|
|
|
|
HJ0117 |
|
LRB094 19942 NHT 57274 r |
|
|
| 1 |
| HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION
|
| 2 |
| WHEREAS, The current measure of Adequate Yearly Progress |
| 3 |
| (AYP) under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB |
| 4 |
| Act) does not provide for any accounting of students who make |
| 5 |
| significant progress but not enough progress to meet the |
| 6 |
| standard; these students are classified as not succeeding, |
| 7 |
| when, in actuality, in many instances they have progressed |
| 8 |
| beyond a year's growth; and
|
| 9 |
| WHEREAS, The measuring of AYP at 47.5% leaves many children |
| 10 |
| behind; and
|
| 11 |
| WHEREAS, Using an index to calculate AYP has the potential |
| 12 |
| to address some of the flaws in the NCLB Act; and
|
| 13 |
| WHEREAS, An index that measures student progress allows |
| 14 |
| schools to show movement from one performance level to the next |
| 15 |
| and credits improvement in student achievement across |
| 16 |
| different performance levels; and
|
| 17 |
| WHEREAS, Prior to a school being sanctioned under the NCLB |
| 18 |
| Act, a pre-AYP classification should be used to determine if |
| 19 |
| the school is successful; and
|
| 20 |
| WHEREAS, The pre-AYP classification would be determined by |
| 21 |
| looking at the students as individuals, with the understanding |
| 22 |
| that individuals achieve at different rates; because |
| 23 |
| individual students do make progress, an individual student's |
| 24 |
| progress would be measured to determine if there had been added |
| 25 |
| value to his or her education; and
|
| 26 |
| WHEREAS, This measure would include all students: Regular |
| 27 |
| Education students, Special Education students, Limited |
| 28 |
| English Proficient students, and other subgroups; and
|