|
|
|
09600HB2283sam001 |
- 2 - |
LRB096 09929 AJO 26096 a |
|
|
1 |
| person who may
significantly affect the child's best |
2 |
| interest;
|
3 |
| (4) the child's adjustment to his home, school and |
4 |
| community;
|
5 |
| (5) the mental and physical health of all individuals |
6 |
| involved;
|
7 |
| (6) the physical violence or threat of physical |
8 |
| violence by the child's
potential custodian, whether |
9 |
| directed against the child or directed against
another |
10 |
| person;
|
11 |
| (7) the occurrence of ongoing or repeated abuse as |
12 |
| defined in Section 103 of the
Illinois Domestic Violence |
13 |
| Act of 1986, whether directed against the child
or directed |
14 |
| against another person;
|
15 |
| (8) the willingness and ability of each parent to |
16 |
| facilitate and
encourage a close and continuing |
17 |
| relationship between the other parent
and the child; and
|
18 |
| (9) whether one of the parents is a sex offender ; and .
|
19 |
| (10) the terms of a parent's military family-care plan |
20 |
| that a parent must complete before deployment if a parent |
21 |
| is a member of the United States armed forces who is being |
22 |
| deployed. |
23 |
| In the case of a custody proceeding in which a stepparent |
24 |
| has standing
under Section 601, it is presumed to be in the |
25 |
| best interest of the minor child
that the natural parent have |
26 |
| the custody of the minor child unless the
presumption is |
|
|
|
09600HB2283sam001 |
- 3 - |
LRB096 09929 AJO 26096 a |
|
|
1 |
| rebutted by the stepparent.
|
2 |
| (b) The court shall not consider conduct of a present or |
3 |
| proposed
custodian that does not affect his relationship to the |
4 |
| child.
|
5 |
| (c) Unless the court finds the occurrence of ongoing abuse |
6 |
| as defined
in Section 103 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act |
7 |
| of 1986, the court
shall presume that the maximum involvement |
8 |
| and cooperation
of both parents regarding the physical, mental, |
9 |
| moral, and emotional
well-being of
their child is in the best |
10 |
| interest of the child. There shall be no
presumption in favor |
11 |
| of or against joint custody.
|
12 |
| (Source: P.A. 94-377, eff. 7-29-05; 94-643, eff. 1-1-06; |
13 |
| 95-331, eff. 8-21-07.)
|
14 |
| (750 ILCS 5/610) (from Ch. 40, par. 610)
|
15 |
| Sec. 610. Modification.
|
16 |
| (a) Unless by stipulation of the parties or except as |
17 |
| provided in subsection (a-5), no motion
to modify a custody |
18 |
| judgment may be made earlier than 2 years after its
date, |
19 |
| unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of |
20 |
| affidavits
that there is reason to believe the child's present |
21 |
| environment may endanger
seriously his physical, mental, moral |
22 |
| or emotional health.
|
23 |
| (a-5) A motion to modify a custody judgment may be made at |
24 |
| any time by a party who has been informed of the existence of |
25 |
| facts requiring notice to be given under Section 609.5.
|
|
|
|
09600HB2283sam001 |
- 4 - |
LRB096 09929 AJO 26096 a |
|
|
1 |
| (b) The court shall not modify a prior custody judgment |
2 |
| unless it finds by
clear and convincing evidence, upon the |
3 |
| basis of facts that have arisen since
the prior judgment or |
4 |
| that were unknown to the court at the time of entry of
the |
5 |
| prior judgment, that a change has occurred in the circumstances |
6 |
| of the
child or his custodian, or in the case of a joint |
7 |
| custody arrangement that a
change has occurred in the |
8 |
| circumstances of the child or either or both parties
having |
9 |
| custody, and that the modification is necessary to serve the |
10 |
| best
interest of the child. The existence of facts requiring |
11 |
| notice to be given under Section 609.5 of this Act shall be |
12 |
| considered a change in circumstance. In the case of joint |
13 |
| custody, if the parties agree to a
termination of a joint |
14 |
| custody arrangement, the court shall so terminate the
joint |
15 |
| custody and make any modification which is in the child's best |
16 |
| interest.
The court shall state in its decision specific |
17 |
| findings of fact in support of
its modification or termination |
18 |
| of joint custody if either parent opposes the
modification or |
19 |
| termination.
|
20 |
| (c) Attorney fees and costs shall be assessed against a |
21 |
| party seeking
modification if the court finds that the |
22 |
| modification action is vexatious
and constitutes harassment.
|
23 |
| (d) Notice under this Section shall be given as provided in
|
24 |
| subsections (c) and (d) of Section 601.
|
25 |
| (e) A party's absence, relocation, or failure to comply |
26 |
| with the court's orders on custody, visitation, or parenting |
|
|
|
09600HB2283sam001 |
- 5 - |
LRB096 09929 AJO 26096 a |
|
|
1 |
| time may not, by itself, be sufficient to justify a |
2 |
| modification of a prior order if the reason for the absence, |
3 |
| relocation, or failure to comply is the party's deployment as a |
4 |
| member of the United States armed forces. |
5 |
| (Source: P.A. 94-643, eff. 1-1-06.)".
|