| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, The State of Illinois is currently experiencing a | ||||||
3 | fiscal crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic and is considering | ||||||
4 | a multitude of options to solve its economic concerns; and
| ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, Increased excise taxes on Illinois brewers, | ||||||
6 | winemakers, and distillers, many of which are small | ||||||
7 | businesses, are being contemplated by some in the State's | ||||||
8 | leadership in order to generate additional revenue to balance | ||||||
9 | the State's budget; and
| ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, Illinois' alcohol excise taxes already rank among | ||||||
11 | the highest in the United States at $8.55 per gallon liquor tax | ||||||
12 | (3rd highest), $1.39 per gallon wine tax (9th highest), and | ||||||
13 | $0.23 per gallon beer tax (22nd highest); and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, Additional excise taxes on alcohol in Cook County | ||||||
15 | and the City of Chicago, Illinois' most populous region, | ||||||
16 | greatly increase the cost of beer, wine, and liquor for | ||||||
17 | Illinois adult consumers; this includes a $2.68 per gallon tax | ||||||
18 | on liquor imposed by the City of Chicago and a $2.50 per gallon | ||||||
19 | liquor tax imposed by Cook County, a $0.36 to $0.89 per gallon | ||||||
20 | tax on wine imposed by the City of Chicago and a $0.20 to $0.45 | ||||||
21 | per gallon wine tax imposed by Cook County, and a $0.29 per | ||||||
22 | gallon beer tax imposed by the City of Chicago and a $0.06 per |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | gallon beer tax imposed by Cook County; and | ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Illinois' excise beer taxes are already the | ||||||
3 | highest at $0.23 per gallon, compared to all of its | ||||||
4 | neighboring states, including Wisconsin at $0.06 per gallon, | ||||||
5 | Iowa at $0.19 per gallon, Missouri at $0.06 per gallon, | ||||||
6 | Indiana at $0.11 per gallon, and Kentucky at $0.08 per gallon; | ||||||
7 | and | ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, Illinois brewers, winemakers, and distillers, as | ||||||
9 | well as importers, also pay federal excise taxes on the | ||||||
10 | products they produce; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, Illinois' beer industry, made up of brewers, beer | ||||||
12 | importers, beer distributors, brewer suppliers, and retailers, | ||||||
13 | contributes more than $10.1 billion annually to Illinois' | ||||||
14 | economy and is linked to 86,400 local jobs; and | ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, Illinois' wine industry directly creates 36,403 | ||||||
16 | jobs and generates $1.22 billion in wages and $2.98 billion in | ||||||
17 | economic activity in the State; and | ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, When the state of Maryland increased their | ||||||
19 | alcohol excise taxes from 6% to 9% in 2012, it resulted in | ||||||
20 | Maryland residents traveling to Virginia, Delaware, and | ||||||
21 | Washington, D.C. for cheaper alternatives, crippling Maryland |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | business in bordering counties; and | ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Illinois' costly alcohol taxes continue to | ||||||
3 | provoke border-town residents to find cheaper prices in | ||||||
4 | neighboring states and to create black markets for overtaxed | ||||||
5 | goods, diminishing state revenues, which by one estimate costs | ||||||
6 | Illinois up to $30 million annually due to cross-border | ||||||
7 | alcohol sales; and
| ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, Additional taxes on alcohol in Illinois would | ||||||
9 | cripple the ability of business owners, both large and small, | ||||||
10 | to successfully recover from the devastating financial impact | ||||||
11 | wrought by a global pandemic; and
| ||||||
12 | WHEREAS, More taxes on beer, wine, and liquor would | ||||||
13 | continue to ravage the already shattered hospitality industry | ||||||
14 | in Illinois, driving opportunity, revenue, and jobs to | ||||||
15 | neighboring states and hurting Illinois' already fragile | ||||||
16 | economy; and
| ||||||
17 | WHEREAS, Imposing additional taxes on brewers, winemakers, | ||||||
18 | and distillers during a global pandemic is counterintuitive | ||||||
19 | and goes against the pro-jobs policies that should be under | ||||||
20 | careful consideration as Illinois seeks to regain sound | ||||||
21 | financial footing; therefore, be it
|
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE | ||||||
2 | HUNDRED SECOND GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that | ||||||
3 | we state our firm opposition to any additional excise taxes on | ||||||
4 | Illinois businesses that produce beer, wine, or liquor or | ||||||
5 | their related industries; and be it further
| ||||||
6 | RESOLVED, That we state our belief that Illinois' present | ||||||
7 | fiscal crisis must be managed in other ways rather than | ||||||
8 | increased taxes that unfairly target a single industry in the | ||||||
9 | State.
|