| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning children.
| ||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||||
4 | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | ||||||
5 | Bias-Free Child Removal Pilot Program Act. | ||||||
6 | Section 5. Findings. The General Assembly finds that the | ||||||
7 | University of Illinois' Children and Family Research Center | ||||||
8 | determined in its October 2021 report, "Racial | ||||||
9 | Disproportionality in the Illinois Child Welfare System", | ||||||
10 | that: | ||||||
11 | (1) In 2020, compared to their percentage in the | ||||||
12 | general child population, black children were | ||||||
13 | overrepresented in foster care having made up 16.4% of the | ||||||
14 | general child population, but accounting for 38.5% of | ||||||
15 | protective custodies. | ||||||
16 | (2) In comparison, white children were proportionally | ||||||
17 | represented in foster care having made up 52.8% of the | ||||||
18 | general child population, but accounting for 48.8% of | ||||||
19 | protective custodies. Hispanic children were | ||||||
20 | under-represented having made up 24.9% of the general | ||||||
21 | child population, but accounting for 11.5% of protective | ||||||
22 | custodies. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Section 10. Purpose. | ||||||
2 | (a) In Illinois, and across the nation, some racial and | ||||||
3 | ethnic minority groups are disproportionately represented in | ||||||
4 | the child welfare system. This disproportionality could occur | ||||||
5 | at 5 different decision points during a family's child welfare | ||||||
6 | involvement: | ||||||
7 | (1) investigated child abuse/neglect (CAN) reports; | ||||||
8 | (2) protective custodies; | ||||||
9 | (3) indicated CAN reports; | ||||||
10 | (4) post-investigation service provision; and | ||||||
11 | (5) timely exits from substitute care. | ||||||
12 | (b) The purpose of this Act is to: | ||||||
13 | (1) Require the Department of Children and Family | ||||||
14 | Services to establish a 3-year, Bias-Free Child Removal | ||||||
15 | Pilot Program for the purpose of promoting unbiased | ||||||
16 | decision making in the child removal process, while | ||||||
17 | maintaining the safety of children and reducing risk, with | ||||||
18 | the goal of decreasing the overrepresentation of BIPOC | ||||||
19 | children in out-of-home placements. This goal would be | ||||||
20 | achieved by convening a group of senior-level internal | ||||||
21 | staff members from the Department of Children and Family | ||||||
22 | Services who are from an area
other than the pilot area
to | ||||||
23 | (i) review removal decisions, absent specific demographic | ||||||
24 | information and (ii) determine whether removal of a child | ||||||
25 | is necessary to avoid imminent risk to the child's safety, | ||||||
26 | health, and well-being. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (2) Establish a steering committee to: | ||||||
2 | (A) develop and implement the Bias-Free Removal | ||||||
3 | Pilot Program; | ||||||
4 | (B) appoint members for the Bias-Free Case Review | ||||||
5 | Team; and | ||||||
6 | (C) appoint members for the Bias-Free Child | ||||||
7 | Removal Advisory Board. | ||||||
8 | (3) Establish a Bias-Free Case Review Team consisting | ||||||
9 | of a child protection supervisor, an area administrator, | ||||||
10 | and a regional administrator from an area other than the | ||||||
11 | pilot area to: (i) review removal decisions absent | ||||||
12 | specific demographic information as provided in paragraph | ||||||
13 | (3) of subsection (e) of Section 25; and (ii) determine | ||||||
14 | whether removal of the child is necessary to avoid | ||||||
15 | imminent risk to the child's safety, health, and | ||||||
16 | well-being. | ||||||
17 | (4) Establish a Bias-Free Child Removal Advisory Board | ||||||
18 | to monitor and oversee the Bias-Free Case Review Team and | ||||||
19 | ensure that the Bias-Free Case Review Team executes | ||||||
20 | bias-free removals in accordance with the provisions of | ||||||
21 | this Act. | ||||||
22 | Section 15. Definitions. As used in this Act: | ||||||
23 | "Bias-free" means to review a case file without the | ||||||
24 | following identifying demographic information on the parent | ||||||
25 | and child: gender, race, ethnicity, geographic location, and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | socioeconomic status, which prevents a reader from inserting | ||||||
2 | bias, implicit or explicit, into critical decisions such as | ||||||
3 | removing a child from the child's family. | ||||||
4 | "BIPOC" means people who are members of the groups | ||||||
5 | described in subparagraphs (a) through (e) of paragraph (A) of | ||||||
6 | subsection (1) of Section 2 of the Business Enterprise for | ||||||
7 | Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act. | ||||||
8 | "Child" means any person under 18 years of age. | ||||||
9 | "Child welfare court personnel" means lawyers, judges, | ||||||
10 | public defenders, and
guardians ad litem. | ||||||
11 | "Department" means the Department of Children and Family | ||||||
12 | Services. | ||||||
13 | "Evaluation design" means identifying an overall strategy | ||||||
14 | for analyzing the effectiveness of a program to include | ||||||
15 | outlining a distinct approach to formulating key outputs and | ||||||
16 | outcomes, selecting an appropriate research method, and | ||||||
17 | evaluating the outcomes of a program. | ||||||
18 | "Immediate and urgent necessity", in accordance with | ||||||
19 | Section 5 of the Abused and Neglected Child reporting Act, | ||||||
20 | means (i) that there is a reason to believe that the child | ||||||
21 | cannot be cared for at home or in the custody of the person | ||||||
22 | responsible for the child's welfare without endangering the | ||||||
23 | child's health or safety and (ii) that there is no time to
| ||||||
24 | apply for a court order under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 | ||||||
25 | for temporary custody of the child. | ||||||
26 | "Lived experience" means a representation of the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | experiences of a person
involved in the child welfare system, | ||||||
2 | the knowledge and understanding that the person gains
from | ||||||
3 | these experiences, and the ability to understand the policies | ||||||
4 | or guidelines of the Department. | ||||||
5 | "Program" or "pilot program" means the Bias-Free Child | ||||||
6 | Removal Pilot Program. | ||||||
7 | "Review Team" means the Bias-Free Case Review
Team. | ||||||
8 | Section 20. Program. The Department of Children and Family | ||||||
9 | Services shall establish a 3-year Bias-Free Child Removal | ||||||
10 | Pilot Program no later than January 1, 2024, for the purpose of | ||||||
11 | promoting unbiased decision making in the child removal | ||||||
12 | process. The pilot program shall be implemented in a field | ||||||
13 | office located in DuPage County, a field office located in | ||||||
14 | Champaign County, and a field office located in Williamson | ||||||
15 | County. The purpose of promoting unbiased decision making in | ||||||
16 | the child removal process shall be achieved by the identified | ||||||
17 | county using a bias-free child removal strategy when deciding | ||||||
18 | whether a child should be removed from the custody of the | ||||||
19 | child's parent or guardian, as specified. | ||||||
20 | By January 1, 2024, the steering committee established by | ||||||
21 | the Department as provided in Section 25 shall develop the | ||||||
22 | pilot program for the purpose of addressing racial | ||||||
23 | disproportionality in the child welfare system. The pilot | ||||||
24 | program shall be implemented for a period of no less than 3 | ||||||
25 | years in at least one office located in DuPage County, one |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | office located in Champaign County, and one office located in | ||||||
2 | Williamson County. | ||||||
3 | The Department shall on January 1, 2025, January 1, 2026, | ||||||
4 | and January 1, 2027 submit to the General Assembly an | ||||||
5 | evaluation report that details the pilot program's | ||||||
6 | implementation and that provides an analysis of the pilot | ||||||
7 | program's effect and impact on the removal rates of BIPOC | ||||||
8 | children. The January 1, 2027 report shall be the final | ||||||
9 | evaluation report submitted to the General Assembly by the | ||||||
10 | Department. | ||||||
11 | Section 25. Implementation. | ||||||
12 | (a) By January 1, 2023, the Department shall establish a | ||||||
13 | steering committee consisting of an interdisciplinary, diverse | ||||||
14 | group of child welfare professionals and advocates for the | ||||||
15 | purpose of creating the Bias-Free Child Removal Pilot Program | ||||||
16 | and the pre-implementation plan for the pilot program. The | ||||||
17 | steering committee shall be diverse in regard to the | ||||||
18 | geographic location, race/ethnicity, gender, and profession | ||||||
19 | and lived experience of committee members. As used in this | ||||||
20 | Section, "lived experience" includes
knowledge and | ||||||
21 | understanding of Department processes and policies. The | ||||||
22 | steering committee
shall develop and oversee the | ||||||
23 | implementation of the Bias-Free Case Review Team and
bias-free | ||||||
24 | removal process. Once established, the steering committee | ||||||
25 | shall initiate
implementation of the pilot program ensuring: |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (i) organizational readiness; (ii) adequate
data collection | ||||||
2 | and analysis; (iii) professional development and training for | ||||||
3 | the staff; and
(iv) adherence to existing rules and State laws | ||||||
4 | concerning child safety.
The steering committee shall include, | ||||||
5 | but not be limited to, the following members: | ||||||
6 | (1) A parent with lived experience in the child | ||||||
7 | welfare system. | ||||||
8 | (2) A former youth in care with lived experience in | ||||||
9 | the child welfare system. | ||||||
10 | (3) A member of an organization or office that | ||||||
11 | represents children in abuse and neglect proceedings. | ||||||
12 | (4) A community-based organization that advocates for | ||||||
13 | parents' rights within
the child welfare system. | ||||||
14 | (5) A public or private university responsible for | ||||||
15 | evaluating the pilot program. | ||||||
16 | (6) Five staff members from the Department, which | ||||||
17 | shall include a child protection investigator, a child
| ||||||
18 | protection supervisor, the Deputy Director of the | ||||||
19 | Department's Division of Child Protection, the Deputy | ||||||
20 | Director of the Department's Division of Race Equity | ||||||
21 | Practice, and the Deputy Director of the Department's | ||||||
22 | Division of Intact Services. | ||||||
23 | (7) A licensed attorney who has practiced within the | ||||||
24 | Illinois child welfare court
system in a county | ||||||
25 | represented in the pilot program such as, but not limited | ||||||
26 | to, a public defender,
an assistant state's attorney, a |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | guardian ad litem, or a judge. | ||||||
2 | (8) A member of a statewide organization that | ||||||
3 | advocates on behalf of community-based services for | ||||||
4 | children and families. | ||||||
5 | (b) By January 1, 2024, the steering committee shall | ||||||
6 | establish the pilot program for the purpose of addressing | ||||||
7 | racial disproportionality in the child welfare system. The | ||||||
8 | pilot program shall be implemented for a period of no less than | ||||||
9 | 3 years in at least one office located in DuPage County, one | ||||||
10 | office located in Champaign County, and one office located in | ||||||
11 | Williamson County. | ||||||
12 | (c) The steering committee shall develop a written plan | ||||||
13 | for the pilot program, in accordance with the goals of this | ||||||
14 | Act, that shall be adopted by a unanimous vote. | ||||||
15 | (d) The steering committee must include in the development | ||||||
16 | of the pilot program the following: | ||||||
17 | (1) Three permanent Bias-Free Case Review Team members | ||||||
18 | for each county with a pilot program. The Review Team | ||||||
19 | shall be diverse in regard to the members' geographic | ||||||
20 | location, race and ethnicity, and gender. All Review Team | ||||||
21 | members shall possess the knowledge, experience, | ||||||
22 | understanding, and training equivalent to that of a child | ||||||
23 | welfare caseworker or investigator, or higher. The Review | ||||||
24 | Team shall be made up of the following: | ||||||
25 | (A) one child protection supervisor; | ||||||
26 | (B) one area administrator; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (C) one regional administrator. | ||||||
2 | (2) At least 4 alternate Review Team members who meet | ||||||
3 | the same criteria set forth in paragraph (1) to fill in if | ||||||
4 | or when a permanent Review Team member is unable to | ||||||
5 | participate or attend meetings. | ||||||
6 | (3) A decision regarding a timeline for convening the | ||||||
7 | Bias-Free Case Review Team. | ||||||
8 | (4) Establishment of decision-making protocols for the | ||||||
9 | following questions: | ||||||
10 | (i) What constitutes a child protection | ||||||
11 | investigation meeting or not meeting the criteria to | ||||||
12 | be presented to the Review
Team? | ||||||
13 | (ii) Who decides to bring the investigation to the | ||||||
14 | Review
Team? | ||||||
15 | (iii) How and when the Review
Team is to convene | ||||||
16 | during holidays, weekends, and after normal business | ||||||
17 | hours? | ||||||
18 | (e) The steering committee shall ensure that the pilot | ||||||
19 | program includes: | ||||||
20 | (1) A timeline for when the Bias-Free Case Review Team
| ||||||
21 | shall convene. | ||||||
22 | (2) How and when the child protection investigator or
| ||||||
23 | child protection supervisor shall present the | ||||||
24 | investigation to the Bias-Free Case Review Team. | ||||||
25 | (3) A requirement that, prior to the Review
Team | ||||||
26 | convening, the following demographic and identifiable |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | information must be removed from the case notes, intake | ||||||
2 | summary, and investigation: | ||||||
3 | (A) The name of the child and the child's parents. | ||||||
4 | (B) The race or ethnicity of the child and the | ||||||
5 | child's parents, except when the allegations require | ||||||
6 | thoughtful considerations pertaining to a family's | ||||||
7 | culture, ethnicity, or religion. | ||||||
8 | (C) The sexual orientation or gender identity of | ||||||
9 | the child and the child's parents, except when the | ||||||
10 | allegations require thoughtful considerations | ||||||
11 | pertaining to the LGBTQ status or gender identity of | ||||||
12 | the child. | ||||||
13 | (D) The religious affiliation or beliefs of the | ||||||
14 | child and the child's parents, except when the | ||||||
15 | allegations require thoughtful considerations | ||||||
16 | pertaining to a family's culture, ethnicity, or | ||||||
17 | religion. | ||||||
18 | (E) The disability status of a parent, except when | ||||||
19 | the allegations require thoughtful
considerations | ||||||
20 | pertaining to a family's disability status. | ||||||
21 | (F) The political affiliation or beliefs of the | ||||||
22 | child and the child's parents. | ||||||
23 | (G) The marital status of the child's parents. | ||||||
24 | (H) The income level of the child's parents. | ||||||
25 | (I) The education level of the child's parents. | ||||||
26 | (J) Any reference to the location of the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | neighborhood or county of the parent's address. | ||||||
2 | Redacting the demographic and identifiable information | ||||||
3 | from the intake summary, case notes, and investigation | ||||||
4 | reduces the potential for biased decision making among | ||||||
5 | Review
Team members. In adherence with the standards under | ||||||
6 | the Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act and | ||||||
7 | Department rules, the focus shall instead be on the | ||||||
8 | evidence of safety factors, risk elements, and family | ||||||
9 | strengths. If removal is identified as unwarranted, the | ||||||
10 | Review
Team shall make appropriate recommendations to | ||||||
11 | ensure the safety and well-being of the child, including, | ||||||
12 | but not limited to, voluntary or court-ordered intact | ||||||
13 | family services. | ||||||
14 | The pilot program shall not prevent a child protection | ||||||
15 | investigator or supervisor from performing routine | ||||||
16 | assignments required under Department policy after taking | ||||||
17 | protective custody of a child. | ||||||
18 | The redaction of case file information or the | ||||||
19 | preparation of case files for the Review Team shall not be | ||||||
20 | completed by
the child protection investigator or the | ||||||
21 | child protection
supervisor. | ||||||
22 | Agreement by a majority of the Review Team
members, as | ||||||
23 | shall be outlined in protocol, is needed to render a
final | ||||||
24 | decision. | ||||||
25 | (f) The Department shall develop a tool or rubric for the | ||||||
26 | Review
Team to fully document the decision-making process and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | what led to the final decision. | ||||||
2 | (1) The Review
Team shall make a decision on whether | ||||||
3 | the child's removal from the child's home should be upheld | ||||||
4 | or the child should be returned home to the child's | ||||||
5 | parent. | ||||||
6 | (2) The Review
Team shall submit to the child | ||||||
7 | protection team (child protection worker, child protection | ||||||
8 | supervisor, and area administrator) the final decision in | ||||||
9 | writing. | ||||||
10 | (g) The steering committee shall have the authority to | ||||||
11 | include additional parameters in developing the pilot program, | ||||||
12 | as necessary, to remain consistent with and fulfill the | ||||||
13 | purpose and goal of the pilot program. | ||||||
14 | (h) Cases that shall not be included in the pilot program: | ||||||
15 | (1) Where protective custody is taken by law | ||||||
16 | enforcement or a medical professional. | ||||||
17 | (2) Cases that involve a forensic interview by a child | ||||||
18 | protective investigator or law
enforcement. | ||||||
19 | (3) Cases that include photographs of injuries. | ||||||
20 | (4) Any case where the child welfare court has made a | ||||||
21 | determination on the issue of custody. | ||||||
22 | (i) There is established a Bias-Free Child Removal | ||||||
23 | Advisory Board with the knowledge and understanding of the
| ||||||
24 | Department's policies, rules, and procedures that shall | ||||||
25 | include up to 2 of the following members, per pilot area: | ||||||
26 | (1) community-based partners from the fields of |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health, or | ||||||
2 | housing; | ||||||
3 | (2) public or private university partners; | ||||||
4 | (3) a member of an organization that advocates on | ||||||
5 | behalf of parents and families; | ||||||
6 | (4) a member of an organization that legally | ||||||
7 | represents children who are involved in the foster care | ||||||
8 | system, in the court process; | ||||||
9 | (5) a member of a statewide organization that | ||||||
10 | advocates on behalf of community-based services for | ||||||
11 | children and families; | ||||||
12 | (6) a parent with lived experience in the child | ||||||
13 | welfare system; | ||||||
14 | (7) a former youth in care with lived experience in | ||||||
15 | the child welfare system; and | ||||||
16 | (8) a member of an organization or office that | ||||||
17 | represents children in legal abuse and neglect | ||||||
18 | proceedings. | ||||||
19 | The Advisory Board shall be present with the Bias-Free | ||||||
20 | Review Team for all case reviews for the purpose of ensuring | ||||||
21 | that the Review Team executes bias-free removals in accordance | ||||||
22 | with this Act. The Advisory Board shall not be responsible for | ||||||
23 | any decision making. | ||||||
24 | (j) The Department shall adopt the written protocols | ||||||
25 | developed by the steering committee. | ||||||
26 | (k) Criteria for determining success. The pilot program |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | shall be considered successful and expanded statewide if it is | ||||||
2 | implemented with fidelity and the evaluation
reveals that | ||||||
3 | disproportionality of BIPOC children is reduced by the end of | ||||||
4 | the pilot program. The
pilot program shall not be expanded | ||||||
5 | statewide if the evaluation
reveals that the bias-free removal | ||||||
6 | process did not reduce disproportionality. | ||||||
7 | (l)
The Department shall adopt rules, policies, and | ||||||
8 | procedures necessary to implement this Act with the assistance | ||||||
9 | of the steering committee. The Department shall present | ||||||
10 | findings of the evaluation to the General Assembly on a yearly | ||||||
11 | basis, with the first report due on January 1, 2025. After year | ||||||
12 | 3 of the pilot program, the Department shall determine the | ||||||
13 | need to expand the pilot program statewide, if data shows an | ||||||
14 | impact on disproportionality, and shall provide a | ||||||
15 | justification for or against statewide expansion. The pilot | ||||||
16 | program does not create a private cause of action in case there | ||||||
17 | is a problem with the application of the bias-free removal | ||||||
18 | process. | ||||||
19 | Section 30. Repealer. This Act is repealed on January 1, | ||||||
20 | 2027. | ||||||
21 | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||||||
22 | becoming law.
|