Full Text of HR0272 102nd General Assembly
HR0272 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
| | HR0272 | | LRB102 18194 MST 25795 r |
|
| 1 | | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| 2 | | WHEREAS, The State of Illinois is currently experiencing a | 3 | | fiscal crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic and is considering | 4 | | a multitude of options to solve its economic concerns; and
| 5 | | WHEREAS, Increased excise taxes on Illinois brewers, | 6 | | winemakers, and distillers, many of which are small | 7 | | businesses, are being contemplated by some in the State's | 8 | | leadership in order to generate additional revenue to balance | 9 | | the State's budget; and
| 10 | | WHEREAS, Illinois' alcohol excise taxes already rank among | 11 | | the highest in the United States at $8.55 per gallon liquor tax | 12 | | (3rd highest), $1.39 per gallon wine tax (9th highest), and | 13 | | $0.23 per gallon beer tax (22nd highest); and | 14 | | WHEREAS, Additional excise taxes on alcohol in Cook County | 15 | | and the City of Chicago, Illinois' most populous region, | 16 | | greatly increase the cost of beer, wine, and liquor for | 17 | | Illinois adult consumers; this includes a $2.68 per gallon tax | 18 | | on liquor imposed by the City of Chicago and a $2.50 per gallon | 19 | | liquor tax imposed by Cook County, a $0.36 to $0.89 per gallon | 20 | | tax on wine imposed by the City of Chicago and a $0.20 to $0.45 | 21 | | per gallon wine tax imposed by Cook County, and a $0.29 per | 22 | | gallon beer tax imposed by the City of Chicago and a $0.06 per |
| | | HR0272 | - 2 - | LRB102 18194 MST 25795 r |
|
| 1 | | gallon beer tax imposed by Cook County; and | 2 | | WHEREAS, Illinois' excise beer taxes are already the | 3 | | highest at $0.23 per gallon, compared to all of its | 4 | | neighboring states, including Wisconsin at $0.06 per gallon, | 5 | | Iowa at $0.19 per gallon, Missouri at $0.06 per gallon, | 6 | | Indiana at $0.11 per gallon, and Kentucky at $0.08 per gallon; | 7 | | and | 8 | | WHEREAS, Illinois brewers, winemakers, and distillers, as | 9 | | well as importers, also pay federal excise taxes on the | 10 | | products they produce; and | 11 | | WHEREAS, Illinois' beer industry, made up of brewers, beer | 12 | | importers, beer distributors, brewer suppliers, and retailers, | 13 | | contributes more than $10.1 billion annually to Illinois' | 14 | | economy and is linked to 86,400 local jobs; and | 15 | | WHEREAS, Illinois' wine industry directly creates 36,403 | 16 | | jobs and generates $1.22 billion in wages and $2.98 billion in | 17 | | economic activity in the State; and | 18 | | WHEREAS, When the state of Maryland increased their | 19 | | alcohol excise taxes from 6% to 9% in 2012, it resulted in | 20 | | Maryland residents traveling to Virginia, Delaware, and | 21 | | Washington, D.C. for cheaper alternatives, crippling Maryland |
| | | HR0272 | - 3 - | LRB102 18194 MST 25795 r |
|
| 1 | | business in bordering counties; and | 2 | | WHEREAS, Illinois' costly alcohol taxes continue to | 3 | | provoke border-town residents to find cheaper prices in | 4 | | neighboring states and to create black markets for overtaxed | 5 | | goods, diminishing state revenues, which by one estimate costs | 6 | | Illinois up to $30 million annually due to cross-border | 7 | | alcohol sales; and
| 8 | | WHEREAS, Additional taxes on alcohol in Illinois would | 9 | | cripple the ability of business owners, both large and small, | 10 | | to successfully recover from the devastating financial impact | 11 | | wrought by a global pandemic; and
| 12 | | WHEREAS, More taxes on beer, wine, and liquor would | 13 | | continue to ravage the already shattered hospitality industry | 14 | | in Illinois, driving opportunity, revenue, and jobs to | 15 | | neighboring states and hurting Illinois' already fragile | 16 | | economy; and
| 17 | | WHEREAS, Imposing additional taxes on brewers, winemakers, | 18 | | and distillers during a global pandemic is counterintuitive | 19 | | and goes against the pro-jobs policies that should be under | 20 | | careful consideration as Illinois seeks to regain sound | 21 | | financial footing; therefore, be it
|
| | | HR0272 | - 4 - | LRB102 18194 MST 25795 r |
|
| 1 | | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE | 2 | | HUNDRED SECOND GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that | 3 | | we state our firm opposition to any additional excise taxes on | 4 | | Illinois businesses that produce beer, wine, or liquor or | 5 | | their related industries; and be it further
| 6 | | RESOLVED, That we state our belief that Illinois' present | 7 | | fiscal crisis must be managed in other ways rather than | 8 | | increased taxes that unfairly target a single industry in the | 9 | | State.
|
|