|
|
|
09500SB2552sam001 |
- 2 - |
LRB095 19700 DRJ 49465 a |
|
|
1 |
| local agencies that require an applicant to undergo a |
2 |
| fingerprint-based criminal history record check pursuant to |
3 |
| State law or agencies that are contemplating such a |
4 |
| requirement. The task force shall include but need not be |
5 |
| limited to representatives from the Department of Children and |
6 |
| Family Services, the Department of Financial and Professional |
7 |
| Regulation, the Department of Public Health, the Department of |
8 |
| Human Services, the Office of the Secretary of State, and the |
9 |
| Illinois State Board of Education, and representatives from |
10 |
| large regional school districts. The task force shall review |
11 |
| and make recommendations to create a more centralized and |
12 |
| coordinated process for conducting criminal history record |
13 |
| checks in order to reduce duplication of effort and make better |
14 |
| use of resources and more efficient use of taxpayer dollars. |
15 |
| The task force shall provide a plan to revise the criminal |
16 |
| history record check process to the General Assembly by |
17 |
| February 1, 2009. The plan shall address the following issues: |
18 |
| (1) Identification of any areas of concern that have |
19 |
| been identified by stakeholders and task force members |
20 |
| regarding State-mandated criminal history record checks. |
21 |
| (2) Evaluation of the feasibility of using an |
22 |
| applicant's initial criminal history record information |
23 |
| results for subsequent employment or licensing screening |
24 |
| purposes. |
25 |
| (3) Evaluation of the feasibility of centralizing the |
26 |
| screening of criminal history record information inquiry |
|
|
|
09500SB2552sam001 |
- 3 - |
LRB095 19700 DRJ 49465 a |
|
|
1 |
| responses. |
2 |
| (4) Identification and evaluation of existing |
3 |
| technologies that could be utilized to eliminate the need |
4 |
| for a subsequent fingerprint inquiry each time an applicant |
5 |
| changes employment or seeks a license requiring a criminal |
6 |
| history record inquiry. |
7 |
| (5) Evaluation of what other states are doing to |
8 |
| address similar concerns. |
9 |
| (6) Identification of programs serving vulnerable |
10 |
| populations that do not currently require criminal history |
11 |
| record information to determine whether those programs |
12 |
| should be included in a centralized screening of criminal |
13 |
| history record information. |
14 |
| (7) Preparation of a report for the General Assembly |
15 |
| proposing solutions that can be adopted to eliminate the |
16 |
| duplication of applicant fingerprint submissions and the |
17 |
| duplication of criminal records check response screening |
18 |
| efforts and to minimize the costs of conducting State and |
19 |
| FBI fingerprint-based inquiries in Illinois. ".
|