|
|
|
HR1009 |
|
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION
|
2 |
| WHEREAS, FutureGen is the first of its kind coal-fueled |
3 |
| power plant that will link state of the art technologies to |
4 |
| produce electricity and hydrogen with near-zero emissions; the |
5 |
| project will take a significant step in strengthening the |
6 |
| United States' ability to produce reliable energy, improve the |
7 |
| environment, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil; this |
8 |
| effort will serve as a prototype for the next generation of |
9 |
| power plants throughout the country and the world; and
|
10 |
| WHEREAS, FutureGen represents an important and |
11 |
| revolutionary scientific breakthrough; for the first time, the |
12 |
| power of coal can be harnessed without releasing harmful |
13 |
| emissions into the environment; and |
14 |
| WHEREAS, FutureGen will help ensure the long-term |
15 |
| viability and affordability of coal as a major energy source |
16 |
| for the United States; the project will represent a significant |
17 |
| step in the United States' efforts to become a self-sufficient |
18 |
| energy producer, further reducing our dependence on foreign |
19 |
| oil; and |
20 |
| WHEREAS, FutureGen will serve as a research laboratory for |
21 |
| discovering and refining clean coal technology, hydrogen |
22 |
| production, and carbon sequestration; as new technology is |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 2 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| discovered and evolves, it will be incorporated into the design |
2 |
| and operation of the plant; FutureGen will foster innovations |
3 |
| that will affect the energy industry for years to come; and |
4 |
| WHEREAS, The FutureGen Alliance is a consortium of the |
5 |
| world's largest coal producers and energy generators; they |
6 |
| bring valuable technical and industrial project management |
7 |
| expertise to the project; the Alliance is a not-for-profit |
8 |
| organization; as a result, none of the members of the Alliance |
9 |
| will claim any direct financial benefit from their |
10 |
| contributions; the Alliance will own the power plant and sell |
11 |
| the electricity, hydrogen, and other useful byproducts; and |
12 |
| WHEREAS, Illinois has the ideal geological conditions |
13 |
| necessary for the storage of carbon dioxide, enhanced oil |
14 |
| recovery, and coal bed methane extraction; and |
15 |
| WHEREAS, Illinois is a global research and technology |
16 |
| center, boasting top-tier research institutions and |
17 |
| universities, as well as one of the largest state-sponsored |
18 |
| coal research and development programs in the United States; |
19 |
| the program is administered by the Office of Coal Development |
20 |
| and is under the technical oversight of the Illinois Clean Coal |
21 |
| Institute; and |
22 |
| WHEREAS, Illinois is home to one of the nation's largest |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 3 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| supplies of high-energy bituminous coal; recoverable reserves |
2 |
| in Illinois represent almost one-eighth of the total U.S. coal |
3 |
| reserves and one-quarter of the nation's bituminous coal |
4 |
| reserves; and |
5 |
| WHEREAS, Centered in the middle of the Midwest, Illinois is |
6 |
| a significant interchange point among railroads serving either |
7 |
| eastern or western states, with Chicago and East St. Louis |
8 |
| being principal rail gateways; with 7,292 miles of rail |
9 |
| network, Illinois is the center of the nation's rail system; |
10 |
| and |
11 |
| WHEREAS, Communities throughout this State have been |
12 |
| supporting the coal industry for more than 100 years; with |
13 |
| broad support from the people of Mattoon and Tuscola, the |
14 |
| Illinois Congressional Delegation, the Illinois General |
15 |
| Assembly, and the states of Indiana and Kentucky, Illinois |
16 |
| provides the kind of broad community support that is necessary |
17 |
| for the project to be successful; leadership in the business, |
18 |
| labor, environmental, and civic communities are united and |
19 |
| working hard to bring FutureGen to Illinois; and |
20 |
| WHEREAS, The General Assembly offered numerous financial |
21 |
| incentives for FutureGen in Illinois, including: |
22 |
| (1) a $17 million direct cash grant from clean-coal |
23 |
| technology fund; |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 4 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| (2) up to $50 million in reduced-interest loans; |
2 |
| (2) sales tax exemptions and business tax credits; |
3 |
| (3) public improvement funding; and |
4 |
| (4) reimbursement for employee training costs; and |
5 |
| WHEREAS, The $1 billion project is a government-industry |
6 |
| partnership between the U.S. Department of Energy and the |
7 |
| FutureGen Alliance, a consortium of the world's largest coal |
8 |
| and energy producers; and |
9 |
| WHEREAS, FutureGen will greatly benefit industries |
10 |
| involved in mining, transportation, and the use of coal; these |
11 |
| are industries that currently employ thousands of people across |
12 |
| the State; FutureGen will also create jobs; the U.S. Department |
13 |
| of Energy estimated that FutureGen would create approximately |
14 |
| 1,300 construction jobs and 150 permanent jobs; and |
15 |
| WHEREAS, During the four-year construction period, there |
16 |
| would be more than $1 billion in economic impact statewide; |
17 |
| approximately 1,225 indirect spin-off jobs will be created as a |
18 |
| result of the ripple effect generated by FutureGen; and |
19 |
| WHEREAS, The U.S. Department of Energy announced plans to |
20 |
| build FutureGen in 2003; in July 2006, the FutureGen Alliance |
21 |
| announced the 2 finalists for the facility in Illinois: Mattoon |
22 |
| and Tuscola; the FutureGen plant will be a medium-sized, |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 5 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| coal-fueled plant, generating approximately 275 megawatts of |
2 |
| electricity, enough to supply approximately 150,000 U.S. |
3 |
| households; and |
4 |
| WHEREAS, Mattoon and Tuscola are located in east central |
5 |
| Illinois and are equidistant from Chicago, St. Louis, and |
6 |
| Indianapolis; with nearby roads, railways, rivers, and |
7 |
| airports, the region boasts the most advanced multi-modal |
8 |
| transportation network in the United States; Mattoon and |
9 |
| Tuscola are also in close proximity to oil refineries and |
10 |
| hydrogen customers who can share in the success of FutureGen; |
11 |
| and |
12 |
| WHEREAS, The region also contains two major state |
13 |
| universities that lead in the fields of geology; these include |
14 |
| the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, home of the |
15 |
| Illinois State Geological Survey, and Southern Illinois |
16 |
| University's Coal Research Center, which focuses on clean-coal |
17 |
| research; and |
18 |
| WHEREAS, Mattoon and Tuscola sit above vast coal reserves; |
19 |
| the coal reserves beneath Illinois contain more energy than the |
20 |
| oil reserves of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait combined; and |
21 |
| WHEREAS, In September of 2005, several large U.S. electric |
22 |
| utilities and coal producers, including Peabody Energy of St. |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 6 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| Louis, announced the formation of the consortium that will |
2 |
| develop FutureGen using federal and private dollars; and |
3 |
| WHEREAS, In December of 2005, the Alliance, under a new |
4 |
| CEO, signed a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of |
5 |
| Energy; the Alliance would agree to pay 26% of the cost; and |
6 |
| WHEREAS, In March of 2006, the Alliance, through its |
7 |
| technical consultant, issued a detailed Request for Proposals |
8 |
| from states interested in hosting FutureGen; twelve locations |
9 |
| from seven states, including four from Illinois, submitted |
10 |
| bids; and |
11 |
| WHEREAS, In May of 2006, the General Assembly re-earmarked |
12 |
| $17 million in Coal Bond Funds from inactive clean coal project |
13 |
| to FutureGen as part of State's preliminary offer; and |
14 |
| WHEREAS, In July of 2006, the Alliance picked the Illinois |
15 |
| sites at Tuscola and Mattoon for FutureGen; key reasons for |
16 |
| these 2 sites were water resources, support from the community |
17 |
| and State political leadership, and suitability for carbon |
18 |
| dioxide storage in the Mt. Simon Sandstone, a mile below the |
19 |
| surface; and |
20 |
| WHEREAS, In August of 2006, the U.S. Department of Energy |
21 |
| and the Alliance launched an aggressive schedule for completing |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 7 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| an Environmental Impact Statement within 12 months; hearings in |
2 |
| Congress raised concerns about costs escalating, due primarily |
3 |
| to inflation in construction materials, to $1.5 million; the |
4 |
| total amount was $1.8 million, which included the estimate coal |
5 |
| fuel costs for a 4-year test period; and |
6 |
| WHEREAS, Between May of 2007 and June of 2007, the drafted |
7 |
| Environmental Impact Statement was published by the U.S. |
8 |
| Department of Energy, after a month's delay awaiting federal |
9 |
| agency approval, with none of the sites disqualified; the U.S. |
10 |
| Department of Energy held formal public hearings on the |
11 |
| Environmental Impact Statement on June 26, 2007 in Mattoon and |
12 |
| June 28, 2007 in Tuscola, with community supporters turning out |
13 |
| in large numbers; and |
14 |
| WHEREAS, Between June of 2007 and July of 2007, the |
15 |
| Illinois General Assembly gives overwhelming support to Senate |
16 |
| Bill 1704; this bill created the Clean Coal FutureGen for |
17 |
| Illinois Act for the purpose of providing the FutureGen |
18 |
| Alliance with adequate liability protection, land use rights, |
19 |
| and permitting certainty to facilitate the FutureGen Project in |
20 |
| Illinois; the bill was signed into law on July 30, 2007; and |
21 |
| WHEREAS, In August of 2007, Illinois submitted a detailed |
22 |
| Best and Final Offer for both sites, including public and |
23 |
| private incentives, which included direct grants, cost |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 8 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| offsets, and tax exemptions; the total amount was valued at $90 |
2 |
| million; and |
3 |
| WHEREAS, In September of 2007, an Illinois team met with |
4 |
| the Alliance in Edwardsville to defend and clarify final offer |
5 |
| issues; the U.S. Department of Energy still had not decided on |
6 |
| the location for the plant; and |
7 |
| WHEREAS, Between October of 2007 and November of 2007, |
8 |
| letters supporting the State's bid from all major coal |
9 |
| producing states, representing 75% of the nation's tonnage, |
10 |
| were forwarded to the U.S. Department of Energy; and
|
11 |
| WHEREAS, On November 17, 2007, the U.S. Department of |
12 |
| Energy published a final Environmental Impact Statement; this |
13 |
| started the 30-day clock for a formal decision to be made |
14 |
| regarding the location of the plant; and
|
15 |
| WHEREAS, On December 4, 2007, the Alliance Board of |
16 |
| Directors, meeting in Washington D.C., made a final site |
17 |
| selection decision, but it was kept confidential; the U.S. |
18 |
| Department of Energy issued a letter at that time urging the |
19 |
| Alliance to delay announcing the final site; and
|
20 |
| WHEREAS, On December 18, 2007, at a news conference in |
21 |
| Washington D.C., the Alliance announced Mattoon was the |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 9 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| unanimous choice to host FutureGen; the U.S. Department of |
2 |
| Energy issued a statement that it plans to re-scope the |
3 |
| FutureGen project after more than $40 million has already been |
4 |
| spent; and
|
5 |
| WHEREAS, On January 10, 2008, by letter, the Alliance made |
6 |
| a counteroffer to take on a larger share of future cost |
7 |
| escalation and, through negotiations over the assets of the |
8 |
| project, repay the U.S. Department of Energy; and |
9 |
| WHEREAS, On January 16, 2008, it was disclosed that the |
10 |
| U.S. Department of Energy will abandon FutureGen in favor of |
11 |
| re-allocating the funds through a new solicitation of interest |
12 |
| to assist with multiple power plant projects; and |
13 |
| WHEREAS, On January 29, 2008, it was disclosed to members |
14 |
| of Illinois delegation that FutureGen will be cancelled and a |
15 |
| new FutureGen Program will take its place; the U.S. Department |
16 |
| of Energy disclosed that its new idea was to pay 100% of the |
17 |
| carbon dioxide capture and storage costs, but it would fund |
18 |
| nothing for the power side of several gasification facilities |
19 |
| being planned by private firms; this new proposal further |
20 |
| delays important technology advances on carbon dioxide capture |
21 |
| by at least five years and largely ignores the participation by |
22 |
| international members of the Alliance; and |
|
|
|
HR1009 |
- 10 - |
LRB095 19100 KBJ 45307 r |
|
|
1 |
| WHEREAS, The Alliance, which has a contract with the U.S. |
2 |
| Department of Energy extending through June, 15, 2008, |
3 |
| continues to hold its regular monthly meeting in Mattoon; and |
4 |
| WHEREAS, The Alliance has pledged to continue its move |
5 |
| ahead with private funds; therefore, be it
|
6 |
| RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE |
7 |
| NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we |
8 |
| urge the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Department of Energy to |
9 |
| make any changes necessary to reverse the decision that |
10 |
| resulted in the dismantling and abandonment of FutureGen; and |
11 |
| be it further
|
12 |
| RESOLVED, That the commitment is kept for all the |
13 |
| researchers, private-sector supporters, and public officials |
14 |
| and, most importantly, the people of Central Illinois who have |
15 |
| worked to bring this landmark project to fruition; and be it |
16 |
| further
|
17 |
| RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be |
18 |
| delivered to the Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate, the |
19 |
| Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, the members of |
20 |
| the Illinois Congressional delegation, and the Secretary of the |
21 |
| U.S. Department of Energy.
|