|
Rep. Curtis J. Tarver, II
Filed: 2/28/2022
| | 10200HB4580ham001 | | LRB102 23396 NLB 37087 a |
|
|
| 1 | | AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL 4580
|
| 2 | | AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend House Bill 4580 by replacing |
| 3 | | everything after the enacting clause with the following:
|
| 4 | | "Section 5. The School Code is amended by adding Section |
| 5 | | 34-222 as follows: |
| 6 | | (105 ILCS 5/34-222 new) |
| 7 | | Sec. 34-222. School attendance boundaries. |
| 8 | | (a) At least once every 5 years, the Department of School |
| 9 | | Demographics and Planning ("DSP") shall evaluate the |
| 10 | | enrollment at existing schools in the school district to |
| 11 | | determine if there is a need to revise existing boundaries. |
| 12 | | (1) In reviewing the enrollment at existing schools to |
| 13 | | determine if there is a need to revise existing |
| 14 | | boundaries, DSP shall consider a range of factors, |
| 15 | | including the following: |
| 16 | | (A) capacities of the school being reviewed and |
|
| | 10200HB4580ham001 | - 2 - | LRB102 23396 NLB 37087 a |
|
|
| 1 | | schools with contiguous boundaries to the school being |
| 2 | | reviewed; |
| 3 | | (B) current and projected racial and ethnic |
| 4 | | composition of the school being reviewed and any |
| 5 | | schools with contiguous boundaries to the school being |
| 6 | | reviewed; |
| 7 | | (C) current and projected income level composition |
| 8 | | of the school being reviewed and any schools with |
| 9 | | contiguous boundaries to the school being reviewed; |
| 10 | | (D) geographic barriers; |
| 11 | | (E) travel time and distance to the school; and |
| 12 | | (F) program considerations of the school being |
| 13 | | reviewed and any schools with contiguous boundaries to |
| 14 | | the school being reviewed. |
| 15 | | (2) DSP shall submit a written report of its findings, |
| 16 | | conclusions, and recommendations to the chief executive |
| 17 | | officer and the Board. The report shall document the |
| 18 | | evaluation of the factors of the school being reviewed. |
| 19 | | The report shall be made public on the district's website |
| 20 | | within 30 days after its completion. |
| 21 | | (b) If it is determined that there is a need to revise any |
| 22 | | existing boundaries, DSP shall develop and recommend any |
| 23 | | proposed changes to the chief executive officer prior to the |
| 24 | | beginning of the school year in which the changes are to take |
| 25 | | effect. In addition, DSP shall develop and recommend proposed |
| 26 | | boundaries for new schools to the chief executive officer |
|
| | 10200HB4580ham001 | - 3 - | LRB102 23396 NLB 37087 a |
|
|
| 1 | | prior to the beginning of the school year in which the new |
| 2 | | school boundaries are to take effect. |
| 3 | | (1) In developing proposed changes to boundaries for |
| 4 | | existing schools and proposing attendance boundaries for |
| 5 | | new schools, DSP shall consider a range of factors, |
| 6 | | including the following: |
| 7 | | (A) DSP shall consider the capacities of each of |
| 8 | | the schools involved in the proposed boundary |
| 9 | | revisions, including the extent
to which a school is |
| 10 | | overcrowded or underutilized. Where feasible, the goal |
| 11 | | is for elementary schools to
be utilized at not more |
| 12 | | than 80% of design capacity and for high schools at not |
| 13 | | more than 100% of program capacity. Schools shall be |
| 14 | | considered severely overcrowded if they are
operating |
| 15 | | in excess of 100% utilization and significantly |
| 16 | | underutilized if they are operating at less than 30% |
| 17 | | utilization. DSP shall consider these utilization |
| 18 | | rates when proposing revisions to attendance |
| 19 | | boundaries for
existing schools and when proposing |
| 20 | | attendance boundaries for new schools. |
| 21 | | (B) DSP shall consider the current and projected |
| 22 | | racial and ethnic composition of the schools affected. |
| 23 | | Where feasible, DSP shall propose establishing or |
| 24 | | revising attendance boundaries to maintain or promote
|
| 25 | | stably desegregated enrollments in each of the |
| 26 | | affected schools and to avoid the creation of one-race
|
|
| | 10200HB4580ham001 | - 4 - | LRB102 23396 NLB 37087 a |
|
|
| 1 | | schools. |
| 2 | | (C) DSP shall consider geographic barriers so as |
| 3 | | to promote safety and minimize transportation burdens, |
| 4 | | to the extent feasible. |
| 5 | | (D) DSP shall consider travel time and distance |
| 6 | | and, to the extent feasible, seek to minimize travel |
| 7 | | time and distance. |
| 8 | | (E) DSP shall consider the placement of programs |
| 9 | | in each of the schools
involved, such as programs for |
| 10 | | English learners and for special education students. |
| 11 | | In addition, DSP shall consider the impact of magnet |
| 12 | | schools and programs and the requirements of the |
| 13 | | federal Every Student Succeeds Act and the Illinois |
| 14 | | Balanced Accountability Measures. |
| 15 | | (2) For each proposed attendance boundary, DSP shall |
| 16 | | develop at least 2 alternatives. For each alternative, DSP |
| 17 | | shall prepare a report showing 3-year enrollment |
| 18 | | projections by racial and ethnic groups for all schools |
| 19 | | affected by the proposed change pursuant to each |
| 20 | | alternative. The report shall document for each |
| 21 | | alternative the impact on the affected schools for the |
| 22 | | factors of capacity, geographic barriers, travel time and |
| 23 | | distance, and program considerations. In developing |
| 24 | | alternatives, DSP shall consider whether any feasible |
| 25 | | alternatives would better maintain or promote stably |
| 26 | | desegregated enrollments in each of the affected schools |
|
| | 10200HB4580ham001 | - 5 - | LRB102 23396 NLB 37087 a |
|
|
| 1 | | or better avoid the creation of one-race schools. The |
| 2 | | report shall be made public on the district's website |
| 3 | | within 30 days after its completion. |
| 4 | | (c) The chief executive officer shall review the report |
| 5 | | from DSP and may suggest additional alternatives. The chief |
| 6 | | executive officer shall report to the Board if he or she |
| 7 | | recommends any changes to existing boundaries or establishing |
| 8 | | boundaries for new schools. If the chief executive officer is |
| 9 | | recommending any changes to existing boundaries or |
| 10 | | establishing any boundaries for new schools, the chief |
| 11 | | executive officer shall provide the Board with a report of the |
| 12 | | alternatives considered, including data on the factors of |
| 13 | | capacity, current and projected racial and ethnic |
| 14 | | considerations, geographic barriers, travel time and distance, |
| 15 | | and program considerations. The chief executive officer shall |
| 16 | | inform the Board of the alternative that is being recommended. |
| 17 | | The report shall be made public on the district's website |
| 18 | | within 30 days after its completion. |
| 19 | | (d) Prior to taking action on the establishment or |
| 20 | | revision of any attendance boundaries, the Board shall conduct |
| 21 | | public hearings on the proposed establishment or revision of |
| 22 | | attendance boundaries and the chief executive officer's |
| 23 | | recommendation. Prior to the public hearing, the Board shall |
| 24 | | make available reports and data on the factors of capacity, |
| 25 | | current and projected racial and ethnic considerations, |
| 26 | | geographic barriers, travel time and distance, and program |