Updating the database of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) is an ongoing process.
Recent laws may not yet be included in the ILCS database, but they are found on this site as
Public
Acts soon after they become law. For information concerning the relationship between statutes and Public Acts, refer to the
Guide.
Because the statute database is maintained primarily for legislative drafting purposes,
statutory changes are sometimes included in the statute database before they take effect.
If the source note at the end of a Section of the statutes includes a Public Act that has
not yet taken effect, the version of the law that is currently in effect may have already
been removed from the database and you should refer to that Public Act to see the changes
made to the current law.
(820 ILCS 275/90) Sec. 90. Contents of orders. (a) A workplace protection restraining order shall describe each remedy granted by the court, in reasonable detail and not by reference to any other document, so that the respondent may clearly understand what he or she must do or refrain from doing. (b) A workplace protection restraining order shall include the following: (1) the name of the petitioner; (2) the date and time the workplace protection |
| restraining order was issued, whether it is an emergency or plenary order, and the duration of the order;
|
|
(3) the date, time, and place for any scheduled
|
| hearing for extension of the workplace protection restraining order or for another order of greater duration or scope;
|
|
(4) for each remedy in an emergency workplace
|
| protection restraining order, the reason for entering that remedy without prior notice to the respondent or greater notice than was actually given; and
|
|
(5) for emergency workplace protection restraining
|
| orders, that the respondent may petition the court, in accordance with Section 100, to reopen the order if he or she did not receive actual prior notice of the hearing as required under Section 55 of this Act and if the respondent alleges that he or she had a meritorious defense to the order or that the order or its remedy is not authorized by this Act.
|
|
(Source: P.A. 98-766, eff. 7-16-14.)
|