|
|
|
09500SB2552sam002 |
- 2 - |
LRB095 19700 DRJ 49488 a |
|
|
| 1 |
| local agencies that require an applicant to undergo a |
| 2 |
| fingerprint-based criminal history record check pursuant to |
| 3 |
| State law or agencies that are contemplating such a |
| 4 |
| requirement. The task force shall include but need not be |
| 5 |
| limited to representatives from the Department of State Police, |
| 6 |
| the Department of Children and Family Services, the Department |
| 7 |
| of Financial and Professional Regulation, the Department of |
| 8 |
| Public Health, the Department of Human Services, the Office of |
| 9 |
| the Secretary of State, and the Illinois State Board of |
| 10 |
| Education, and representatives from large regional school |
| 11 |
| districts. The task force shall review and make recommendations |
| 12 |
| to create a more centralized and coordinated process for |
| 13 |
| conducting criminal history record checks in order to reduce |
| 14 |
| duplication of effort and make better use of resources and more |
| 15 |
| efficient use of taxpayer dollars. |
| 16 |
| The task force shall provide a plan to revise the criminal |
| 17 |
| history record check process to the General Assembly by |
| 18 |
| February 1, 2009. The plan shall address the following issues: |
| 19 |
| (1) Identification of any areas of concern that have |
| 20 |
| been identified by stakeholders and task force members |
| 21 |
| regarding State-mandated criminal history record checks. |
| 22 |
| (2) Evaluation of the feasibility of using an |
| 23 |
| applicant's initial criminal history record information |
| 24 |
| results for subsequent employment or licensing screening |
| 25 |
| purposes. |
| 26 |
| (3) Evaluation of the feasibility of centralizing the |
|
|
|
09500SB2552sam002 |
- 3 - |
LRB095 19700 DRJ 49488 a |
|
|
| 1 |
| screening of criminal history record information inquiry |
| 2 |
| responses. |
| 3 |
| (4) Identification and evaluation of existing |
| 4 |
| technologies that could be utilized to eliminate the need |
| 5 |
| for a subsequent fingerprint inquiry each time an applicant |
| 6 |
| changes employment or seeks a license requiring a criminal |
| 7 |
| history record inquiry. |
| 8 |
| (5) Evaluation of what other states are doing to |
| 9 |
| address similar concerns. |
| 10 |
| (6) Identification of programs serving vulnerable |
| 11 |
| populations that do not currently require criminal history |
| 12 |
| record information to determine whether those programs |
| 13 |
| should be included in a centralized screening of criminal |
| 14 |
| history record information. |
| 15 |
| (7) Preparation of a report for the General Assembly |
| 16 |
| proposing solutions that can be adopted to eliminate the |
| 17 |
| duplication of applicant fingerprint submissions and the |
| 18 |
| duplication of criminal records check response screening |
| 19 |
| efforts and to minimize the costs of conducting State and |
| 20 |
| FBI fingerprint-based inquiries in Illinois.".
|