| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AN ACT concerning State government. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | represented in the General Assembly: | |||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Chicago Water Contracts Transparency Study Act. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Section 5. Purpose. The purpose of this Act is to direct | |||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability to | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | commission a comprehensive study on the City of Chicago's | |||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | water contracts with distributing municipalities. This study | |||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | shall include detailed information on the agreements, charges, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | past infrastructure costs, future infrastructure costs, and | |||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | fee increases and shall provide transparency concerning water | |||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | distribution agreements within this State. The study shall | |||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | also assess the potential cost impacts of establishing an | |||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | alternative stream of water distribution, such as through the | |||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | creation of a Southwest Water Authority or similar entity. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | Section 10. Study commissioned. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | (a) The Commission on Government Forecasting and | |||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | Accountability shall commission an independent study to: | |||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | (1) identify and catalog all existing water contracts | |||||||||||||||||||
| 21 | the City of Chicago has with municipalities that | |||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | distribute water from the City of Chicago's water supply; | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | (2) articulate the amount of money charged by the City | ||||||
| 2 | of Chicago for the provision of water to these | ||||||
| 3 | distributing municipalities, including an analysis of any | ||||||
| 4 | pass-through contracts or agreements these municipalities | ||||||
| 5 | may have with other municipalities; | ||||||
| 6 | (3) analyze historical trends in the charges and fee | ||||||
| 7 | increases associated with these water contracts, including | ||||||
| 8 | but not limited to: | ||||||
| 9 | (A) the percentage increases in charges over the | ||||||
| 10 | previous 10 years; | ||||||
| 11 | (B) the specific reasons for any fee increases; | ||||||
| 12 | and | ||||||
| 13 | (C) an overview of how those increases have | ||||||
| 14 | impacted municipal budgets and water customers; | ||||||
| 15 | (4) review past infrastructure costs related to water | ||||||
| 16 | treatment and distribution to these municipalities and | ||||||
| 17 | estimate future infrastructure costs needed to maintain or | ||||||
| 18 | improve water delivery systems, including projected costs | ||||||
| 19 | for upgrades, maintenance, and necessary capital | ||||||
| 20 | improvements; | ||||||
| 21 | (5) provide recommendations for improving | ||||||
| 22 | transparency, accountability, and equitable pricing in the | ||||||
| 23 | future water contracts between the City of Chicago and | ||||||
| 24 | distributing municipalities; and | ||||||
| 25 | (6) assess the potential cost impacts and benefits of | ||||||
| 26 | establishing an alternative stream of water distribution | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | to the distributing municipalities, such as through the | ||||||
| 2 | creation of a Southwest Water Authority or similar entity. | ||||||
| 3 | (b) The study shall include a detailed examination of the | ||||||
| 4 | following: | ||||||
| 5 | (1) Infrastructure and capital investment. The study | ||||||
| 6 | shall evaluate the initial capital investment required to | ||||||
| 7 | develop and construct an alternative water distribution | ||||||
| 8 | system, including the construction of treatment plants, | ||||||
| 9 | pipelines, reservoirs, and any necessary infrastructure to | ||||||
| 10 | support water delivery. The study shall also consider the | ||||||
| 11 | timeline for such development and the long-term | ||||||
| 12 | maintenance and operational needs. | ||||||
| 13 | (2) Operational and maintenance costs. The study shall | ||||||
| 14 | analyze the annual operating costs associated with the | ||||||
| 15 | establishment and ongoing management of a new water | ||||||
| 16 | distribution entity, including staffing, energy, | ||||||
| 17 | maintenance, and administrative overhead. The study shall | ||||||
| 18 | also compare these costs to the current expenditures | ||||||
| 19 | related to water distribution through the City of Chicago, | ||||||
| 20 | including any hidden or indirect costs borne by | ||||||
| 21 | municipalities. | ||||||
| 22 | (3) Impact on existing contracts. The study shall | ||||||
| 23 | examine how the introduction of a new water distribution | ||||||
| 24 | authority might affect the terms and financial obligations | ||||||
| 25 | of current water contracts between the City of Chicago and | ||||||
| 26 | municipalities. The study shall specifically assess | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | whether municipalities could potentially reduce reliance | ||||||
| 2 | on the City of Chicago for water, renegotiate existing | ||||||
| 3 | contracts, or seek alternative supply sources, and how | ||||||
| 4 | this would affect the pricing structure and stability of | ||||||
| 5 | the current system. | ||||||
| 6 | (4) Cost to municipalities and ratepayers. The study | ||||||
| 7 | shall project the potential cost impact on municipalities | ||||||
| 8 | and their residents if an alternative water distribution | ||||||
| 9 | system were implemented. The study shall also include | ||||||
| 10 | short-term and long-term price projections for water | ||||||
| 11 | rates, including any potential savings or increased costs | ||||||
| 12 | to municipalities and their customers and the financial | ||||||
| 13 | feasibility of transitioning to such a system. | ||||||
| 14 | (5) Environmental and regulatory considerations. The | ||||||
| 15 | study shall assess any environmental impacts associated | ||||||
| 16 | with building a new water distribution system, including | ||||||
| 17 | water sourcing, treatment processes, and the | ||||||
| 18 | sustainability of the proposed alternative water supply. | ||||||
| 19 | The study shall include any considerations of compliance | ||||||
| 20 | with State and federal regulations and any potential | ||||||
| 21 | environmental challenges, such as water quality or access | ||||||
| 22 | issues. | ||||||
| 23 | (6) Market competition and reliability. The study | ||||||
| 24 | shall analyze how the establishment of a Southwest Water | ||||||
| 25 | Authority or similar entity could introduce competition | ||||||
| 26 | into the water market, potentially benefiting | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | municipalities by offering more competitive pricing and | ||||||
| 2 | reliable service options. The study shall also assess | ||||||
| 3 | whether the introduction of competition could lead to | ||||||
| 4 | innovation, greater efficiency, or better service quality. | ||||||
| 5 | (7) Feasibility study of water sources. The study | ||||||
| 6 | shall evaluate alternative water sources available to the | ||||||
| 7 | proposed new authority, including the feasibility of | ||||||
| 8 | obtaining water from new sources, such as rivers, lakes, | ||||||
| 9 | or groundwater, that could be used to supply the new water | ||||||
| 10 | distribution entity. The study shall also consider the | ||||||
| 11 | potential risks and benefits of these sources compared to | ||||||
| 12 | the current reliance on the City of Chicago's water | ||||||
| 13 | supply. | ||||||
| 14 | (8) Regional and statewide implications. The study | ||||||
| 15 | shall analyze the broader impact of establishing an | ||||||
| 16 | alternative water distribution system on regional and | ||||||
| 17 | statewide water management strategies. The study shall | ||||||
| 18 | also assess how the creation of an alternative authority | ||||||
| 19 | would influence overall water resource planning, | ||||||
| 20 | coordination among municipalities, and alignment with | ||||||
| 21 | State water management goals. | ||||||
| 22 | (9) Potential for public-private partnerships. The | ||||||
| 23 | study shall explore the possibility of engaging | ||||||
| 24 | public-private partnerships to fund, build, and operate | ||||||
| 25 | the new water distribution system. The study shall also | ||||||
| 26 | evaluate the potential advantages and risks associated | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | with such partnerships, including the potential for | ||||||
| 2 | greater efficiency, cost-sharing, and infrastructure | ||||||
| 3 | investment. | ||||||
| 4 | (10) Municipal wells and local infrastructure. The | ||||||
| 5 | study shall examine the following: | ||||||
| 6 | (A) State of infrastructure. The study shall | ||||||
| 7 | assess the condition of municipal wells used by | ||||||
| 8 | municipalities that do not solely rely on the City of | ||||||
| 9 | Chicago for water supply. The study shall include an | ||||||
| 10 | evaluation of existing well infrastructure, such as | ||||||
| 11 | pump systems, pipelines, storage tanks, treatment | ||||||
| 12 | facilities, maintenance needs, and associated costs | ||||||
| 13 | for repairs or upgrades. | ||||||
| 14 | (B) Wells expiring and costs of replacement. The | ||||||
| 15 | study shall catalog the expiration or decommissioning | ||||||
| 16 | dates of wells in municipalities using wells as a | ||||||
| 17 | primary or supplementary water source, including the | ||||||
| 18 | age of the wells, expected lifespans, and projected | ||||||
| 19 | decommissioning timelines. The study shall also | ||||||
| 20 | evaluate the costs associated with replacing or | ||||||
| 21 | upgrading these wells, including drilling new wells, | ||||||
| 22 | expanding storage capacity, and upgrading treatment | ||||||
| 23 | systems to meet modern standards and regulatory | ||||||
| 24 | requirements. | ||||||
| 25 | (C) Costs of infrastructure improvements. The | ||||||
| 26 | study shall examine the costs of necessary | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | infrastructure improvements in municipalities with | ||||||
| 2 | aging or inadequate water infrastructure, including | ||||||
| 3 | system-wide assessments, repairs, expansions, or full | ||||||
| 4 | replacements. The study shall project the funding | ||||||
| 5 | required to bring the infrastructure up to code, | ||||||
| 6 | maintain system reliability, and ensure the | ||||||
| 7 | sustainability of local water supplies. | ||||||
| 8 | (D) Impacts of wells on overall water cost. The | ||||||
| 9 | study shall consider the financial impacts on | ||||||
| 10 | municipalities' water costs, including any savings or | ||||||
| 11 | increases that could result from relying on well water | ||||||
| 12 | versus purchasing water from the City of Chicago or an | ||||||
| 13 | alternative distribution authority. The study shall | ||||||
| 14 | include energy costs, maintenance of infrastructure, | ||||||
| 15 | and the long-term sustainability of groundwater | ||||||
| 16 | resources in making this consideration. | ||||||
| 17 | Section 15. Public hearings. The Commission on Government | ||||||
| 18 | Forecasting and Accountability shall hold at least 2 public | ||||||
| 19 | hearings to solicit input from municipal representatives, | ||||||
| 20 | water industry experts, and other stakeholders and include any | ||||||
| 21 | relevant information resulting from those hearings in the | ||||||
| 22 | study. | ||||||
| 23 | Section 20. Reporting requirements. The Commission on | ||||||
| 24 | Government Forecasting and Accountability shall complete the | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | study and submit a report that includes an executive summary, | ||||||
| 2 | detailed findings, and any recommendations resulting from the | ||||||
| 3 | study to the General Assembly and the Governor no later than | ||||||
| 4 | one year after the effective date of this Act. | ||||||
| 5 | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||||||
| 6 | becoming law. | ||||||