums charged for qualified health plans |
| 23 | | offering different levels of coverage, taking into account |
| 24 | | any funding or lack of funding for cost-sharing reductions |
| 25 | | and the covered benefits for each level of coverage; and |
|
| | 10200HB0836sam001 | - 4 - | LRB102 11349 BMS 38980 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (3) whether the plan issuer utilized the induced |
| 2 | | demand factors developed by the Centers for Medicare and |
| 3 | | Medicaid Services for the risk adjustment program |
| 4 | | established under 42 U.S.C. 18063 for the level of |
| 5 | | coverage offered by the plan or any State-specific induced |
| 6 | | demand factors established by Department rules. |
| 7 | | (b) The study shall produce cost estimates for Illinois |
| 8 | | residents addressing metal-level premium misalignment policy |
| 9 | | as studied in subsection (a) along with the impact of the |
| 10 | | policy on health insurance affordability and access and the |
| 11 | | uninsured rates for low-income and middle-income residents, |
| 12 | | with break-out data by geography, race, ethnicity, and income |
| 13 | | level. The study shall evaluate how premium realignment, if |
| 14 | | implemented, would affect costs and outcomes for Illinoisans. |
| 15 | | (c) The Department of Insurance shall develop and submit, |
| 16 | | no later than January 1, 2024, a report to the General Assembly |
| 17 | | and the Governor concerning the design, costs, benefits, and |
| 18 | | implementation of premium realignment to increase |
| 19 | | affordability and access to health care coverage that |
| 20 | | leverages existing State infrastructure.".
|