|
| | 10300HB5346ham003 | - 2 - | LRB103 38554 RLC 72545 a |
|
|
1 | | that is a place of operation for a municipal police department |
2 | | or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency |
3 | | at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection |
4 | | with criminal charges against those persons or allegations |
5 | | that those persons are delinquent minors. |
6 | | (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a |
7 | | custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other |
8 | | place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in |
9 | | any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for |
10 | | the prosecution of a homicide. |
11 | | (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution |
12 | | shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary |
13 | | hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made |
14 | | during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of |
15 | | detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any |
16 | | electronic recordings of the statement and any documents |
17 | | relating to the circumstances under which the statement was |
18 | | obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon |
19 | | to determine the statement's reliability. |
20 | | (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a |
21 | | statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall |
22 | | specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to |
23 | | be unreliable. |
24 | | (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the |
25 | | prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that |
26 | | the statement is reliable. |
|
| | 10300HB5346ham003 | - 3 - | LRB103 38554 RLC 72545 a |
|
|
1 | | (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court |
2 | | should consider: |
3 | | (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the |
4 | | evidence known before the interrogation, especially |
5 | | details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts |
6 | | of the crime that had not been made public; |
7 | | (2) whether the statement provides any new details or |
8 | | any new evidence not known before the interrogation that |
9 | | can be independently corroborated after the interrogation; |
10 | | (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the |
11 | | defendant rather than originated with the defendant; |
12 | | (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's |
13 | | statement at any time and the circumstances of that |
14 | | recantation; |
15 | | (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded; |
16 | | and |
17 | | (6) any other information relevant to the reliability |
18 | | of the statement. |
19 | | Section 10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is |
20 | | amended by adding Section 103-2.3 as follows: |
21 | | (725 ILCS 5/103-2.3 new) |
22 | | Sec. 103-2.3. Inadmissibility of unreliable statements by |
23 | | defendants. |
24 | | (a) In this Section: |
|
| | 10300HB5346ham003 | - 4 - | LRB103 38554 RLC 72545 a |
|
|
1 | | "Custodial interrogation" means any interrogation (i) |
2 | | during which a reasonable person in the subject's position |
3 | | would consider himself or herself to be in custody and (ii) |
4 | | during which a question is asked that is reasonably likely to |
5 | | elicit an incriminating response. |
6 | | "Place of detention" means a building or a police station |
7 | | that is a place of operation for a municipal police department |
8 | | or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency |
9 | | at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection |
10 | | with criminal charges against those persons or allegations |
11 | | that those persons are delinquent minors. |
12 | | (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a |
13 | | custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other |
14 | | place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in |
15 | | any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for |
16 | | the prosecution of a homicide. |
17 | | (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution |
18 | | shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary |
19 | | hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made |
20 | | during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of |
21 | | detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any |
22 | | electronic recordings of the statement and any documents |
23 | | relating to the circumstances under which the statement was |
24 | | obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon |
25 | | to determine the statement's reliability. |
26 | | (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a |
|
| | 10300HB5346ham003 | - 5 - | LRB103 38554 RLC 72545 a |
|
|
1 | | statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall |
2 | | specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to |
3 | | be unreliable. |
4 | | (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the |
5 | | prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that |
6 | | the statement is reliable. |
7 | | (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court |
8 | | should consider: |
9 | | (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the |
10 | | evidence known before the interrogation, especially |
11 | | details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts |
12 | | of the crime that had not been made public; |
13 | | (2) whether the statement provides any new details or |
14 | | any new evidence not known before the interrogation that |
15 | | can be independently corroborated after the interrogation; |
16 | | (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the |
17 | | defendant rather than originated with the defendant; |
18 | | (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's |
19 | | statement at any time and the circumstances of that |
20 | | recantation; |
21 | | (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded; |
22 | | and |
23 | | (6) any other information relevant to the reliability |
24 | | of the statement. ". |