|
| | HR0675 | | LRB098 14607 GRL 49543 r |
|
|
| 1 | | HOUSE RESOLUTION
|
| 2 | | WHEREAS, The Chicago Transit Authority is proposing a |
| 3 | | 5.3-mile extension of the Red Line from the existing 95th |
| 4 | | Street Terminal to the vicinity of 130th Street; and
|
| 5 | | WHEREAS, The proposed extension would include 4 new |
| 6 | | stations near 103rd Street, 111th Street, Michigan Avenue, and |
| 7 | | 130th Street; each new station would include bus and parking |
| 8 | | facilities; and
|
| 9 | | WHEREAS, Following the Red Line Extension Project open |
| 10 | | house meeting during the summer of 2011, the agency began work |
| 11 | | on a technical analysis of the project and a Draft |
| 12 | | Environmental Impact Statement on behalf of the Federal Transit |
| 13 | | Administration, which serves as the federal lead agency for the |
| 14 | | project; and
|
| 15 | | WHEREAS, The Red Line Extension Project would reduce travel |
| 16 | | times to jobs for far South Side and South Suburban residents |
| 17 | | and improve the performance of the existing Red Line 95th |
| 18 | | Street Station terminal; the project would also support current |
| 19 | | and future economic development initiatives; and
|
| 20 | | WHEREAS, The Red Line Extension Project is needed for many |
| 21 | | reasons, including the lack of Park and Ride and passenger drop |
|
| | HR0675 | - 2 - | LRB098 14607 GRL 49543 r |
|
|
| 1 | | off and poor pedestrian facilities, which limit access to the |
| 2 | | existing 95th Street terminal of the Red Line; lengthy delays |
| 3 | | experienced by customers who access the existing terminal |
| 4 | | facility by bus, caused by the poor performance of surrounding |
| 5 | | arterial intersections, insufficient space for bus loading and |
| 6 | | unloading, and insufficient space for bus layovers; congested |
| 7 | | bus and passenger conditions at the existing terminal station |
| 8 | | and bus facility, which result in safety issues and diminish |
| 9 | | the attractiveness of transit as an alternative to other travel |
| 10 | | modes; the adverse impact of narrow arterial streets and |
| 11 | | frequent at-grade freight rail crossings on roadway |
| 12 | | performance in the study area; and the nature of transit |
| 13 | | dependence of minority and low-income populations in the study |
| 14 | | area; and
|
| 15 | | WHEREAS, Discussion of a Red Line Extension has been going |
| 16 | | on since Mayor Richard J. Daley proposed it and many other |
| 17 | | infrastructure improvement plans for the Chicago area in April |
| 18 | | of 1967; planners and community groups have discussed the |
| 19 | | necessity and benefits of the extension in the intervening |
| 20 | | years, but have received no tangible information as to its |
| 21 | | construction; and |
| 22 | | WHEREAS, In 2007, the Regional Equity Subcommittee of the |
| 23 | | Illinois House of Representatives' Mass Transit Committee held |
| 24 | | a comprehensive subject matter hearing on transportation |
|
| | HR0675 | - 3 - | LRB098 14607 GRL 49543 r |
|
|
| 1 | | equity in the south suburbs of Chicago; the hearing shone a |
| 2 | | light on the Red Line Extension and other transportation |
| 3 | | projects and issues where, seemingly, resources were spent in |
| 4 | | areas other than the south side and southern suburbs; and |
| 5 | | WHEREAS, It has been the policy and priority of many |
| 6 | | General Assembly members in the affected areas to call into |
| 7 | | question the Chicago Transit Authority's commitment to this |
| 8 | | long overdue project and have not seen any funding allocated to |
| 9 | | the Red Line extension in the Chicago Transit Authority's 2014 |
| 10 | | budget; many elected officials and members of the community |
| 11 | | have shown patience, but now want financial, planning, and |
| 12 | | programmatic commitments from the Chicago Transit Authority to |
| 13 | | make the Red Line Extension a top priority; and |
| 14 | | WHEREAS, While Chicago Transit Authority officials say the |
| 15 | | extension is a top priority, the agency has not established a |
| 16 | | timeline for building the 5.3 miles of new track or any of the |
| 17 | | proposed 4 new stations; and
|
| 18 | | WHEREAS, By making firm financial commitments and setting |
| 19 | | specific dates, the Chicago Transit Authority would see |
| 20 | | increased credibility in the project area and would provide |
| 21 | | hope and confidence to taxpayers on the South Side and in the |
| 22 | | south suburbs that the Chicago Transit Authority is indeed |
| 23 | | concerned about all of the citizens in its service area; |
|
| | HR0675 | - 4 - | LRB098 14607 GRL 49543 r |
|
|
| 1 | | therefore, be it |
| 2 | | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE |
| 3 | | NINETY-EIGHTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that |
| 4 | | we urge the Chicago Transit Authority to prioritize and |
| 5 | | expedite the planning and construction of the Red Line |
| 6 | | Extension Project in order to provide far South Side and South |
| 7 | | Suburban residents with the transportation and economic |
| 8 | | development benefits expected from the completion of this |
| 9 | | project; and be it further
|
| 10 | | RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be |
| 11 | | delivered to the Chicago Transit Authority.
|