99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2015 and 2016
HB6279

 

Introduced 2/11/2016, by Rep. Katherine Cloonen

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 
750 ILCS 5/602.5
750 ILCS 5/602.7

    Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides that in determining the child's best interests for purposes of allocating significant decision-making responsibilities and parenting time, the court may order drug testing of a parent.


LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

 

 

A BILL FOR

 

HB6279LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1    AN ACT concerning civil law.
 
2    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
 
4    Section 5. The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of
5Marriage Act is amended by changing Sections 602.5 and 602.7 as
6follows:
 
7    (750 ILCS 5/602.5)
8    Sec. 602.5. Allocation of parental responsibilities:
9decision-making.
10    (a) Generally. The court shall allocate decision-making
11responsibilities according to the child's best interests.
12Nothing in this Act requires that each parent be allocated
13decision-making responsibilities.
14    (b) Allocation of significant decision-making
15responsibilities. Unless the parents otherwise agree in
16writing on an allocation of significant decision-making
17responsibilities, or the issue of the allocation of parental
18responsibilities has been reserved under Section 401, the court
19shall make the determination. The court shall allocate to one
20or both of the parents the significant decision-making
21responsibility for each significant issue affecting the child.
22Those significant issues shall include, without limitation,
23the following:

 

 

HB6279- 2 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1        (1) Education, including the choice of schools and
2    tutors.
3        (2) Health, including all decisions relating to the
4    medical, dental, and psychological needs of the child and
5    to the treatments arising or resulting from those needs.
6        (3) Religion, subject to the following provisions:
7            (A) The court shall allocate decision-making
8        responsibility for the child's religious upbringing in
9        accordance with any express or implied agreement
10        between the parents.
11            (B) The court shall consider evidence of the
12        parents' past conduct as to the child's religious
13        upbringing in allocating decision-making
14        responsibilities consistent with demonstrated past
15        conduct in the absence of an express or implied
16        agreement between the parents.
17            (C) The court shall not allocate any aspect of the
18        child's religious upbringing if it determines that the
19        parents do not or did not have an express or implied
20        agreement for such religious upbringing or that there
21        is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a course of
22        conduct regarding the child's religious upbringing
23        that could serve as a basis for any such order.
24        (4) Extracurricular activities.
25    (c) Determination of child's best interests. In
26determining the child's best interests for purposes of

 

 

HB6279- 3 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1allocating significant decision-making responsibilities, the
2court shall consider all relevant factors, including, without
3limitation, the following:
4        (1) the wishes of the child, taking into account the
5    child's maturity and ability to express reasoned and
6    independent preferences as to decision-making;
7        (2) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school,
8    and community;
9        (3) the mental and physical health of all individuals
10    involved;
11        (4) the ability of the parents to cooperate to make
12    decisions, or the level of conflict between the parties
13    that may affect their ability to share decision-making;
14        (5) the level of each parent's participation in past
15    significant decision-making with respect to the child;
16        (6) any prior agreement or course of conduct between
17    the parents relating to decision-making with respect to the
18    child;
19        (7) the wishes of the parents;
20        (8) the child's needs;
21        (9) the distance between the parents' residences, the
22    cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each
23    parent's and the child's daily schedules, and the ability
24    of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement;
25        (10) whether a restriction on decision-making is
26    appropriate under Section 603.10;

 

 

HB6279- 4 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1        (11) the willingness and ability of each parent to
2    facilitate and encourage a close and continuing
3    relationship between the other parent and the child;
4        (12) the physical violence or threat of physical
5    violence by the child's parent directed against the child;
6        (13) the occurrence of abuse against the child or other
7    member of the child's household;
8        (14) whether one of the parents is a sex offender, and
9    if so, the exact nature of the offense and what, if any,
10    treatment in which the parent has successfully
11    participated; and
12        (15) any other factor that the court expressly finds to
13    be relevant.
14    (c-5) In determining the child's best interests for
15purposes of allocating significant decision-making
16responsibilities, the court may order drug testing of a parent.
17    (d) A parent shall have sole responsibility for making
18routine decisions with respect to the child and for emergency
19decisions affecting the child's health and safety during that
20parent's parenting time.
21    (e) In allocating significant decision-making
22responsibilities, the court shall not consider conduct of a
23parent that does not affect that parent's relationship to the
24child.
25(Source: P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)
 

 

 

HB6279- 5 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1    (750 ILCS 5/602.7)
2    Sec. 602.7. Allocation of parental responsibilities:
3parenting time.
4    (a) Best interests. The court shall allocate parenting time
5according to the child's best interests.
6    (b) Allocation of parenting time. Unless the parents
7present a mutually agreed written parenting plan and that plan
8is approved by the court, the court shall allocate parenting
9time. It is presumed both parents are fit and the court shall
10not place any restrictions on parenting time as defined in
11Section 600 and described in Section 603.10, unless it finds by
12a preponderance of the evidence that a parent's exercise of
13parenting time would seriously endanger the child's physical,
14mental, moral, or emotional health.
15    In determining the child's best interests for purposes of
16allocating parenting time, the court shall consider all
17relevant factors, including, without limitation, the
18following:
19        (1) the wishes of each parent seeking parenting time;
20        (2) the wishes of the child, taking into account the
21    child's maturity and ability to express reasoned and
22    independent preferences as to parenting time;
23        (3) the amount of time each parent spent performing
24    caretaking functions with respect to the child in the 24
25    months preceding the filing of any petition for allocation
26    of parental responsibilities or, if the child is under 2

 

 

HB6279- 6 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1    years of age, since the child's birth;
2        (4) any prior agreement or course of conduct between
3    the parents relating to caretaking functions with respect
4    to the child;
5        (5) the interaction and interrelationship of the child
6    with his or her parents and siblings and with any other
7    person who may significantly affect the child's best
8    interests;
9        (6) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school,
10    and community;
11        (7) the mental and physical health of all individuals
12    involved;
13        (8) the child's needs;
14        (9) the distance between the parents' residences, the
15    cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each
16    parent's and the child's daily schedules, and the ability
17    of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement;
18        (10) whether a restriction on parenting time is
19    appropriate;
20        (11) the physical violence or threat of physical
21    violence by the child's parent directed against the child
22    or other member of the child's household;
23        (12) the willingness and ability of each parent to
24    place the needs of the child ahead of his or her own needs;
25        (13) the willingness and ability of each parent to
26    facilitate and encourage a close and continuing

 

 

HB6279- 7 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1    relationship between the other parent and the child;
2        (14) the occurrence of abuse against the child or other
3    member of the child's household;
4        (15) whether one of the parents is a convicted sex
5    offender or lives with a convicted sex offender and, if so,
6    the exact nature of the offense and what if any treatment
7    the offender has successfully participated in; the parties
8    are entitled to a hearing on the issues raised in this
9    paragraph (15);
10        (16) the terms of a parent's military family-care plan
11    that a parent must complete before deployment if a parent
12    is a member of the United States Armed Forces who is being
13    deployed; and
14        (17) any other factor that the court expressly finds to
15    be relevant.
16    (c-5) In determining the child's best interests for
17purposes of allocating parenting time, the court may order drug
18testing of a parent.
19    (c) In allocating parenting time, the court shall not
20consider conduct of a parent that does not affect that parent's
21relationship to the child.
22    (d) Upon motion, the court may allow a parent who is
23deployed or who has orders to be deployed as a member of the
24United States Armed Forces to designate a person known to the
25child to exercise reasonable substitute visitation on behalf of
26the deployed parent, if the court determines that substitute

 

 

HB6279- 8 -LRB099 20632 HEP 45220 b

1visitation is in the best interests of the child. In
2determining whether substitute visitation is in the best
3interests of the child, the court shall consider all of the
4relevant factors listed in subsection (b) of this Section and
5apply those factors to the person designated as a substitute
6for the deployed parent for visitation purposes. Visitation
7orders entered under this subsection are subject to subsections
8(e) and (f) of Section 602.9 and subsections (c) and (d) of
9Section 603.10.
10    (e) If the street address of a parent is not identified
11pursuant to Section 708 of this Act, the court shall require
12the parties to identify reasonable alternative arrangements
13for parenting time by the other parent including, but not
14limited to, parenting time of the minor child at the residence
15of another person or at a local public or private facility.
16(Source: P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)