|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 2 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | review processes is a matter of statewide concern |
| 2 | | affecting housing supply, public safety, and economic |
| 3 | | competitiveness. |
| 4 | | (3) Several states, including Florida, Arizona, |
| 5 | | Tennessee, Texas, and New Hampshire, have adopted |
| 6 | | third-party plan review and inspection systems that |
| 7 | | accelerate development timelines while maintaining safety |
| 8 | | and code compliance. |
| 9 | | (4) By setting statewide expectations and offering |
| 10 | | qualified third-party review options when local deadlines |
| 11 | | are exceeded, Illinois can reduce avoidable delays and |
| 12 | | help advance needed housing and commercial development in |
| 13 | | communities large and small. |
| 14 | | (b) It is the purpose of this Division to create a |
| 15 | | statewide third-party plan review and inspection framework, to |
| 16 | | establish uniform county deadlines, and to ensure that all |
| 17 | | applicants may obtain timely approvals necessary to advance |
| 18 | | construction while maintaining public safety and building-code |
| 19 | | standards. |
| 20 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48002 new) |
| 21 | | Sec. 5-48002. Definitions. As used in this Act: |
| 22 | | "Business day" means any day other than a Saturday, |
| 23 | | Sunday, or State-recognized or county-recognized holiday. |
| 24 | | "Complete application" means a building permit application |
| 25 | | that includes all forms, fees, documents, site plans, and |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 3 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | other materials required by local ordinance. |
| 2 | | "Qualified third-party inspector" means a person who: |
| 3 | | (1) is an architect or engineer licensed under the |
| 4 | | laws of this State; and |
| 5 | | (2) holds a current and active certification issued by |
| 6 | | the International Code Council, the National Fire |
| 7 | | Protection Association, or the International Association |
| 8 | | of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, or one of their |
| 9 | | successor organizations; |
| 10 | | (3) demonstrates an understanding of local codes and |
| 11 | | amendments thereto; and |
| 12 | | (4) is in compliance with a pre-registration |
| 13 | | requirement, if any, established by the county under |
| 14 | | subsection (f) of Section 5-48030. |
| 15 | | "Qualified third-party plan reviewer" means a person who: |
| 16 | | (1) is an architect or engineer licensed under the |
| 17 | | laws of this State; |
| 18 | | (2) holds a current and active certification issued by |
| 19 | | the International Code Council, the National Fire |
| 20 | | Protection Association, the Independent Alliance of the |
| 21 | | Electrical Industry, or the International Association of |
| 22 | | Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, or one of their |
| 23 | | successor organizations; |
| 24 | | (3) demonstrates an understanding of local codes and |
| 25 | | amendments of local codes; and |
| 26 | | (4) is in compliance with a pre-registration |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 4 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | requirement, if any, established by the county under |
| 2 | | subsection (f) of Section 5-48030. |
| 3 | | "Single-trade permit" means any construction project on |
| 4 | | the property of a one-family or 2-family residential building |
| 5 | | that requires a permit or approval pursuant to a building code |
| 6 | | that is limited to a single construction discipline, including |
| 7 | | erecting, installing, enlarging, altering, repairing, |
| 8 | | removing, converting, or replacing: |
| 9 | | (1) a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning |
| 10 | | system; |
| 11 | | (2) a heat pump system; |
| 12 | | (3) a water heater or water-treatment appliance; |
| 13 | | (4) a solar photovoltaic system, a solar thermal |
| 14 | | system, an energy storage system, or a combination system; |
| 15 | | (5) an electric vehicle charging station and related |
| 16 | | equipment; |
| 17 | | (6) roofing; |
| 18 | | (7) exterior openings; |
| 19 | | (8) stucco, plaster, or siding; or |
| 20 | | (9) fencing. |
| 21 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48005 new) |
| 22 | | Sec. 5-48005. Applicability. This Division applies to all |
| 23 | | counties, including home rule counties. |
| 24 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48010 new) |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 5 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | Sec. 5-48010. County plan review timelines. |
| 2 | | (a) A county shall complete its initial plan review within |
| 3 | | 30 business days after receipt of a complete application for a |
| 4 | | one-family residential project, a 2-family residential |
| 5 | | project, or any multifamily, mixed-use, or commercial project. |
| 6 | | (b) For single-trade permits, a county shall complete its |
| 7 | | permit review within 10 business days after receipt of a |
| 8 | | complete application for an installation or addition to, or |
| 9 | | repair, alteration, or remodeling of a one-family or 2-family |
| 10 | | residential project. |
| 11 | | (c) A county shall issue written comments or approval |
| 12 | | within the applicable deadline. |
| 13 | | (d) For any subsequent review cycle after the applicant |
| 14 | | submits revisions responding to comments, the county shall |
| 15 | | complete its review within 10 business days of receipt of |
| 16 | | revisions. |
| 17 | | (e) Failure to meet any deadline under this Section |
| 18 | | triggers the applicant's right to use a qualified third-party |
| 19 | | plan reviewer under Section 5-48020. |
| 20 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48015 new) |
| 21 | | Sec. 5-48015. Inspection timelines. |
| 22 | | (a) A county shall conduct any required inspection within |
| 23 | | 10 business days after receipt of a request. |
| 24 | | (b) Failure to conduct the inspection within the required |
| 25 | | period triggers the applicant's right to use a qualified |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 6 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | third-party inspector under Section 5-48025. |
| 2 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48020 new) |
| 3 | | Sec. 5-48020. Use of qualified third-party plan reviewers |
| 4 | | upon missed deadline. |
| 5 | | (a) If a county fails to complete its plan review within |
| 6 | | the deadlines established under Section 5-48010, then the |
| 7 | | applicant may retain a qualified third-party plan reviewer. |
| 8 | | The applicant must notify the county, in writing, of the |
| 9 | | applicant's intent to use the services of a third-party plan |
| 10 | | reviewer. |
| 11 | | (b) A county shall accept any plan review submitted by a |
| 12 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer as meeting the county's |
| 13 | | requirements if the review demonstrates compliance with the |
| 14 | | applicable building codes. However, if the county completes |
| 15 | | its plan review before receiving a compliant plan review from |
| 16 | | a qualified third-party reviewer, the county may rely on its |
| 17 | | own plan review. |
| 18 | | (c) A county shall issue the permit within 2 business days |
| 19 | | after receiving a compliant third-party plan review. |
| 20 | | (d) A county may not require a second review, impose |
| 21 | | additional comments, or delay issuance once a qualified review |
| 22 | | has been submitted. This includes requiring changes to |
| 23 | | approved permit drawings during construction. Once a permit |
| 24 | | has been approved, inspectors shall not request design changes |
| 25 | | or additional requirements beyond what is reflected in the |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 7 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | approved plan, except as permitted under Section 5-48030. |
| 2 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48025 new) |
| 3 | | Sec. 5-48025. Use of qualified third-party inspectors upon |
| 4 | | missed deadline. |
| 5 | | (a) If a county fails to conduct a required inspection |
| 6 | | within 10 business days, then the applicant may retain a |
| 7 | | qualified third-party inspector. The applicant must notify the |
| 8 | | county, in writing, of the applicant's intent to use the |
| 9 | | services of a third-party inspector. |
| 10 | | (b) A county shall accept inspection reports submitted |
| 11 | | under this Section as satisfying local inspection requirements |
| 12 | | if the report demonstrates compliance with applicable building |
| 13 | | codes. |
| 14 | | (c) A county shall issue any required approval, |
| 15 | | certificate, or authorization within one business day after |
| 16 | | receiving a compliant inspection report. |
| 17 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48030 new) |
| 18 | | Sec. 5-48030. County audit authority. |
| 19 | | (a) A county retains full authority to audit any qualified |
| 20 | | third-party plan review or inspection for compliance with |
| 21 | | applicable codes. Nothing in this Division limits a county's |
| 22 | | authority to issue stop-work orders, withhold certificates of |
| 23 | | occupancy, or pursue enforcement actions if the county audit |
| 24 | | authority makes a written finding of material noncompliance |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 8 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | with the Division, detailing each case of material |
| 2 | | noncompliance. |
| 3 | | (b) An audit may not delay issuance of a permit or |
| 4 | | authorization submitted under Section 5-48020 or 5-48025. |
| 5 | | (c) If a county identifies material noncompliance, then it |
| 6 | | may pursue enforcement actions available under its code |
| 7 | | authority and report the findings to the Department of |
| 8 | | Financial and Professional Regulation or the applicable |
| 9 | | credentialing organization. |
| 10 | | (d) A county may require reasonable documentation |
| 11 | | demonstrating that a qualified third-party plan reviewer or |
| 12 | | qualified third-party inspector meets the qualification |
| 13 | | requirements of this Division, including proof that the |
| 14 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's or qualified third-party |
| 15 | | inspector's licensure or certification is current and active. |
| 16 | | (e) A county may require a qualified third-party reviewer |
| 17 | | or qualified third-party inspector providing services under |
| 18 | | this Section to secure and maintain professional liability |
| 19 | | insurance, errors and omissions insurance, or comparable |
| 20 | | insurance coverage appropriate to the scope of the services |
| 21 | | provided. A county may require proof of such coverage before |
| 22 | | accepting or relying on third-party review or third-party |
| 23 | | inspection services under this Section. Any insurance |
| 24 | | requirement shall be commercially reasonable, uniformly |
| 25 | | applied to similarly situated third-party reviewers or |
| 26 | | inspectors, and shall not be used to prohibit, materially |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 9 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | impede, or unreasonably delay a third-party review or |
| 2 | | inspection authorized under this Section. The permit applicant |
| 3 | | shall verify the third-party plan reviewer's or third-party |
| 4 | | inspector's compliance with any applicable county insurance |
| 5 | | requirements. |
| 6 | | (f) A county may require registration of qualified |
| 7 | | third-party plan reviewers and qualified third-party |
| 8 | | inspectors prior to accepting reviews and inspections under |
| 9 | | this Division, but registration requirements shall not be used |
| 10 | | to prohibit, materially preclude, or delay the administration |
| 11 | | of third-party plan review or inspection services. |
| 12 | | (1) Registration requirements for third-party plan |
| 13 | | reviewers shall be relevant to the qualifications |
| 14 | | necessary to carry out plan reviews and may not be greater |
| 15 | | or more stringent than qualifications for plan reviewers |
| 16 | | employed by the county. |
| 17 | | (2) Registration requirements for third-party |
| 18 | | inspectors shall be relevant to the qualifications |
| 19 | | necessary to carry out inspections and may not be greater |
| 20 | | or more stringent than qualifications for inspectors |
| 21 | | employed by the county. |
| 22 | | (g) Nothing in this Division shall be construed to |
| 23 | | transfer liability for code compliance or construction defects |
| 24 | | from the owner, design professional, or contractor. |
| 25 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48035 new) |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 10 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | Sec. 5-48035. Fees; fee parity. |
| 2 | | (a) In the absence of a county plan review or county |
| 3 | | inspection, a county may not charge plan review or inspection |
| 4 | | fees for any portion of the review process or inspection |
| 5 | | process performed by a qualified third-party plan reviewer or |
| 6 | | qualified third-party inspector. |
| 7 | | (b) Fees charged by a qualified third-party plan reviewer |
| 8 | | or qualified third-party inspector may not exceed the county's |
| 9 | | standard fees for the same service. To effectuate this |
| 10 | | requirement, a county must post its schedule of fees for plan |
| 11 | | reviews and inspections online or provide a copy of its |
| 12 | | schedule of fees to an applicant in person or electronically |
| 13 | | within one business day of the applicant's request. |
| 14 | | (c) A county shall reduce its fees proportionally when an |
| 15 | | applicant uses a qualified third-party plan reviewer or |
| 16 | | qualified third-party inspector for only one portion of the |
| 17 | | process. |
| 18 | | (d) An applicant who retains a qualified third-party plan |
| 19 | | reviewer or a qualified third-party inspector is solely liable |
| 20 | | for costs incurred for the indicated services. A county is not |
| 21 | | liable for fees of a qualified third-party plan reviewer or |
| 22 | | qualified third-party inspector. |
| 23 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48040 new) |
| 24 | | Sec. 5-48040. Conflicts of interest. |
| 25 | | (a) A qualified third-party plan reviewer may not review |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 11 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | plans if: |
| 2 | | (1) the qualified third-party plan reviewer, an |
| 3 | | employee of the qualified third-party plan reviewer, or |
| 4 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's employer was |
| 5 | | involved in making the plans; or |
| 6 | | (2) the plans are for work to be performed on property |
| 7 | | owned by the qualified third-party plan reviewer, an |
| 8 | | employee of the qualified third-party plan reviewer, or |
| 9 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's employer. |
| 10 | | (b) A qualified third-party inspector may not inspect work |
| 11 | | if the qualified third-party inspector, an employee of the |
| 12 | | qualified third-party inspector, or qualified third-party |
| 13 | | inspector's employer: |
| 14 | | (1) performed any of the work; |
| 15 | | (2) planned any of the work; or |
| 16 | | (3) is the owner of the property on which the work was |
| 17 | | performed. |
| 18 | | (c) A qualified third-party plan reviewer or qualified |
| 19 | | third-party inspector shall disclose any potential conflict of |
| 20 | | interest to the applicant and the county before accepting an |
| 21 | | engagement. |
| 22 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48045 new) |
| 23 | | Sec. 5-48045. County immunity. Nothing in this Division |
| 24 | | shall be construed to: |
| 25 | | (1) find a county liable for contracts or agreements |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 12 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | between an applicant and a third-party plan reviewer or |
| 2 | | third-party inspector for unfulfilled or delayed |
| 3 | | third-party plan reviews or inspections. |
| 4 | | (2) grant an applicant the right to obtain relief |
| 5 | | against a local public entity or public employee if a |
| 6 | | third-party plan reviewer or inspector fails to conduct a |
| 7 | | required plan review or inspection. |
| 8 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48050 new) |
| 9 | | Sec. 5-48050. Home rule preemption. A home rule unit may |
| 10 | | not regulate plan reviews or building inspections in a manner |
| 11 | | inconsistent with this Division. This Division is a limitation |
| 12 | | under subsection (i) of Section 6 of Article VII of the |
| 13 | | Illinois Constitution on the concurrent exercise by home rule |
| 14 | | units of powers and functions exercised by the State. |
| 15 | | (55 ILCS 5/5-48097 new) |
| 16 | | Sec. 5-48097. Severability. The provisions of this |
| 17 | | Division are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on |
| 18 | | Statutes. |
| 19 | | Section 10. The Illinois Municipal Code is amended by |
| 20 | | adding Division 31.2 as follows: |
| 21 | | (65 ILCS 5/Art. 11 Div. 31.2 heading new) |
| 22 | | DIVISION 31.2. BUILDING INSPECTIONS |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 13 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-1 new) |
| 2 | | Sec. 11-31.2-1. Findings and purpose. |
| 3 | | (a) The General Assembly finds and declares that: |
| 4 | | (1) Uncertain and lengthy building permit review and |
| 5 | | inspection timelines add costs, delay community |
| 6 | | investment, and make it harder to deliver housing across |
| 7 | | the State. |
| 8 | | (2) Ensuring predictable, efficient, and transparent |
| 9 | | review processes is a matter of statewide concern |
| 10 | | affecting housing supply, public safety, and economic |
| 11 | | competitiveness. |
| 12 | | (3) Several states, including Florida, Arizona, |
| 13 | | Tennessee, Texas, and New Hampshire, have adopted |
| 14 | | third-party plan review and inspection systems that |
| 15 | | accelerate development timelines while maintaining safety |
| 16 | | and code compliance. |
| 17 | | (4) By setting statewide expectations and offering |
| 18 | | qualified third-party review options when local deadlines |
| 19 | | are exceeded, Illinois can reduce avoidable delays and |
| 20 | | help advance needed housing and commercial development in |
| 21 | | communities large and small. |
| 22 | | (b) It is the purpose of this Division to create a |
| 23 | | statewide third-party plan review and inspection framework, to |
| 24 | | establish uniform municipal deadlines, and to ensure that all |
| 25 | | applicants may obtain timely approvals necessary to advance |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 14 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | construction while maintaining public safety and building-code |
| 2 | | standards. |
| 3 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-2 new) |
| 4 | | Sec. 11-31.2-2. Definitions. As used in this Act: |
| 5 | | "Business day" means any day other than a Saturday, |
| 6 | | Sunday, or State-recognized or municipally-recognized holiday. |
| 7 | | "Complete application" means a building permit application |
| 8 | | that includes all forms, fees, documents, site plans, and |
| 9 | | other materials required by local ordinance. |
| 10 | | "Qualified third-party inspector" means a person who: |
| 11 | | (1) is an architect or engineer licensed under the |
| 12 | | laws of this State; and |
| 13 | | (2) holds a current and active certification issued by |
| 14 | | the International Code Council, the National Fire |
| 15 | | Protection Association, or the International Association |
| 16 | | of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, or one of their |
| 17 | | successor organizations; |
| 18 | | (3) demonstrates an understanding of local codes and |
| 19 | | the local codes amendments; and |
| 20 | | (4) is in compliance with a pre-registration |
| 21 | | requirement, if any, established by the municipality under |
| 22 | | subsection (f) of Section 11-31.2-30. |
| 23 | | "Qualified third-party plan reviewer" means a person who: |
| 24 | | (1) is an architect or engineer licensed under the |
| 25 | | laws of this State; |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 15 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (2) holds a current and active certification issued by |
| 2 | | the International Code Council, the National Fire |
| 3 | | Protection Association, the Independent Alliance of the |
| 4 | | Electrical Industry, or the International Association of |
| 5 | | Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, or one of their |
| 6 | | successor organizations; |
| 7 | | (3) demonstrates an understanding of local codes and |
| 8 | | the local codes amendments; and |
| 9 | | (4) is in compliance with a pre-registration |
| 10 | | requirement, if any, established by the municipality under |
| 11 | | subsection (f) of Section 11-31.2-30. |
| 12 | | "Single-trade permit" means any construction project on |
| 13 | | the property of a one-family or 2-family residential building |
| 14 | | that requires a permit or approval pursuant to a building code |
| 15 | | that is limited to a single construction discipline including |
| 16 | | erecting, installing, enlarging, altering, repairing, |
| 17 | | removing, converting, or replacing: |
| 18 | | (1) a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning |
| 19 | | system; |
| 20 | | (2) a heat pump system; |
| 21 | | (3) a water heater or water-treatment appliance; |
| 22 | | (4) a solar photovoltaic system, a solar thermal |
| 23 | | system, an energy storage system, or a combination system; |
| 24 | | (5) an electric vehicle charging station and related |
| 25 | | equipment; |
| 26 | | (6) roofing; |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 16 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (7) exterior openings; |
| 2 | | (8) stucco, plaster, or siding; or |
| 3 | | (9) fencing. |
| 4 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-5 new) |
| 5 | | Sec. 11-31.2-5. Applicability. This Division applies to |
| 6 | | all municipalities, including home rule municipalities. |
| 7 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-10 new) |
| 8 | | Sec. 11-31.2-10. Municipal plan review timelines. |
| 9 | | (a) A municipality shall complete its initial plan review |
| 10 | | within 30 business days after receipt of a complete |
| 11 | | application for a one-family residential project, a 2-family |
| 12 | | residential project, or any multifamily, mixed-use, or |
| 13 | | commercial project. |
| 14 | | (b) For single-trade permits, a municipality shall |
| 15 | | complete its permit review within 10 business days after |
| 16 | | receipt of a complete application for an installation or |
| 17 | | addition to, or repair, alteration, or remodeling of a |
| 18 | | one-family or 2-family residential project. |
| 19 | | (c) A municipality shall issue written comments or |
| 20 | | approval within the applicable deadline. |
| 21 | | (d) For any subsequent review cycle after the applicant |
| 22 | | submits revisions responding to comments, the municipality |
| 23 | | shall complete review within 10 business days of receipt of |
| 24 | | revisions. |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 17 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (e) Failure to meet any deadline under this Section |
| 2 | | triggers the applicant's right to use a qualified third-party |
| 3 | | plan reviewer under Section 11-31.2-20. |
| 4 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-15 new) |
| 5 | | Sec. 11-31.2-15. Inspection timelines. |
| 6 | | (a) A municipality shall conduct any required inspection |
| 7 | | within 10 business days after receipt of a request. |
| 8 | | (b) Failure to conduct the inspection within the required |
| 9 | | period triggers the applicant's right to use a qualified |
| 10 | | third-party inspector under Section 11-31.2-25. |
| 11 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-20 new) |
| 12 | | Sec. 11-31.2-20. Use of qualified third-party plan |
| 13 | | reviewers upon missed deadline. |
| 14 | | (a) If a municipality fails to complete its plan review |
| 15 | | within the deadlines established under Section 11-31.2-10, |
| 16 | | then the applicant may retain a qualified third-party plan |
| 17 | | reviewer. The applicant must notify the municipality, in |
| 18 | | writing, of the applicant's intent to use the services of a |
| 19 | | third-party plan reviewer. |
| 20 | | (b) A municipality shall accept any plan review submitted |
| 21 | | by a qualified third-party plan reviewer as meeting the |
| 22 | | municipality's requirements if the review demonstrates |
| 23 | | compliance with the applicable building codes. However, if the |
| 24 | | municipality completes its plan review before receiving a |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 18 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | compliant plan review from a qualified third-party reviewer, |
| 2 | | the municipality may rely on its own plan review. |
| 3 | | (c) A municipality shall issue the permit within 2 |
| 4 | | business days after receiving a compliant third-party plan |
| 5 | | review. |
| 6 | | (d) A municipality may not require a second review, impose |
| 7 | | additional comments, or delay issuance once a compliant review |
| 8 | | has been submitted. This includes requiring changes to |
| 9 | | approved permit drawings during construction. Once a permit |
| 10 | | has been approved, inspectors shall not request design changes |
| 11 | | or additional requirements beyond what is reflected in the |
| 12 | | approved plan, except as permitted under Section 11-31.2-30. |
| 13 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-25 new) |
| 14 | | Sec. 11-31.2-25. Use of qualified third-party inspectors |
| 15 | | upon missed deadline. |
| 16 | | (a) If a municipality fails to conduct a required |
| 17 | | inspection within 10 business days, then the applicant may |
| 18 | | retain a qualified third-party inspector. The applicant must |
| 19 | | notify the municipality, in writing, of the applicant's intent |
| 20 | | to use the services of a third-party inspector. |
| 21 | | (b) Municipalities shall accept inspection reports |
| 22 | | submitted under this Section as satisfying local inspection |
| 23 | | requirements if the report demonstrates compliance with |
| 24 | | applicable building codes. |
| 25 | | (c) A municipality shall issue any required approval, |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 19 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | certificate, or authorization within one business day after |
| 2 | | receiving a compliant inspection report. |
| 3 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-30 new) |
| 4 | | Sec. 11-31.2-30. Municipal audit authority. |
| 5 | | (a) A municipality retains full authority to audit any |
| 6 | | third-party plan review or inspection for compliance with |
| 7 | | applicable codes. Nothing in this Division limits a |
| 8 | | municipality's authority to issue stop-work orders, withhold |
| 9 | | certificates of occupancy, or pursue enforcement actions if |
| 10 | | the municipal authority makes a written finding of material |
| 11 | | noncompliance with the Division, detailing each case of |
| 12 | | material noncompliance. |
| 13 | | (b) An audit may not delay issuance of a permit or |
| 14 | | authorization submitted under Section 11-31.2-20 or |
| 15 | | 11-31.2-25. |
| 16 | | (c) If a municipality identifies material noncompliance, |
| 17 | | then it may pursue enforcement actions available under its |
| 18 | | code authority and report the findings to the Department of |
| 19 | | Financial and Professional Regulation or applicable |
| 20 | | credentialing organization. |
| 21 | | (d) A municipality may require reasonable documentation |
| 22 | | demonstrating that a qualified third-party plan reviewer or |
| 23 | | qualified third-party inspector meets the qualification |
| 24 | | requirements of this Division, including proof that the |
| 25 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's or qualified third-party |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 20 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | inspector's licensure or certification is current and active. |
| 2 | | (e) A municipality may require a qualified third-party |
| 3 | | reviewer or qualified third-party inspector providing services |
| 4 | | under this Section to secure and maintain professional |
| 5 | | liability insurance, errors and omissions insurance, or |
| 6 | | comparable insurance coverage appropriate to the scope of the |
| 7 | | services provided. A municipality may require proof of such |
| 8 | | coverage before accepting or relying on third-party review or |
| 9 | | third-party inspection services under this Section. Any |
| 10 | | insurance requirement shall be commercially reasonable, |
| 11 | | uniformly applied to similarly situated third-party reviewers |
| 12 | | or third-party inspectors, and shall not be used to prohibit, |
| 13 | | materially impede, or unreasonably delay a third-party review |
| 14 | | or third-party inspection authorized under this Section. The |
| 15 | | permit applicant shall verify the third-party plan reviewer's |
| 16 | | or third-party inspector's compliance with any applicable |
| 17 | | municipal insurance requirements. |
| 18 | | (f) A municipality may require registration of qualified |
| 19 | | third-party plan reviewers and qualified third-party |
| 20 | | inspectors prior to accepting reviews and inspections under |
| 21 | | this Division, but registration requirements shall not be used |
| 22 | | to prohibit, materially preclude, or delay the administration |
| 23 | | of third-party plan review or third-party inspection services. |
| 24 | | (1) Registration requirements for third-party plan |
| 25 | | reviewers shall be relevant to the qualifications |
| 26 | | necessary to carry out plan reviews and may not be greater |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 21 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | or more stringent than qualifications for plan reviewers |
| 2 | | employed by the municipality. |
| 3 | | (2) Registration requirements for third-party |
| 4 | | inspectors shall be relevant to the qualifications |
| 5 | | necessary to carry out inspections and may not be greater |
| 6 | | or more stringent than qualifications for inspectors |
| 7 | | employed by the municipality. |
| 8 | | (g) Nothing in this Division shall be construed to |
| 9 | | transfer liability for code compliance or construction defects |
| 10 | | from the owner, design professional, or contractor. |
| 11 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-35 new) |
| 12 | | Sec. 11-31.2-35. Fees; fee parity. |
| 13 | | (a) In the absence of a municipal plan review or municipal |
| 14 | | inspection, a municipality may not charge plan review or |
| 15 | | inspection fees for any portion of the review process or |
| 16 | | inspection process performed by a qualified third-party plan |
| 17 | | reviewer or qualified third-party inspector. |
| 18 | | (b) Fees charged by a qualified third-party plan reviewer |
| 19 | | or third-party inspector may not exceed the municipality's |
| 20 | | standard fees for the same service. To effectuate this |
| 21 | | requirement, a municipality must post its schedule of fees for |
| 22 | | plan reviews and inspections online or provide a copy of its |
| 23 | | schedule of fees to an applicant in person or electronically |
| 24 | | within one business day of the applicant's request. |
| 25 | | (c) A municipality shall reduce its fees proportionally |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 22 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | when an applicant uses a qualified third-party plan reviewer |
| 2 | | or a qualified third-party inspector for only one portion of |
| 3 | | the process. |
| 4 | | (d) An applicant who retains a qualified third-party plan |
| 5 | | reviewer or a qualified third-party inspector is solely liable |
| 6 | | for costs incurred for the indicated services. A municipality |
| 7 | | is not liable for fees of a qualified third-party plan |
| 8 | | reviewer or qualified third-party inspector. |
| 9 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-40 new) |
| 10 | | Sec. 11-31.2-40. Conflicts of interest. |
| 11 | | (a) A qualified third-party plan reviewer may not review |
| 12 | | plans if: |
| 13 | | (1) the qualified third-party plan reviewer, an |
| 14 | | employee of the qualified third-party plan reviewer, or |
| 15 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's employer was |
| 16 | | involved in making the plans; or |
| 17 | | (2) the plans are for work to be performed on property |
| 18 | | owned by the qualified third-party plan reviewer, an |
| 19 | | employee of the qualified third-party plan reviewer, or |
| 20 | | qualified third-party plan reviewer's employer. |
| 21 | | (b) A qualified third-party inspector may not inspect work |
| 22 | | if the qualified third-party inspector, an employee of the |
| 23 | | qualified third-party inspector, or qualified third-party |
| 24 | | inspector's employer: |
| 25 | | (1) performed any of the work; |
|
| | 10400SB0643sam002 | - 23 - | LRB104 06921 TRT 38603 a |
|
|
| 1 | | (2) planned any of the work; or |
| 2 | | (3) is the owner of the property on which the work was |
| 3 | | performed. |
| 4 | | (c) A qualified third-party plan reviewer or qualified |
| 5 | | third-party inspector shall disclose any potential conflict of |
| 6 | | interest to the applicant and the municipality before |
| 7 | | accepting an engagement. |
| 8 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-45 new) |
| 9 | | Sec. 11-31.2-45. Municipal immunity. Nothing in this |
| 10 | | Division shall be construed to: |
| 11 | | (1) find a municipality liable for contracts or |
| 12 | | agreements between an applicant and a third-party plan |
| 13 | | reviewer or third-party inspector for unfulfilled or |
| 14 | | delayed third-party plan reviews or inspections; or |
| 15 | | (2) grant an applicant the right to obtain relief |
| 16 | | against a local public entity or public employee if a |
| 17 | | third-party plan reviewer or inspector fails to conduct a |
| 18 | | required plan review or inspection. |
| 19 | | (65 ILCS 5/11-31.2-50 new) |
| 20 | | Sec. 11-31.2-50. Home rule preemption. A home rule unit |
| 21 | | may not regulate plan reviews or building inspections in a |
| 22 | | manner inconsistent with this Division. This Division is a |
| 23 | | limitation under subsection (i) of Section 6 of Article VII of |
| 24 | | the Illinois Constitution on the concurrent exercise by home |