|
| | 10300HB5264sam001 | - 2 - | LRB103 38085 RPS 73096 a |
|
|
1 | | position. |
2 | | (c) Any policeman who has been denied a disability benefit |
3 | | without an offer of reinstatement or a limited-duty position |
4 | | after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd |
5 | | General Assembly is entitled to disability benefits. |
6 | | (40 ILCS 5/5-228) (from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 5-228) |
7 | | Sec. 5-228. Administrative review. |
8 | | (a) The provisions of the Administrative Review Law, and |
9 | | all amendments and modifications thereof and the rules adopted |
10 | | pursuant thereto, shall apply to and govern all proceedings |
11 | | for the judicial review of final administrative decisions of |
12 | | the retirement board provided for under this Article. The term |
13 | | "administrative decision" is as defined in Section 3-101 of |
14 | | the Code of Civil Procedure. |
15 | | (b) If any policeman whose application for either a duty |
16 | | disability benefit under Section 5-154 , or for an occupational |
17 | | disease disability benefit under Section 5-154.1 , or for an |
18 | | ordinary disability benefit under Section 5-155 has been |
19 | | denied by a majority vote of the Retirement Board brings an |
20 | | action for administrative review challenging the denial of |
21 | | disability benefits and the policeman prevails in the action |
22 | | in administrative review, then the prevailing policeman shall |
23 | | be entitled to recover from the Fund court costs and |
24 | | litigation expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, as |
25 | | part of the costs of the action. |
|
| | 10300HB5264sam001 | - 3 - | LRB103 38085 RPS 73096 a |
|
|
1 | | (c) If a policeman whose duty disability benefits, |
2 | | ordinary disability benefits, or occupational disability |
3 | | benefits are terminated by a majority vote of the Retirement |
4 | | Board brings an action for administrative review challenging |
5 | | the termination of those disability benefits and prevails in |
6 | | the action in administrative review, then the prevailing |
7 | | policeman shall be entitled to recover from the Fund court |
8 | | costs and litigation expenses, including reasonable attorney's |
9 | | fees, as part of the costs of the action. |
10 | | (Source: P.A. 101-387, eff. 8-16-19.) |
11 | | Section 90. The State Mandates Act is amended by adding |
12 | | Section 8.48 as follows: |
13 | | (30 ILCS 805/8.48 new) |
14 | | Sec. 8.48. Exempt mandate. Notwithstanding Sections 6 and |
15 | | 8 of this Act, no reimbursement by the State is required for |
16 | | the implementation of any mandate created by this amendatory |
17 | | Act of the 103rd General Assembly. |
18 | | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
19 | | becoming law.". |