Bill Status of HB 462   96th General Assembly

Short Description:  FIREARMS-CONCEALED CARRY

House Sponsors
Rep. Brandon W. Phelps-David Reis-Patrick J. Verschoore-John D. Cavaletto, Shane Cultra, Bill Mitchell, Mike Bost, Ron Stephens, Robert F. Flider, Paul D. Froehlich, Daniel V. Beiser, Jerry L. Mitchell, Lisa M. Dugan, Richard P. Myers and Keith P. Sommer

Last Action  View All Actions

DateChamber Action
  1/11/2011HouseSession Sine Die

Statutes Amended In Order of Appearance
New Act
50 ILCS 705/10.6 new
720 ILCS 5/24-2from Ch. 38, par. 24-2

Synopsis As Introduced
Creates the Family and Personal Protection Act. Permits the county sheriff to issue permits to carry concealed firearms to persons at least 21 years of age who meet certain requirements. Requires an applicant for a permit to have completed specified training requirements developed by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board consisting of classroom instruction and live firing exercises. Preempts home rule. Amends the Illinois Police Training Act and the Criminal Code of 1961 to make conforming changes. Effective immediately.

 Housing Affordability Impact Note (Housing Development Authority)
 This bill will have no effect on the cost of constructing, purchasing, owning, or selling a single-family residence.

 Land Conveyance Appraisal Note (Dept. of Transportation)
 No land conveyances are included in this bill, therefore, there are no appraisals to be filed.

 Fiscal Note (Dept of Corrections)
 HB 462 has no fiscal impact

 Correctional Note (Dept of Corrections)
 HB 462 has no corrections population impact

 State Debt Impact Note (Government Forecasting & Accountability)
 HB 462 would not change the amount of authorization for any type of State-issued or State-supported bond, and, therefore, would not affect the level of State indebtedness.

 Pension Note (Government Forecasting & Accountability)
 HB 462 will not impact any public pension fund or retirement system in Illinois.

 Fiscal Note (lllinois State Police)
 The Illinois State Police (ISP) would have to coordinate with the 102 county sheriffs' departments to implement a procedure to compare conceal carry applicants/card holders against the FOID database to eliminate those prohibited from possessing firearms. This would be done through the development of a computer application that would allow interface with the sheriffs. The ISP estimates it would need two additional personnel to assist the sheriffs in dealing strictly with issues of those prohibited. The ISP is mandated to maintain an automated listing pf permit holders. This information shall be available on-line, upon request, at all times to Illinois law enforcement agencies. In addition, the ISP is required to submit a yearly statistical report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, indicating the number of permits issued, revoked, suspended, denied and issued after appeal along with other prohibiting information. There is nothing set up in this bill to allow the ISP to receive funding from the Citizens Safety and Self Defense Trust Fund for costs associated with this system. Firearms & Information Resources Bureau (FIRB) would need the additional personnel and equipment: two additional personnel and equipment required to assist sheriffs for prohibiting issues (approximately $120,000.00 salary/benefits funding required). (1) FOID Mainframe and database modification = $350,000; (2) Application to apply development = $20,000; (3) 2 personnel = $120,000; Total Estimated Start Up Costs = $490,000.

 State Mandates Fiscal Note (Dept. of Commerce & Economic Opportunity)
 HB 462 would require the expansion of duties for local enforcement officials. Therefore, HB 462 creates a service mandate.

 Home Rule Note (Dept. of Commerce & Economic Opportunity)
 HB 462 does not pre-empt home rule authority.

 Judicial Note (Admin Office of the Illinois Courts)
 Based on a review of the HB 462, it is possible that the bill could result in additional litigation thereby impacting the workload of judicial officers in the State. However, it is not possible to determine the extent of this impact.

 Balanced Budget Note (Office of Management and Budget)
 HB 462 has no fiscal impact and will not add additional spending pressure to the General Revenue Fund or to the current Fiscal Year 2009 budget deficit.

Actions 
DateChamber Action
  2/4/2009HouseFiled with the Clerk by Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
  2/4/2009HouseAdded Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. David Reis
  2/4/2009HouseAdded Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick J. Verschoore
  2/4/2009HouseFirst Reading
  2/4/2009HouseReferred to Rules Committee
  2/10/2009HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Shane Cultra
  2/11/2009HouseAssigned to Agriculture & Conservation Committee
  2/18/2009HouseDo Pass / Short Debate Agriculture & Conservation Committee; 011-001-000
  2/19/2009HousePlaced on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
  2/19/2009HouseFiscal Note Requested by Rep. Elizabeth Coulson
  2/19/2009HouseState Mandates Fiscal Note Requested by Rep. Elizabeth Coulson
  2/19/2009HouseHome Rule Note Requested by Rep. Elizabeth Coulson
  2/24/2009HouseAdded Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. John D. Cavaletto
  2/24/2009HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Bill Mitchell
  2/24/2009HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Bost
  2/24/2009HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Ron Stephens
  2/24/2009HouseSecond Reading - Short Debate
  2/24/2009HouseHeld on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
  2/24/2009HouseBalanced Budget Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HouseCorrectional Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HouseHousing Affordability Impact Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HouseJudicial Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HouseLand Conveyance Appraisal Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HousePension Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/24/2009HouseState Debt Impact Note Requested by Rep. John E. Bradley
  2/25/2009HouseHousing Affordability Impact Note Filed
  2/25/2009HouseLand Conveyance Appraisal Note Filed
  2/26/2009HouseFiscal Note Filed
  2/26/2009HouseCorrectional Note Filed
  2/26/2009HouseState Debt Impact Note Filed
  2/27/2009HousePension Note Filed
  2/27/2009HouseFiscal Note Filed
  3/2/2009HouseState Mandates Fiscal Note Filed
  3/2/2009HouseHome Rule Note Filed
  3/2/2009HouseJudicial Note Filed
  3/4/2009HouseBalanced Budget Note Filed
  3/17/2009HouseSecond Reading - Short Debate
  3/17/2009HousePlaced on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
  3/31/2009HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
  3/31/2009HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee
  4/1/2009HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Agriculture & Conservation Committee
  4/3/2009HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert F. Flider
  4/3/2009HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
  4/3/2009HouseRule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
  2/22/2010HouseApproved for Consideration Rules Committee; 003-000-000
  2/22/2010HousePlaced on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
  2/23/2010HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Agriculture & Conservation Committee
  2/24/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
  2/24/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Daniel V. Beiser
  3/11/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Jerry L. Mitchell
  3/16/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Lisa M. Dugan
  3/18/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Richard P. Myers
  3/24/2010HouseAdded Co-Sponsor Rep. Keith P. Sommer
  3/26/2010HouseHouse Floor Amendment No. 1 Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
  3/26/2010HouseRule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
  1/11/2011HouseSession Sine Die

Back To Top