HB1769sam002 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Sen. Steve Stadelman

Filed: 10/28/2021

10200HB1769sam002 LRB102 10422 HLH 30296 a

AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL 1769

AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend House Bill 1769, AS AMENDED, with reference to page and line numbers of Senate Amendment No. 1, on page 4, line 14, by deleting "electric motorcycles or"; and

on page 4, line 22, by replacing "focused" with "primarily focused"; and

on page 20, line 9, by replacing "sound and" with "sound,"; and

on page 20, line 11, by replacing "employment and" with "employment, and will"; and

on page 21, line 17, after "Illinois" by inserting ", the Clean Jobs Workforce Network Program,"; and

on page 21, line 20, after "Training.", by inserting "An applicant is also eligible for a training credit that shall not exceed 10% of the training costs of retained employees for the purpose of upskilling to meet the operational needs of the applicant or the REV Illinois Project."; and

on page 22, line 12, by deleting "in any taxable year"; and

on page 23, lines 14 and 15, by deleting "in any taxable year"; and

on page 23, line 22, by replacing "approved by the Department of Labor" with "that conforms with the Project Labor Agreements Act"; and

by deleting line 17 on page 24 though line 3 on page 25; and

on page 30, immediately below line 7, by inserting the following:

"(20) Each taxpayer under paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of Section 20 above shall maintain labor neutrality toward any union organizing campaign for any employees of the taxpayer assigned to work on the premises of the REV Illinois Project Site. This paragraph shall not apply to an electric vehicle manufacturer, electric vehicle component part manufacturer, electric vehicle power supply manufacturer or any joint venture including an electric vehicle manufacturer, electric vehicle component part manufacturer, and electric vehicle power supply manufacturer, who is subject to collective bargaining agreement entered into prior to the taxpayer filing an application pursuant to this Act."; and

on page 30, line 22, after "taxpayer", by inserting "with a workforce of 100 or more employees and"; and

on page 31, by replacing lines 12 through 16 with the following:

"(b) Vendor diversity and annual report. Each taxpayer with a workforce of 100 or more full-time employees shall, starting on April 15, 2025 and every year thereafter for which the taxpayer has an Agreement under this Act, report on the diversity of the vendors that it utilizes, for publication on the Department's website, and include the following information:"; and

on page 36, line 10, by replacing "misdemeanor." with "misdemeanor and may be enforced by the Illinois Department of Labor or the Department. The Attorney General shall represented the Illinois Department of Labor or the Department in the proceeding."; and

on page 36, by replacing lines lines 20 through 21 with "The contractor or subcontractor shall submit reports to the Department of Labor electronically that meet the"; and

on page 42, lines 22 through 23, by replacing "this Act" with "the Illinois Income Tax Act"; and

on page 45, line 1, by deleting "at least"; and

on page 45, line 2, after the period, by inserting "The purchasing agency may require additional information from bidders or offerors to verify whether an electric vehicle is manufactured in Illinois as defined by this Section."; and

on page 45, line 21, by deleting "of this Act"; and

on page 98, by replacing lines 11 through 13 with the following:

"No debit reduction or charge back of any item on a warranty repair order may be made absent a finding of fraud or illegal actions by the dealer."; and

on page 101, by replacing lines 17 through 25 with the following: "vehicle franchiser. The requirements of this subsection (e) shall not apply to entire engine assemblies, propulsion engine assemblies, including electric vehicle batteries, and entire transmission assemblies. In the case of those assemblies, the motor vehicle franchiser shall reimburse the motor vehicle franchisee up to and including 30% of what the motor vehicle franchisee would have paid the motor vehicle franchiser for the assembly if the assembly had not been supplied by the franchiser other than by the sale of that assembly to the motor vehicle franchisee. Provided that such reimbursement is not unreasonable when compared to the parts markup paid by retail customers for the same work at the franchisee or with that of other motor vehicle franchisees of the same manufacturer for the same line-make vehicles for identical assemblies in the same geographic area in which the dealer is engaged in business and entire transmission assemblies.".