|
| | 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2023 and 2024 HB2248 Introduced 2/14/2023, by Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
| |
Creates the Civil Rights Remedies Restoration Act. Provides that certain violations of the following federal Acts constitute a violation of the Act: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; the Education Amendments of 1972; the Civil Rights Act of 1964; or other federal statutes prohibiting discrimination under a program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Provides that whoever injures another by a violation of the Act is liable for each and every offense for all remedies available at law, including, but not limited to various damages in an amount no less than $4,000, and attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. Allows a court to grant as relief any permanent or preliminary negative or mandatory injunction, temporary restraining order, order of declaratory judgment, or other relief. Allows claims for a violation of the Act to be filed in any court of competent jurisdiction. Provides that nothing limits any enforcement authority under the Illinois Human Rights Act. Provides that the State waives sovereign and Eleventh Amendment immunity for any violation of the Act. States legislative findings and purpose.
|
| |
| | A BILL FOR |
|
|
| | HB2248 | | LRB103 26125 LNS 52481 b |
|
|
1 | | AN ACT concerning civil law.
|
2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
3 | | represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 | | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Civil |
5 | | Rights Remedies Restoration Act. |
6 | | Section 5. Legislative findings. |
7 | | (a) For decades, courts and juries have awarded damages |
8 | | for emotional distress for violations of federal civil rights |
9 | | statutes passed pursuant to Congress's authority under the |
10 | | Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section |
11 | | 8, Clause 1). |
12 | | (b) The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Cummings v. |
13 | | Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., 142 S.Ct. 1562 (2022) |
14 | | prohibits damages for emotional distress for violations of the |
15 | | Spending Clause statutes at issue there, the Rehabilitation |
16 | | Act of 1973, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care |
17 | | Act, unless they expressly provide for such damages. The |
18 | | decision will likely impair the availability of emotional |
19 | | distress damages under other federal civil rights statutes as |
20 | | well. |
21 | | (c) As a result of the Cummings decision, an individual |
22 | | whose civil rights have been violated will be left without the |
23 | | full range of remedies once available, and perpetrators of |