|
|
|
96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2009 and 2010 SB0297
Introduced 2/6/2009, by Sen. Martin A. Sandoval SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
|
|
Creates the Design-Build for Highway Construction Demonstration Act. Authorizes the Department of Transportation and the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority to use a design-build method of source selection for highway construction projects. Sets forth procedures for using the design-build method. Requires the agencies to submit an evaluation report concerning the design-build method no later than December 31, 2012. Repeals the Act on June 30, 2013. Effective July 1, 2009.
|
| |
|
|
| FISCAL NOTE ACT MAY APPLY | |
|
|
A BILL FOR
|
|
|
|
|
SB0297 |
|
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| AN ACT concerning highways.
|
2 |
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
3 |
| represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 |
| Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the |
5 |
| Design-Build for Highway Construction Demonstration Act. |
6 |
| Section 5. Legislative intent. Design-bid-build has been |
7 |
| the traditional and preferred method of delivering completed |
8 |
| highway construction projects since the inception of the system |
9 |
| of state highways under the jurisdiction and management of |
10 |
| state government authorities. Design-bid-build has relied on a |
11 |
| qualifications-based selection of engineering expertise for |
12 |
| the design function and a sealed competitive bid selection for |
13 |
| the build function. The existing process is intended to secure |
14 |
| a quality project at the lowest cost while avoiding fraud, |
15 |
| corruption, and abuse in the contracting process. |
16 |
| Design-build combines the design and construction |
17 |
| functions in one contract with the intention of saving time and |
18 |
| money by taking advantage of innovation in both design and |
19 |
| construction and by realizing the benefits of a single |
20 |
| contract. The design-build method of project delivery has been |
21 |
| used with success in private sector construction and has been |
22 |
| attempted by other states for highway construction with mixed |
23 |
| results. The civil engineering and highway construction |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 2 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| industries in Illinois have developed over a considerable time |
2 |
| working in the traditional method of contracting and project |
3 |
| delivery. |
4 |
| Adoption of design-build carries with it risks that should |
5 |
| be assessed and potential rewards that should be identified |
6 |
| before the method is fully adopted for highway construction. |
7 |
| The State agencies responsible for the construction and |
8 |
| maintenance of State highways also need to adapt to the changes |
9 |
| that such an adoption would bring. The General Assembly |
10 |
| therefore believes that a period of study and evaluation is |
11 |
| appropriate before the design-build method is adopted for |
12 |
| general use. It is the policy of the State that |
13 |
| design-bid-build remains the preferred delivery method of |
14 |
| highway construction projects, but that design-build should be |
15 |
| authorized and evaluated as an alternative method for selected |
16 |
| projects. |
17 |
| Section 10. Authority for use. |
18 |
| (a) The Illinois Department of Transportation and the |
19 |
| Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, as the State highway |
20 |
| construction agencies, may provide for use of a design-build |
21 |
| method of source selection for highway construction projects, |
22 |
| on highways subject to their jurisdiction, in order to |
23 |
| demonstrate and evaluate the use, advantages, and |
24 |
| disadvantages of that method of source selection for highway |
25 |
| construction projects. It is the policy of the State for the |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 3 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| use of this method to publicly announce all requirements for |
2 |
| design-build services and to procure those services on the |
3 |
| basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications with due |
4 |
| regard for the principles of competitive selection. The State |
5 |
| highway construction agency undertaking demonstration projects |
6 |
| selected under the authority of this Act must evaluate the |
7 |
| design-build method compared to the traditional method by |
8 |
| considering the following factors: |
9 |
| (1) The relative advantages and disadvantages, |
10 |
| considering time, cost, and the resources of the agency to |
11 |
| achieving the final completion of the project; |
12 |
| (2) The type, size, and suitability of projects to the |
13 |
| design-build method of source selection; and |
14 |
| (3) The ability of the agency to define and provide |
15 |
| comprehensive scope and performance criteria for the |
16 |
| construction project as required by this Act, as well as |
17 |
| what may be possible under a design-build contract |
18 |
| providing for greater conceptual responsibility for the |
19 |
| design-build entity. |
20 |
| (b) Projects selected by the Illinois Department of |
21 |
| Transportation for demonstration under this Act must be |
22 |
| identified in the annual highway construction program document |
23 |
| published by the Department under Section 2705-200 of the |
24 |
| Department of Transportation Law of the Civil Administrative |
25 |
| Code of Illinois. |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 4 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| Section 15. Definitions. As used in this Act: |
2 |
| "Design-bid-build" means the traditional method of source |
3 |
| selection used on public projects in this State that |
4 |
| incorporates the Architectural, Engineering, and Land |
5 |
| Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act, and the Illinois |
6 |
| Procurement Code.
|
7 |
| "Design-build" means a method of source selection that |
8 |
| provides responsibility within a single contract for the |
9 |
| furnishing of engineering, land surveying and related design |
10 |
| services, and the labor, materials, equipment, and other |
11 |
| construction services for the project. |
12 |
| "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public |
13 |
| project procured under this Act between a State highway |
14 |
| construction agency and a design-build entity to furnish |
15 |
| engineering, land surveying and related design services as |
16 |
| required and to furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and |
17 |
| other construction services for the project. The design-build |
18 |
| contract may be conditioned upon subsequent refinements in |
19 |
| scope and price and may allow the State highway construction |
20 |
| agency to make modifications in the project scope and contract |
21 |
| price without invalidating the design-build contract. |
22 |
| "Design-build entity" means any entity organized in a |
23 |
| manner recognized in law that proposes to design and build a |
24 |
| public project under this Act. |
25 |
| "Design professional" means any entity recognized by law to |
26 |
| offer services under the Professional Engineering Practice Act |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 5 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| of 1989, the Structural Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the |
2 |
| Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Act of 1989, or the |
3 |
| Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989. |
4 |
| "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements to be used for |
5 |
| the selection process as defined in this Act including any |
6 |
| specialized experience, technical qualifications and |
7 |
| competence, financial capacity to perform, past performance or |
8 |
| experience, personnel resources, cost, and other appropriate |
9 |
| factors. The manner of judging qualifications in relation to |
10 |
| the proposed costs must be clearly defined as provided in this |
11 |
| Act. |
12 |
| "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build |
13 |
| contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance |
14 |
| with this Act. |
15 |
| "Request for proposals" means the document used by a State |
16 |
| highway construction agency to solicit proposals for a |
17 |
| design-build contract. |
18 |
| "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements |
19 |
| for the project, including, but not limited to, the intended |
20 |
| usage, capacity, size, scope, quality and performance |
21 |
| standards, life-cycle costs, and other programmatic criteria |
22 |
| that are expressed in performance-oriented and quantifiable |
23 |
| specifications and drawings that can be reasonably inferred and |
24 |
| are suitable to allow a design-build entity to develop a |
25 |
| proposal. |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 6 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| Section 20. Scope and performance criteria. The State |
2 |
| highway construction agency must develop the scope and |
3 |
| performance criteria. The scope and performance criteria must |
4 |
| be in reasonably sufficient detail and contain reasonably |
5 |
| adequate information to inform the qualified design-build |
6 |
| entities of the State highway construction agency's overall |
7 |
| needs and goals, including, but not limited to, applicable |
8 |
| standards adopted by the agency governing the work of the |
9 |
| project, preliminary design plans, anticipated schedules, and |
10 |
| delivery requirements. The scope and performance criteria must |
11 |
| also include a description of the level of design to be |
12 |
| provided in the proposals. The description must include the |
13 |
| scope and type of renderings, drawings, and specifications |
14 |
| that, at a minimum, will be required to be produced by the |
15 |
| design-build entity. The scope and performance criteria must be |
16 |
| prepared by an appropriately licensed design professional who |
17 |
| may be an employee of the agency, or the agency may contract |
18 |
| with an independent design professional selected in accordance |
19 |
| with the Architectural, Engineering, and Land Surveying |
20 |
| Qualification Based Selection Act to provide these services. |
21 |
| The design professional that prepares the scope and performance |
22 |
| criteria is prohibited from participating in any design-build |
23 |
| entity proposal for the project. |
24 |
| Section 25. Solicitation of design-build proposals. |
25 |
| Design-build contracts must be procured by a request for |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 7 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| proposals process conforming to this Act. A request for |
2 |
| proposals must be prepared for each project and must contain, |
3 |
| at a minimum, all of the following information: |
4 |
| (1) The State transportation construction agency that |
5 |
| will award the design-build contract; |
6 |
| (2) The desired schedule for the completion of the |
7 |
| project; |
8 |
| (3) The qualification criteria for design-build |
9 |
| entities desiring to submit proposals incorporating any |
10 |
| established prequalification, registration, or other |
11 |
| requirements that are relevant to the needs of the |
12 |
| individual project; |
13 |
| (4) The terms and conditions of the contract that will |
14 |
| govern the performance of the project; |
15 |
| (5) The scope and performance criteria governing the |
16 |
| contract; |
17 |
| (6) The selection criteria to evaluate the |
18 |
| design-build entity proposal; |
19 |
| (7) The date, time, and place that proposals are due |
20 |
| that in no case may be less than 30 calendar days after the |
21 |
| date of the issuance of the request for proposals; |
22 |
| (8) The requirements for identification of the |
23 |
| design-build team members; and |
24 |
| (9) The date, time, and place that the cost component |
25 |
| of accepted proposals will be publicly opened and read.
|
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 8 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| Section 30. Publication of requests for proposals. All |
2 |
| requests for design-build proposals must be published in the |
3 |
| volume of the Illinois Procurement Bulletin used by the State |
4 |
| highway construction agency for its regular construction |
5 |
| contract lettings under the Illinois Procurement Code. |
6 |
| Section 35. Submission of proposals. Proposals must be |
7 |
| properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be reviewed |
8 |
| until after the deadline for submission has passed as set forth |
9 |
| in the request for proposals. All design-build entities |
10 |
| submitting proposals must be disclosed after the deadline for |
11 |
| submission. Proposals must include a bid bond in the form and |
12 |
| security as designated in the request for proposals. Proposals |
13 |
| must contain a separate sealed envelope containing the cost |
14 |
| component within the overall proposal submission. Proposals |
15 |
| must conform in all material respects to the request for |
16 |
| proposal or they may be rejected as non-responsive. The State |
17 |
| transportation construction agency may reject any and all |
18 |
| proposals and may waive technicalities. Any drawings and |
19 |
| specifications contained in proposals not selected remain the |
20 |
| property of the design-build entity unless otherwise provided |
21 |
| for in the request for proposals. Proposals may be withdrawn |
22 |
| prior to evaluation for any reason. |
23 |
| Section 40. Selection committee. The State highway |
24 |
| construction agency must establish a selection committee to |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 9 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| evaluate the technical components of the proposals. The |
2 |
| selection committee must consist of 5 members, 3 of whom are |
3 |
| professionally licensed officers or employees of the agency, |
4 |
| and 2 of whom are public members. The public members may not be |
5 |
| employed or associated with any firm holding a contract with |
6 |
| the State highway construction agency and must be nominated, |
7 |
| one each, by the American Council of Engineering Companies of |
8 |
| Illinois, and, in the following order on a rotating basis, the |
9 |
| Associated General Contractors of Illinois, the Illinois Road |
10 |
| and Transportation Builders Association, the Illinois Asphalt |
11 |
| Pavement Association, and the Illinois chapter of the American |
12 |
| Concrete Pavement Association. The selection committee and |
13 |
| individual members may be designated for a set term or for a |
14 |
| particular project. Each member of the selection committee must |
15 |
| certify, for each request for proposal, that no conflict of |
16 |
| interest exists between the member and each of the design-build |
17 |
| entities submitting proposals. If a conflict exists, the member |
18 |
| must be replaced before any review of proposals. |
19 |
| Section 45. Procedures for selection and award. |
20 |
| (a) For highway construction projects estimated to cost |
21 |
| $10,000,000 or less, all proposals received by the date and |
22 |
| time due must be opened and recorded. The cost component must |
23 |
| remain sealed and retained by the chief contracting official |
24 |
| responsible for the conduct of lettings in accordance with the |
25 |
| regular procedures of the agency. The chief contracting |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 10 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| official must transmit all technical components for evaluation |
2 |
| to the selection committee. The chief contracting official must |
3 |
| serve as recording secretary to the selection committee. The |
4 |
| selection committee must evaluate each proposal for |
5 |
| responsiveness to the request, qualifications of the |
6 |
| design-build team, proposed methods of achieving the scope and |
7 |
| performance criteria, and achievement of any other evaluation |
8 |
| factors set forth in the request. The selection committee may |
9 |
| require clarification of any element contained in the technical |
10 |
| component in order to determine whether the proposal conforms |
11 |
| to the request. The proposals may not be ranked, except that |
12 |
| after evaluation, the selection committee must mark and record |
13 |
| each proposal as either "accepted" or "not accepted." The time |
14 |
| for evaluation must be no less than 24 hours unless a longer |
15 |
| period is specified in the request. After evaluation, the chief |
16 |
| contracting official must reseal and retain all accepted and |
17 |
| unaccepted proposals. The cost component of each accepted |
18 |
| proposal must be opened and publicly read at the date, time, |
19 |
| and place specified in the request. The right to reject any and |
20 |
| all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to solicit new |
21 |
| proposals must be reserved. The design-build contract may be |
22 |
| awarded to the lowest accepted proposal by the State highway |
23 |
| construction agency provided the cost component is responsive |
24 |
| to the request. After the award, all proposals not accepted and |
25 |
| non-low proposals must be returned. |
26 |
| (b) For highway construction projects exceeding an |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 11 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| estimate of $10,000,000, the procedures and rights are the same |
2 |
| as subsection (a) of this Section, except that accepted |
3 |
| proposals must be graded by the selection committee for quality |
4 |
| of the proposal and achievement of the scope and performance |
5 |
| criteria. The scoring is from 1 through 100 points. Any |
6 |
| accepted proposal scoring less than 76 points must be marked |
7 |
| unacceptable. The time for evaluation must be no less than 72 |
8 |
| hours unless a longer period is specified in the request. The |
9 |
| design-build contract may be awarded to the responsive best |
10 |
| value proposal determined by adjusting the as read cost |
11 |
| component by the technical component score as follows: |
12 |
| (1) The cost component for a proposal scored 97-100 |
13 |
| must be divided by 1; |
14 |
| (2) The cost component for a proposal scored 93-96 must |
15 |
| be divided by 0.99; |
16 |
| (3) The cost component for a proposal scored 89-92 must |
17 |
| be divided by 0.98; |
18 |
| (4) The cost component for a proposal scored 85-88 must |
19 |
| be divided by 0.97; |
20 |
| (5) The cost component for a proposal scored 81-84 must |
21 |
| be divided by 0.96; and |
22 |
| (6) The cost component for a proposal scored 77-80 must |
23 |
| be divided by 0.95. |
24 |
| Section 50. Confidentiality. The status of a proposal as |
25 |
| accepted or not accepted and proposal scores may not be |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 12 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| disclosed for any reason before the cost element is publicly |
2 |
| opened and read. |
3 |
| Section 55. Conditions. Projects selected for procurement |
4 |
| under the terms of this Act are subject to the following |
5 |
| conditions: |
6 |
| (1) Department of Transportation projects must be |
7 |
| selected that have been designed through at least the |
8 |
| completion of Phase I preliminary engineering, as defined |
9 |
| by the design policies and procedures of the Department. On |
10 |
| any project selected for this demonstration program, the |
11 |
| design-build components may be initiated only after all |
12 |
| necessary approvals have been obtained from the department |
13 |
| and, as applicable, the Federal Highway Administration for |
14 |
| an engineering study and report that establishes the |
15 |
| location and scope of the project, and for environmental |
16 |
| documentation that analyzes the environmental impacts of |
17 |
| the project alternatives considered. |
18 |
| (2) All necessary rights-of-way, permanent and |
19 |
| temporary, must be acquired prior to the commencement of |
20 |
| construction by the design-build entity. Nothing in this |
21 |
| paragraph (2) prohibits the design-build entity from |
22 |
| securing any additional temporary interests or rights of |
23 |
| access deemed necessary to accomplish the project. |
24 |
| (3) The State highway construction agency must secure |
25 |
| all necessary permits. |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 13 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| (4) The State highway construction agency must secure |
2 |
| any necessary relocation of utilities located on existing |
3 |
| or acquired rights-of-way unless the request for proposals |
4 |
| provides that existing utilities will be planned for and |
5 |
| adjusted during construction. Notwithstanding any |
6 |
| provision contained in Section 9-113 of the Illinois |
7 |
| Highway Code concerning the provision of final engineering |
8 |
| plans prior to notice given to permitted utilities to |
9 |
| relocate, a permitted utility must proceed to relocate and |
10 |
| adjust permitted
facilities pursuant to Section 9-113 of |
11 |
| the Illinois Highway Code upon notice with preliminary |
12 |
| plans showing the final or adjusted position of the |
13 |
| utilities. |
14 |
| Section 60. Procurement and contract mandates. |
15 |
| Design-build contracts procured under this Act are subject to |
16 |
| all applicable federal and State laws governing the performance |
17 |
| of public contracts and all applicable ethical and conflict of |
18 |
| interest disclosures and prohibitions mandated by law. The |
19 |
| design-build entity must certify that no state appropriated |
20 |
| funds have been or will be paid, by or on behalf of the |
21 |
| design-build entity, to any person for influencing or |
22 |
| attempting to influence an officer or employee of a State |
23 |
| agency or the Governor's office, a member of the General |
24 |
| Assembly, an officer or employee of the General Assembly, or an |
25 |
| employee of a member of the General Assembly in connection with |
|
|
|
SB0297 |
- 14 - |
LRB096 03731 AJT 13760 b |
|
|
1 |
| the awarding of any design-build contract. |
2 |
| Section 65. Design professional seal. Nothing in this Act |
3 |
| may be deemed to eliminate, reduce, or affect the requirements |
4 |
| of the Structural Engineering Practice Act of 1989, |
5 |
| Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Illinois |
6 |
| Professional Land Surveyor Act of 1989, and the Illinois |
7 |
| Architecture Practice Act of 1989, including, but not limited |
8 |
| to, the preparation and sealing of plans and documents. |
9 |
| Section 70. Rules and regulations. The State highway |
10 |
| construction agencies are not required to adopt rules and |
11 |
| regulations pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure |
12 |
| Act in order to implement this Act. All policies and procedures |
13 |
| adopted to implement this Act must be identified and published |
14 |
| in the web site maintained by the Department of Transportation. |
15 |
| Section 75. Report. The State highway construction |
16 |
| agencies must, jointly or severally, submit an evaluation |
17 |
| report as required by Section 10 of this Act. The agencies must |
18 |
| solicit, accept, and respond to comments provided by the |
19 |
| industry groups or associations providing appointed public |
20 |
| members to the selection committee, and must incorporate the |
21 |
| comments and responses into the report. The report is due and |
22 |
| must be filed with the Procurement Policy Board no later than |
23 |
| December 31, 2012. |