HR0443LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1
HOUSE RESOLUTION

 
2    WHEREAS, Under Article IV, Section 3 of the Illinois
3Constitution of 1970, in the year following each federal
4decennial census year, the General Assembly by law shall
5redistrict the Legislative Districts and the Representative
6Districts by June 30; and
 
7    WHEREAS, The United States Census Bureau failed to deliver
8the 2020 Census Public Law 94-171 population data to the
9States, including Illinois, by March 31, 2021 as required by
10the federal Census Act; and
 
11    WHEREAS, While the 2020 Census Public Law 94-171
12population data was not available as required by federal law,
13the General Assembly remained constitutionally mandated to
14enact a redistricting plan prior to June 30, 2021; and
 
15    WHEREAS, On April 26, 2021, the United States Census
16Bureau released the 2020 Census apportionment data, which
17showed that the total resident population of Illinois as of
18April 1, 2020 was 12,812,508 according to the 2020 Census, a
19decrease of more than 18,000 people, or 0.14%, from the 2010
20Census; and
 
21    WHEREAS, In addition to the decennial census, the United

 

 

HR0443- 2 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1States Census Bureau conducts the American Community Survey, a
2nationwide, continuous survey that includes detailed questions
3about population and housing characteristics, and publishes
4the data on a 1-year and 5-year basis; and
 
5    WHEREAS, The total resident population of Illinois
6according to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey data was
712,770,577, which is approximately 0.3% less than the total
8resident population from the 2020 Census; and
 
9    WHEREAS, The 2015-2019 American Community Survey data
10represented the most accurate, recent low-level population
11data available to the Illinois public prior to June 30, 2021;
12and
 
13    WHEREAS, The Illinois General Assembly conducted 50
14hearings on redistricting, resulting in hundreds of
15testimonials from the public in April and May 2021; and
 
16    WHEREAS, House and Senate staff reached out to more than
172,000 community groups, local leaders, and stakeholders in
18advance of these hearings; and
 
19    WHEREAS, House Bill 2777 of the 102nd General Assembly was
20amended with legislative language creating the General
21Assembly Redistricting Act of 2021, which established the

 

 

HR0443- 3 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1boundaries of all 59 Legislative Districts and 118
2Representative Districts using the 2015-2019 American
3Community Survey population data; and
 
4    WHEREAS, The General Assembly passed House Bill 2777, in
5compliance with the requirements of Article IV, Section 8 of
6the Illinois Constitution of 1970, on May 28, 2021; and
 
7    WHEREAS, The Governor signed House Bill 2777 into law as
8Public Act 102-10; and
 
9    WHEREAS, Public Act 102-10 contained an immediate
10effective date and became effective on June 4, 2021 in
11accordance with Article IV, Section 10 of the Illinois
12Constitution of 1970; and
 
13    WHEREAS, Through the enactment of Public Act 102-10 on
14June 4, 2021, the General Assembly met its constitutional
15deadline under Article IV, Section 3(b) of the Illinois
16Constitution of 1970 to redistrict the Legislative Districts
17and the Representative Districts by June 30 in the year
18following the Federal decennial census year; and
 
19    WHEREAS, At the time of the passage of House Bill 2777, the
20House and Senate Democrats committed to reviewing the 2020
21Census Public Law 94-171 population data and determining if

 

 

HR0443- 4 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1adjustments should be made to Public Act 102-10; and
 
2    WHEREAS, The United States Census Bureau released the 2020
3Census Public Law 94-171 population data on August 12, 2021 to
4the States, including Illinois; and
 
5    WHEREAS, The 2020 Census population data shows that 15
6Illinois counties grew in population from the 2010 Census; and
 
7    WHEREAS, The 2020 Census population data shows that the
8counties of Carroll (2.0%), Champaign (2.4%), Cook (1.6%),
9DuPage (1.7%), Effingham (1.2%), Grundy (4.9%), Johnson
10(5.8%), Kane (0.2%), Kendall (14.9%), Lake (1.5%), McHenry
11(0.5%), McLean (0.8%), Monroe (6.1%), Will (2.8%) and
12Williamson (5.8%) gained population from the 2010 Census; and
 
13    WHEREAS, The 2020 Census population data shows Cook County
14had the state's largest population growth with 80,866
15additional people from the 2010 Census; and
 
16    WHEREAS, These 15 counties grew by a total population of
17159,253 from 2010 Census; and
 
18    WHEREAS, The 2020 Census population data shows that 87
19Illinois counties lost a total population of 177,377 from the
202010 Census, with St. Clair County losing the highest number

 

 

HR0443- 5 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1of people, 12,656 or -4.7%, and Alexander County losing the
2greatest percentage of its population, -36.4% or 2,998 people;
3and
 
4    WHEREAS, These 87 counties lost by a total population of
5177,377 from 2010 Census; and
 
6    WHEREAS, the House and Senate Redistricting Committees
7conducted 9 hearings to receive public input on the 2020
8Census data and Public Act 102-10, including proposed
9adjustments, after the release of the 2020 Census Public Law
1094-171 population data; and
 
11    WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 1 of the Illinois
12Constitution of 1970 vests legislative power in the General
13Assembly, and the General Assembly may pass legislation, as
14provided in Article IV, Section 8, to amend the redistricting
15plan enacted in Public Act 102-10, or adopt a new
16redistricting plan; and
 
17    WHEREAS, The Illinois General Assembly has drafted an
18amendment to the General Assembly Redistricting Act of 2021 to
19adjust the plan for redistricting the Legislative Districts
20and the Representative Districts to incorporate the 2020
21Census Public Law 94-171 population data (hereinafter, the
22plan as amended shall be referred to as "the 2021 General

 

 

HR0443- 6 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Assembly Redistricting Plan"); therefore, be it
 
2    RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE
3HUNDRED SECOND GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that
4in establishing boundaries for Illinois Legislative and
5Representative Districts ("Districts"), the following
6redistricting principles were taken into account:
7        (i) each of the Districts contained in the 2021
8    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to be
9    substantially equal in population;
10        (ii) each of the Districts contained in the 2021
11    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to be
12    consistent with the United States Constitution;
13        (iii) each of the Districts contained in the 2021
14    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to be
15    consistent with the federal Voting Rights Act, where
16    applicable;
17        (iv) each of the Districts contained in the 2021
18    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to be
19    compact and contiguous, as required by the Illinois
20    Constitution;
21        (v) each of the Districts contained in the 2021
22    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to be
23    consistent with the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011
24    where applicable; and
25        (vi) each of the Districts contained in the 2021

 

 

HR0443- 7 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn taking into
2    account the partisan composition of the District and of
3    the Plan itself; and be it further
 
4    RESOLVED, That in addition to the foregoing redistricting
5principles, each of the Districts contained in the 2021
6General Assembly Redistricting Plan was drawn to reflect a
7balance of the following redistricting principles: the
8preservation of the core or boundaries of the existing
9Districts; the preservation of communities of interest;
10respect for county, township, municipal, ward, and other
11political subdivision boundaries; the maintenance of
12incumbent-constituent relationships and tracking of population
13migration; proposals or other input submitted by members of
14the public and stakeholder groups; public hearing testimony;
15other incumbent requests; respect for geographic features and
16natural or logical boundaries; and other redistricting
17principles recognized by state and federal court decisions;
18and be it further
 
19    RESOLVED, That the House used the 2020 Census Public Law
2094-171 population data, election data, and public input to
21establish the boundaries for the 2021 General Assembly
22Redistricting Plan; and be it further
 
23    RESOLVED, That the House hereby adopts and incorporates by

 

 

HR0443- 8 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1reference all information received by the House Redistricting
2Committee or the Senate Redistricting Committee that was
3submitted by the general public and stakeholders in person or
4remotely at the hearings; by e-mail; by U.S. mail; by
5facsimile; or via the public portal on the House and Senate
6Democratic redistricting websites; and be it further
 
7    RESOLVED, That the House further adopts and incorporates
8by reference transcripts of proceedings for all of the
9redistricting hearings conducted by either the House or Senate
10or both; and be it further
 
11    RESOLVED, That the Representative Districts proposed in
12the 2021 General Assembly Redistricting Plan are substantially
13equal in population, with a total deviation of less than 0.5%;
14and be it further
 
15    RESOLVED, That the Representative Districts proposed in
16the 2021 General Assembly Redistricting Plan are as compact
17overall as the existing Representative Districts adopted in
182011; and be it further
 
19    RESOLVED, That the Representative Districts proposed in
20the 2021 General Assembly Redistricting Plan are contiguous;
21and be it further
 

 

 

HR0443- 9 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    RESOLVED, That the following summary describes the general
2characteristics of each Representative District and makes
3reference to some but not all of the redistricting principles
4that were considered in drawing that District. The term
5"proposed RD", followed by a number, will refer to the
6Representative District proposed in the 2021 General Assembly
7Redistricting Plan, as amended, and the term "current RD",
8followed by a number, will refer to the Representative
9District under the plan adopted in 2011:
 
10    Cook County and Chicago: Over the past decade, suburban
11Cook County's population decreased, mostly in the western and
12southern suburbs. The population in the City of Chicago
13remained steady, mostly due to population gains in the city
14center and the northern areas. As a result, the City of Chicago
15continues to have the same number of representatives, but the
16district lines are altered to address rapidly changing areas
17with dense population and those areas that suffered population
18losses. The changing populations, demographics, and migration
19of residents within Cook County and the Collar Counties
20(DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties) requires
21adjustments to the current map. These districts were drawn
22using the articulated redistricting principles, with emphasis
23on ensuring equal population, preserving the core of the
24current districts if possible, and political considerations.
25    Chicago Lakefront: Representative Districts 5, 6, 25, and

 

 

HR0443- 10 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

126 represent the area most notably along or near Lake
2Michigan. These districts collectively had significant
3population growth and as a result the boundaries have been
4altered to accommodate the growing population, shifts in the
5other districts, and for political purposes. The results of
6the 2020 Census revealed additional population growth beyond
7what was estimated in the 2015-2019 American Community Survey
8data, necessitating further reconfiguration of these
9districts. These districts have numerous communities of
10interest, including concerns about maintenance of the beaches
11and lakefront, pollution control, and maintaining the urban
12lifestyle of the communities. These districts generally have
13majority Black populations, with small but growing Hispanic
14and Asian populations. The communities in these districts tend
15to pool their political power and traditionally elect members
16of the Democratic party.
17    The configuration of Representative District 5 as enacted
18in 2011 contained 130,516 people according to the 2020 Census.
19This was overpopulated by 21,935 people compared to target
20population. The configuration of RD 5 as enacted in Public Act
21102-10 contained 124,836 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was overpopulated by 16,255 people. As amended, the
23district is substantially the same as the current RD 5,
24maintaining a majority of the current district and the core of
25the current district. The district includes cultural,
26economic, racial and ethnic communities of interest as it

 

 

HR0443- 11 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1stretches in a corridor from the Near North Side to the Loop,
2Near South Side, Douglas, Grand Boulevard, Washington Park,
3Woodlawn, and Greater Grand Crossing. Like the current
4district, the proposed district maintains its high transit
5availability according to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for
6Planning (CMAP). It includes numerous higher education
7institutions, including Columbia College, Roosevelt
8University, and DePaul University's Wintrust Arena, and
9provides ample transit for other institutions of higher
10education that are within one mile, including Illinois College
11of Optometry. It also includes some of the most prominent art
12and cultural attractions, including The Art Institute of
13Chicago, The Museum of Contemporary Photography, the Chicago
14Symphony Orchestra, and Cloud Gate, popularly known as "The
15Bean." Despite being a highly urban district, proposed RD 5
16contains a large amount of green, open, or recreational space.
17It also contains Mercy Hospital and St. Bernard Hospital, both
18of which are safety net hospitals serving as a vital source of
19care for low-income and uninsured Illinoisans.
20    The total population of RD 5 is 108,665. The voting age
21population is 51.13% African American, 10.27% Asian, 5.00%
22Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
23members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
24identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
2553.42% African American.
26    Representative District 6 has gained 8,546 people over the

 

 

HR0443- 12 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1past decade. This growth was underestimated in the American
2Community Survey, as the district as reconfigured under Public
3Act 102-10 was 10,477 people above the 2020 Census target
4population. To bring the population closer to the 2020 Census
5target population, the district boundaries from Public Act
6102-10 were changed by moving the district's northern border
7slightly south, removing some of the most densely populated
8sections of downtown Chicago.
9    As amended, the district is substantially the same as the
10current RD 6, maintaining the core of the current district and
11the majority of its population. Proposed RD 6, like current RD
126, is an urban district with cultural, economic, and ethnic
13diversity that stretches in a corridor from the Near North
14Side to the Loop, Near South Side, Douglas, Armour Square, New
15City, Gage Park, Chicago Lawn, West Englewood, Englewood, and
16Greater Grand Crossing. The proposed district continues to
17include the many higher education opportunities and cultural
18institutions, including Illinois Institute of Technology, the
19VanderCook College of Music, Guaranteed Rate Field, and the
20Harold Washington Library Center. It also contains primary
21offices for federal, State, and local governments, including
22Chicago City Hall, the George W. Dunne Cook County Office
23Building, the James R. Thompson Center, the Richard J. Daley
24Center, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. The proposed
25district would also largely keep Chicago's historic Financial
26District intact.

 

 

HR0443- 13 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    The total population of RD 6 is 108,689. The voting age
2population is 45.37% African American, 6.80% Asian, 26.19%
3Hispanic. Over the past decade, this region has experienced
4significant population growth and gentrification. Including
5individuals who identify as multiple races, the voting age
6population is 47.41% African American.
7    The configuration of Representative District 25 as enacted
8in 2011 contained 112,221 people according to the 2020 Census.
9This was overpopulated by 3,640 people compared to target
10population. The configuration of RD 25 as enacted in Public
11Act 102-10 contained 108,487 people according to the 2020
12Census. This was underpopulated by 94 people. The proposed
13district contains a majority of the current district and
14retains the core of the current district's population,
15including its many cultural, economic, religious and ethnic
16communities of interest. The proposed district splits fewer
17current wards than the current district, but continues to
18include major medical, educational, and cultural institutions
19such as portions of the University of Chicago campus, La
20Rabida Children's Hospital, the Museum of Science and
21Industry, the Frederick C. Robie House, the Smart Museum of
22Art, and numerous theological seminaries.
23    The total population of RD 25 is 108,487. The voting age
24population is 53.63% African American, 6.49% Asian, 18.15%
25Hispanic.
26    The configuration of Representative District 26 as enacted

 

 

HR0443- 14 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1in 2011 contained 121,318 people according to the 2020 Census.
2This was overpopulated by 12,737 people compared to target
3population. The configuration of RD 26 as enacted in Public
4Act 102-10 contained 113,480 people according to the 2020
5Census. This was overpopulated by 4,899 people. The proposed
6district contains a majority of the current district
7population, with changes made to accommodate the growth of the
8district and population changes in other districts. The
9proposed district splits fewer wards than the current
10district, but keeps intact the cultural, economic, racial, and
11ethnic diversity. The district continues to house some of the
12most famous open spaces and parks, cultural institutions, and
13attractions in Chicago, including the University of Chicago,
14Grant Park, Navy Pier, McCormick Place, Adler Planetarium, the
15DuSable Museum of African American History, Burnham Harbor,
16Northerly Island, Burnham Park, and Washington Park.
17    The total population of RD 26 is 108,741. The voting age
18population is 46.08% African American, 10.85% Asian, 5.51%
19Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
20members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
21identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
2248.26% African American.
23    The House Redistricting Committee received testimony
24requesting that the General Assembly increase the African
25American population in RD 26 and move the northern boundary of
26the district farther south, when compared to the district

 

 

HR0443- 15 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1under Public Act 100-0010. The requested change was not
2accommodated because this would disrupt a number of
3historically African American districts and potentially pair
4multiple incumbent Democratic legislators. Additionally,
5extending further south would cause at least one south side
6district to fracture into Iroquois County, creating districts
7with more rural population alongside city and suburban-based
8population. Although the district does not contain a majority
9African American voting age population, the district remains
10one in which African American voters have an equal opportunity
11to elect a candidate of their choice.
12    Chicago Southwest and Southwest Suburbs: Representative
13Districts 1, 2, 21, 22, 23, and 24 represent the Southwest side
14of the City of Chicago and southwest suburban Cook County.
15These districts experienced population declines. The proposed
16districts were established following the redistricting
17principles and all share commonalities, including a
18significant Latino population and a majority who traditionally
19elects members of the Democratic party. These districts
20represent many blue-collar, working class families.
21    Some participants at public hearings of the House
22Redistricting Committee suggested changes to the region and
23the possibility of creating a new majority-Hispanic district.
24While the General Assembly cannot, and should not, create a
25district solely for race-based reasons, the request was
26considered. Any such configuration would have a major impact

 

 

HR0443- 16 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1on neighboring districts and create a ripple effect throughout
2the redistricting plan. The most probable proposal submitted
3to create a new district did so by fracturing Chicago's Little
4Village neighborhood. That change would have a dramatic effect
5on the redistricting plan as a whole and require substantial
6changes to other districts. As a result, other communities of
7interest would need to be fractured, and many of the
8redistricting principles used when creating the plan would
9have to be wholly ignored or altered to the detriment of other
10principles taken into consideration for the entire
11redistricting plan. The request to fracture Little Village was
12taken into consideration, as well as the request to keep
13Little Village intact, and located in one district, to
14maximize the voting power and this community of interest. In
15reviewing the possibilities, it was also clear that in order
16to achieve population targets, a reconfigured district
17extending north would cut into multiple districts, including
18several that provide representation opportunities for
19African-American communities, and result in the pairing of two
20or more incumbents. These adjustments would also likely cause
21disruption to the south, forcing these districts further south
22and fracturing other communities of interest.
23    The configuration of Representative District 1 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 109,593 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was overpopulated by 1,012 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 1 as enacted in Public Act

 

 

HR0443- 17 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1102-10 contained 113,224 people according to the 2020 Census.
2This was overpopulated by 4,643 people. The core of the
3proposed RD 1 is substantially similar to the current RD 1. The
4district adds portions of current RDs 2, 6, 21, and 22, and
5represents the neighborhoods of Archer Heights, West Elsdon,
6Garfield Ridge, Archer Limits, Gage Park, Chicago Lawn and
7LeClaire Courts. The proposed district includes more of the
814th Ward. The communities of proposed RD 1 have many
9commonalities, including being tied together by the
10transportation industry. RD 1 continues to maintain clearly
11defined borders with permanent fixtures, such as railroad
12lines and expressways. The total population for RD 1 is
13108,580. It has a voting age population that is 5.56% African
14American, 3.59% Asian, and 75.95% Hispanic.
15    Representative District 2, renumbered from the current RD
1624, was overpopulated by 2,034 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 2 as enacted in Public Act
18102-10 contained 112,075 people according to the 2020 Census.
19This was overpopulated by 3,494 people. The core of the
20proposed RD 2 is substantially similar to the current RD 2. The
21proposed district adds portions of current RDs 8, 21, 23, and
2224. Proposed RD 2 includes most of Cicero, all of Stickney, all
23of Lyons, and significant portions of Berwyn, Riverside, and
24Brookfield. These municipalities have similar demographics,
25with predominant or growing Hispanic populations, and many
26commonalities, including shared school districts. During the

 

 

HR0443- 18 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Berwyn/Cicero hearing on April 3, 2021 of the House
2Redistricting Committee, the Mexican American Legal Defense
3and Educational Fund commented that they wished that this
4district maintained a strong Hispanic voting age population.
5It was a political priority to ensure these communities have
6an opportunity to elect the candidate of their choice. The
7district is renumbered and paired with a different Legislative
8District for purposes of maintaining communities of interest
9and the political power of the region. The proposed district
10moved west out of the 22nd Ward in Chicago - including losing
11parts of the neighborhood known as "Little Village" - and
12entirely into suburban Cook County in an effort to meet the
13intentions of the incumbent State representative who wished to
14represent more of Cicero. While Cicero is split into the same
15number of districts as the 2011 plan, more of the population is
16now consolidated into the proposed RD 2. The total population
17of RD 2 is 108,632. The voting age population is 3.44% African
18American, 1.23% Asian, 64.57% Hispanic.
19    Representative District 21, which was current RD 23, was
20overpopulated by 1,123 people compared to target population.
21The configuration of RD 21 as enacted in Public Act 102-10
22contained 110,895 people according to the 2020 Census. This
23was overpopulated by 2,314 people. Changes to the district are
24due in large part to those population shifts and changes in
25neighboring districts. The district is renumbered and paired
26with a different Legislative District for purposes of

 

 

HR0443- 19 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1maintaining communities of interest and the political
2composition of the region. The core of the proposed RD 21 is
3substantially similar to the current RD 23. Proposed RD 21
4contains suburban Cook County communities west of Chicago,
5including portions of Bridgeview, Justice, Summit, McCook, La
6Grange, Brookfield, Riverside, North Riverside, Berwyn and
7Cicero. These communities share many commonalities, including
8school districts, several major roadways and key intersections
9that serve as major transportation and freight corridors
10connecting the communities throughout the region. These
11municipalities have similar demographics, with predominant or
12growing Hispanic populations, and many other commonalities,
13including shared school districts. The district has a majority
14Latino population, and as suggested by the Latino Policy Forum
15at a hearing of the House Redistricting Committee, this will
16provide opportunities for the Latino community to elect
17candidates of their choice. The total population of RD 21 is
18108,781. The voting age population is 6.43% African American,
192.32% Asian, 51.74% Hispanic.
20    The configuration of Representative District 22 as enacted
21in 2011 contained 110,338 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was overpopulated by 1,757 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 22 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 108,518 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was underpopulated by 63 people. The core of the
26proposed RD 22 is substantially similar to the current RD 22.

 

 

HR0443- 20 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1The district contains the majority of Chicago's Garfield
2Ridge, all of Clearing, Chrysler Village, and West Elsdon
3neighborhoods, and smaller portions of the West Lawn and
4Archer Heights neighborhoods, along with suburban Burbank. The
5district includes the entirety of Chicago's 13th Ward, and
6portions of Wards 14, 18, and 23. This proposed district
7includes Midway Airport, which many witnesses described as the
8central hub of a community of interest. Witnesses cited the
9area's shared interest in soundproofing and the economic
10development surrounding the airport.
11    The total population of RD 22 is 108,518. The voting age
12population is 1.92% African American, 1.55% Asian, 62.79%
13Hispanic.
14    Representative District 23, which is current RD 21, was
15underpopulated by 6,417 people compared to target population.
16The configuration of RD 23 as enacted in Public Act 102-10
17contained 109,696 people according to the 2020 Census. This
18was overpopulated by 1,115 people. Changes in neighboring
19districts. The district is renumbered and paired with a
20different Legislative District for purposes of maintaining
21communities of interest and the political power of the region.
22As amended, the district is substantially the same as the
23current RD 21, maintaining the core of the district. Proposed
24RD 21 is more compact than current RD 23. Boundaries of
25neighborhoods have shifted over the past 10 years, and the new
26lines reflect those shifting patterns. Plus, the district more

 

 

HR0443- 21 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1accurately reflects the socioeconomic and political priorities
2of the community, including a significant Democratic
3progressive population. The "26th Street Corridor", a
4lucrative economic entity, is in the district to benefit the
5surrounding community in District 23. At the request of
6community groups, the proposed district includes the entirety
7of the population of Little Village, which was previously
8split into multiple districts, to respect a significant
9community of interest. The demographics of the district
10continue to be largely Latino with varying ethnic groups and
11migration patterns accounted for in the composition, including
12the movement in the Mexican American community from Chicago's
13Pilsen community to Cicero. The total population of RD 23 is
14108,507. The voting age population is 7.05% African American,
153.33% Asian, 84.44% Hispanic.
16    Representative District 24, which is the current RD 2,
17lost over 1,000 in population. The configuration of RD 24 as
18enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 107,419 people
19according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated by 1,162
20people. Changes to district are due in large part to
21population shifts in this and neighboring districts. The
22district is entirely within the City of Chicago and includes
23most of the population of current RD 2, plus portions of
24current RDs 6, 9, and 21. The core of the proposed RD 24 is
25substantially similar to the current RD 2. Like the current
26district, RD 24 unites Chinatown, and includes more of the

 

 

HR0443- 22 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1surrounding areas that coalesce around the Chinatown
2community. The district contains communities of interest
3connected to Chinatown, including Coalition For A Better
4Chinese American Community (CBCAC) and the Chicago Chinatown
5Chamber of Commerce. The district is renumbered and paired
6with a different Legislative District for purposes of
7maintaining communities of interest and the political power of
8the region.
9    The total population of RD 24 is 108,608. The voting age
10population is 3.49% African American, 26.93% Asian, 48.50%
11Hispanic.
12    Chicago Northern Shore: Representative Districts 11, 12,
1313, and 14 represent the northern shore of the City of Chicago.
14These districts experienced significant population gain. As a
15result each of these districts were altered to reflect
16increases in population, changes to neighboring districts, and
17preservation of communities of interest. These districts
18traditionally elect members of the Democratic party, and
19partisan advantage was considered. The changes to these
20districts also make the districts more compact.
21    The configuration of Representative District 11 as enacted
22in 2011 contained 119,492 people according to the 2020 Census.
23This was overpopulated by 10,911 people compared to target
24population. The configuration of RD 11 as enacted in Public
25Act 102-10 contained 108,644 people according to the 2020
26Census. This was overpopulated by 63 people. As amended, the

 

 

HR0443- 23 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1district is substantially the same as the current RD 11,
2maintaining the core of the district and a majority of the
3current district's population. The district includes
4Ravenswood Gardens, unites large portions of Lake View, and
5keeps most of Roscoe Village. In following population
6migration district now includes parts of Wrigleyville, which
7is an important economic driver for the area in tourism and
8entertainment.
9    The total population of RD 11 is 108,793. The voting age
10population is 3.51% African American, 6.99% Asian, 9.43%
11Hispanic.
12    The configuration of Representative District 12 as enacted
13in 2011 contained 118,591 people according to the 2020 Census.
14This was overpopulated by 10,010 people compared to target
15population. The configuration of RD 12 as enacted in Public
16Act 102-10 contained 111,326 people according to the 2020
17Census. This was overpopulated by 2,745 people. As amended,
18the district is substantially the same as the current RD 12,
19maintaining a majority of the district and preserving its
20core. The proposed district includes the vast majority of
21Boystown, Lakeview East, and Park West neighborhoods along
22with large parts of Lincoln Park and Near Northside.
23    The total population of RD 12 is 108,656. The voting age
24population is 4.62% African American, 8.23% Asian, 6.45%
25Hispanic.
26    The configuration of Representative District 13 as enacted

 

 

HR0443- 24 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1in 2011 contained 110,128 people according to the 2020 Census.
2This was overpopulated by 1,547 people compared to target
3population. The configuration of RD 13 as enacted in Public
4Act 102-10 contained 103,708 people according to the 2020
5Census. This was underpopulated by 4,873 people. As amended,
6the district is substantially the same as the current RD 13,
7maintaining a majority of the current population of RD 13 as
8well as the core of the current district. Proposed RD 13 is
9made up of the neighborhoods Uptown, Sheridan Park, Winnemac,
10Ravenswood, Arcadia Terrace, Wolcott Gardens, West Edgewater,
11and Lincoln Square keeping these communities unified.
12    The total population of RD 13 is 108,814. The voting age
13population is 10.91% African American, 10.26% Asian, 14.24%
14Hispanic.
15    The configuration of Representative District 14 as enacted
16in 2011 contained 110,058 people according to the 2020 Census.
17This was overpopulated by 1,477 people compared to target
18population. The configuration of RD 14 as enacted in Public
19Act 102-10 contained 107,823 people according to the 2020
20Census. This was underpopulated by 758 people. As amended, the
21district is substantially the same as the current RD 14,
22maintaining the core of the district and the majority of its
23current population. In addition to preserving many of the
24communities of interest, the proposed district brings together
25communities of interest by keeping together the vast majority
26of Rogers Park and Edgwater.

 

 

HR0443- 25 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    The total population of RD 14 is 108,411. The voting age
2population is 18.53% African American, 10.23% Asian, 16.96%
3Hispanic.
4    Northside: Representative Districts 3, 4, 19, 20, 39, and
540 represent the northern parts of the City of Chicago, with
6some parts of neighboring suburbs. These districts experienced
7significant population shifts, arguably due to increasing
8gentrification of the area, and as a result the districts are
9altered to reflect the population and changes in neighboring
10districts. The shifting demographics of the area significantly
11impact these districts, and attempts have been made to
12maintain the communities of interest currently served by the
13districts. This area contains various cultural, racial, and
14ethnic communities of interest, and the districts were drafted
15with the goal of preserving as many of these communities of
16interest as possible. The current districts' cores are
17preserved, but the population shifts and migration patterns of
18the population result in changes to the borders of the
19district. The proposed districts follow the redistricting
20principles and all share commonalities, including a population
21that traditionally elects members of the Democratic party.
22    The configuration of Representative District 3 as enacted
23in 2011 contained 108,018 people according to the 2020 Census.
24This was underpopulated by 563 people compared to target
25population. The configuration of RD 3 as enacted in Public Act
26102-10 contained 105,132 people according to the 2020 Census.

 

 

HR0443- 26 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1This was underpopulated by 3,449 people. The majority of the
2proposed RD 3 is similar to the current RD 3. The district is
3majority Latino, but that was not the primary consideration
4when drawing the district. The incumbent preservation and the
5residence of the incumbent was a factor in adjustments to this
6district, as well as the ability to increase the partisan
7advantage.
8    The total population of RD 3 is 108,636. The voting age
9population is 4.01% African American, 3.98% Asian, 54.13%
10Hispanic.
11    The configuration of Representative District 4 as enacted
12in 2011 contained 107,602 people according to the 2020 Census.
13This was underpopulated by 979 people compared to target
14population. The configuration of RD 4 as enacted in Public Act
15102-10 contained 109,899 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was overpopulated by 1,318 people. The majority of the
17proposed RD 4 is within the current RD 4. As requested during
18testimony before the House Redistricting Committee, the
19district maintains a majority of Chicago Grand Neighbors
20Association boundaries, and the boundaries of Talacott and
21Wolcott school boundaries. Important to the area and the
22incumbent, the district maintains the corridor along Division
23Street from Western to Kostner, which is the historical,
24cultural and economic center of the Puerto Rican community. At
25the request of witnesses attending House hearings, the
26district aligns more of the Puerto Rican community to maximize

 

 

HR0443- 27 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1their political power. The district is majority Latino, but
2that was not the primary consideration when drawing the
3district. At a public hearing it was stated that the proposed
4district follows the migration patterns of the Puerto Rican
5community. The residence of the incumbent was a factor in
6adjustments to this district, as well as the ability to
7increase the partisan advantage.
8    The total population of RD 4 is 108,533. The voting age
9population is 11.99% African American, 2.66% Asian, 52.65%
10Hispanic.
11    The configuration of Representative District 19 as enacted
12in 2011 contained 111,140 people according to the 2020 Census.
13This was overpopulated by 2,559 people compared to target
14population. The configuration of RD 19 as enacted in Public
15Act 102-10 contained 106,275 people according to the 2020
16Census. This was underpopulated by 2,306 people. As amended,
17the district is substantially the same as the current RD 19,
18maintaining the core of the district and its population, with
19alterations to accommodate the growth of the region and
20population changes in other nearby districts. The district is
21more compact and fractures fewer townships and neighborhoods
22when compared to the current district. The district contains
23parts or all of several of Chicago's northwest side
24neighborhoods, including Jefferson Park, Dunning, Portage
25Park, and Albany Park. The reconfigured district brings large
26segments of Old Irving Park into the district to connect it

 

 

HR0443- 28 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1with neighboring community areas.
2    The total population of RD 19 is 108,549. The voting age
3population is 2.26% African American, 8.36% Asian, 27.32%
4Hispanic.
5    The configuration of Representative District 20 as enacted
6in 2011 contained 112,289 people according to the 2020 Census.
7This was overpopulated by 3,708 people compared to target
8population. The configuration of RD 20 as enacted in Public
9Act 102-10 contained 111,497 people according to the 2020
10Census. This was overpopulated by 2,916 people. As amended,
11the district is substantially the same as the current RD 20,
12maintaining the core of the district and most of its current
13population. The district includes the 29th, 38th and 41st
14wards of the City of Chicago, all of Schiller Park and
15Norridge, most of Rosemont, and portions of River Grove, and
16Harwood Heights. The proposed district unites most of
17Rosemont, which allows a partisan advantage to other
18neighboring districts, and moves the casino located in Des
19Plaines to a district that includes a majority of Des Plaines
20(RD 55).
21    The total population of RD 20 is 108,620. The voting age
22population is 1.09% African American, 5.02% Asian, 19.02%
23Hispanic.
24    The configuration of Representative District 39 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 105,519 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was underpopulated by 3,062 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 29 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 39 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 109,336 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was overpopulated by 755 people. As amended, the
4district is substantially the same as the current RD 39,
5maintaining the core of the district and its population, and
6includes significant portions of Portage Park, Belmont Cragin,
7Hermosa, Avondale, and Logan Square. It also maintains the
8vibrant business district along Milwaukee Avenue and unites it
9with another growing business district on Elston in RD 40
10utilized by the constituents of the proposed RD 39.
11    The total population of RD 39 is 108,434. The voting age
12population is 3.20% African American, 4.06% Asian, 51.61%
13Hispanic.
14    The configuration of Representative District 40 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 103,081 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was underpopulated by 5,500 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 40 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 102,621 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was underpopulated by 5,960 people. As amended,
20the district is substantially the same as the current RD 40,
21maintaining the core of the district and most of its
22population. The district includes communities in the Lincoln
23Park, Logan Square, North Center, Avondale, Irving Park, and
24Albany Park community areas of Chicago. It also preserves most
25of the Albany Park neighborhood, which has one of the highest
26foreign-born populations in the city and is the third most

 

 

HR0443- 30 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1diverse zip code in the country with more than languages
2spoken in the area's public schools. Many parts of this
3district have also experienced significant gentrification over
4the past decade. This area has experienced significant
5gentrification and demographic changes over the past decade.
6Residents are from regions of Central America, South America,
7Eastern Europe, India, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Asia.
8Albany Park residents with roots in Korea and other parts of
9Asia have shared cultural and social similarities and
10contributed to the redevelopment of Lawrence Avenue into a
11commercial corridor. This community of interest along Lawrence
12Avenue within the Albany Park neighborhood has been preserved.
13    The total population of RD 40 is 108,660. The voting age
14population is 4.00% African American, 9.54% Asian, 42.76%
15Hispanic.
16    Chicago West Side and West Suburbs: The districts located
17in Chicago's west side and western suburbs share many
18commonalities, including an overall loss of population. The
199th and 10th Representative Districts were affected by large
20population growth in the Chicago Loop area -- growth that
21exceeded the estimates of the American Community Survey and
22necessitated reconfiguration. Population migration patterns
23and gentrification in many parts of the west side have
24contributed to changes in the region. As a result, the current
25districts have been altered for population and considerations
26of communities of interest, politics, incumbent protection,

 

 

HR0443- 31 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1and maintaining minority opportunities to elect candidates of
2their choice.
3    The configuration of Representative District 7 as enacted
4in 2011 contained 109,744 people according to the 2020 Census.
5This was underpopulated by 1,163 people compared to ideal
6population. The configuration of RD 7 as enacted in Public Act
7102-10 contained 108,285 people according to the 2020 Census.
8This was underpopulated by 296 people. The current district is
9entirely within the Cook County suburbs, but to accommodate
10the population shifts and neighboring districts, the proposed
11district retains the core of the current district and adds a
12new population from DuPage County. The district contains all
13or parts of the following municipalities: Melrose Park,
14Maywood, Forest Park, River Forest, Broadview, Bellwood,
15Hillside, Berkeley, Northlake, Elmhurst, Oak Brook,
16Westchester, La Grange Park, and Western Springs. The
17communities have much in common, namely that nearly every
18community consists primarily of owner-occupied single-family
19homes.
20    Like the current district, no single minority group
21represents a majority of the voting age population, but
22collectively the district has a majority minority population.
23    The total population of RD 7 is 108,592. The voting age
24population is 42.33% African American, 3.21% Asian, 22.49%
25Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
26races, the voting age population is 44.05% African American.

 

 

HR0443- 32 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    The configuration of Representative District 8 as enacted
2in 2011 contained 109,504 people according to the 2020 Census.
3This was overpopulated by 923 people compared to target
4population. The configuration of RD 8 as enacted in Public Act
5102-10 contained 110,811 people according to the 2020 Census.
6This was overpopulated by 2,230 people. RD 8 contains the
7majority of the current district and contains portions of
8Chicago, Oak Park, Cicero, Berwyn, Forest Park, North
9Riverside, Broadview, La Grange Park, La Grange, Western
10Springs, Indian Head Park, Countryside, and Hodgkins. To
11accommodate for the population gain and neighboring population
12loss, Brookfield is moved into another district and RD 8 adds
13population from other communities that are parts of the
14townships currently included in RD 8. The changes keep
15together more of the population encompassed by local high
16school districts.
17    The total population of RD 8 is 108,552. The voting age
18population is 49.51% African American, 1.36% Asian, 15.11%
19Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
20races, the voting age population is 51.26% African American.
21    The configuration of Representative District 9 as enacted
22in 2011 contained 120,173 people according to the 2020 Census.
23The configuration of RD 9 as enacted in Public Act 102-10
24contained 114,253 people according to the 2020 Census, which
25is 5,672 above the target population. To bring the district
26closer to target population, the boundaries as enacted in

 

 

HR0443- 33 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Public Act 102-10 were changed by receding in northern parts
2of the district and shifting boundaries with RD 10 to
3accommodate regional changes.
4    The proposed RD 9 retains the core of the current
5population. The district is located entirely within Chicago
6and includes Sheffield Neighbors, Ranch Triangle, Goose
7Island, River West, Fulton River District, West Loop,
8Greektown, Little Italy, Illinois Medical District, Tri
9Taylor, Douglas Park, North Lawndale, and Homan Square. The
10area has undergone tremendous changes over the past decade,
11arguably due to gentrification and population shifts. The
12district was drawn to maintain as much of the core as possible,
13including retaining North Lawndale and the Illinois Medical
14District, one of the largest medical districts in the United
15States with the John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Rush
16University Medical Center, University of Illinois College of
17Medicine, and the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center.
18    The total population of RD 9 is 108,687. The voting age
19population is 40.54% African American, 12.81% Asian, 9.32%
20Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
21members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
22identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
2342.30% African American.
24    The House Redistricting Committee received testimony from
25multiple witnesses requesting that RD 9 be drawn to be over 50%
26African American voting age population while maintaining the

 

 

HR0443- 34 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1core of the district. Such a configuration could require
2significantly under populating the district. Alternatively,
3this would require African American population from other
4nearby districts, such as RDs 8 and 78, to be integrated into
5RD 9, reducing the opportunity of African-American voters of
6those districts to elect the candidate of their choice and the
7political compositions of those and other districts. Such
8reconfiguration would also result in multiple Chicago
9districts breaking the border with DuPage County. Although the
10district does not contain a majority African American voting
11age population, the district remains one in which African
12American voters have an equal opportunity to elect a candidate
13of their choice.
14    The configuration of Representative District 10 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 114,021 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was overpopulated by 5,440 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 10 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 116,532 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was over/underpopulated by 7,951 people. As
20amended, the district is substantially the same as the current
21RD 10, maintaining the core of the district as well as the
22majority of its population. The district is located entirely
23within Chicago and includes Bucktown, Wicker Park, Sheffield
24Neighbors, Ranch Triangle, Pulaski Park, Noble Square, West
25Town, West Jackson Boulevard District, Garfield Park, and
26Fifth City. The proposed district takes a portion of the 27th

 

 

HR0443- 35 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Ward from RD 9 and moves it into RD 10 to consolidate more of
2the ward. The area has undergone tremendous changes over the
3past decade, arguably due to gentrification and population
4shifts.
5    The total population of RD 10 is 108,647. The voting age
6population is 38.96% African American, 4.86% Asian, 11.41%
7Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
8races, the voting age population is 40.77% African American.
9    As with RD 9, the House Redistricting Committee received
10testimony advocating for RD 10 to be drawn to have a majority
11African American voting age population. Such a configuration
12would require significantly underpopulating the district or
13incorporating African American population from other nearby
14districts, such as RDs 8, 9, and 78, threatening the
15opportunity of African American voters of those districts to
16elect the candidate of their choice and the political
17compositions of those and other districts. Although the
18district does not contain a majority African American voting
19age population, the district has a majority minority voting
20age population and a plurality of African Americans. The
21African American population is likely large enough to be able
22to elect a candidate of their choice.
23    The configuration of Representative District 77 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 106,369 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was underpopulated by 2,212 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 77 as enacted in Public

 

 

HR0443- 36 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Act 102-10 contained 108,809 people according to the 2020
2Census. This was overpopulated by 228 people. As amended, the
3district is substantially the same as the current RD 77,
4maintaining the core of the district and most of its
5population. The district contains parts of Bensenville, Stone
6Park, and Addison, plus the majority of Northlake, Franklin
7Park and Melrose Park. RD 77 includes the geographic footprint
8of O'Hare Airport, and the communities within the district are
9tied economically to O'Hare Airport and the extensive network
10of freight train lines and roadways that run through the area.
11    The total population of RD 77 is 108,704. The voting age
12population is 3.05% African American, 3.51% Asian, 52.73%
13Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
14races, the voting age population is 3.99% African American.
15    The configuration of Representative District 78 as enacted
16in 2011 contained 110,394 people according to the 2020 Census.
17This was overpopulated by 1,813 people compared to target
18population. The configuration of RD 78 as enacted in Public
19Act 102-10 contained 114,451 people according to the 2020
20Census. This was overpopulated by 5,870 people. The core of
21the district remains the west side of Chicago in the Austin
22neighborhood and west suburban communities of Oak Park,
23Elmwood Park, and River Grove. As amended, the district is
24substantially the same as the current RD 78, maintaining the
25core of the district and its population. The major change is
26that a majority of Oak Park is united with a majority of River

 

 

HR0443- 37 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Forest. Unifying the majority of Oak Park and River Forest
2preserves High School District (HSD) 209, the main high school
3district that serves this area. The western end of the
4district extends to pick up Triton Community College. This is
5an important connection, as many students from HSD 209
6continue their education at Triton Community College, creating
7a unified education community in one Representative District.
8There are several small cultural institutions, such as
9museums, that remain in one district.
10    The total population of RD 78 is 108,415. The voting age
11population is 30.75% African American, 4.38% Asian, 14.76%
12Hispanic.
13    Chicago South Side and South Suburbs: The districts in
14Chicago's South Side and south suburbs sustained some of the
15heaviest population loss in northern Illinois. While Chicago's
16population overall remained steady over a ten-year period,
17significant growth in the Loop and north shore areas mask
18population loss on the south side. An overall population loss
19in Cook County was also largely concentrated in the
20southlands.
21    The configuration of Representative District 27 as enacted
22in 2011 contained 103,321 people according to the 2020 Census.
23This was underpopulated by 5,260 people compared to target
24population. The configuration of RD 27 as enacted in Public
25Act 102-10 contained 107,878 people according to the 2020
26Census. This was underpopulated by 703 people, with changes to

 

 

HR0443- 38 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1accommodate population shifts in the district and neighboring
2districts. RD 27 consists of portions of Chicago's Roseland,
3Morgan Park, and Washington Heights neighborhoods, along with
4Blue Island, Alsip, Crestwood, Oak Forest, Orland Park, Tinley
5Park, Homer Glen, and Orland Hills. RD 27 also goes slightly
6into Will County in areas similar to the bordering communities
7in Cook County.
8    The total population of RD 27 is 108,605. The voting age
9population is 51.82% African American, 1.82% Asian, 6.49%
10Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
11members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
12identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1353.35% African American.
14    The configuration of Representative District 28 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 99,681 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was underpopulated by 8,900 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 28 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 103,205 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was underpopulated by 5,376 people. As amended,
20the district is substantially the same as the current RD 28,
21maintaining the core of its district and most of its
22population. To compensate for the population loss, the
23district moves further into suburban Cook County. The district
24includes a portion of Chicago and portions of Calumet Park,
25Riverdale, Blue Island, part of Posen, Robbins, Crestwood, Oak
26Forest, and Tinley Park.

 

 

HR0443- 39 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    The total population of RD 28 is 108,557. The voting age
2population is 45.40% African American, 1.66% Asian, 15.49%
3Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
4members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
5identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
646.75% African American.
7    The configuration of Representative District 29 as enacted
8in 2011 contained 106,665 people according to the 2020 Census.
9This was underpopulated by 1,916 people compared to target
10population. The configuration of RD 29 as enacted in Public
11Act 102-10 contained 106,616 people according to the 2020
12Census. This was underpopulated by 1,965 people. As amended,
13the district is substantially the same as the current RD 29,
14maintaining the core of the district and most of its
15population. The proposed RD 29 encompasses regions of Cook,
16Will, and Kankakee counties, and municipalities including the
17City of Chicago, Dolton, Calumet City, South Holland,
18Thornton, Glenwood, Ford Heights, Sauk Village, Steger, Crete,
19Beecher, Peotone, Manteno, and Bradley. Transportation
20arteries include proximity to I-57, I-80, I-94, I-294, and
21Route 394. Communities within the Will and Kankakee portions
22of proposed RD 29 are more suburban and exurban than rural, and
23several communities in the Will County portion are part of the
24Southland region of Illinois that share economic interests
25with southern Cook County. There are many communities of
26interest throughout this district, including schools that

 

 

HR0443- 40 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1often compete against each other in athletics. As proposed,
2the district is relatively homogenous in that it is largely
3composed of middle-class working families which is consistent
4with current RD 29.
5    The total population of RD 29 is 108,520. The voting age
6population is 57.12% African American, 0.47% Asian, 6.12%
7Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
8races, the voting age population is 58.85% African American.
9    The configuration of Representative District 30 as enacted
10in 2011 contained 98,006 people according to the 2020 Census.
11This was underpopulated by 10,575 people compared to target
12population. The configuration of RD 30 as enacted in Public
13Act 102-10 contained 101,719 people according to the 2020
14Census. This was underpopulated by 6,862 people. RD 30 retains
15incumbent relationships for continuity of representation by
16continuing to include all or parts of the municipalities of
17Harvey, Dixmoor, Midlothian, Oak Forest, Markham, Olympia
18Fields, Phoenix, Dolton, Hazel Crest, East Hazel Crest,
19Homewood, and Flossmoor. These communities are part of the
20Southland region of the Chicago suburbs, which share similar
21economic interests. The majority of the current RD 30 is
22contained within the proposed RD 30, keeping the core of the
23district intact.
24    The total population of RD 30 is 108,525. The voting age
25population is 51.17% African American, 1.78% Asian, 15.74%
26Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple

 

 

HR0443- 41 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1races, the voting age population is 53.25% African American.
2    The configuration of Representative District 31 as enacted
3in 2011 contained 105,926 people according to the 2020 Census.
4This was underpopulated by 2,655 people compared to target
5population. The configuration of RD 31 as enacted in Public
6Act 102-10 contained 109,821 people according to the 2020
7Census. This was overpopulated by 1,240 people. The proposed
8district maintains the core of the current district and keeps
9similar communities of interest intact, while recognizing
10popular migration patterns. The district includes a portion of
11Chicago's Auburn Gresham, Beverly View, Wrightwood, and
12Ashburn neighborhoods, as well as the suburbs of Hometown, Oak
13Lawn, Chicago Ridge, Bridgeview, Palos Hills, Hickory Hills,
14and Justice. The total population of RD 31 is 108,638. The
15voting age population is 51.92% African American, 1.12% Asian,
1611.23% Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
17members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
18identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1953.50% African American.
20    The configuration of Representative District 32 as enacted
21in 2011 contained 105,728 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was underpopulated by 2,853 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 32 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 108,187 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was underpopulated by 394 people. The proposed
26district maintains the core of the current district and

 

 

HR0443- 42 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1extends west to gain population, while recognizing the needs
2of other neighboring districts. The district includes portions
3of Chicago's Greater Grand Crossing, Englewood, West
4Englewood, Marquette Park, Chicago Lawn Ashburn, and
5Scottsdale neighborhoods, suburbs of Burbank, Bridgeview, and
6Hickory Hills, and a small part of Justice. The boundaries of
7proposed RD 32 reflect the competing goals of preserving the
8existing district balanced against the need to obtain more
9population to reach the equal population target. It also
10maintains the core of the existing RD 32 to preserve
11continuity of representation.
12    The total population of RD 32 is 108,536. The voting age
13population is 50.46% African American, 0.93% Asian, 31.17%
14Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
15races, the voting age population is 52.22% African American.
16    The configuration of Representative District 33 as enacted
17in 2011 contained 106,236 people according to the 2020 Census.
18This was underpopulated by 2,345 people compared to target
19population. The configuration of RD 33 as enacted in Public
20Act 102-10 contained 107,444 people according to the 2020
21Census. This was underpopulated by 1,137 people, with
22adjustments made for population in the district and
23neighboring districts. Proposed RD 33 comprises parts of
24Chicago, Burnham, Calumet City, Lansing, and Lynwood. The
25district connects the more urban suburbs of Cook County with
26the parts of Chicago that share common interests. Proposed RD

 

 

HR0443- 43 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

133 is home to many employees who work in Chicago and Cook
2County and connects areas with similar median incomes and
3economic interests according to the Census Bureau.
4    The total population of RD 33 is 108,624. The voting age
5population is 62.35% African American, 0.35% Asian, 20.83%
6Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple
7races, the voting age population is 64.65% African American.
8    The configuration of Representative District 34 as enacted
9in 2011 contained 105,993 people according to the 2020 Census.
10This was underpopulated by 2,588 people compared to target
11population. The configuration of RD 34 as enacted in Public
12Act 102-10 contained 106,970 people according to the 2020
13Census. This was underpopulated by 1,611 people. The proposed
14district retains the core of the district while making
15adjustments for population in the district and neighboring
16districts and reducing split communities in the current
17district. Proposed RD 34 keeps most of the current district
18intact, with the southern border now going to the Kankakee
19County Line and part of the Southwestern border along the
20Kankakee River. To reduce the number of split communities, the
21majority of Sauk Village is now in one district, and many other
22municipalities in Kankakee County that are split in the
23current districts are consolidated into one district.
24    The total population of RD 34 is 108,429. The voting age
25population is 66.87% African American, 0.29% Asian, 8.58%
26Hispanic. Including individuals who identify as multiple

 

 

HR0443- 44 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1races, the voting age population is 69.16% African American.
2    The configuration of Representative District 35 as enacted
3in 2011 contained 108,853 people according to the 2020 Census.
4This was overpopulated by 272 people compared to target
5population. The configuration of RD 35 as enacted in Public
6Act 102-10 contained 107,085 people according to the 2020
7Census. This was underpopulated by 1,496 people. To
8accommodate the population changes and shifts in other
9districts in the region, the proposed district reduces
10population in the northern portion and picks up population
11near the southern and western borders. A majority of the
12current district's population resides in the proposed
13district. The proposed district contains portions of Chicago,
14Merrionette Park, Alsip, Worth, Palos Heights, Palos Park, and
15Orland Park. This splits fewer communities than the current RD
1635. The communities within proposed RD 35 are united by common
17socioeconomic characteristics, with the majority of residents
18being single-family homeowners who move into these communities
19to take advantage of their housing values, quality schools,
20and low crime rates. Many of the residents of the suburban
21townships have either moved from Chicago themselves or are the
22children of former Chicago residents. The eastern portion of
23the district in Beverly and Morgan Park is racially diverse
24and the far eastern portion in Washington Heights is largely
25African-American. These communities are economically similar
26to other portions of the proposed RD 35. Additionally,

 

 

HR0443- 45 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1religious communities are kept together in proposed RD 35 to
2the east and the suburban portion to the west.
3    The total population of RD 35 is 108,568. The voting age
4population is 21.04% African American, 1.88% Asian, 8.67%
5Hispanic.
6    The configuration of Representative District 36 as enacted
7in 2011 contained 109,801 people according to the 2020 Census.
8This was overpopulated by 1,220 people compared to target
9population. The configuration of RD 36 as enacted in Public
10Act 102-10 contained 110,606 people according to the 2020
11Census. This was overpopulated by 2,025 people. The proposed
12district is nearly identical to the current district and
13maintains the core of the district as well as the majority of
14its population. Proposed RD 36 contains the same areas as the
15current district, including portions of Chicago's Ashburn,
16Beverly, and Mount Greenwood communities, all of Evergreen
17Park, the majority of Oak Lawn, Chicago Ridge, and Palos Hills
18as well as portions of Worth, Palos Heights, Palos Hills,
19Palos Park, and Willow Springs. The district is largely
20similar socioeconomically, with a high percentage of
21single-family owner-occupied homes and middle-class incomes.
22    The total population of RD 36 is 108,750. The voting age
23population is 13.16% African American, 2.26% Asian, 14.12%
24Hispanic.
25    The configuration of Representative District 37 as enacted
26in 2011 contained 112,743 people according to the 2020 Census.

 

 

HR0443- 46 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1This was overpopulated by 4,162 people compared to target
2population. The configuration of RD 37 as enacted in Public
3Act 102-10 contained 109,448 people according to the 2020
4Census. This was overpopulated by 867 people. The district
5includes portions of Cook and Will counties, and the proposed
6district contains the same municipalities as the current
7district, which includes Frankfort, Homer Glen, Joliet,
8Lockport, Mokena, New Lenox, Orland Hills, Orland Park, and
9Tinley Park. The proposed district retains a majority of the
10current population. Proposed RD 37, like the current RD 37, is
11economically homogeneous, with median annual incomes above
12$80,000 and ranging to over $100,000. This district
13consolidates more of Homer Glen and Lockport than current
14districts.
15    The total population of RD 37 is 108,575. The voting age
16population is 2.01% African American, 2.56% Asian, 6.40%
17Hispanic.
18    The configuration of Representative District 38 as enacted
19in 2011 contained 106,439 people according to the 2020 Census.
20This was underpopulated by 2,142 people compared to target
21population. The configuration of RD 38 as enacted in Public
22Act 102-10 contained 106,369 people according to the 2020
23Census. This was underpopulated by 2,212 people. and
24adjustments to the district were made to assist neighboring
25districts with population and increase the political
26competitiveness of the region. The core of the district

 

 

HR0443- 47 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1remains the same as the current RD 38. The proposed district
2retains a majority of the current population. The district
3contains communities Frankfort, Matteson, Olympia Fields,
4Country Club Hills, Tinley Park, Richton Park, and Mokena.
5According to the Census Bureau these communities have similar
6economic characteristics with a high percentage of home
7ownership and owner-occupied housing.
8    The total population of RD 38 is 108,601. The voting age
9population is 47.04% African American, 2.16% Asian, 5.82%
10Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
11members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
12identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1348.67% African American.
14    The configuration of Representative District 79 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 102,732 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was underpopulated by 5,849 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 79 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 105,113 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was underpopulated by 3,468 people. The proposed
20district contains a majority of the current population. It
21includes the municipalities of Park Forest, Crete, University
22Park, Monee, Andres, Manteno, Bourbonnais, Bradley, Limestone,
23Kankakee, Bonfield, Irwin, Herscher, Sammons Point, Chebanse,
24Union Hill, Essex, Reddick, Cabrey, Braceville, Coal City,
25Godley, and Diamond. RD 79 contains four different counties -
26Cook, Will, Kankakee, and Grundy. The communities share

 

 

HR0443- 48 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1economic interests, many commuting into the city for work and
2making median household incomes ranging from $37,894 to
3$74,755 per year. This district was drawn to make the seat more
4competitive.
5    The total population of RD 79 is 108,475. The voting age
6population is 24.05% African American, 1.09% Asian, 8.81%
7Hispanic.
8    The configuration of Representative District 80 as enacted
9in 2011 contained 111,343 people according to the 2020 Census.
10This was overpopulated by 2,762 people compared to target
11population. The configuration of RD 80 as enacted in Public
12Act 102-10 contained 108,265 people according to the 2020
13Census. This was underpopulated by 316 people. The proposed
14district retains a majority of the current population. The
15district is located in Cook and Will counties, and includes
16the municipalities of Chicago Heights, South Chicago Heights,
17Steger, Park Forest, Crete, New Lenox, Frankfort, Manhattan,
18Wilton, Symerton, and Wilmington. The district maintains
19numerous communities of interest and connects towns that share
20services, employers, and school districts.
21    The total population of RD 80 is 108,843. The voting age
22population is 26.43% African American, 0.74% Asian, 15.37%
23Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
24members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
25identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
2627.94% African American.

 

 

HR0443- 49 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    Northern Cook Suburbs and Lake County: Representative 26
2Districts 15, 16, 17, 18, 51, 52, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, and 64
3represent various parts of northern Cook, Lake, and McHenry
4counties. These districts sustained various changes in
5population. These districts were drawn to address population
6issues, maintain the cores of districts, and take into account
7political considerations.
8    The configuration of Representative District 15 as enacted
9in 2011 contained 111,166 people according to the 2020 Census.
10This was overpopulated by 2,585 people compared to target
11population. The configuration of RD 15 as enacted in Public
12Act 102-10 contained 109,721 people according to the 2020
13Census. This was overpopulated by 1,140 people. The proposed
14district retains the majority of the current population and
15core, preserving continuity of representation. The district
16includes portions of Chicago's Forest Glen, North Park, Irving
17Park, and Albany Park neighborhoods; the municipalities of
18Morton Grove, and Niles. The current district retains many
19portions of the current district, but to assist with
20population and compactness, the proposed district consolidates
21more of Niles, and the city of Glenview is removed from RD 15
22and consolidated in RDs 17 and 18.
23    The total population of RD 15 is 108,709. The voting age
24population is 2.42% African American, 22.06% Asian, 14.48%
25Hispanic.
26    The configuration of Representative District 16 as enacted

 

 

HR0443- 50 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1in 2011 contained 115,955 people according to the 2020 Census.
2This was overpopulated by 7,374 people compared to target
3population. The configuration of RD 16 as enacted in Public
4Act 102-10 contained 109,891 people according to the 2020
5Census. This was overpopulated by 1,310 people. The proposed
6district retains a majority of the current population. The
7core of the district remains in Skokie and Lincolnwood, with a
8portion of Chicago. These communities share similar racial,
9ethnic, and religious demographics. At the request of
10community members, the district will ensure more of the
11Orthodox Jewish community is kept together to maximize the
12political power of and maintain the community of interest. The
13reconfigured district consolidates more of Skokie and
14Lincolnwood. Additionally, the 50th Ward element of RD 16
15contains an Orthodox Jewish identified in testimony before the
16House Redistricting Committee. Uniting all areas of the
17Orthodox community in one House district could not be done
18without fracturing the district's existing core of Skokie or
19Lincolnwood, or fracturing the district's significant Indian
20and Pakistani community.
21    The total population of RD 16 is 108,819. The voting age
22population is 8.94% African American, 28.27% Asian, 14.43%
23Hispanic.
24    The configuration of Representative District 17 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 114,448 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was overpopulated by 5,867 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 51 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 17 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 112,775 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was overpopulated by 4,194 people. The district
4includes portions of Glenview, Northbrook, Wilmette, Skokie,
5Golf, and Evanston. A majority of the current district's
6population remains in the proposed district. The existing
7southeastern boundary remains largely unchanged except a few
8blocks of Skokie were exchanged for population reasons to
9ensure that the Orthodox Jewish community was more
10consolidated. At the request of community members, the
11proposed district consolidates a majority of Glenview School
12District, which was previously located in multiple districts.
13    The total population of RD 17 is 108,474. The voting age
14population is 3.70% African American, 19.87% Asian, 6.67%
15Hispanic.
16    The configuration of Representative District 18 as enacted
17in 2011 contained 114,382 people according to the 2020 Census.
18This was overpopulated by 5,801 people compared to target
19population. The configuration of RD 18 as enacted in Public
20Act 102-10 contained 112,497 people according to the 2020
21Census. This was overpopulated by 3,916 people. The proposed
22district retains the majority of the current population.
23Proposed RD 18 includes most of Evanston, Winnetka,
24Northfield, and Kenilworth, and a small part of Wilmette. At
25the request of Evanston elected officials, Evanston is located
26entirely within one Legislative District and now sits within

 

 

HR0443- 52 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1RD 17 and The proposed district unites two densely populated
2wards that are historically home to a large African American
3population to maximize political power and increase the
4partisan advantage for the incumbent. This district links high
5income communities with similar interest areas.
6    The southern end of the district extends down toward the
750th Ward of Chicago to bring RD 18 up to equal population
8while also preserving important communities of interest within
9RD 16. This change preserves the majority of an Orthodox
10Jewish community to the west, as described by witness
11testimony in Redistricting Committee hearings in Spring 2021,
12as well as a significant Indo-Pacific community to the south.
13    The total population of RD 18 is 108,339. The voting age
14population is 12.70% African American, 10.21% Asian, 9.15%
15Hispanic.
16    The configuration of Representative District 51 as enacted
17in 2011 contained 112,784 people according to the 2020 Census.
18This was overpopulated by 4,203 people compared to target
19population. The configuration of RD 51 as enacted in Public
20Act 102-10 contained 110,139 people according to the 2020
21Census. This was overpopulated by 1,558 people. The proposed
22RD 51 includes all or part of the communities of Inverness,
23Palatine, Deer Park, Lake Zurich, Forest Lake, Kildeer,
24Hawthorn Woods, Long Grove, Barrington, Mundelein, and
25Libertyville. Proposed RD 51 becomes more compact while
26accounting for population shifts throughout the region and

 

 

HR0443- 53 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1state.
2    The total population of RD 51 is 108,489. The voting age
3population is 1.39% African American, 13.52% Asian, 6.23%
4Hispanic.
5    The configuration of Representative District 52 as enacted
6in 2011 contained 107,599 people according to the 2020 Census.
7This was underpopulated by 982 people compared to target
8population. The configuration of RD 52 as enacted in Public
9Act 102-10 contained 109,755 people according to the 2020
10Census. This was overpopulated by 1,174 people. The proposed
11district contains a majority of the current district. It
12includes all or parts of the municipalities of Algonquin,
13Barrington, North Barrington, South Barrington, Barrington
14Hills, Lake Barrington, Tower Lakes, Volo, Island Lake, Long
15Grove, and Wauconda. The communities within the proposed
16district are largely upper middle class economically and share
17similar demographics. They share similar median home values as
18well as median income households that are largely above the
19statewide median income according to Census Bureau data.
20    The total population of RD 52 is 108,647. The voting age
21population is 1.16% African American, 7.90% Asian, 9.57%
22Hispanic.
23    The configuration of Representative District 59 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 113,498 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was overpopulated by 4,917 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 59 as enacted in Public

 

 

HR0443- 54 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Act 102-10 contained 113,036 people according to the 2020
2Census. This was overpopulated by 4,455 people. The proposed
3district includes a majority of the current district's
4population. The proposed district is mostly located in Lake
5County, with a small part of Cook County to retain a common
6area in Wheeling. The district includes the municipalities of
7Buffalo Grove, Wheeling, Lincolnshire, Indian Creek, Vernon
8Hills, Mundelein, Green Oaks, and Park City and portions of
9Libertyville and Mettawa. The proposed district remains mostly
10the same, although it brings in more of Libertyville to
11consolidate a township and keep communities of interest
12together. For example, Vernon Hills, Green Oaks, part of
13Indian Creek, part of Mettawa, and Libertyville all feed into
14Community High 26 School District 128.
15    The total population for proposed RD 59 is 108,549. It has
16a voting age population that is 2.31% African American, 20.91%
17Asian, and 18.89% Hispanic.
18    The configuration of Representative District 60 as enacted
19in 2011 contained 108,727 people according to the 2020 Census.
20This was overpopulated by 146 people compared to target
21population. The configuration of RD 60 as enacted in Public
22Act 102-10 contained 108,705 people according to the 2020
23Census. This was overpopulated by 124 people. Proposed RD 60
24contains a majority of the current RD 60. The proposed RD 60
25contains the majority of Waukegan Township and has portions of
26Shields, Libertyville, and Warren townships. The district

 

 

HR0443- 55 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1includes most of Waukegan, a large part of North Chicago, and
2portions of Wadsworth Village, Gurnee, and Park City. Beach
3Park was removed from the district to consolidate it with
4similar communities to the north in RD 61, and more of North
5Chicago was included in RD 60 to further consolidate the
6municipality.
7    The total population of RD 60 is 108,705. The voting age
8population is 18.87% African American, 4.13% Asian, 50.27%
9Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
10members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
11identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1220.79% African American.
13    The configuration of Representative District 61 as enacted
14in 2011 contained 108,434 people according to the 2020 Census.
15This was underpopulated by 147 people compared to target
16population. The configuration of RD 61 as enacted in Public
17Act 102-10 contained 109,579 people according to the 2020
18Census. This was overpopulated by 998 people. The proposed
19district contains a majority of the current district. It
20includes the municipalities of Beach Park, Gurnee, Zion,
21Winthrop Harbor, Wadsworth Village, Old Mill Creek,
22Lindenhurst, and Grandwood Park, and parts of Grayslake,
23Venetian Village, Third Lake, Gages Lake, and Lake Villa. This
24district was drawn for political purposes to assist with
25increasing the political advantage of this district, as well
26as to impact the political composition of neighboring

 

 

HR0443- 56 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1districts.
2    The proposed district has a total population of 108,652,
3with an African American voting-age population of 11.8%, a
4Hispanic voting-age population of 23.2%, and an Asian
5voting-age population of 6.5%.
6    The configuration of Representative District 62 as enacted
7in 2011 contained 109,130 people according to the 2020 Census.
8This was overpopulated by 549 people compared to target
9population. The configuration of RD 62 as enacted in Public
10Act 102-10 contained 110,217 people according to the 2020
11Census. This was overpopulated by 1,636 people. The proposed
12district contains a majority of the current district,
13including parts of the municipalities of Long Lake, Round Lake
14Heights, Round Lake Beach, Round Lake, Round Lake Park,
15Grayslake, Hainesville, Grayslake, Libertyville and Gurnee.
16This district was drawn for political purposes to assist with
17increasing the political advantage of this district, as well
18as to impact the political composition of neighboring
19districts.
20    The proposed district has a total population of 108,565,
21with an African American voting-age population of 4%, a
22Hispanic voting-age population of 27.3%, and an Asian
23voting-age population of 6.7%.
24    The configuration of Representative District 63 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 107,982 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was underpopulated by -599 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 57 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 63 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 112,120 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was overpopulated by 3,539 people. It includes
4parts of the municipalities of Crystal Lake, McHenry,
5Woodstock, Prairie Grove, Ridgefield, Oakwood Hills, Holiday
6Hills, Wonder Lake, Cary, and Bull Valley. Similar to the
7current RD 63, the proposed RD 63 is a mix of agricultural land
8as well as suburban area. Proposed RD 63, like the current RD
963, contains stops along Metra's Union Pacific Northwest line,
10which allows commuters to travel to and from downtown Chicago.
11    Proposed RD 63, like the current RD 63, continues to
12represent communities along the Fox River and in the Fox River
13Valley. Within the proposed RD 63 are a number of lakes and
14recreational areas that serve local residents as well as
15visitors. This district was drawn for political purposes to
16assist with increasing the political advantage of this
17district, as well as to impact the political composition of
18neighboring districts.
19    The proposed district has a total population of 108,559,
20with an African American voting-age population of 1.2%, a
21Hispanic voting-age population of 13.8%, and an Asian
22voting-age population of 2.3%.
23    The configuration of Representative District 64 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 111,915 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was overpopulated by 3,334 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 64 as enacted in Public

 

 

HR0443- 58 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Act 102-10 contained 109,063 people according to the 2020
2Census. This was overpopulated by 482 people. It contains
3nearly all of Richmond and Burton townships and a large
4portion of McHenry Township. In Lake County, proposed RD 64
5contains portions of Antioch, Grant, and Lake Villa townships.
6This greatly reduces the number of townships represented and
7township splits from the current RD 64.
8    Municipalities within the proposed RD 64 include parts of
9Wonder Lake, McCullom Lake, Lakemoore, Lake Catherine,
10Johnsburg, Pistakee Highlands, Fox Lake, Lake Villa, Richmond,
11Ringwood, Spring Grove, Volo, and Antioch. The northern
12boundary of proposed RD 64 is the state line with Wisconsin,
13like the current RD 64. Proposed RD 64, like the current RD 64,
14continues to represent communities along the Fox River and in
15the Fox River Valley.
16    Within the proposed RD 64 are a number of lakes and
17recreational areas that serve local residents as well as
18visitors. Proposed RD 64 is served by Metra's North Central
19Service, which takes commuters to and from downtown Chicago.
20Proposed RD 64's is relatively homogeneous demographically and
21is predominantly middle class and upper middle class. The
22partisan advantage of the proposed RD 64 is similar to the
23current RD 64.
24    The proposed district has a total population of 108,575,
25with an African American voting-age population of 1.5%, a
26Hispanic voting-age population of 9%, and an Asian voting-age

 

 

HR0443- 59 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population of 2%.
2    Northwest Suburbs: Representative Districts 43, 44, 53,
354, 55, 56, 57, 58, 65, and 66 comprise the northwest suburban
4areas. These districts retain the core of each existing
5district to the greatest extent possible, but there are
6deviations due to population shifts, the need to ensure equal
7population, and political considerations. Significant
8population growth in downtown Chicago has also necessitated
9many districts throughout the suburbs to adjust to take in new
10population to the east and south.
11    The configuration of Representative District 43 as enacted
12in 2011 contained 107,984 people according to the 2020 Census.
13This was underpopulated by 597 people compared to target
14population. The configuration of RD 43 as enacted in Public
15Act 102-10 contained 110,756 people according to the 2020
16Census. This was overpopulated by 2,175 people. Proposed RD 43
17contains communities in Cook and Kane counties. Within Cook
18County, it contains part of Hanover Township and within Kane
19County it contains parts of Elgin and Dundee townships. It
20contains communities within the municipalities of Streamwood,
21Hoffman Estates, East Dundee, and Elgin. Proposed RD 43 was
22adjusted to encompass more of Elgin, consolidating a community
23that has historically been split among several districts into
24fewer representative districts. These communities have similar
25economic characteristics and demographics according to the
26Census Bureau.

 

 

HR0443- 60 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    Proposed RD 43 contains Chicago and North Western Railroad
2lines, which serve as major arteries to facilitate tourism,
3development, transportation, and commerce in the region.
4    The total population of RD 43 is 108,581. The voting age
5population is 6.04% African American, 7.95% Asian, 51.19%
6Hispanic.
7    The configuration of Representative District 44 as enacted
8in 2011 contained 109,195 people according to the 2020 Census.
9This was overpopulated by 614 people compared to target
10population. The configuration of RD 44 as enacted in Public
11Act 102-10 contained 107,147 people according to the 2020
12Census. This was underpopulated by 1,434 people. Proposed RD
1344 maintains the core of current RD 44 as well as the majority
14of its population and preserves incumbent-constituent
15relationships. Proposed RD 44 is located in Hanover and
16Schaumburg townships within Cook County. The reconfigured
17district unites more of Hoffman Estates in one district, and
18pairs it with neighboring communities of Streamwood,
19Schaumburg, and Hanover Park. These communities share similar
20demographics and economic characteristics according to the
21Census Bureau. They are further connected by shared
22transportation infrastructure and shared economies. The total
23population of RD 44 is 108,540. The voting age population is
244.91% African American, 19.10% Asian, 26.93% Hispanic.
25    The configuration of Representative District 53 as enacted
26in 2011 contained 112,576 people according to the 2020 Census.

 

 

HR0443- 61 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1This was overpopulated by 3,995 people compared to target
2population. The configuration of RD 53 as enacted in Public
3Act 102-10 contained 112,157 people according to the 2020
4Census. This was overpopulated by 3,576 people. The proposed
5district contains parts of Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect,
6Rolling Meadows, Des Plaines, Schaumburg, and Palatine. These
7communities share similar demographics, incomes, and home
8values according to the Census Bureau. These communities are
9also majority homeowners with a smaller level of renters, with
10over 60% owning homes and less than 30% renting. Additionally,
11RD 53 contains Northwest Community Hospital. Healthcare is the
12largest employer in these municipalities and this region. By
13linking Northwest Community Hospital with communities such as
14Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect, Rolling Meadows, RD 53
15keeps many employees linked with the major healthcare services
16in the district.
17    The total population of RD 53 is 108,563. The voting age
18population is 2.69% African American, 14.41% Asian, 14.22%
19Hispanic.
20    The configuration of Representative District 54 as enacted
21in 2011 contained 110,037 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was overpopulated by 1,456 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 54 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 109,297 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was overpopulated by 716 people. Proposed RD 54
26includes parts of Prospect Heights, Mount Prospect, Arlington

 

 

HR0443- 62 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Heights, Buffalo Grove, Wheeling, and Palatine. Changes to the
2district unite more of Palatine within the neighboring 51st
3District and enhance the overall partisan composition of the
4district.
5    The district includes portions of Prospect Heights,
6Arlington Heights, and Palatine. The district shares many
7similarities with RD 53, and together collectively combine
8municipalities that form a Legislative District that leans
9Democratic. The proposed district moves southeast to account
10for population shifts.
11    The total population of RD 54 is 108,589. The voting age
12population is 2.26% African American, 9.80% Asian, 14.00%
13Hispanic.
14    The configuration of Representative District 55 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 113,843 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was overpopulated by 5,262 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 55 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 111,230 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was overpopulated by 2,649 people. The proposed
20district includes a majority of the population of the current
21district. The proposed district consists of Cook County and
22includes parts of Park Ridge, most of Des Plaines and a small
23portion of the 41st Ward in Chicago. Large portions of the
24district are united by being in Maine Township. The 41st Ward
25is a community of similar interest to the suburban Cook County
26portions of the proposed district. The new proposed district

 

 

HR0443- 63 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1improves the compactness of the district while maintaining the
2core of the district as Des Plaines. The proposed district
3also brings together two communities (Park Ridge and Des
4Plaines) that share a township and high school township
5district.
6    The total population of RD 55 is 108,686. The voting age
7population is 2.52% African American, 18.57% Asian, 12.06%
8Hispanic.
9    The configuration of Representative District 56 as enacted
10in 2011 contained 111,966 people according to the 2020 Census.
11This was overpopulated by 3,385 people compared to target
12population. The configuration of RD 56 as enacted in Public
13Act 102-10 contained 113,450 people according to the 2020
14Census. This was overpopulated by 4,869 people. The proposed
15district includes a majority of the population of the current
16district. The boundaries of proposed RD 56 increase minority
17influence. Greater portions of the population draw from highly
18diverse areas of Cook County. The district shares a number of
19business interests, as it houses the corporate offices of many
20large companies, takes in all of the Elk Grove Industrial
21Park, and includes a significant retail community anchored by
22Woodfield Mall as well as many Indian, Pakistani, and
23Asian-owned businesses. Proposed District 56 contains school
24districts Lake Park Community High School District 108,
25Township High School District 214, Township High School
26District 211, Schaumburg Community Consolidated School

 

 

HR0443- 64 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1District 54, and Community Consolidated School District 59.
2    The total population of RD 56 is 108,413. The voting age
3population is 3.39% African American, 18.72% Asian, 16.91%
4Hispanic.
5    The configuration of Representative District 57 as enacted
6in 2011 contained 110,823 people according to the 2020 Census.
7This was overpopulated by 2,242 people compared to target
8population. The configuration of RD 57 as enacted in Public
9Act 102-10 contained 109,687 people according to the 2020
10Census. This was overpopulated by 1,106 people. The district
11retains a majority of the population of the former district.
12The district sits mostly in Cook County, with a small portion
13in Lake, and includes Wheeling, Northbrook, Buffalo Grove,
14Glencoe, Riverwoods, and Lincolnshire and very small parts of
15Deerfield, Prospect Heights, Des Plaines and Glenview. The
16portions of Palatine and Mount Prospect were removed to assist
17other districts and aid in maintaining more of those
18municipalities' populations in other districts. To unite the
19cities on the west that share regional interests, the western
20border receded east to accommodate those communities of
21interest. RD 57 still represents both northern Cook and Lake
22counties which share socioeconomic, ethnic, and religious
23similarities. Proposed RD 57 consolidates more of the similar
24more urban communities in the region by traveling farther east
25and out of the previous western part of the district.
26    The total population of RD 57 is 108,417. The voting age

 

 

HR0443- 65 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population is 1.44% African American, 14.93% Asian, 14.12%
2Hispanic.
3    The configuration of Representative District 58 as enacted
4in 2011 contained 108,366 people according to the 2020 Census.
5This was underpopulated by 215 people compared to target
6population. The configuration of RD 58 as enacted in Public
7Act 102-10 contained 109,916 people according to the 2020
8Census. This was overpopulated by 1,335 people. The proposed
9district ensures equal population and retains nearly a
10majority of the current population. The district includes
11parts of Highland Park, Deerfield, Lake Forest, Bannockburn,
12Lake Bluff, Highwood City, Glencoe, Lincolnshire, Mettawa,
13Green Oaks, Knollwood, and North Chicago. RD 58 had to take in
14population and expanded west to keep a majority of the
15district in Lake County, and the area of Cook County shares
16commonalities with the rest of the district.
17    The total population for proposed RD 58 is 108,398. It has
18a voting age population that is 3.97% African American, 6.07%
19Asian, and 9.75% Hispanic.
20    The configuration of Representative District 65 as enacted
21in 2011 contained 123,080 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was overpopulated by 14,499 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 65 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 110,625 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was overpopulated by 2,044 people. It includes
26the municipalities of South Elgin, Elgin, Campton Hills, Lily

 

 

HR0443- 66 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Lake, Wayne, Bartlett, St. Charles, Elburn, Prestbury and
2Sugar Grove. This district also includes all of Plato and
3Campton Township, nearly all of St. Charles Township, and
4small portions of Blackberry, Geneva, Wayne, and Elgin
5township. Proposed RD 65 consolidates more of St. Charles than
6previously.
7    The proposed district has a total population of 108,537
8with an African American voting-age population of 1.8%, a
9Hispanic voting-age population of 9.8%, and an Asian
10voting-age population of 6.1%.
11    The configuration of Representative District 66 as enacted
12in 2011 contained 114,214 people according to the 2020 Census.
13This was overpopulated by 5,633 people compared to target
14population. The configuration of RD 66 as enacted in Public
15Act 102-10 contained 106,732 people according to the 2020
16Census. This was underpopulated by 1,849 people. The proposed
17district includes a majority of the existing district
18population. The proposed RD 66 includes Kane and McHenry
19counties and includes the townships of Algonquin, Dundee,
20Elgin and Grafton. To reduce population, the proposed district
21removed the populated northwest side of Crystal Lake and added
22the less populated parts of Elgin and Carpentersville. The
23proposed district reflects changes requested during public
24testimony at the McHenry County redistricting hearing. Public
25comments asked for communities of similar economic and
26community interests by adding more of Carpentersville and

 

 

HR0443- 67 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Elgin and removing the northwest side of Crystal Lake that
2best reflects the interests of the neighboring districts. RD
366 has the municipalities of Carpentersville, West Dundee,
4Sleepy Hollow, Elgin, a small portion of East Dundee,
5Algonquin, Lake in the Hills, and Crystal Lake. Due to the rise
6in population, much of the west side of the district 25 got put
7into a neighboring district to unite more similar communities.
8School Districts in proposed RD 66 include Community Unit
9School District 300 takes in students from Carpentersville,
10West and East Dundee, Sleepy Hollow, Algonquin, and Lake in
11the Hills. These represent a community of interest kept
12together in the proposed RD 66. Crystal Lake CCSD 47 also pulls
13in students from Crystal Lake and Lake in the Hills, keeping
14communities of interest united.
15    The proposed district has a total population of 108,650,
16with an African American voting-age population of 3.13%, a
17Hispanic voting-age population of 17%, and an Asian voting-age
18population of 6.6%. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify
19as members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals
20who identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
2156.46% African American.
22    DuPage County: DuPage County saw a modest population
23increase over the past decade, and reconfigurations in this
24area reflect this; the cores of existing House districts were
25held largely intact with some adjustments in order to create
26compact districts of substantially equal population. Just as

 

 

HR0443- 68 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1many DuPage municipalities share transportation
2infrastructure, business interests, and community identity
3with neighboring areas of Cook, Will, and Kane counties,
4several of the districts cross adjacent counties.
5    The configuration of Representative District 41 as enacted
6in 2011 contained 109,814 people according to the 2020 Census.
7This was overpopulated by 1,233 people compared to target
8population. The configuration of RD 41 as enacted in Public
9Act 102-10 contained 106,170 people according to the 2020
10Census. This was underpopulated by 2,411 people. The proposed
11district includes a majority of the existing district
12population. The proposed district retains Naperville as the
13core of the district, contains a portion of Warrenville, and
14maintains an interest in the Illinois Technology and Research
15Corridor along Interstate 88.
16    The total population of RD 41 is 108,579. The voting age
17population is 5.13% African American, 16.39% Asian, 8.05%
18Hispanic.
19    Representative District 42, was formerly RD 48. The
20configuration of Representative District 48 as enacted in 2011
21contained 112,509 people according to the 2020 Census. This
22was overpopulated by 3928 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 42 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 110,931 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was over/underpopulated by 2,350 people. The
26proposed district includes a majority of the existing 48th

 

 

HR0443- 69 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1District population. The proposed district retains the core of
2current RD 48 and contains Lisle, Lombard, Glen Ellyn, and
3Downers Grove. The proposed district maintains the core of the
4current district and the boundaries largely remain the same.
5Proposed RD 42 is anchored by Interstate 355, Interstate 88,
6the College of DuPage, Hidden Lake Forest Preserve and the
7Morton Arboretum, and it creates transportation corridors by
8extending to include the intersection of I-88 and I-355.
9Proposed RD 42 also contains Union Pacific Railroad and has
10public transportation available on the Metra through the Union
11Pacific West Line. The Western border follows boundaries
12created by Glen Ellyn Community Consolidated School District
13and Glenbard Township High School District 87. Proposed RD 42
14picks up portions of former RDs 48 and 81. The district
15preserves numerous communities of interest, including a
16population of Asian households that stretch from the south
17section of Lombard to the portion of Downers Grove.
18    The total population of RD 42 is 108,677. The voting age
19population is 4.69% African American, 10.25% Asian, 7.55%
20Hispanic.
21    The configuration of Representative District 45 as enacted
22in 2011 contained 109,166 people according to the 2020 Census.
23This was overpopulated by 585 people compared to target
24population. The configuration of RD 45 as enacted in Public
25Act 102-10 contained 105,586 people according to the 2020
26Census. This was underpopulated by 2,995 people. The proposed

 

 

HR0443- 70 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1RD 45 retains a majority of current RD 47. This district was
2drawn for political purposes to assist with increasing the
3political advantage for neighboring districts. It includes all
4or portions of Elmhurst, Oakbrook Terrace, Westmont, Clarendon
5Hills, Hinsdale, Willowbrook and Downers Grove. The district
6stretches from the northern municipal boundary of Elmhurst
7into the south regions of Westmont. The district includes
8Elmhurst University as well as intersections of several busy
9highways including US 20, I-290, IL State Route 83, and US 34.
10This district was drawn to protect communities of similar
11economic interest as well as keep several school districts
12together.
13    The total population of RD 45 is 108,585. The voting age
14population is 2.89% African American, 11.05% Asian, 9.85%
15Hispanic.
16    The configuration of Representative District 46 as enacted
17in 2011 contained 109,101 people according to the 2020 Census.
18This was overpopulated by 520 people compared to target
19population. The configuration of RD 46 as enacted in Public
20Act 102-10 contained 109,507 people according to the 2020
21Census. This was overpopulated by 926 people. The proposed
22Representative District 46 retains a majority of the district,
23maintaining a large majority of its core, with small
24geographical shifts to account for population loss. The
25district contains all or portions of Carol Stream,
26Bloomingdale, Glendale Heights, Addison, Glen Ellyn and Villa

 

 

HR0443- 71 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Park. The proposed district keeps Villa Park united and
2follows the boundaries of Villa Park and Glendale Heights,
3while also maintaining strong business districts, the DuPage
4County Forest Preserve, and access to Interstate 355.
5    The total population for proposed RD 46 is 108,562. It has
6a voting age population that is 5.67% African American, 15.90%
7Asian, and 23.85% Hispanic.
8    Representative District 47, the current RD 42, was
9overpopulated by 2,563 people compared to target population.
10The proposed RD 47 retains a majority of the current RD 42. The
11district is located entirely within DuPage County and includes
12Wayne, Bloomingdale, Milton, Winfield, Naperville, and Lisle
13townships. According to the Census Bureau, households in the
14communities within the proposed district have similar median
15incomes, ranging from $82,062 to $125,926. Proposed RD 47 is a
16strong professional community with socioeconomic similarities.
17Homes in the communities within the proposed district also
18share similar values, ranging from $221,700 in Warrenville and
19$416,700 in Naperville.
20    The total population of RD 47 is 108,621. The voting age
21population is 3.50% African American, 9.47% Asian, 7.79%
22Hispanic.
23    The configuration of Representative District 48 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 112,509 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was overpopulated by 3,928 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 48 as enacted in Public

 

 

HR0443- 72 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Act 102-10 contained 106,344 people according to the 2020
2Census. This was underpopulated by 2,237 people. The proposed
3RD 48 retains a majority of current RD 45. The proposed
4district is located within Cook and DuPage counties and
5contains communities in Carol Stream, Bloomingdale, Roselle,
6Itasca, Wood Dale, Addison, and Elk Grove Village. This
7suburban district contains communities within similar
8demographics and economic characteristics according to the
9Census Bureau.
10    The total population of RD 48 is 108,568. The voting age
11population is 2.14% African American, 11.68% Asian, 12.35%
12Hispanic.
13    Representative District 84 was overpopulated by more than
142,000 people. Proposed RD 84 was renumbered to RD 49 in Public
15Act 102-10, but has reverted to maintain its current district
16number. It contains the municipalities of Aurora, Oswego,
17Boulder Hill, Naperville, and Montgomery. The district is at
18the intersection of the counties of DuPage, Will, Kendall, and
19Kane. According to the Census Bureau, these communities have
20similar economic characteristics and demographics.
21    The total population of RD 84 is 108,422. The voting age
22population is 10.66% African American, 18.53% Asian, 18.69%
23Hispanic.
24    The configuration of Representative District 49 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 109,051 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was overpopulated by 470 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 73 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 49 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 108,422 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was underpopulated by 159 people.
4    Proposed RD 49 is located primarily in DuPage County, but
5also contains portions in Kane and Cook counties.
6    Proposed RD 49 contains parts of the communities of
7Warrenville, Naperville, Aurora, Batavia, West Chicago,
8Geneva, Wayne, Bartlett, Elgin, and South Elgin. According to
9the Census Bureau, these communities share similar
10demographics and economic characteristics. Proposed RD 43 was
11adjusted to encompass more of Elgin, consolidating a community
12that has historically been split among several districts into
13fewer representative districts.
14    The configuration of Representative District 49 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 109,051 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was 2,055 people over the target population. The proposed
17district unites a majority of West Chicago in one district.
18The district also unites a number of DuPage County's forest
19preserves and nature areas into a single district, including
20the James "Pate" Phillips State Park, Pratt Wayne Woods County
21Forest Preserve, West Chicago Prairie County Forest Preserve,
22Blackwell Forest Preserve, Herrons Woods State Habitat,
23Westbridge Park, Elgin Shores Forest Preserve, and DuPage
24County Big Woods Forest Preserve.
25    The total population of RD 49 is 108,753. The voting age
26population is 4.01% African American, 14.01% Asian, 23.85%

 

 

HR0443- 74 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Hispanic.
2    Representative District 50 is renumbered from
3Representative District 83 as enacted in Public Act 102-10.
4This district was also known as RD 83 in Public Act 97-6. The
5configuration of Representative District 83 as enacted in 2011
6contained 94,164 people according to the 2020 Census. This was
7underpopulated by 14,417 people compared to target population.
8The configuration of RD 50 as enacted in Public Act 102-10
9contained 107,156 people according to the 2020 Census. This
10was underpopulated by 1,425 people. This proposed RD 50
11remains substantially the same as current district 83. It
12contains most of Aurora as well as parts of North Aurora and
13Batavia.
14    The total population of RD 50 is 108,660. The voting age
15population is 7.76% African American, 4.21% Asian, 48.78%
16Hispanic.
17    The configuration of Representative District 81 as enacted
18in 2011 contained 110,166 people according to the 2020 Census.
19This was overpopulated by 1,585 people compared to target
20population. The configuration of RD 81 as enacted in Public
21Act 102-10 contained 109,499 people according to the 2020
22Census. This was overpopulated by 918 people. The proposed
23district remains largely the same geographically and includes
24a majority of the population of the current district. There is
25a small shift to help consolidate the communities of
26Naperville, Woodridge, and Downers Grove. Proposed RD 81

 

 

HR0443- 75 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1contains a major transportation corridor, as Interstate 355
2bisects into the proposed district.
3    The total population of RD 81 is 108,489. The voting age
4population is 4.34% African American, 12.36% Asian, 6.81%
5Hispanic.
6    The configuration of Representative District 82 as enacted
7in 2011 contained 113,018 people according to the 2020 Census.
8This was overpopulated by 4,437 people compared to target
9population. The configuration of RD 82 as enacted in Public
10Act 102-10 contained 109,791 people according to the 2020
11Census. This was overpopulated by 1,210 people. The proposed
12district contains a majority of the current district. It
13includes Cook, DuPage, and Will counties and the
14municipalities of Western Springs, Hinsdale, Indian Head Park,
15Burr Ridge, Willowbrook, Darien, Lemont, Palos Park, Homer
16Glen, Woodridge, and Lockport. This district was drawn to keep
17all of Lemont Township in one House district as well as several
18community school districts; Lemont Township HSD 210, Lemont
19Bromberek CSD 113A and Cass SD 63. The district also keeps
20almost all of Glower SD 62, Hinsdale Township HSD 86, and Lyons
21Township together. The northern border of the district is
22formed by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and has a
23southern border of north Homer Glen.
24    The total population of RD 82 is 108,661. The voting age
25population is 3.03% African American, 7.44% Asian, 7.50%
26Hispanic.

 

 

HR0443- 76 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    Representative District 83 was renumbered from RD 50. The
2configuration of Representative District 50 as enacted in 2011
3contained 119,740 people according to the 2020 Census. This
4was overpopulated by 11,159 people compared to target
5population. The configuration of RD 83 as enacted in Public
6Act 102-10 contained 92,390 people according to the 2020
7Census. This was underpopulated by 16,191 people. The proposed
8district includes the core of the current RD 50 district. It
9contains parts of the municipalities of Oswego, Yorkville,
10Montgomery, Aurora, Batavia, Geneva, and St. Charles. These
11communities share similar demographics and economic interests
12according to the Census Bureau.
13    The total population of RD 83 is 108,736. The voting age
14population is 6.11% African American, 2.82% Asian, 20.63%
15Hispanic.
16    Will County: Representative Districts 85, 86, 97, and 98
17sit mostly within Will County, with portions sitting in DuPage
18and Kendall counties.
19    The configuration of Representative District 85 as enacted
20in 2011 contained 106,535 people according to the 2020 Census.
21This was underpopulated by 2,046 people compared to target
22population. The configuration of RD 85 as enacted in Public
23Act 102-10 contained 107,703 people according to the 2020
24Census. This was underpopulated by 878 people. The proposed
25district includes a majority of the population of the current
26district, with minor adjustments to account for the population

 

 

HR0443- 77 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1change and changes to neighboring districts. The proposed
2district maintains the core of the district and contains part
3of Woodridge, part of Bolingbrook, part of Lemont, a majority
4of Romeoville, most of Lockport, most of Bonnie Brae, some of
5Crest Hill, most of Fairmont, and a small portion of
6Naperville.
7    The total population of RD 85 is 108,384. The voting age
8population is 14.54% African American, 6.88% Asian, 23.27%
9Hispanic.
10    The configuration of Representative District 86 as enacted
11in 2011 contained 106,802 people according to the 2020 Census.
12This was underpopulated by 1,779 people compared to target
13population. The configuration of RD 86 as enacted in Public
14Act 102-10 contained 108,289 people according to the 2020
15Census. This was underpopulated by 292 people. The proposed
16district includes a majority of the population of the current
17district. It includes all of Jackson and Channahon townships
18and portions of Joliet and Troy townships. It includes parts
19of Joliet, Rockdale, Preston Heights, Shorewood, Channahon,
20Elwood, Ridgewood, and Ingalls Park.
21    The total population of RD 86 is 108,572. The voting age
22population is 15.97% African American, 1.00% Asian, 30.41%
23Hispanic.
24    The configuration of Representative District 97 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 120,820 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was overpopulated by 12,239 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 78 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 97 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 113,482 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was overpopulated by 4,901 people. The proposed
4district contains a majority of the current district. It
5includes parts of Kendall and Will counties and all or parts of
6Aurora, Naperville, Plainfield, Joliet, Shorewood, and
7Bolingbrook municipalities. This district was drawn to keep
8families of similar economic interests and median incomes
9together, with incomes ranging from $70,000 - $130,000. The
10northern border is Wolf's Crossing Road with the southern
11border being the municipality of Shorewood.
12    The total population of RD 97 is 108,719. The voting age
13population is 8.68% African American, 7.69% Asian, 15.85%
14Hispanic.
15    The configuration of Representative District 98 as enacted
16in 2011 contained 110,268 people according to the 2020 Census.
17This was overpopulated by 1,687 people compared to target
18population. The configuration of RD 98 as enacted in Public
19Act 102-10 contained 107,650 people according to the 2020
20Census. This was underpopulated by 931 people. The district
21includes all or parts of Joliet, Plainfield, Crystal Lawns,
22Crest Hill, Romeoville, and Bolingbrook, and the proposed
23district is entirely within Will County. Additional areas of
24Joliet were added to the district to enhance the partisan
25composition of the district. All communities in the district
26are linked by their proximity to Interstate 55, which bisects

 

 

HR0443- 79 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1the district. The district retains the majority of the current
2district, preserving its core, which was originally created
3based on witness testimony received in 2011 about the common
4interests of residents relocating to the growing area. Public
5transportation and school quality were among these concerns.
6Testimony indicated that it makes the most sense to keep these
7growing populations together, as opposed to pairing them with
8downstate communities.
9    The total population of RD 98 is 108,505. The voting age
10population is 13.98% African American, 7.67% Asian, 22.57%
11Hispanic.
12    North Central Illinois: The districts in the north central
13Illinois region suffered a significant loss of population, and
14as a result the districts have been reconfigured. For the most
15part, the core communities remain intact, but efforts were
16made to connect the more urban areas of the districts to
17maximize their political power.
18    The configuration of Representative District 67 as enacted
19in 2011 contained 101,713 people according to the 2020 Census.
20This was underpopulated by 6,868 people compared to target
21population. The configuration of RD 67 as enacted in Public
22Act 102-10 contained 107,492 people according to the 2020
23Census. This was underpopulated by 1,089 people. The proposed
24district retains a majority of the current district
25population. To adjust for the loss of population, the district
26adds parts of New Milford and Cherry Valley, which were

 

 

HR0443- 80 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1previously in RD 67 prior to 2011. The district keeps the 5th
2and 11th Wards of Rockford in the district as requested by
3Armando Cardenas from the Coalition of Latino Leaders in
4Rockford in his written and oral testimony at a hearing of the
5House Redistricting Committee.
6    The median household income of Rockford is $40,100,
7$42,200 for New Milford and $58,800 for Cherry Valley, thus
8uniting communities of similar economic interest. The district
9remains entirely within Winnebago County. The proposed
10district has a total population of 108,458, with an African
11American voting-age population of 20.1%, a Hispanic voting-age
12population of 16.5%, and an Asian voting-age population of 2%.
13The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as members of
14multiple racial groups. Including individuals who identify as
15multiple races, the voting age population is 22.04% African
16American.
17    The configuration of Representative District 68 as enacted
18in 2011 contained 107,158 people according to the 2020 Census.
19This was underpopulated by 1,423 people compared to target
20population. The configuration of RD 68 as enacted in Public
21Act 102-10 contained 108,426 people according to the 2020
22Census. This was underpopulated by 155 people. The proposed
23district retains a majority of the current district
24population. The portions of the district that include Rockford
25remain largely unchanged with only slight variations to the
26borders. Manufacturing remains the top industry in the current

 

 

HR0443- 81 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1district and the proposed district moves east to include the
2city of Belvidere, which is home to the Belvidere Chrysler
3Assembly Plant. The workers at the plant are part of The
4International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and
5Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW).
6    The Belvidere community shares a similar interest to the
7existing core of the current district in that they have a
8shared interest in being represented by someone who supports
9organized labor and carries a commitment to protecting the
10rights of organized labor and working families.
11    The proposed district has a total population of 108,450,
12with an African American voting-age population of 9.7%, a
13Hispanic voting-age population of 17.5%, and an Asian
14voting-age population of 3.8%.
15    The configuration of Representative District 69 as enacted
16in 2011 contained 107,256 people according to the 2020 Census.
17This was underpopulated by 1,325 people compared to target
18population. The configuration of RD 69 as enacted in Public
19Act 102-10 contained 107,484 people according to the 2020
20Census. This was underpopulated by 1,097 people. The changes
21in the district are primarily to account for population
22changes in the region. This district links numerous
23communities that contain outdoor recreational areas and parks.
24It also connects numerous conservation areas like Rush Creek
25Conservation Area, Brookdale Conservation Area, Marengo Ridge
26Conservation Area, Coral Woods Conservation Area, Pleasant

 

 

HR0443- 82 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Valley Conservation Area, Piscasaw Fen Conservation Area,
2Beck's Woods Conservation Area, High Point Conservation,
3Winding Creek Conservation Area, North Branch Conservation
4Area, and Glacier Park Conservation Area. RD 69's proposed
5northeast border proceeds westward along the Illinois -
6Wisconsin border.
7    The proposed district has a total population of 108,508,
8with an African American voting-age population of 1.5%, a
9Hispanic voting-age population of 13.5%, and an Asian American
10voting-age population of 3.1%.
11    Following the release of the proposed legislative map on
12Friday, May 21, 2021, Republican state representatives made
13public comments criticizing the number of incumbent Republican
14state representatives whose primary residences were located in
15the same representative district as another incumbent
16Republican state representative. This new proposed district
17boundary therefore changed boundaries from the original
18proposal district from Friday, May 21. Following the request
19of Republicans, RD 69 was reconfigured to put Representative
20Keicher's home in RD 70, while keeping Representative
21Sosnowski's home in RD 69.
22    The configuration of Representative District 70 as enacted
23in 2011 contained 105,830 people according to the 2020 Census.
24This was underpopulated by 2,751 people compared to target
25population. The configuration of RD 70 as enacted in Public
26Act 102-10 contained 111,087 people according to the 2020

 

 

HR0443- 83 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Census. This was overpopulated by 2,506 people. The changes in
2the district are primarily to account for population changes
3in the region. The proposed district maintains consistency in
4socioeconomic status, ethnic tradition, municipal government
5and various other practical considerations. Proposed RD 70
6will contain Kane, DeKalb, Kendall, and McHenry counties, and
7the municipalities of Maple Park, Burlington, Sugar Grove,
8Gilberts, Huntley and Hampshire. Those municipalities have
9median incomes ranging from $65,984 to $100,809 respectively,
10uniting communities of similar levels of economic interest.
11    The total population of RD 70 is 108,589. The voting age
12population is 2.00% African American, 3.77% Asian, 9.00%
13Hispanic.
14    Following the release of the proposed legislative map on
15Friday, May 21, 2021, Republican state representatives made
16public comments criticizing the number of incumbent Republican
17state representatives whose primary residences were located in
18the same representative district as another incumbent
19Republican state representative. This new proposed district
20boundary therefore changed boundaries from the original
21proposal district from Friday, May 21. Following the request
22of Republicans, RD 70 was reconfigured to include
23Representative Keicher's home.
24    The configuration of Representative District 75 as enacted
25in 2011 contained 117,180 people according to the 2020 Census.
26This was overpopulated by 8,599 people compared to target

 

 

HR0443- 84 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population. The configuration of RD 75 as enacted in Public
2Act 102-10 contained 111,471 people according to the 2020
3Census. This was overpopulated by 2,890 people. To reduce
4population and account for population shifts in neighboring
5districts, proposed RD 75 loses population in its current
6southern and eastern portions and gains population west and
7north. This helps make proposed RD 75 more compact. Proposed
8RD 75 contains portions of LaSalle, DeKalb, Kendall, and
9Grundy County. Townships in the proposed RD 75 include in
10DeKalb County, Sandwich; in LaSalle County, Northville,
11Mission, Miller, and Manlius; in Grundy County, Nettle Creek,
12Erienna, Vienna (partial), Morris, Saratoga, Aux Sable, and
13Felix; and in Kendall County, Seward (partial), Na-Au-Say
14(partial), Oswego (partial), Bristol (partial), Little Rock,
15Fox, Kendall, Lisbon, and Big Grove. Municipalities in
16proposed RD 75 include parts of Marseilles, Seneca, Sheridan,
17Lisbon, Morris, Channahon, Minooka, Joliet, Oswego, Yorkville,
18Milington, Millbrook, Somonauk, Plano, and Sandwich.
19Communities within proposed RD 75 are similar demographically
20and have similar rates of per capita income ranging from
21approximately $30,000 to $35,000.
22    Proposed RD 75 is more compact than the current RD 75. The
23partisan composition of the proposed RD 75 is similar to that
24of the current RD 75. The total population of RD 75 is 108,653.
25The voting age population is 4.26% African American, 1.49%
26Asian, 12.33% Hispanic.

 

 

HR0443- 85 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    The configuration of Representative District 76 as enacted
2in 2011 contained 104,334 people according to the 2020 Census.
3This was underpopulated by 4,247 people compared to target
4population. The configuration of RD 76 as enacted in Public
5Act 102-10 contained 107,563 people according to the 2020
6Census. This was underpopulated by 1,018 people. While this
7regional population loss necessitated some significant
8reconfiguration, a majority of the existing RD 76's core is
9maintained in the district. The proposed district achieves its
10target population by connecting several of the 18 largest
11cities in the north central Illinois region. The southern end
12of the proposed district maintains the existing connection
13between Ottawa, North Utica, LaSalle, Peru, and Spring Valley,
14and combines this with the city of DeKalb, which is kept whole
15in the proposed district. Several economic, geographic, and
16regional factors connect DeKalb and the Illinois River Valley
17communities. Median income in DeKalb is much closer to the
18median incomes of Peru, LaSalle, Ottawa, and other small parts
19of the district, as opposed to communities DeKalb is connected
20to the current configuration, where the median income reaches
21as high as $119,000. With economies centered around
22manufacturing and distribution, both DeKalb and the Illinois
23River Valley communities are centers for organized labor and
24have a shared interest in representation that will prioritize
25the needs of middle-class workers. In the northern end of the
26district, distribution centers for Target, Nestle, and 3M are

 

 

HR0443- 86 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1all located in DeKalb. Ferrara Distribution Center, also
2located in DeKalb, is a major regional distribution center for
3Wal-Mart located in Spring Valley in the southern end of the
4district. Nearly all the communities in the proposed district
5are hubs along the interstate highway system, giving these
6areas a shared interest in representation that prioritizes
7infrastructure investment and maintenance. Interstate 80
8connects Ladd, Dalzell, LaSalle, and Dayton in the southern
9end of the district. Interstate 39 links LaSalle and
10Jonesville. DeKalb is a major stop along Interstate 88. The
11DeKalb Oasis, Interstate 88's only rest stop in Illinois, is
12included in the district. The district follows State Highway
1323 from Ottawa to DeKalb. The district shares environmental
14interests. The proposed district links the four areas in the
15Illinois River Valley that have been designated as Superfund
16sites by the United States Environmental Protection Agency -
17Spring Valley, Ottawa, and two sites in LaSalle. Furthermore,
18including DeKalb in the district links these sites with
19Northern Illinois University - one of the state's leading
20institutions for environmental studies.
21    The district also connects river communities with a shared
22interest in flood control and water quality. The Illinois
23    River and its tributaries flow across the entire southern
24end of the district, while the Kishwaukee River flows through
25all of DeKalb in the northern part of the district. The
26district also includes Wedron, which borders the Fox River.

 

 

HR0443- 87 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1The Fox River makes up the district's southeastern boundary.
2Boating and watersports contribute to the economies of each of
3these communities. DeKalb, Wedron, LaSalle, Ottawa, and Peru
4have numerous businesses dedicated to river recreation,
5fishing, boat rental, and more. DeKalb and the Illinois River
6Valley communities included in the proposed district have a
7shared interest in hunting and fishing. The southern end of
8the district includes a number of popular duck, goose, and
9deer hunting locations, and hunting clubs are a significant
10part of the local economy. Meanwhile, numerous parks and
11nature areas in DeKalb attract fishers, including Prairie
12Park, East Lagoon, and Rotary Park. The proposed district
13reconnects DeKalb and LaSalle, which were previously connected
14into one representative district under legislative maps
15enacted in 1981.
16    The total population of RD 76 is 108,628. The voting age
17population is 7.04% African American, 2.34% Asian, 11.66%
18Hispanic.
19    Central Illinois: Representative Districts 87, 88, 91, 92,
2095, 96, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, and 109 lost
21more than 4,000 people over the past decade, necessitating
22reconfiguration in parts of the region.
23    The configuration of Representative District 87 as enacted
24in 2011 contained 103,051 people according to the 2020 Census.
25This was underpopulated by 5,530 people compared to target
26population. The configuration of RD 87 as enacted in Public

 

 

HR0443- 88 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Act 102-10 contained 108,750 people according to the 2020
2Census. This was overpopulated by 169 people. The proposed RD
387 It includes portions of McLean, Tazewell, DeWitt, Macon,
4Sangamon, and Logan counties. It includes all or portions of
5the communities of Armington, Atlanta, McLean, Chestnut,
6Warrensburg, Lincoln, Broadwell, Wapella, Clinton, Maroa,
7Delavan, New Holland, Danvers, Mackinaw, Tremont, and
8Heyworth. Proposed RD 87 is a major hub of transportation with
9several major highways running through it including I-55,
10I-74, I-155, Route 9, Route 10, Route 90, Route 122 and US-136.
11Proposed RD 87 also includes multiple nature preserves and
12outdoor recreation areas including Thaddeus Stubblefield Grove
13Nature Preserve and Mackinaw River State Fish and Wildlife
14Area, maintaining a community of interest. Proposed RD 87
15connects the rural communities that lay outside of Bloomington
16and Peoria, which have shared interests different from those
17of more urban areas.
18    Representative District 87 has a total population of
19108,650 and a voting age population that is 2.1% African
20American, .7% Asian, and 2.2% Hispanic.
21    The configuration of Representative District 88 as enacted
22in 2011 contained 109,108 people according to the 2020 Census.
23This was overpopulated by 527 people compared to target
24population. The configuration of RD 88 as enacted in Public
25Act 102-10 contained 106,648 people according to the 2020
26Census. This was underpopulated by 1,933 people. To

 

 

HR0443- 89 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1accommodate population shifts in neighboring districts,
2Representative District 88 includes all or portions of
3Livingston, McLean, DeWitt, Piatt, Macon, and counties. It
4includes the municipalities of Argenta, Cisco, Monticello,
5Farmer City, Bement, Cerro Gordo, Forsyth, and parts of
6Bloomington. These areas share similar cultural values of more
7rural areas and a strong connection to larger cities in
8eastern Illinois. Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois
9lost large portions of population according to the 2020
10census, this necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those
11districts. These areas were also generally overcounted in the
122015-2019 American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. To
13accommodate population shifts in neighboring districts,
14Representative District 88 includes all or portions of
15Livingston, McLean, DeWitt, Piatt, Macon, and counties. It
16includes the municipalities of Argenta, Cisco, Monticello,
17Farmer City, Bement, Cerro Gordo, Forsyth, and parts of
18Bloomington. These areas share similar cultural values of more
19rural areas and a strong connection to larger cities in
20eastern Illinois. Proposed RD 88 also contains the
21intersections of several major roadways and highways including
22I-55, I-155, Route 10 and Route 121. Additionally, a community
23of interest connected through outdoor recreation is maintained
24as RD 88 is home to different nature preserves including
25Edward R. Madigan State Park, Chestnut Beason Park, Kickapoo
26Creek County Park, Weldon Springs State Park and Old Settlers

 

 

HR0443- 90 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Park. Rd 88 includes Logan Correctional Center which serves as
2a major employer of the region, as well as educational
3institutions Lincoln Christian University and Lincoln College.
4    Representative District 88 has a total voting population
5of 108,513, with an African American voting population of 4%,
6a Hispanic voting population of 3%, and an Asian voting
7population of 4.4%.
8    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
9portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
10necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
11These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
12American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. Proposed
13Representative 91 contains parts of multiple current districts
14including RD 91, 88, 105, and 106. The configuration of RD 91
15as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 105,668 people
16according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated by 2,913
17people.
18    Representative District 91 was underpopulated by over
197,600 and shifted to accommodate the need to gain population.
20Proposed RD 91 contains portions of Peoria, Tazewell,
21Woodford, and McLean counties. Communities within proposed RD
2291 have similar home values and household incomes. Proposed RD
2391 maintains a community of interest among college students,
24faculty, and staff by keeping Illinois State University and
25Illinois Wesleyan University united within a single
26representative district. As indicated by Republican lawmakers

 

 

HR0443- 91 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1at Redistricting Hearings in August 2021, the Central Illinois
2Regional Airport in Bloomington has been included in proposed
3RD 91 to keep the airport with the community of Bloomington.
4    The total population of RD 91 is 108,488. The voting age
5population is 9.64% African American, 2.43% Asian, 5.84%
6Hispanic.
7    The configuration of Representative District 92 as enacted
8in 2011 contained 100,700 people according to the 2020 Census.
9This was underpopulated by v7881 people compared to target
10population. The configuration of RD 92 as enacted in Public
11Act 102-10 contained 103,890 people according to the 2020
12Census. This was underpopulated by 4,691 people.
13    Representative District 92 saw population loss of more
14than 7,800 over the past decade, necessitating expansion.
15Proposed RD 92 remains entirely within Peoria County and
16expands to include more of the City of Peoria. It includes all
17or parts of Peoria City, Richwoods, Medina, Radnor, Kickapoo,
18Limestone, and West Peoria townships. Proposed RD 92 contains
19all or parts of the communities of Peoria, Peoria Heights,
20West Peoria, Bartonville and Bellevue. As indicated by
21Republican lawmakers at Redistricting Hearings in August 2021,
22the Peoria airport has been included in proposed RD 92 to keep
23the airport with the community of Peoria.
24    The total population of RD 92 is 108,499. The voting age
25population is 25.84% African American, 3.24% Asian, 6.15%
26Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as

 

 

HR0443- 92 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
2identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
328.14% African American.
4    The configuration of Representative District 96 as enacted
5in 2011 contained 100,036 people according to the 2020 Census.
6This was underpopulated by 8,545 people compared to target
7population. The configuration of RD 96 as enacted in Public
8Act 102-10 contained 104,264 people according to the 2020
9Census. This was underpopulated by 4,317 people.
10    Proposed RD 96 retains the communities of interest formed
11between the city of Decatur and Springfield - two major
12central Illinois cities connected by Interstate 72. The
13proposed district includes a majority of the population of the
14current district. The district as proposed contains the vast
15majority of urban Decatur, all of the towns of Mt. Auburn,
16Roby, and Buckhart, a significant portion of the city of
17Springfield, and portions of Jerome, which are surrounded
18entirely by Springfield. In response to repeated requests from
19Republican members of the House Redistricting Springfield's
20representation into fewer districts, the proposed RD 96
21expands to include more of the city of Springfield and
22consolidate the city's central core into two House districts
23and one Senate district. The proposed district also fulfills
24requests from hearings by keeping the majority of Decatur
25intact as requested by a Decatur City Council member and
26reflecting the socioeconomic links between Decatur and parts

 

 

HR0443- 93 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1of Springfield as noted by a Decatur business owner. Eastern
2Springfield shares numerous socioeconomic similarities with
3Decatur; in many categories, including median household
4income, unemployment, and public school attendance,
5Springfield's east side compares more to Decatur than to other
6parts of Springfield outside of the proposed RD 96. Rather
7than creating multiple representative districts with a
8significant portion of residents with similar socioeconomic
9needs, proposed RD 96, by joining much of Decatur with the east
10side of Springfield, creates a representative district in
11which the needs and concerns of lower-income residents can be
12better addressed by one representative. With the seat of State
13government in Springfield, many State workers commute from
14Decatur to Springfield, and some Springfield residents work at
15the hospitals and manufacturing facilities in Decatur,
16creating a shared interest. The healthcare industry is a major
17employer in both Springfield and Decatur, linking this area
18with central Illinois hospitals with similar needs and
19interests in Decatur, including keeping Memorial Medical
20Center and HSHS St. John's Hospitals. This keeps the entire
21Springfield Medical District in the same Representative
22District, split in HB2777. The proposed RD 96 links Millikin
23University with Richland Community College, which was
24previously located in another district. The partisan
25composition of the district is enhanced by extending farther
26west into Springfield. As configured, Proposed RD 96 also

 

 

HR0443- 94 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1keeps small central Illinois cities Mechanicsburg, Buffalo,
2and Dawson complete in adjacent districts, as these
3communities share a school district. Stonington, Taylorville,
4and Rochester, which currently are fully or partially in RD 96
5have been removed so they may be kept whole in proposed RD 95.
6    The total population of RD 96 is 108,426. The voting age
7population is 26.96% African American, 1.56% Asian, 2.89%
8Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
9members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
10identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1129.14% African American.
12    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
13portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
14necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
15These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
16American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
17of RD 101 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 104,689
18people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
19by 3,892 people.
20    The proposed district reaches its most north point
21in-between the south side of Gibson City and the north side of
22Fisher. The district travels southeast along the outside of
23Champaign city limits. The district dips up to pick up St.
24Joseph before continuing south to reach its most southern
25point in Janesville. The western border travels from the
26southern border north passing through or containing the towns

 

 

HR0443- 95 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Sullivan, Atwood, Ivesdale, Mahomet and Dickerson. The entire
2district is made of rural areas and small towns outside of
3Charleston and Mattoon. Communities within the proposed
4district are largely similar demographically. They are also
5bound together with similar median incomes.
6    The total population of RD 101 is 108,583. The voting age
7population is 2.27% African American, 1.12% Asian, 4.04%
8Hispanic.
9    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
10portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
11necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
12These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
13American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
14of RD 102 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 105,283
15people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
16by 3,298 people.
17    The proposed Representative District 102 is in Champaign,
18Vermilion, Edgar, Clark, Cumberland, Coles, Effingham, Jasper,
19Crawford, and Lawrence Counties. Clark, Edgar, Jasper,
20Crawford, and Lawrence counties are kept whole. Other
21boundaries were drawn largely along township lines or major
22roadways in order to ensure substantially equal population and
23keep municipalities together. This includes many different
24municipalities throughout those counties that share rural
25interests and values. This district keeps many school
26districts intact, including Red Hill CUSD 9, Lawrence CUSD 20,

 

 

HR0443- 96 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Palestine CUSD 3, Robinson CUSD 2, Oblong CUSD 4, Jasper CUSD
21, Hutsonville CUSD 1, Dieterich CUSD 30, Teutopolis CUSD 50,
3Cumberland CUSD 77, Casey-Westfield CUSD 4C, Martinsville CUSD
43C, Marshall CUSD 2C, Paris Union CUSD 95, Kansas CUSD 3,
5Shiloh CUSD 1, Edgar County CUSD 6, Salt Fork CUSD 512,
6Georgetown-Ridge Farm CUSD 4 and parts of Heritage CUSD 8 and
7Westville CUSD 2.
8    The total population of RD 102 is 108,586. The voting age
9population is 2.57% African American, 0.34% Asian, 1.68%
10Hispanic.
11    The configuration of Representative District 103 as
12enacted in 2011 contained 109,575 people according to the 2020
13Census. This was overpopulated by 994 people compared to
14target population. The configuration of RD 103 as enacted in
15Public Act 102-10 contained 106,450 people according to the
162020 Census. This was underpopulated by 2,131 people.
17    The district sits entirely within the cities of Champaign
18and Urbana, and retains 100% of the core of the existing
19district. Numerous factors link the cities of Champaign and
20Urbana, including current representation, partisan
21similarities, and the flagship campus of the University of
22Illinois - which is a major employer and economic engine in the
23district. It keeps the cores of Champaign and Urbana together
24with the University of Illinois campus, the main housing
25areas, and the major traffic patterns around Champaign, Urbana
26and the U of I campus. The proposed district also preserves,

 

 

HR0443- 97 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1intact and in one district, the community of interest
2populations of African Americans to the north of the city
3centers and Asians to the south of the city centers. Keeping
4the majority of the cities of Champaign and Urbana in one House
5district and entirely within one Senate district strengthens
6both an urban community of interest in this district and a
7rural community of interest in surrounding districts. This
8separation helps ensure that elected officials in surrounding
9areas can focus on issues that are more pressing to rural
10communities.
11    The total population of RD 103 is 108,573. The voting age
12population is 16.61% African American, 19.11% Asian, 9.19%
13Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
14members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
15identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1618.43%.
17    The configuration of Representative District 104 as
18enacted in 2011 contained 102,465 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was underpopulated by 6116 people compared to
20target population. The configuration of RD 104 as enacted in
21Public Act 102-10 contained 103,519 people according to the
222020 Census. This was underpopulated by 5,062 people. The
23proposed RD 104 is in Champaign and Vermilion counties. The
24proposed district contains Danville, Tilton, Westville,
25Belgium, Oakwood, Muncie, Fithian, Royal, Savoy, Thomasboro,
26and Rantoul. RD 104 is made up of the areas outside of the

 

 

HR0443- 98 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1urban areas of Champaign and Urbana. It extends north of the
2city to take in Thomasboro and Rantoul. It travels east along
3the northern boundaries of Ogden and Stanton Townships. This
4northern boundary follows E 2500 North Rd. The eastern
5boundary extends all the way to the border of Illinois and
6Indiana. This envelopes nearly the entire municipality of
7Danville. This district was drawn to keep the surrounding
8communities around Champaign Urbana together.
9    The total population of RD 104 is 108,592. The voting age
10population is 13.65% African American, 5.15% Asian, 5.51%
11Hispanic.
12    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
13portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
14necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
15These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
16American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
17of RD 105 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 106,399
18people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
19by 2,182 people.
20    Representative District 105 was overpopulated by nearly
212,500. Proposed RD 105 includes all of Putnam County and
22portions of Bureau, Marshall, Peoria, Woodford, Tazewell,
23McLean, LaSalle, and Livingston counties. Lines largely follow
24township and municipal boundaries. It included the school
25districts of Putnam County CUSD 535, Lostant CUSD 425,
26Fieldcrest CUSD 6, Lowpoint Washburn CUSD #21, Roanoke-Benson

 

 

HR0443- 99 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1CUSD 60, Flanagan-Cornell Unit 74, El Paso Gridley, CUSD 11
2and Lexington 7 McLean County 5.
3    The total population of RD 105 is 108,658. The voting age
4population is 2.03% African American, 1.64% Asian, 2.91%
5Hispanic.
6    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
7portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
8necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
9These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
10American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. This was
11underpopulated by 6,953 people compared to target population.
12The configuration of RD 106 as enacted in Public Act 102-10
13contained 105,924 people according to the 2020 Census. This
14was underpopulated by 2,657 people.
15    Representative District 106 was underpopulated by nearly
167,000. It includes portions of the counties of LaSalle,
17Grundy, Livingston, Ford, Champaign, and Iroquois. Households
18in the communities within proposed RD 106 have similar median
19incomes, ranging from $46,515 to $77,160.
20    The total population of RD 106 is 108,394. The voting age
21population is 1.00% African American, 0.51% Asian, 5.87%
22Hispanic.
23    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
24portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
25necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
26These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019

 

 

HR0443- 100 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
2of RD 107 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 108,108
3people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
4by 473 people.
5    Representative District 107 is comprised largely of
6portions of current RDs 101 and 102. Proposed RD 107 contains
7all of Moultrie and Shelby counties along with portions of
8Macon, Christian, Montgomery, and Effingham counties.
9Municipalities of Taylorville, Pana, Owaneco, Wenonah,
10Nokomis, Strasburg, Witt, Coalton, Herrick, Altamont,
11Stewardson, Sigel, Sullivan, Lovington, Beecher, and Effingham
12are within the confines of proposed RD 107. The western border
13goes to Cumberland and Effingham County, then goes east to
14include the city of Effingham. Counties are split almost
15exclusively along township lines with the exception of South
16Wheatland and Neoga townships. These were split to ensure
17substantially equal population between the districts.
18    The total population of RD 107 is 108,548. The voting age
19population is 0.71% African American, 0.58% Asian, 2.09%
20Hispanic.
21    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
22portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
23necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
24These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
25American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
26of RD 108 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 108,549

 

 

HR0443- 101 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
2by 32 people.
3    Representative District 108 is comprised of portions of
4current RDs 87, 95, 96, 99 and 100. It includes parts of
5Macoupin, Montgomery, Christian, and Sangamon counties along
6with all of Menard County. The proposed district allows for
7Springfield to be less split over several districts than the
8current map. The district boundaries follow the local county
9and township boundaries. Only Chatham, Curran, Ball, Cotton
10Hill, Gardner, Clear Lake, and Mechanicsburg townships are
11split in proposed RD108. These splits are largely along
12municipal boundaries, major roads, and bodies of water.
13Interstate 55 runs through the core of proposed RD108.
14    The total population of RD 108 is 108,600. The voting age
15population is 1.52% African American, 0.50% Asian, 1.27%
16Hispanic.
17    Metro East: Generally labeled as the "Metro East", this
18region borders St. Louis, Missouri to the east. It has seen
19significant population loss over the last ten years, losing
20more than 10,000 residents within the four representative
21districts over the last decade. This has resulted in the
22representative districts having to add population to reach the
23targeted equal population. This is an economically and
24socially diverse region with common economic challenges which
25impact all or parts of the area. Many of the residents of these
26four representative districts work in and commute to St. Louis

 

 

HR0443- 102 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1every day.
2    The configuration of Representative District 111 as
3enacted in 2011 contained 103,026 people according to the 2020
4Census. This was underpopulated by 5,555 people compared to
5target population. The configuration of RD 111 as enacted in
6Public Act 102-10 contained 104,424 people according to the
72020 Census. This was underpopulated by 4,157 people.
8    The proposed district keeps the majority of the current
9district, including the core of Riverbend Region. It is
10located entirely within Madison County, whereas current RD 111
11is split between Madison and Jersey counties. The cities of
12Alton, Godfrey, Bethalto, Wood River, East Alton, Hartford,
13Rosewood Heights, Roxana and South Roxana all belong to the
14same Chamber of Commerce Group, the Riverbend Growth
15Association. The proposed district removes much of the rural
16areas of the current district and adds more of Granite City so
17it is only divided between two representative districts
18instead of three. The proposed district adds parts of Glen
19Carbon and Maryville which share many of the same social,
20cultural and economic characteristics as seen in other parts
21of the proposed district.
22    The total population of RD 111 is 108,642. The voting age
23population is 9.02% African American, 0.82% Asian, 3.38%
24Hispanic.
25    The configuration of Representative District 112 as
26enacted in 2011 contained 114,505 people according to the 2020

 

 

HR0443- 103 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Census. This was overpopulated by 5,924 people compared to
2target population. The configuration of RD 112 as enacted in
3Public Act 102-10 contained 113,336 people according to the
42020 Census. This was overpopulated by 4,755 people.
5    The district boundaries were adjusted to accommodate
6significant population loss in the Metro East region, but it
7retains the core of the current district and most of its
8current population. It includes more of Granite City which
9splits Granite City between two representative districts and
10one legislative district instead of three representative
11districts and two legislative districts. The proposed district
12includes more of Caseyville and Fairview Heights, puts all of
13State Park Place and Fairmont Race Track in one district, and
14keeps Southern Illinois University Edwardsville campus in the
15district, with the campus boundary as one of the western
16district lines. Changes in the southern border of the proposed
17district return the district to some of the 2001 district
18boundaries.
19    The total population of RD 112 is 108,602. The voting age
20population is 14.41% African American, 2.00% Asian, 5.66%
21Hispanic.
22    The configuration of Representative District 113 as
23enacted in 2011 contained 101,432 people according to the 2020
24Census. This was underpopulated by 7,149 people compared to
25target population. The configuration of RD 113 as enacted in
26Public Act 102-10 contained 108,460 people according to the

 

 

HR0443- 104 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

12020 Census. This was underpopulated by 121 people.
2    The proposed district is made up of portions of both
3Madison and St. Clair Counties. While the district expands its
4current border to add population, it roughly maintains the
5same shape and includes the majority of the current district.
6The divisions through Madison and Fairmont City follow along
7township and county boundaries. In the proposed district, both
8Belleville High School and O'Fallon High School are all in the
9South Western Conference for sports.
10    The total population of RD 113 is 108,474. The voting age
11population is 29.56% African American, 1.66% Asian, 4.64%
12Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
13members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
14identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1531.21% African American.
16    The configuration of Representative District 114 as
17enacted in 2011 contained 97,784 people according to the 2020
18Census. This was underpopulated by 10,797 people compared to
19target population. The configuration of RD 114 as enacted in
20Public Act 102-10 contained 99,346 people according to the
212020 Census. This was underpopulated by 9,235 people. The
22proposed RD 114 largely maintains the same shape and includes
23a majority of the current district. The proposed district
24makes whole Cahokia, East Carondelet, Smithton, Sauget,
25Mascoutah, and Millstadt which were all previously split with
26another representative district. The proposed district's

 

 

HR0443- 105 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1southern border now follows the Fayetteville, Millstadt,
2Prairie Du Long, and New Athens Township lines and keeps the
3economic drivers and landmarks such as Scott Air Force Base in
4the district. The proposed district makes whole Cahokia
5Community Unit School District 187 and Dupo Community Unit
6School District 196, which were previously split.
7    The total population of RD 114 is 108,384. The voting age
8population is 33.41% African American, 1.01% Asian, 2.38%
9Hispanic. The 2020 Census allowed people to identify as
10members of multiple racial groups. Including individuals who
11identify as multiple races, the voting age population is
1234.90% African American.
13    Western Illinois: The configuration of Representative
14District 71 as enacted in 2011 contained 106,494 people
15according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated by 2,087
16people compared to target population. The configuration of RD
1771 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 105,383 people
18according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated by 3,198
19people. To gain population and accommodate population shifts
20in neighboring districts, RD 71 shifts south. Counties
21represented within the proposed RD 71 include Rock Island
22County, Henry County, Mercer County, Warren County, Knox
23County, and McDonough County. Proposed RD 71 contains the
24following townships: In Rock Island County, Coal Valley
25(portion), Hampton (portion), South Moline (portion), and
26Rural; in Henry County, Colona, Western, Lynn, and Oxford; in

 

 

HR0443- 106 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Mercer County, Richland Grove, Rivoli, and North Henderson; in
2Knox County, Rio, Henderson, Galesburg City, Galesburg, and
3Knox; in Warren County, Kelly, Coldbrook, Monmouth, Lenox,
4Floyd, Roseville, Berwick, Swan, Greenbush; in McDonough
5County, Walnut Grove, Prairie City, Bushnell, Mound, Macomb,
6Emmet, and Macomb City (portion). Proposed RD 71 contains a
7higher education community of interest with Black Hawk
8College, Western Illinois University, Monmouth College, and
9Knox College. At the request of the Knox County Board,
10Galesburg is wholly located within one district. Proposed RD
1171 preserves agricultural and small town communities of
12interest by keeping as many townships and municipalities as
13possible intact. The proposed RD 71's partisan index is
14similar to that of the current RD 71.
15    The total population of RD 71 is 108,735. The voting age
16population is 7.28% African American, 1.87% Asian, 6.07%
17Hispanic.
18    The configuration of Representative District 72 as enacted
19in 2011 contained 105,876 people according to the 2020 Census.
20This was underpopulated by 2,705 people compared to target
21population. The configuration of RD 72 as enacted in Public
22Act 102-10 contained 108,840 people according to the 2020
23Census. This was overpopulated by 259 people. Proposed RD 72
24includes a majority of the current district. Located entirely
25within Rock Island County, proposed RD 72 keeps South Rock
26Island, Rock Island, and Moline townships together, as they

 

 

HR0443- 107 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1are in current RD 72. To ensure compactness and unite
2communities of interest, proposed RD 72 fully incorporates
3Black Hawk Township, which is currently split between
4districts. Proposed RD 72 takes in additional portions of
5Milan, Moline, and East Moline, while removing more rural
6areas of current RD 72. Expanding eastward to gain population,
7proposed RD 72 includes all of Hampton and more of Silvis,
8which is currently divided by a boundary line. Proposed RD 72
9lies within the Peoria Catholic Diocese, and the
10Davenport-Rock Island-Moline media market-all distinctions
11carried over from current RD 72. It contains one regional
12airport authority in Moline, is represented by the Tri-City
13Building Trades, operates on the Bi-State Regional Commission
14and is covered by the Moline office of the Department of
15Employment Security. All of these characteristics are carried
16over from current RD 72.
17    The total population of RD 72 is 108,580. The voting age
18population is 11.39% African American, 2.50% Asian, 13.74%
19Hispanic.
20    The configuration of Representative District 73 as enacted
21in 2011 contained 110,651 people according to the 2020 Census.
22This was overpopulated by 2,070 people compared to target
23population. The configuration of RD 73 as enacted in Public
24Act 102-10 contained 108,973 people according to the 2020
25Census. This was overpopulated by 392 people. It includes
26portions of Henry, Bureau, Stark, Marshall, Peoria and

 

 

HR0443- 108 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Woodford counties. The district has parts of northeast Peoria
2as its southern border. This district was drawn to keep
3communities of similar economic interest together as the
4median household income of all the counties range from $54,907
5to $72,808. RD 73 was reconfigured to avoid pairing incumbents
6after concerns raised by House Republicans.
7    Proposed RD 73 will contain Berlin, Bureau, Clarion,
8Concord, Dover, Fairfield, Gold, Greenville, Indianatown, La
9Moille, Macon, Manlius, Milo, Mineral, Neponset, Ohio,
10Princeton, Walnut, Westfield, and Wyanet Townships.
11    The total population of RD 73 is 108,553. The voting age
12population is 1.16% African American, 3.32% Asian, 2.66%
13Hispanic.
14    The configuration of Representative District 74 as enacted
15in 2011 contained 105,304 people according to the 2020 Census.
16This was underpopulated by 3,277 people compared to target
17population. The configuration of RD 74 as enacted in Public
18Act 102-10 contained 106,987 people according to the 2020
19Census. This was underpopulated by 1,594 people. RD 74 links
20communities off I-88 and I-39, two major roadways in the area.
21This district also links communities along the Rock River,
22creating a community of interest for river communities. It
23includes the municipalities of Rochelle, Hillcrest, Creston,
24Malta, Steward, Lee, Shabbona, Paw, Earlville, Leland,
25Harding, Triumph, Troy Grove, Morrison, Rock Falls, Sterling,
26Nelson, Harmon, Amboy, Mendota, Ashton, Franklin Grove, Dixon,

 

 

HR0443- 109 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1and Coleta.
2    The total population of RD 74 is 108,476. The voting age
3population is 2.96% African American, 0.68% Asian, 12.24%
4Hispanic.
5    The configuration of Representative District 89 as enacted
6in 2011 contained 103,495 people according to the 2020 Census.
7This was underpopulated by 5,086 people compared to target
8population. The configuration of RD 89 as enacted in Public
9Act 102-10 contained 109,988 people according to the 2020
10Census. This was overpopulated by 1,407 people.
11    Proposed Representative District 89 has similar income
12levels, and similar home value levels. It has several highways
13within the confines of the district, including Interstate 39,
14State Route 2, State Route 38, State Route 64, State Route 70,
15State Route 72, State Route 75, and State Route 251. It also
16has several outdoor recreations, Hononegah Forest Preserve,
17Kieselburg County Forest Preserve, Rock Cut State Park,
18Rockton Bog Nature Preserve, Sugar River Alder Nature
19Preserve, Colored Sands Forest Preserve, Sand Bluff Bird
20Observatory, and Colored Sands Bluff Nature Preserve.
21    Proposed RD 89 contains stateline communities bordering
22Iowa and Wisconsin as well as other communities in
23northwestern Illinois. These include Galena, Hanover,
24Elizabeth, Warren, Nora, Apple River, Winslow, Pearl City,
25Lake Carroll, Channon, Milledgeville, Savanna, Thomson, Mount
26Morris, Byron, Stillman Valley, Monroe center, Genoa,

 

 

HR0443- 110 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Kirkland, and Davis Junction.
2    The total population of RD 89 is 108,566. The voting age
3population is 1.34% African American, 0.44% Asian, 4.43%
4Hispanic.
5    Rural areas in Illinois lost large portions of population
6according to the 2020 census, this necessitated a larger
7reconfiguration of those districts. These areas were also
8generally overcounted in the 2015-2019 American Community
9Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration of RD 90 as enacted
10in Public Act 102-10 contained 109,678 people according to the
112020 Census. This was overpopulated by 1,097 people.
12    Proposed Representative District 90 contains all or
13portions of the communities of Freeport, Willow Lake, Ridott,
14Cedarville, Orangeville, Dakota, Rock City, Davis, Lake
15Summerset, Durand, Machesney Park, Roscoe, Rockton, South
16Beloit, Argyle. Proposed RD 90 is located within Stephenson
17County and Winnebago County. In Stephenson County it contains
18all or parts of Oneco, Dakota, Rock Grove, Rock Run, Ridott,
19Silver Greek, Freeport, Lancaster, Harlem, and Florence
20Townships. In Winnebago County it contains all or parts of
21Durand, Laona, Shirland, Harrison, Rockton, Roscoe, Owen,
22Harlem, and Rockford townships. Proposed RD 90 contains
23stateline communities bordering Wisconsin.
24    The total population of RD 90 is 108,525. The voting age
25population is 5.56% African American, 1.48% Asian, 5.12%
26Hispanic.

 

 

HR0443- 111 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
2portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
3necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
4These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
5American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
6of RD 93 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 109,437
7people according to the 2020 Census. This was overpopulated by
8856 people. To accommodate population shifts, Representative
9District 93 expands and contains all or parts of Henry, Knox,
10Stark, Peoria, and Tazewell counties. It contains rural
11communities including Osco, Andover, Cambridge, Kewanee,
12Bishop Hill, Nekoma, Galva, La Fayette, Altona, Oneida,
13Wataga, Victoria, Oak Run, Williamsfield, Princeville,
14Wyoming, Toulon, Brimfield, Maquon, Gilson, Yates, Elmwood,
15Trivoli, Hanna City, Smithville, Lake Camelot, Glasford,
16Kingston Mines, Mapleton, and Norwood. It also contains
17communities in North Pekin, South Pekin, Pekin, and Marquette
18Heights.
19    The total population of RD 93 is 108,708. The voting age
20population is 2.11% African American, 1.07% Asian, 3.10%
21Hispanic.
22    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
23portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
24necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
25These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
26American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration

 

 

HR0443- 112 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1of RD 94 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 106,344
2people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
3by 2,237 people.
4    Proposed Representative District 94 contains communities
5including San Jose, Mason City, Green Valley, Easton,
6Kilbourne, Topeka, Forest City, Manito, Goofy Ridge,
7Liverpool, Banner, Havana, St. David, Dunfermline, Bath,
8Astoria, Ipava, Lewistown, Bryant, Canton, Cuba, Smithfield,
9Fairview, Vermont, Table Grove, Marietta, Ellisville, London
10Mills, Avon, St. Augustine, Abingdon, Adair, Industry,
11Littleton, Macomb, Colchester, Tennessee, Plymouth, Augusta,
12Golden, La Prairie, Bowen, Lorraine, West Point, Bentley,
13Carthage, Ferris, Elvaston, Hamilton, Warsaw, Lima, Meyer,
14Basco, Good Hope, Sciota, Blandinsville, La Harpe, Nauvoo,
15Niota, Pontoosuc, Dallas City, Lomax, Carman, Raritan,
16Stronghurst, Gulfport, Gladstone, Biggsville, Kirkwood,
17Oquawka, Little York, Seaton, Keithsburg, New Boston, Joy,
18Aledo, Viola, Matherville, Millersburg, Preemption, Reynolds,
19Hamlet Eliza, Illinois City, Buffalo Prairie, Taylor Ridge,
20Edington, and Andalusia. Proposed RD 94 contains all or parts
21of Rock Island, Mercer, Warren, Henderson, Hancock, Adams,
22McDonough, Fulton, Mason, Tazewell, and Knox counties.
23    The total population of RD 94 is 108,580. The voting age
24population is 1.51% African American, 0.29% Asian, 1.77%
25Hispanic.
26    The configuration of Representative District 95 as enacted

 

 

HR0443- 113 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1in 2011 contained 104,076 people according to the 2020 Census.
2This was underpopulated by 4,505 people compared to target
3population. The configuration of RD 95 as enacted in Public
4Act 102-10 contained 110,054 people according to the 2020
5Census. This was overpopulated by 1,473 people.
6    Proposed district 95 has its most north point on the
7southside of Sherman and contains the northern, western and
8southern outskirts of Springfield. Counties contained in the
9proposed district are Sangamon, Macon and Christian. Proposed
10RD 95 unites Rochester and Stonington municipalities, both of
11which are split in the current district. Proposed RD 95 also
12keeps the Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport, Lincoln's Tomb, and
13the Illinois State Fair grounds together in one district.
14    The total population of RD 95 is 108,730. The voting age
15population is 7.86% African American, 2.87% Asian, 2.18%
16Hispanic.
17    Representative District 99, which is the former RD 100,
18was underpopulated by over 8,800. It includes portions of
19Morgan, Schuyler, Brown and Adams counties along with all of
20Cass County. The western border of the district is the
21Missouri-Illinois state line with the western border following
22county lines. The southern and northern boundaries are largely
23along township lines. Proposed RD 99 only splits Versailles,
24Chapin, and Woodson townships for population purposes, but
25keeps together municipalities in those townships. This
26district was drawn to keep communities of similar economic

 

 

HR0443- 114 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1interest together. The median income for Jacksonville, Quincy
2and Beardstown is between $40,750 and $46,189.
3    The total population of RD 99 is 108,582. The voting age
4population is 5.75% African American, 0.78% Asian, 3.98%
5Hispanic.
6    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
7portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
8necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
9These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
10American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
11of RD 100 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 105,106
12people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
13by 3,475 people.
14    Proposed Representative District 100 includes the parts of
15Adams, Brown, Morgan, Madison, and Macoupin counties, and
16includes all of Pike, Scott, Greene, Calhoun, and Jersey
17counties. Counties are split largely along township lines.
18Rural parts of Godfrey, Foster and Fort Russell townships in
19Madison County are in proposed RD 100 that are in current 111,
20this places them in a more rural district that better matches
21the needs of the areas than the more urban and industrial parts
22of current and proposed RD 111. The district boundaries follow
23the Missouri and Illinois borders and unite a plethora of
24Riverfront communities.
25    The total population of RD 100 is 108,707. The voting age
26population is 1.11% African American, 0.38% Asian, 1.23%

 

 

HR0443- 115 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Hispanic.
2    Southern Illinois: The Southern Illinois region sustained
3some of the largest population losses in the State, and House
4districts required significant reconfiguration to create
5compact districts of substantially equal population.
6    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
7portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
8necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
9These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
10American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
11of RD 109 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 111,147
12people according to the 2020 Census. This was overpopulated by
132,566 people.
14    Representative District 109 saw population loss of more
15than 4,400. The proposed district includes parts of Bond,
16Madison, Clinton, St. Clair, and Washington Counties. These
17counties are well-paired economically, with relatively
18consistent median household incomes throughout the group.
19Incomes range from $52,200 in Bond County to $63,900 in
20Clinton County. Townships and municipalities are largely kept
21intact with only Lebanon, O'Fallon, Collinsville,
22Fayetteville, and Fort Russell townships being split for the
23purposes of keeping substantially equal population.
24    Proposed RD 109 also keeps all of Triad Community Unit
25School District 2 and Highland Community Unit School District
265 in the same district. The two schools compete in most school

 

 

HR0443- 116 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1sports and have a strong school rivalry that brings the two
2communities together for football and basketball games.
3    The total population of RD 109 is 108,548. The voting age
4population is 2.30% African American, 0.70% Asian, 2.67%
5Hispanic.
6    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
7portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
8necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
9These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
10American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
11of RD 110 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 106,266
12people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
13by 2,315 people.
14    Representative District 110 was underpopulated by over
1510,000. Proposed RD 110 includes all or portions of Marion,
16Clay, Richland, Fayette, Clinton, Bond, Montgomery, and
17Effingham counties. There are no split townships in proposed
18RD 110. Wamac is the only split municipality and is split along
19county lines. Proposed RD 110 keeps Centralia in one district
20where it is currently split. Proposed RD 110 is a largely rural
21district with mostly small farming towns. Proposed RD 110 also
22includes the entirety of Vandalia where the second, third, and
23fourth capitol buildings used by the Illinois General Assembly
24were located with the fourth capitol building still standing
25in Vandalia today.
26    The total population of RD 110 is 108,564. The voting age

 

 

HR0443- 117 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1population is 3.36% African American, 0.69% Asian, 1.99%
2Hispanic.
3    Rural areas in eastern and central Illinois lost large
4portions of population according to the 2020 census, this
5necessitated a larger reconfiguration of those districts.
6These areas were also generally overcounted in the 2015-2019
7American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. The configuration
8of RD 116 as enacted in Public Act 102-10 contained 106,482
9people according to the 2020 Census. This was underpopulated
10by 2,099 people.
11    Representative District 115 is the core of the current RD
12116. The configuration of Representative District 116 as
13enacted in 2011 contained 104,205 people according to the 2020
14Census. This was underpopulated by 4,376 people compared to
15target population. The configuration of RD 115 as enacted in
16Public Act 102-10 contained 105,955 people according to the
172020 Census. This was underpopulated by 2,626 people.
18    The proposed district contains all of Monroe, Perry, and
19Randolph counties and portions of Jackson, St. Clair, and
20Washington counties, and the municipalities of Gorham,
21Murphysboro, Vergennes, Ava, Campbell Hill, Rockwood, Percy,
22Steeleville, Chester, Kaskaskia, Ellis Grove, Evansville,
23Ruma, Sparta, Coulterville, Tilden, Oakdale, Baldwin, Red Bud,
24Marissa, Lenzburg, Hecker, Maeystown, Valmeyer, Waterloo, and
25Columbia. Proposed RD 115 unites the city of Du Quoin, which is
26the home of the annual Du Quoin State Fair. Proposed RD 115 has

 

 

HR0443- 118 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1an agricultural community of interest and a recreational and
2tourism community of interest that includes Kinkaid Lake, Lake
3Murphysboro State Park, Middle Mississippi River National
4Wildlife Refuge, Piney Creek Ravine Nature Preserve,
5Kaskaskia, which was the first State capital of Illinois,
6Randolph County State Recreation Area, and Washington County
7State Recreation Area. Proposed RD 115 also contains the
8Misselhorn Art Gallery in Sparta, which occupies a former
9train depot used as a filming location in 1967's In The Heat of
10the Night, which the Library of Congress placed on the
11National Film Registry. Partisan advantage is largely the same
12as the current RD 115.
13    The total population of RD 115 is 108,630. The voting age
14population is 5.49% African American, 0.45% Asian, 2.44%
15Hispanic.
16    Representative District 116 is comprised of parts of
17former RDs 109, 115, 117, and 118. Proposed RD 116 contains all
18of Jefferson County, Wayne County, Edwards County, and Wabash
19County and while containing portions of White, Washington,
20Franklin, Hamilton, and Wayne counties. Within Washington
21County, DuBois Township is split along Random Road and County
22Highway 26 for population purposes. In Hamilton County, no
23townships are split, uniting McLeansboro Township which is
24currently split by RD 117 and RD 118.
25    Partisan advantage is largely the same as the current RD
26116. Areas in proposed RD 116 have largely similar

 

 

HR0443- 119 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1demographics, per capita income, rate of people living in
2poverty, average travel time to work, owner-occupied housing
3rates, mortgage costs, and rental housing costs according to
4American Community Survey data. Primary economic communities
5of interest include the agriculture industry and the energy
6industry. Counties in the proposed RD 116 have much higher
7average shares of workers in these industries compared to the
8rest of the State. Proposed RD 116 contains the following
9municipalities: Johnsonville, Cisne, Mount Erie, Fairfield,
10Jeffersonville, Golden Gate, West Salem, Bone Gap, Albion,
11Browns, Belmont, Keensburg, Mount Carmel Buckner, Christopher,
12North City, Valier, Sesser, Benton, West City, Ewing,
13Macedonia, Ina, Nason, Bonnie, Waltonville, Woodlawn, Mt.
14Vernon, Dix, Belle Rive, Dahlgren, Bluford, Keenes, Wayne
15City, Sims, Belle Prairie, McLeansboro, Enfield, Springerton,
16Mill Shoals, Burnt Prairie, Carmi, Phillipstown, Crossville,
17and Grayville. Cultural attractions include Rend Lake
18recreational areas, Mt. Vernon Game Propagation Center, and
19the Hamilton County State Fish & Wildlife Area. Proposed RD
20116 unites McLeansboro.
21    Following the release of the proposed legislative map on
22Friday, May 21, 2021, Republican state representatives made
23public comments criticizing the number of incumbent Republican
24state representatives whose primary residences were located in
25the same representative district as another incumbent
26Republican state representative. This new proposed district

 

 

HR0443- 120 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1boundary therefore changed boundaries from the original
2proposal district from Friday, May 21. Following the request
3of Republicans, RD 116 was reconfigured to put Representative
4Meier's home in RD 109, while keeping Representative Friess'
5home in 116.
6    The total population of RD 116 is 108,536. The voting age
7population is 2.70% African American, 0.80% Asian, 1.45%
8Hispanic.
9    The configuration of Representative District 117 as
10enacted in 2011 contained 107,660 people according to the 2020
11Census. This was underpopulated by 921 people compared to
12target population. The configuration of RD 117 as enacted in
13Public Act 102-10 contained 107,649 people according to the
142020 Census. This was underpopulated by 932 people. Proposed
15RD 117 keeps Pope, Massac, Johnson, Hardin, Gallatin, and
16Saline Counties together. Split counties of Williamson,
17Franklin, White and Hamilton are mostly split along township
18lines keeping Six Mile, Denning, Indian Creek, Heralds
19Prairie, Emma, Eastern, Mayberry, Twigg, Cave, Frankfort,
20Southern, Flannigan, South Flannigan together. Frankfort, East
21Marion and Benton townships are the only split townships in
22proposed 117 to help ensure equal population. Most of these
23township splits are largely along current precinct lines.
24Benton Township is split along the Big Muddy River to ensure
25municipalities in the township remain whole. All of the
26counties in proposed 117 have similar median household incomes

 

 

HR0443- 121 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1with the counties ranging from $39k-$44k. Including places
2like Marion with median household income of $44.4k Proposed RD
3117 includes mostly rural areas along with two of the larger
4population centers in Southern Illinois of Marion and
5Harrisburg. It also includes a large part of Shawnee National
6Forest and follows the Wabash and Ohio rivers that also make up
7the state's borders.
8    The total population of RD 117 is 108,516. The voting age
9population is 3.87% African American, 0.35% Asian, 1.86%
10Hispanic.
11    The configuration of Representative District 99 as enacted
12in 2011 contained 111,958 people according to the 2020 Census.
13This was underpopulated by 3,377 people compared to target
14population. The configuration of RD 99 as enacted in Public
15Act 102-10 contained 106,843 people according to the 2020
16Census. This was underpopulated by -1,738 people.
17    Proposed Representative District 118 contains parts of
18former RDs 115, 117, and 118. The proposed district includes
19the entirety of Pulaski, Alexander, and Union counties.
20Proposed RD 118 splits Jackson, and Williamson counties,
21largely keeping townships and municipalities together in
22whole. It contains all of Carbondale, Elk, De Soto, Makanda,
23Pomona, Grand Tower, Blairsville, Carterville, West Marion and
24Grassy townships, along with parts of Murphysboro and East
25Marion townships. Southern Illinois has a strong regional
26identity, driven in no small part by Southern Illinois

 

 

HR0443- 122 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1University in Carbondale. The University continues to be an
2economic engine as one of the leading research universities in
3the State and a major employer for the area. Proposed RD 118
4unites the entirety of the City of Carbondale and Southern
5Illinois University Carbondale Campus into one Representative
6District where both are currently divided into two
7Representative Districts and two Legislative Districts. In
8addition to the University, Proposed RD 118 includes John A.
9Logan Community College whereas it is currently in a different
10district than the two districts including the University.
11Southern Illinois and proposed RD 118 has unique geography
12that is also a source of tourism. Proposed RD 118 includes
13Giant City State Park and parts of the Shawnee National
14Forest. There are also multiple manmade lakes in proposed RD
15118 widely used for recreation in the region including Little
16Grassy Lake, Crab Orchard Lake, Devils Kitchen Lake, and Cedar
17Lake. Proposed RD 118 also includes all of the Shawnee Hills
18Wine Trail, a collection of local wineries attracting tourists
19from the State and spurring further economic development in
20the region. Proposed RD 118 unites Southern Illinois
21communities with larger minority populations such as Pulaski,
22Mounds, Cairo, Mound City, Tamms, Carbondale, Ullin, and
23Thebes. Uniting these communities and ending the split of
24Carbondale under the 2011 maps in order to protect the voting
25power of historically marginalized and disenfranchised
26citizens was requested by Dr. Linda Flowers, President of the

 

 

HR0443- 123 -LRB102 19992 JWD 28789 r

1Carbondale NAACP, during the Carbondale House Redistricting
2Committee hearing on April 19, 2021.
3    The total population of RD 118 is 108,520. The voting age
4population is 9.98% African American, 2.76% Asian, 3.79%
5Hispanic; and be it further
 
6    RESOLVED, That this House Resolution adopts and
7incorporates by reference the provisions of Senate Resolution
83 of the 1st Special Session of the 102nd General Assembly.