| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning local government.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 5. The Counties Code is amended by changing | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Sections 5-45015, 5-45025, and 5-45045 as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | (55 ILCS 5/5-45015) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Sec. 5-45015. Solicitation of proposals. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | (a) A county may enter into design-build contracts. In | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | addition to the requirements set forth in its local | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | ordinances, when the county elects to use the design-build | |||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent to receive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | proposals for the project at least 14 days before issuing the | |||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | request for the proposal. The county must publish the advance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | notice in the manner prescribed by ordinance, which shall | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | include posting the advance notice online on its website. The | |||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | county may publish the notice in construction industry | |||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | publications or post the notice on construction industry | |||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | websites. A brief description of the proposed procurement must | |||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | be included in the notice. The county must provide a copy of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | the request for proposal to any party requesting a copy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | (b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each | |||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | project and must contain, without limitation, the following | |||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | information: |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (1) The name of the county. | ||||||
2 | (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | ||||||
3 | contract. | ||||||
4 | (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | ||||||
5 | funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | ||||||
6 | request for proposal is submitted. | ||||||
7 | (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | ||||||
8 | entities wishing to submit proposals. The county shall | ||||||
9 | include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | ||||||
10 | licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | ||||||
11 | nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | ||||||
12 | criteria by the county. | ||||||
13 | (5) Material requirements of the contract, including, | ||||||
14 | but not limited to, the proposed terms and conditions, | ||||||
15 | required performance and payment bonds, insurance, and the | ||||||
16 | entity's plan to comply with the county's contracting | ||||||
17 | goals for the county's program for disadvantaged business | ||||||
18 | enterprises based on the county's most recent, legally | ||||||
19 | defensible disparity study or the utilization goals for | ||||||
20 | business enterprises established in the Business | ||||||
21 | Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons with | ||||||
22 | Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois
| ||||||
23 | Human Rights Act. | ||||||
24 | (6) The performance criteria. | ||||||
25 | (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | ||||||
26 | solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | evaluation of Phase I proposals. | ||||||
2 | (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | ||||||
3 | the technical and cost evaluation phase. | ||||||
4 | (c) The county may include any other relevant information | ||||||
5 | that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity shall be | ||||||
6 | entitled to rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in | ||||||
7 | the development of its proposal. | ||||||
8 | (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | ||||||
9 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | ||||||
10 | proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | ||||||
11 | $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | ||||||
12 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | ||||||
13 | proposal. The county shall include in the request for proposal | ||||||
14 | a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II submissions after | ||||||
15 | the selection of entities from the Phase I evaluation is | ||||||
16 | completed.
| ||||||
17 | (Source: P.A. 102-954, eff. 1-1-23 .) | ||||||
18 | (55 ILCS 5/5-45025) | ||||||
19 | Sec. 5-45025. Procedures for Selection. | ||||||
20 | (a) The county must use a two-phase procedure for the | ||||||
21 | selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I of | ||||||
22 | the procedure will evaluate and shortlist the design-build | ||||||
23 | entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate | ||||||
24 | the technical and cost proposals. | ||||||
25 | (b) The county shall include in the request for proposal |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These factors are | ||||||
2 | in addition to any prequalification requirements of | ||||||
3 | design-build entities that the county has set forth. Each | ||||||
4 | request for proposal shall establish the relative importance | ||||||
5 | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | ||||||
6 | any weighting of criteria to be employed by the county. The | ||||||
7 | county must maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be | ||||||
8 | disclosed in event of a protest regarding the solicitation. | ||||||
9 | The county shall include the following criteria in every | ||||||
10 | Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: (i) experience of | ||||||
11 | personnel; (ii) successful experience with similar project | ||||||
12 | types; (iii) financial capability; (iv) timeliness of past | ||||||
13 | performance; (v) experience with similarly sized projects; | ||||||
14 | (vi) successful reference checks of the firm; (vii) commitment | ||||||
15 | to assign personnel for the duration of the project and | ||||||
16 | qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (viii) ability | ||||||
17 | or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith | ||||||
18 | efforts to meet the county's contracting goals for the | ||||||
19 | county's program for disadvantaged business enterprises based | ||||||
20 | on the county's most recent, legally defensible disparity | ||||||
21 | study or the utilization goals for business enterprises | ||||||
22 | established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Women, | ||||||
23 | and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of | ||||||
24 | the Illinois Human Rights Act. The county may include any | ||||||
25 | additional relevant
criteria in Phase I that it deems | ||||||
26 | necessary for a proper qualification review. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | The county may not consider any design-build entity for | ||||||
2 | evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary interest | ||||||
3 | in the project or has other relationships or circumstances, | ||||||
4 | including, but not limited to, long-term leasehold, mutual | ||||||
5 | performance, or development contracts with the county, that | ||||||
6 | may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible | ||||||
7 | advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, | ||||||
8 | evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or | ||||||
9 | that create the appearance of impropriety. No proposal shall | ||||||
10 | be considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply | ||||||
11 | with the county's contracting goals for the county's program | ||||||
12 | for disadvantaged business enterprises based on the county's | ||||||
13 | most recent, legally defensible disparity study or the | ||||||
14 | requirements established in the Business Enterprise for | ||||||
15 | Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for both | ||||||
16 | the design and construction areas of performance, and with | ||||||
17 | Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | ||||||
18 | Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the | ||||||
19 | county shall create a shortlist of the most highly qualified | ||||||
20 | design-build entities. The county, in its discretion, is not | ||||||
21 | required to shortlist the maximum number of entities as | ||||||
22 | identified for Phase II evaluation, provided that no less than | ||||||
23 | 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | ||||||
24 | Phase II proposals. | ||||||
25 | The county shall notify the entities selected for the | ||||||
26 | shortlist in writing. This notification shall commence the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | ||||||
2 | evaluations. The county must allow sufficient time for the | ||||||
3 | shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II submittals | ||||||
4 | considering the scope and detail requested by the county. | ||||||
5 | (c) The county shall include in the request for proposal | ||||||
6 | the evaluating factors to be used in the technical and cost | ||||||
7 | submission components of Phase II. Each request for proposal | ||||||
8 | shall establish, for both the technical and cost submission | ||||||
9 | components of Phase II, the relative importance assigned to | ||||||
10 | each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any weighting | ||||||
11 | of criteria to be employed by the county. The county must | ||||||
12 | maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in | ||||||
13 | event of a protest regarding the solicitation. | ||||||
14 | The county shall include the following criteria in every | ||||||
15 | Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: (i) | ||||||
16 | compliance with objectives of the project; (ii) compliance of | ||||||
17 | proposed services to the request for proposal requirements; | ||||||
18 | (iii) quality of products or materials proposed; (iv) quality | ||||||
19 | of design parameters; (v) design concepts; (vi) innovation in | ||||||
20 | meeting the scope and performance criteria; and (vii) | ||||||
21 | constructability of the proposed project. The county may | ||||||
22 | include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | ||||||
23 | it deems necessary for proper selection. | ||||||
24 | The county shall include the following criteria in every | ||||||
25 | Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | ||||||
26 | construction costs, and the time of completion. The county may |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | ||||||
2 | it deems necessary for proper selection. The total project | ||||||
3 | cost criteria weighting weighing factor shall not exceed 30%. | ||||||
4 | The county shall directly employ or retain a licensed | ||||||
5 | design professional or a public art designer to evaluate the | ||||||
6 | technical and cost submissions to determine if the technical | ||||||
7 | submissions are in accordance with generally accepted industry | ||||||
8 | standards.
Upon completion of the technical submissions and | ||||||
9 | cost submissions evaluation, the county may award the | ||||||
10 | design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity.
| ||||||
11 | (Source: P.A. 102-954, eff. 1-1-23; revised 12-16-22.) | ||||||
12 | (55 ILCS 5/5-45045) | ||||||
13 | Sec. 5-45045. Reports and evaluation. At the end of every | ||||||
14 | 6-month period following the contract award, and again prior | ||||||
15 | to final contract payout and closure, a selected design-build | ||||||
16 | entity shall detail, in a written report submitted to the | ||||||
17 | county, its efforts and success in implementing the entity's | ||||||
18 | plan to comply with the county's contracting goals for the | ||||||
19 | county's program for disadvantaged business enterprises based | ||||||
20 | on the county's most recent, legally defensible disparity | ||||||
21 | study or the utilization goals for business enterprises | ||||||
22 | established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Women, | ||||||
23 | and Persons with Disabilities Act and the provisions of | ||||||
24 | Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
| ||||||
25 | (Source: P.A. 102-954, eff. 1-1-23 .)
|