|
|||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | SENATE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Both the public and numerous states have shown | ||||||
3 | great interest in high-speed rail as an efficient and | ||||||
4 | environmentally friendly means of moving people and creating | ||||||
5 | economic activity; and
| ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, A 2,250-mile Midwestern high-speed rail network | ||||||
7 | as envisioned under the United States Department of | ||||||
8 | Transportation’s high-speed corridor designations could create | ||||||
9 | more than 1 million permanent jobs and more than 450,000 | ||||||
10 | construction jobs in the region; and
| ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, Outside of California, the Midwest has the highest | ||||||
12 | concentration of cities with a population of more than 300,000; | ||||||
13 | most of those cities, including Chicago, Detroit, | ||||||
14 | Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Minneapolis, St. Louis, | ||||||
15 | and Cincinnati, could be served by a Midwest high-speed rail | ||||||
16 | network; these metropolitan areas alone represent nearly 10% of | ||||||
17 | the U.S. population and the Midwest region is home to one-third | ||||||
18 | of the U.S. population; and
| ||||||
19 | WHEREAS, In 2009, President Obama and the United States | ||||||
20 | Congress demonstrated leadership and vision by jumpstarting | ||||||
21 | high speed rail plans in the United States with an $8 billion | ||||||
22 | allocation for high speed rail funding in the American Recovery |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | and Reinvestment Act; and
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, The Federal Rail Administration received | ||||||
3 | pre-applications from 40 states totaling $103 billion this year | ||||||
4 | and ultimately received 45 applications from 23 states totaling | ||||||
5 | $50 billion, as well as an additional $7 billion in requests | ||||||
6 | for corridor studies; these figures ultimately dwarfed the $8 | ||||||
7 | billion to be allocated under the American Recovery and | ||||||
8 | Reinvestment Act; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, In order to meet the demonstrated demand for high | ||||||
10 | speed rail of at least $57 billion, the federal government | ||||||
11 | needs to spend $8 billion every year for the next 7 years; and
| ||||||
12 | WHEREAS, The United States Congress is currently debating | ||||||
13 | the amount of high speed rail funding to put into the annual | ||||||
14 | budget this fall; while the U.S. House of Representatives | ||||||
15 | appropriated $4 billion in the 2010 transportation | ||||||
16 | appropriations bill (H.R. 3288), the U.S. Senate only | ||||||
17 | appropriated $1.2 billion in its version; and
| ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, A conference committee is set to finalize the | ||||||
19 | allocation of high speed rail funding in the FY2010 federal | ||||||
20 | budget; and
| ||||||
21 | WHEREAS, The amount of high speed rail funding in the first |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | federal budget since passage of the stimulus bill will | ||||||
2 | determine whether or not the nation will continue to | ||||||
3 | aggressively invest in high speed rail; the difference between | ||||||
4 | the House's $4 billion allocation for high speed rail and the | ||||||
5 | Senate's $1.2 billion for high speed rail is dramatic; and | ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, The State of Illinois has appropriated funds for | ||||||
7 | high speed rail; the Illinois General Assembly has allocated | ||||||
8 | more than $850 million for railroad infrastructure in the | ||||||
9 | capital bill, the single largest legislative-enacted | ||||||
10 | appropriation of any state in the history of the nation for | ||||||
11 | railroad infrastructure; therefore, be it
| ||||||
12 | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-SIXTH GENERAL | ||||||
13 | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we urge the United | ||||||
14 | States Senate to agree with the United States House of | ||||||
15 | Representatives and spend $4 billion on high speed rail in the | ||||||
16 | FY2010 budget in order to match the commitment to high speed | ||||||
17 | rail demonstrated by the State of Illinois; and be it further
| ||||||
18 | RESOLVED, That we specifically urge U.S. Senators Dick | ||||||
19 | Durbin and Roland Burris to push for a $4 billion allocation | ||||||
20 | for high speed rail in the FY2010 budget; and be it further | ||||||
21 | RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be | ||||||
22 | presented to the Majority and Minority Leaders of the United |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | States Senate and United States Senators Dick Durbin and Roland | ||||||
2 | Burris.
|