|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 2 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | in each direction per day. |
| 2 | | (3) The Midwest Regional Rail Plan also identifies |
| 3 | | other routes radiating from Chicago without specifying |
| 4 | | service levels. |
| 5 | | (4) Increasing passenger rail service frequencies |
| 6 | | across all corridors and long-distance routes will |
| 7 | | strengthen Illinois' economy, reduce congestion, improve |
| 8 | | sustainability, and enhance access to federal and private |
| 9 | | investment. |
| 10 | | (5) It is, therefore, the policy of the State to |
| 11 | | define and pursue an integrated high-speed and intercity |
| 12 | | passenger rail network as part of the Illinois State Rail |
| 13 | | Plan and to ensure that the criteria described in this Act |
| 14 | | are incorporated into all metropolitan, regional, and |
| 15 | | statewide transportation planning processes in a manner |
| 16 | | consistent with federal law and planning cycles. |
| 17 | | (6) The General Assembly recognizes that many existing |
| 18 | | intercity and long-distance passenger rail services within |
| 19 | | the State operate over infrastructure that is privately |
| 20 | | owned and controlled by railroads. These railroads operate |
| 21 | | complex, capital-intensive networks with operating |
| 22 | | practices designed to meet the needs of their customers, |
| 23 | | including the efficient movement of long trains whose |
| 24 | | schedules may be less time-sensitive than frequent |
| 25 | | passenger rail service. High-frequency, time-sensitive |
| 26 | | passenger rail operations may be operationally |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 3 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | inconsistent with certain railroad business models, |
| 2 | | particularly where network capacity is constrained or |
| 3 | | dispatching priorities differ. |
| 4 | | (7) The General Assembly further recognizes that train |
| 5 | | paths, operating slots, dispatching priority, and network |
| 6 | | capacity on privately owned railroad infrastructure are |
| 7 | | valuable commercial assets. Sustainable and scalable |
| 8 | | passenger rail service requires fair, transparent, and |
| 9 | | mutually beneficial compensation arrangements that reflect |
| 10 | | the value of these assets, the opportunity costs of their |
| 11 | | use, and the capital and operating impacts borne by |
| 12 | | railroads. |
| 13 | | (8) The aspirational passenger rail frequencies |
| 14 | | established in this Act are intended to guide long-term |
| 15 | | planning and investment prioritization and shall not be |
| 16 | | construed to require that future passenger rail services |
| 17 | | operate on the same rail lines, alignments, or |
| 18 | | infrastructure currently in use. In planning to achieve |
| 19 | | these frequencies, the Department of Transportation and |
| 20 | | Metropolitan Planning Organizations shall consider all |
| 21 | | reasonable infrastructure and operational options, |
| 22 | | including capacity expansions, grade separations, advanced |
| 23 | | dispatching systems, shared-use agreements, and the |
| 24 | | construction of new or improved publicly owned rail |
| 25 | | infrastructure where appropriate. |
| 26 | | (9) The General Assembly affirms the essential role of |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 4 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | railroads in supporting the State's economy, supply |
| 2 | | chains, and industrial competitiveness. Railroads |
| 3 | | operating within the State have distinct network |
| 4 | | configurations, customer mixes, investment strategies, and |
| 5 | | long-term growth plans. Passenger rail planning under this |
| 6 | | Act shall consider these differences and seek solutions |
| 7 | | that respect railroad operational needs while advancing |
| 8 | | statewide passenger mobility goals. |
| 9 | | (10) The General Assembly further recognizes that |
| 10 | | implementation of expanded passenger rail service on |
| 11 | | corridors that utilize privately owned railroad |
| 12 | | infrastructure will require negotiated agreements and |
| 13 | | operational cooperation with the applicable railroad |
| 14 | | infrastructure owners. The State's aspirational frequency |
| 15 | | goals are intended to guide planning and investment |
| 16 | | decisions and do not supersede the need for mutually |
| 17 | | agreed operational arrangements. |
| 18 | | (11) The General Assembly further finds that intercity |
| 19 | | passenger rail planning is closely linked to airport |
| 20 | | planning and aviation system performance. Planning under |
| 21 | | this Act shall consider how expanded passenger rail |
| 22 | | service can improve access to commercial service airports, |
| 23 | | reduce roadway congestion, and expand nonautomobile travel |
| 24 | | options for passengers, employees, and visitors traveling |
| 25 | | to and from airports. |
| 26 | | (12) Passenger rail planning shall also consider |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 5 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | airside capacity constraints at airports, including gate |
| 2 | | utilization, runway capacity, and airline slot usage, and |
| 3 | | how improved rail connectivity may allow certain |
| 4 | | short-haul air markets to be supplemented or replaced by |
| 5 | | passenger rail service where appropriate. Such planning |
| 6 | | may identify opportunities to reallocate limited aviation |
| 7 | | capacity toward longer-distance or higher-value air |
| 8 | | service when comparable rail alternatives exist. |
| 9 | | Section 10. Establishment of target rail frequencies. |
| 10 | | (a) The following criteria are established for intercity |
| 11 | | passenger rail routes serving or originating in the State. |
| 12 | | These criteria shall serve as official benchmarks for |
| 13 | | statewide rail planning, investment prioritization, and |
| 14 | | coordination with neighboring states, Amtrak or any other |
| 15 | | passenger rail service provider, and other railroads. |
| 16 | | (b) The following corridors shall be designated as: |
| 17 | | (1) Hourly service routes, with trains operating on |
| 18 | | pulse schedules at least once per hour, in each direction, |
| 19 | | throughout the day (5 a.m. to 10 p.m.): |
| 20 | | (A) Chicago to Milwaukee. |
| 21 | | (B) Chicago to Janesville to Madison to St. Paul. |
| 22 | | (C) Chicago to Rockford. |
| 23 | | (D) Chicago to Normal to Springfield. |
| 24 | | (E) Chicago to Detroit to Toronto. |
| 25 | | (F) Chicago to Cleveland to Pittsburgh to |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 6 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | Philadelphia. |
| 2 | | (G) Chicago to Fort Wayne to Columbus. |
| 3 | | (H) Chicago to Indianapolis to Cincinnati. |
| 4 | | (I) Chicago to Indianapolis to Louisville to |
| 5 | | Nashville to Atlanta. |
| 6 | | (J) Chicago to Champaign to Decatur to |
| 7 | | Springfield. |
| 8 | | (K) Springfield to East St. Louis to St. Louis to |
| 9 | | Kansas City. |
| 10 | | (2) Every-2-hour service routes, with trains operating |
| 11 | | at least once every 2 hours, in each direction, throughout |
| 12 | | the day (5 a.m. to 10 p.m.): |
| 13 | | (A) Chicago to Moline. |
| 14 | | (B) Chicago to Peoria. |
| 15 | | (C) Milwaukee to Green Bay (by extension of |
| 16 | | Chicago to Milwaukee). |
| 17 | | (3) Every-4-hour service routes, with trains operating |
| 18 | | at least once every 4 hours, in each direction, throughout |
| 19 | | the day (5 a.m. to 10 p.m.): |
| 20 | | (A) Champaign to Carbondale to Memphis (by |
| 21 | | extension of Chicago to Champaign). |
| 22 | | (B) Rockford to East Dubuque (by extension of |
| 23 | | Chicago to Rockford). |
| 24 | | (C) Quad Cities to Des Moines to Omaha to Denver |
| 25 | | (by extension of Chicago to Moline). |
| 26 | | (D) Chicago to Galesburg to Quincy to Hannibal. |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 7 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (E) Carbondale to East St. Louis. |
| 2 | | (c) The Department of Transportation shall incorporate |
| 3 | | these aspirational service frequencies into the Illinois State |
| 4 | | Rail Plan prepared under 49 U.S.C. 22705 and into the |
| 5 | | Long-Range Statewide Transportation Plan required under 23 |
| 6 | | U.S.C. 135. Prior to advancing a corridor toward |
| 7 | | implementation, the Department of Transportation shall |
| 8 | | evaluate operational feasibility, host railroad capacity, |
| 9 | | infrastructure requirements, and market demand consistent with |
| 10 | | applicable federal Service Development Plan guidance. |
| 11 | | (d) For each interstate corridor identified in subsection |
| 12 | | (b), the Department of Transportation is authorized and |
| 13 | | encouraged to: |
| 14 | | (1) nominate such corridors for inclusion in the |
| 15 | | Federal Railroad Administration's Corridor Identification |
| 16 | | and Development Program under 49 U.S.C. 25101; and |
| 17 | | (2) enter into memoranda of understanding or other |
| 18 | | cooperative agreements with neighboring states under 23 |
| 19 | | U.S.C. 135(b)(1) and 135(c), and consistent with 23 U.S.C. |
| 20 | | 135(e)(3), to provide for shared data, joint investment |
| 21 | | prioritization, and aligned performance measures and |
| 22 | | planning schedules. Such agreements may include |
| 23 | | cost-sharing arrangements, capital partnerships, or other |
| 24 | | jointly beneficial infrastructure investments intended to |
| 25 | | increase network capacity, improve reliability, and |
| 26 | | support both passenger and freight transportation. |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 8 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (e) The Department of Transportation shall evaluate |
| 2 | | opportunities to designate and advance one or more of the |
| 3 | | corridors identified in subsection (b) as components of the |
| 4 | | National Multimodal Freight Network under 49 U.S.C. 70103, |
| 5 | | consistent with the national multimodal freight policy under |
| 6 | | 49 U.S.C. 70101, where such designations would enhance |
| 7 | | eligibility for federal discretionary or formula funding. |
| 8 | | (f) The Department of Transportation shall include a |
| 9 | | recurring section titled "Progress Toward High-Speed and |
| 10 | | Intercity Passenger Rail" within each update of the Illinois |
| 11 | | State Rail Plan and Statewide Transportation Improvement |
| 12 | | Program. That section shall summarize: |
| 13 | | (1) the current level of service frequency in each |
| 14 | | corridor; |
| 15 | | (2) the gap between existing and aspirational service |
| 16 | | levels; |
| 17 | | (3) investments, capital improvements, or service |
| 18 | | agreements made toward achieving the target frequencies; |
| 19 | | (4) coordination with neighboring states, Amtrak or |
| 20 | | any other passenger rail service provider, and federal |
| 21 | | agencies to advance these targets; and |
| 22 | | (5) an analysis of projected ridership demand, market |
| 23 | | potential, and travel behavior for each corridor, |
| 24 | | including surveys or other demand validation tools as |
| 25 | | appropriate, to inform service development planning and |
| 26 | | investment prioritization. |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 9 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (g) The Department of Transportation shall transmit each |
| 2 | | updated Progress Toward High-Speed and Intercity Passenger |
| 3 | | Rail section to the Governor and the General Assembly |
| 4 | | concurrently with the Illinois State Rail Plan submission to |
| 5 | | the Federal Railroad Administration. |
| 6 | | (h) The Department of Transportation shall align |
| 7 | | submissions and project proposals with applicable federal |
| 8 | | selection preferences in intercity passenger rail and |
| 9 | | multimodal grant programs, including 49 U.S.C. 24911 |
| 10 | | (Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail), |
| 11 | | where consistency with the Corridor Identification and |
| 12 | | Development Program (49 U.S.C. 25101) is favored. |
| 13 | | (i) In carrying out the requirements of this Act, the |
| 14 | | Department of Transportation shall coordinate passenger rail |
| 15 | | planning with airport sponsors, aviation authorities, and |
| 16 | | relevant planning agencies. Such coordination shall address |
| 17 | | both landside access to airports, including passenger rail |
| 18 | | connections, and airside capacity considerations, including |
| 19 | | potential implications for gate usage, airline scheduling, and |
| 20 | | regional aviation demand where passenger rail alternatives are |
| 21 | | planned or proposed. |
| 22 | | (j) To the extent a State rail plan or related statewide |
| 23 | | rail planning document is in effect or subsequently adopted, |
| 24 | | the Department of Transportation shall ensure reciprocal |
| 25 | | integration between passenger rail planning under this Act and |
| 26 | | other statewide rail planning efforts. Such integration shall |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 10 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | include consideration of railroad capacity needs and expansion |
| 2 | | plans in passenger rail planning, and consideration of |
| 3 | | aspirational passenger rail service levels when evaluating |
| 4 | | infrastructure investments, including new or replacement |
| 5 | | bridges, grade separations, terminal improvements, and |
| 6 | | dispatching protocols intended to reduce operational |
| 7 | | conflicts. |
| 8 | | (k) In carrying out passenger rail planning and |
| 9 | | implementation under this Act, the Department of |
| 10 | | Transportation shall consult with and seek the cooperation of |
| 11 | | host railroads and rail infrastructure owners whose facilities |
| 12 | | may be affected by proposed passenger rail service and shall |
| 13 | | pursue collaborative solutions intended to support both |
| 14 | | passenger and freight mobility. |
| 15 | | Section 15. Metropolitan Planning Organization |
| 16 | | coordination. |
| 17 | | (a) Each Metropolitan Planning Organization established |
| 18 | | under 23 U.S.C. 134 within this State shall, during each |
| 19 | | federally required update of its metropolitan long-range |
| 20 | | transportation plan or Transportation Improvement Program: |
| 21 | | (1) recognize the target intercity and long-distance |
| 22 | | passenger rail frequencies established in Section 10; |
| 23 | | (2) identify relevant rail corridors within or |
| 24 | | adjacent to the Metropolitan Planning Organization |
| 25 | | planning area; and |
|
| | 10400HB4279ham002 | - 11 - | LRB104 16936 TRT 35088 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (3) include a narrative discussion of how regional |
| 2 | | transportation investments can support achievement of |
| 3 | | those frequency targets. |
| 4 | | (b) The Department of Transportation shall provide |
| 5 | | technical assistance, data, modeling tools, and mapping |
| 6 | | resources to Metropolitan Planning Organizations and regional |
| 7 | | councils to facilitate integration of passenger rail |
| 8 | | frequencies into multimodal planning. The Department of |
| 9 | | Transportation may enter into memoranda of understanding with |
| 10 | | Amtrak or any other passenger rail service provider, |
| 11 | | neighboring state departments of transportation, or regional |
| 12 | | rail authorities to share data and coordinate planning |
| 13 | | consistent with this Act. |
| 14 | | (c) The Department of Transportation shall, at least once |
| 15 | | every 4 years and consistent with the federal planning update |
| 16 | | cycle, convene consultations with each Metropolitan Planning |
| 17 | | Organization to review passenger rail investments, identify |
| 18 | | opportunities to advance frequency targets, and coordinate |
| 19 | | applications for federal or multistate funding that support |
| 20 | | those goals. |
| 21 | | Section 20. Investment prioritization. The Department of |
| 22 | | Transportation and each Metropolitan Planning Organization |
| 23 | | shall, to the maximum extent practicable, consider progress |
| 24 | | toward the target passenger rail frequencies established in |
| 25 | | Section 10 when developing project prioritization criteria for |