|
| | 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 HB4893 Introduced , by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: | | | Amends the Medical Assistance Article of the Illinois Public Aid Code. Provides that the Department of Healthcare and Family Services must incorporate minimum standards governing behavioral health pre-payment and post-payment reviews into MCO contracts effective for all services covered on and after January 1, 2027. Requires the Department to develop or adopt behavioral health-specific pre-payment and post-payment review guidelines and incorporate such guidelines by reference into MCO contracts. Provides that the Department-issued guidelines must: (1) define the documentation and clearly specify the discrete data elements that may be requested prior to and during a pre-payment or post-payment review, and applicable response timeframes, ensuring that all requests are specific, reasonable, and directly tied to the review objectives; (2) identify regulatory, statutory, and contractual standards applicable to behavioral health services; (3) establish uniform evaluation criteria and checklists; and (4) be publicly available and updated as necessary. Contains provisions on MCO contracts and required contract terms; pre-payment and post-payment review processes and notice requirements; timeframes for providers to respond to a documentation request; communication protocols; contract transparency and extrapolation from a statistical sampling of claims; the timeliness and closure of claims reviews; submission methods; reviewer qualifications; and enforcement. Effective immediately. |
| |
| | A BILL FOR |
|
|
| | HB4893 | | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | AN ACT concerning public aid. |
| 2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, |
| 3 | | represented in the General Assembly: |
| 4 | | Section 5. The Illinois Public Aid Code is amended by |
| 5 | | adding Section 5-30.19 as follows: |
| 6 | | (305 ILCS 5/5-30.19 new) |
| 7 | | Sec. 5-30.19. MCO behavioral health pre-payment and |
| 8 | | post-payment reviews. |
| 9 | | (a) The General Assembly finds that: |
| 10 | | (1) Behavioral health providers serving Medicaid |
| 11 | | enrollees are essential to ensuring timely access to |
| 12 | | mental health and substance use disorder services across |
| 13 | | the State of Illinois. |
| 14 | | (2) MCOs contracted with the Department of Healthcare |
| 15 | | and Family Services conduct pre-payment and post-payment |
| 16 | | reviews to ensure program integrity and compliance with |
| 17 | | applicable requirements. |
| 18 | | (3) Providers have reported significant procedural |
| 19 | | challenges in the conduct of such reviews, including |
| 20 | | excessive administrative burden, unclear documentation |
| 21 | | standards, inconsistent findings, inadequate |
| 22 | | communication, and lack of transparency regarding review |
| 23 | | criteria and methodologies. |
|
| | HB4893 | - 2 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | (4) Requests for extensive historical records, unclear |
| 2 | | or inconsistent audit standards, delayed issuance of |
| 3 | | findings, and insufficient time to respond to |
| 4 | | determinations undermine provider capacity and may |
| 5 | | negatively impact service delivery. |
| 6 | | (5) Transparency, consistency, and standardization in |
| 7 | | review processes are essential to promoting compliance, |
| 8 | | reducing unnecessary administrative burden, and ensuring |
| 9 | | fair and equitable treatment of providers. |
| 10 | | (6) State-issued, service-specific review guidelines, |
| 11 | | reasonable timeframes, and clear communication protocols |
| 12 | | are commonly used by accreditation bodies and federal |
| 13 | | programs to promote objective and uniform oversight. |
| 14 | | (b) The Department must incorporate minimum standards |
| 15 | | governing behavioral health pre-payment and post-payment |
| 16 | | reviews into MCO contracts effective for all services covered |
| 17 | | on and after January 1, 2027. |
| 18 | | (c) As used in this Section: |
| 19 | | "Behavioral health services" means mental health services, |
| 20 | | substance use disorder services, and co-occurring disorder |
| 21 | | services covered under the medical assistance program. |
| 22 | | "Managed Care Organization" or "MCO" means an entity |
| 23 | | contracted with the Department to provide or arrange medical |
| 24 | | assistance services on a capitated basis, including Managed |
| 25 | | Care Community Networks. |
| 26 | | "Managed Care Community Network" or "MCCN" means an |
|
| | HB4893 | - 3 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | entity, other than a health maintenance organization, that is |
| 2 | | owned, operated, or governed by providers of health care |
| 3 | | services within Illinois and that provides or arranges |
| 4 | | primary, secondary, and tertiary managed health care services |
| 5 | | under contract with the Department exclusively to persons |
| 6 | | participating in programs administered by the Department. |
| 7 | | "Pre-payment review" means a review, whether titled a |
| 8 | | review or not, conducted prior to payment to determine whether |
| 9 | | submitted claims meet coverage, documentation, and billing |
| 10 | | requirements. |
| 11 | | "Post-payment review" means a review, whether titled a |
| 12 | | review or not, conducted after payment to assess compliance |
| 13 | | with applicable requirements. |
| 14 | | "Provider" means a behavioral health provider, including a |
| 15 | | Community Mental Health Center, Behavioral Health Clinic, |
| 16 | | Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic, or Substance Use |
| 17 | | Treatment and Recovery Center, enrolled in the medical |
| 18 | | assistance program and contracted with or reimbursed by an |
| 19 | | MCO. |
| 20 | | "Extrapolation" means the application of review findings |
| 21 | | from a sampled set of claims to a larger universe of claims for |
| 22 | | purposes of determining overpayments or recoupments. |
| 23 | | (d) Applicability. This Section applies solely to |
| 24 | | behavioral health pre-payment and post-payment reviews |
| 25 | | conducted by MCOs under contract with the Department to |
| 26 | | fulfill contractual requirements for program integrity and |
|
| | HB4893 | - 4 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | compliance. |
| 2 | | (e) Contract requirements. The Department must require, as |
| 3 | | a condition of any contract with an MCO, that the organization |
| 4 | | comply with the requirements of this Section with respect to |
| 5 | | behavioral health services. |
| 6 | | (f) Standardized review guidelines. The Department must |
| 7 | | develop or adopt behavioral health-specific pre-payment and |
| 8 | | post-payment review guidelines and incorporate such guidelines |
| 9 | | by reference into MCO contracts. MCOs must conduct reviews in |
| 10 | | accordance with the Department-issued guidelines. The |
| 11 | | guidelines must: |
| 12 | | (1) define the documentation and clearly specify the |
| 13 | | discrete data elements that may be requested prior to and |
| 14 | | during a pre-payment or post-payment review, and |
| 15 | | applicable response timeframes, ensuring that all requests |
| 16 | | are specific, reasonable, and directly tied to the review |
| 17 | | objectives; |
| 18 | | (2) identify regulatory, statutory, and contractual |
| 19 | | standards applicable to behavioral health services; |
| 20 | | (3) establish uniform evaluation criteria and |
| 21 | | checklists; and |
| 22 | | (4) be publicly available and updated as necessary. |
| 23 | | (g) Reasonable scope and timeframes. MCO contracts must |
| 24 | | provide the following: |
| 25 | | (1) MCOs may conduct pre-payment or post-payment |
| 26 | | reviews only when supported by data indicating a |
|
| | HB4893 | - 5 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | reasonable possibility of error, fraud, waste, or abuse or |
| 2 | | as requested by the State. |
| 3 | | (2) MCOs must notify providers selected for |
| 4 | | pre-payment or post-payment review by individual written |
| 5 | | notice to the correspondence address identified in IMPACT |
| 6 | | with confirmed receipt by provider, stating the specific |
| 7 | | reason for selection, at least 45 calendar days prior to |
| 8 | | beginning the review. |
| 9 | | (3) If the basis for selection of a provider for |
| 10 | | review is comparative data, the MCO must provide the data |
| 11 | | on how the provider varies significantly from other |
| 12 | | providers in the same provider type, service specialty, |
| 13 | | jurisdiction, or locality. |
| 14 | | (4) Documentation requests must clearly specify the |
| 15 | | records being requested and the timeframe for provider |
| 16 | | response. |
| 17 | | (5) Requests for documentation are limited to records |
| 18 | | for dates of service within 12 months of the date of the |
| 19 | | initiation of the review. |
| 20 | | (6) Providers are afforded a minimum of 45 calendar |
| 21 | | days from the date of the request to submit additional |
| 22 | | documentation, with extensions permitted for good cause. |
| 23 | | (7) MCOs must permit electronic or other least |
| 24 | | burdensome methods for submission of requested records. |
| 25 | | (8) The date on which documentation is received in a |
| 26 | | secure electronic system is the official date of receipt |
|
| | HB4893 | - 6 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | for purposes of compliance with submission deadlines. |
| 2 | | (h) Provider right to dispute records requests. |
| 3 | | (1) A provider may dispute or appeal any records |
| 4 | | request issued by an MCO if the provider reasonably |
| 5 | | believes that the request is: |
| 6 | | (A) overly broad; |
| 7 | | (B) duplicative; |
| 8 | | (C) unduly burdensome; or |
| 9 | | (D) not reasonably related to verification of |
| 10 | | payment, medical necessity, quality of care, or |
| 11 | | compliance with applicable law or contract |
| 12 | | requirements. |
| 13 | | (2) The provider must notify the MCO in writing within |
| 14 | | 14 calendar days of receipt of the records request, |
| 15 | | specifying the basis for the dispute. Upon receipt of such |
| 16 | | notice, the MCO must pause the records request, and any |
| 17 | | associated payment holds pending resolution of the |
| 18 | | dispute. |
| 19 | | (3) The MCO must respond in writing within 14 calendar |
| 20 | | days of receipt of the provider's dispute notice, either: |
| 21 | | (A) narrowing the scope of the records request; or |
| 22 | | (B) providing a written justification |
| 23 | | demonstrating the necessity of the requested |
| 24 | | documentation. |
| 25 | | (4) If the dispute is not resolved between the |
| 26 | | provider and the MCO, the provider may escalate the matter |
|
| | HB4893 | - 7 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | to the Department for review and determination. The MCO |
| 2 | | must comply with the Department's final determination |
| 3 | | regarding the dispute. |
| 4 | | (5) Providers must not be subject to any adverse |
| 5 | | action, payment delay, sanctions, or contract termination |
| 6 | | solely for exercising the right to dispute or appeal a |
| 7 | | records request in accordance with this Section. |
| 8 | | (i) Communication protocols. MCO contracts must require |
| 9 | | standardized communication protocols, including that: |
| 10 | | (1) MCOs will clearly state in their initial |
| 11 | | communication to providers if a post-payment review is |
| 12 | | based on suspected fraud. |
| 13 | | (2) MCOs will conduct entry and exit communications |
| 14 | | with providers to clearly convey the review scope, |
| 15 | | expectations, preliminary findings, compliance status, and |
| 16 | | next steps, ensuring consistent messaging throughout the |
| 17 | | review process. |
| 18 | | (3) MCOs will provide advance written notice, |
| 19 | | delivered electronically, to providers of documentation |
| 20 | | requests for any pre-payment or post-payment review, |
| 21 | | including the applicable review period. Paper mail may be |
| 22 | | used as a secondary method of delivery through carriers |
| 23 | | that meet the following requirements: |
| 24 | | (A) Standard Postal Services - any Protected |
| 25 | | Health Information (PHI) that is sent via USPS, UPS, |
| 26 | | or FedEx must be sent in sealed envelopes, and must |
|
| | HB4893 | - 8 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | utilize a package tracking mechanism. |
| 2 | | (B) Certified Mail - proof of delivery and a |
| 3 | | recipient signature of any PHI sent via this method is |
| 4 | | required as a means of providing additional security |
| 5 | | and accountability. |
| 6 | | (4) All notifications and requests for additional |
| 7 | | documents must include specific MCO contact information |
| 8 | | for provider communication regarding the pre-payment or |
| 9 | | post-payment review. |
| 10 | | (j) Transparency of findings and extrapolation. MCO |
| 11 | | contracts must require that: |
| 12 | | (1) Providers receive written notification of final |
| 13 | | review findings, including clear references to applicable |
| 14 | | regulatory or contractual citations, an explanation of the |
| 15 | | rationale for each finding, guidance on required next |
| 16 | | steps or corrective actions, and information regarding the |
| 17 | | process and timelines for appealing the findings. |
| 18 | | (2) All findings and related written communications |
| 19 | | are clear, consistent, and non-contradictory to prevent |
| 20 | | confusion or conflicting conclusions. |
| 21 | | (3) Extrapolation from a statistical sampling of |
| 22 | | claims may only be used after a documented educational |
| 23 | | intervention has failed to correct the payment error. As |
| 24 | | used in this paragraph, "documented educational |
| 25 | | intervention" means: |
| 26 | | (A) targeted communication or training provided to |
|
| | HB4893 | - 9 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | the provider regarding identified billing, coding, or |
| 2 | | documentation errors; |
| 3 | | (B) clear explanation of the correct billing or |
| 4 | | documentation practices required; and |
| 5 | | (C) written documentation that such education was |
| 6 | | provided to the provider, including the date, format, |
| 7 | | and content of the intervention. |
| 8 | | (4) Where an MCO elects to extrapolate findings from a |
| 9 | | sample to a larger universe of claims, the MCO must: |
| 10 | | (A) ensure that any extrapolation methodology is |
| 11 | | statistically valid; |
| 12 | | (B) provide the provider with written notice of |
| 13 | | the extrapolation methodology and sample used; and |
| 14 | | (C) maintain records sufficient to demonstrate |
| 15 | | compliance with this Section, including documentation |
| 16 | | of the educational intervention and rationale for |
| 17 | | extrapolation. |
| 18 | | (5) The provider has the right to dispute or appeal |
| 19 | | the use of extrapolation and the resulting overpayment |
| 20 | | determination under the contract's grievance and appeal |
| 21 | | process. |
| 22 | | Providers must not be subject to adverse action, |
| 23 | | payment delay, or sanctions solely for exercising their |
| 24 | | right to dispute or appeal extrapolation. |
| 25 | | (6) The provider may escalate unresolved disputes |
| 26 | | regarding extrapolation to the Department for review, and |
|
| | HB4893 | - 10 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | the MCO must comply with the Department's final |
| 2 | | determination. |
| 3 | | (k) Timeliness and closure. MCO contracts must require |
| 4 | | that: |
| 5 | | (1) Claims be reviewed and findings issued within 60 |
| 6 | | calendar days of receiving the documentation initially |
| 7 | | requested from the provider, to allow providers sufficient |
| 8 | | opportunity to respond and implement corrective actions. |
| 9 | | (2) Providers are afforded 60 calendar days to review |
| 10 | | and respond to findings, clearly specifying the basis for |
| 11 | | disputes of specific findings. |
| 12 | | (3) Within 60 calendar days of receiving the |
| 13 | | provider's response to findings, MCOs must respond and |
| 14 | | supply a report addendum with a determination of whether |
| 15 | | the response warrants additional investigation and |
| 16 | | discussion. |
| 17 | | (4) Upon completion of the review, a formal written |
| 18 | | notice of compliance or closure be issued to the provider. |
| 19 | | (l) Submission methods. MCO contracts must require the use |
| 20 | | of the least burdensome and lowest-cost method of record |
| 21 | | submission, including secure electronic methods, when |
| 22 | | available. |
| 23 | | (m) Compliance-oriented approach. MCO contracts must |
| 24 | | require an approach emphasizing education, technical |
| 25 | | assistance, and corrective action prior to punitive |
| 26 | | enforcement, except in cases involving fraud or willful |
|
| | HB4893 | - 11 - | LRB104 18033 KTG 31472 b |
|
|
| 1 | | misconduct. |
| 2 | | (n) Qualifications of reviewers. MCOs must ensure that |
| 3 | | reviewers who perform pre-payment and post-payment reviews |
| 4 | | have experience with Illinois-specific behavioral health care |
| 5 | | assessment, service delivery, billing, and documentation and |
| 6 | | receive training consistent with pre-payment and post-payment |
| 7 | | review requirements in managed care contracts. |
| 8 | | (o) Enforcement. Failure by an MCO to comply with this |
| 9 | | Section constitutes a breach of contract subject to remedies |
| 10 | | available to the Department. |
| 11 | | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
| 12 | | becoming law. |