Full Text of HR0710 94th General Assembly
HR0710 94TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
|
|
|
HR0710 |
|
LRB094 15026 AJO 50148 r |
|
| 1 |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION
| 2 |
| WHEREAS, The Menominee tribe has proposed a casino in | 3 |
| Kenosha, Wisconsin, that will be an $808 million facility with | 4 |
| 3,200 gambling positions; and
| 5 |
| WHEREAS, A large portion of the casino's customers will be | 6 |
| Lake County residents, but all of the tax revenue, jobs, and | 7 |
| other benefits from the casino will inure to the benefit of | 8 |
| Kenosha, Kenosha County, and Wisconsin; and | 9 |
| WHEREAS, The Menominee have indicated that they will | 10 |
| employ, on a priority basis, Kenosha and Southeastern Wisconsin | 11 |
| citizens, leaving out hard-working Illinois residents; and
| 12 |
| WHEREAS, The social costs from problem gambling will fall | 13 |
| very heavily on those Illinois communities closest to the | 14 |
| casino, but no funds will be made available to the State of | 15 |
| Illinois or local governments in Illinois to address the impact | 16 |
| of problem gambling; the result will be that Illinois citizens | 17 |
| will be compelled to pay for problems caused by a Wisconsin | 18 |
| casino; and
| 19 |
| WHEREAS, The Menominee Tribe expects gamblers at the | 20 |
| casino, most of whom will be from Illinois, to lose over $400 | 21 |
| million a year; and | 22 |
| WHEREAS, When Illinois citizens gamble with their | 23 |
| discretionary dollars, they will have less money to spend on | 24 |
| dining, entertainment, shopping, and sporting events in Lake | 25 |
| County and elsewhere in Illinois; this casino will adversely | 26 |
| affect the livelihood of countless small businesses in | 27 |
| Illinois; and
| 28 |
| WHEREAS, The casino project will greatly increase traffic | 29 |
| on our already heavily traveled Illinois roads; this will have |
|
|
|
HR0710 |
- 2 - |
LRB094 15026 AJO 50148 r |
|
| 1 |
| the greatest adverse affect on the environment of Lake County | 2 |
| through increased air emissions and water runoff; and
| 3 |
| WHEREAS, While these impacts will undoubtedly take place, | 4 |
| the Bureau of Indian Affairs chose first in its scoping | 5 |
| document and in its Draft Environmental Impact Statement to | 6 |
| totally ignore these serious negative impacts on the Illinois | 7 |
| communities near the casino; in fact, the Draft Environmental | 8 |
| Impact Statement does not even discuss these negative impacts; | 9 |
| not only is this wrong, but this approach violates the Bureau | 10 |
| of Indian Affair's own policies; and | 11 |
| WHEREAS, Under Part 2 of the Bureau of Indian Affair's | 12 |
| Checklist for Gaming Acquisitions (Section 20(b)(1)(A), found | 13 |
| at page 7, issued in March of 2005), units of local government | 14 |
| located within 10 miles of the proposed gaming establishment | 15 |
| are to be included in the analysis of significant detriments | 16 |
| that may be incurred by local governments; Lake County and many | 17 |
| of its communities are a mere 6 miles from the site of the | 18 |
| proposed Menominee Casino; therefore, be it
| 19 |
| RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | 20 |
| NINETY-FOURTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that | 21 |
| the members of the House of Representatives respectfully urge | 22 |
| that the Menominee Draft Environmental Impact Statement be | 23 |
| revised to include northern Illinois and that a public hearing | 24 |
| be held in Illinois to assess the impact on Illinois of this | 25 |
| proposed project; and be it further
| 26 |
| RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be | 27 |
| presented to the Menominee Tribe, the members of the Illinois | 28 |
| Congressional Delegation, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as | 29 |
| an expression of our concerns.
|
|