Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of HB3521
Illinois General Assembly

  Bills & Resolutions  
  Compiled Statutes  
  Public Acts  
  Legislative Reports  
  IL Constitution  
  Legislative Guide  
  Legislative Glossary  

 Search By Number
 (example: HB0001)
Search Tips

Search By Keyword

Full Text of HB3521  104th General Assembly

HB3521 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

 


 
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
HB3521

 

Introduced 2/18/2025, by Rep. Justin Slaughter

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 
705 ILCS 405/5-401.7 new
725 ILCS 5/103-2.3 new

    Amends the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for the prosecution of a homicide. Provides that in any proceeding under this provision, the prosecution shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of detention. Provides that at that time, the prosecution must tender any electronic recordings of the statement and any documents relating to the circumstances under which the statement was obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon to determine the statement's reliability. Provides that before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a statement alleged to be unreliable. Provides that the defendant shall specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to be unreliable. Provides that at the hearing, it shall be the burden of the prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the statement is reliable. Provides that when deciding a statement's reliability, a court should consider: (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the evidence known before the interrogation, especially details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts of the crime that had not been made public; (2) whether the statement provides any new details or any new evidence not known before the interrogation that can be independently corroborated after the interrogation; (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the defendant rather than originated with the defendant; (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's statement at any time and the circumstances of that recantation; (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded; and (6) any other information relevant to the reliability of the statement.


LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

 

 

A BILL FOR

 

HB3521LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

1    AN ACT concerning criminal law.
 
2    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
 
4    Section 5. The Juvenile Court Act of 1987 is amended by
5adding Section 5-401.7 as follows:
 
6    (705 ILCS 405/5-401.7 new)
7    Sec. 5-401.7. Inadmissibility of unreliable statements by
8defendants.
9    (a) In this Section:
10    "Custodial interrogation" means any interrogation (i)
11during which a reasonable person in the subject's position
12would consider himself or herself to be in custody and (ii)
13during which a question is asked that is reasonably likely to
14elicit an incriminating response.
15    "Place of detention" means a building or a police station
16that is a place of operation for a municipal police department
17or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency
18at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection
19with criminal charges against those persons or allegations
20that those persons are delinquent minors.
21    (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a
22custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other
23place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in

 

 

HB3521- 2 -LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

1any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for
2the prosecution of a homicide.
3    (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution
4shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary
5hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made
6during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of
7detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any
8electronic recordings of the statement and any documents
9relating to the circumstances under which the statement was
10obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon
11to determine the statement's reliability.
12    (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a
13statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall
14specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to
15be unreliable.
16    (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the
17prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
18the statement is reliable.
19    (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court
20should consider:
21        (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the
22    evidence known before the interrogation, especially
23    details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts
24    of the crime that had not been made public;
25        (2) whether the statement provides any new details or
26    any new evidence not known before the interrogation that

 

 

HB3521- 3 -LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

1    can be independently corroborated after the interrogation;
2        (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the
3    defendant rather than originated with the defendant;
4        (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's
5    statement at any time and the circumstances of that
6    recantation;
7        (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded;
8    and
9        (6) any other information relevant to the reliability
10    of the statement.
 
11    Section 10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
12amended by adding Section 103-2.3 as follows:
 
13    (725 ILCS 5/103-2.3 new)
14    Sec. 103-2.3. Inadmissibility of unreliable statements by
15defendants.
16    (a) In this Section:
17    "Custodial interrogation" means any interrogation (i)
18during which a reasonable person in the subject's position
19would consider himself or herself to be in custody and (ii)
20during which a question is asked that is reasonably likely to
21elicit an incriminating response.
22    "Place of detention" means a building or a police station
23that is a place of operation for a municipal police department
24or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency

 

 

HB3521- 4 -LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

1at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection
2with criminal charges against those persons or allegations
3that those persons are delinquent minors.
4    (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a
5custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other
6place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in
7any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for
8the prosecution of a homicide.
9    (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution
10shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary
11hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made
12during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of
13detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any
14electronic recordings of the statement and any documents
15relating to the circumstances under which the statement was
16obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon
17to determine the statement's reliability.
18    (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a
19statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall
20specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to
21be unreliable.
22    (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the
23prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
24the statement is reliable.
25    (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court
26should consider:

 

 

HB3521- 5 -LRB104 10283 RLC 20357 b

1        (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the
2    evidence known before the interrogation, especially
3    details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts
4    of the crime that had not been made public;
5        (2) whether the statement provides any new details or
6    any new evidence not known before the interrogation that
7    can be independently corroborated after the interrogation;
8        (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the
9    defendant rather than originated with the defendant;
10        (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's
11    statement at any time and the circumstances of that
12    recantation;
13        (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded;
14    and
15        (6) any other information relevant to the reliability
16    of the statement.