State of Illinois
92nd General Assembly
Legislation

   [ Search ]   [ PDF text ]   [ Legislation ]   
[ Home ]   [ Back ]   [ Bottom ]


[ Introduced ][ Amendatory Veto Motion 001 ][ Engrossed ]
[ Enrolled ][ Re-enrolled ][ Senate Amendment 001 ]


92_SB0175gms

 
                            State of Illinois
                         OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
                      Springfield, Illinois  62706
      George H. Ryan
      GOVERNOR
                                                      July 18, 2001
      To the Honorable Members of
        The Illinois Senate
      92nd General Assembly
          Pursuant to the  authority  vested  in  the  Governor  by
      Article  IV,  Section  9(e)  of  the Illinois Constitution of
      1970, and re-affirmed by the People of the State of  Illinois
      by popular referendum in 1974, and conforming to the standard
      articulated  by  the Illinois Supreme Court in People ex rel.
      Klinger  v.  Howlett,  50  Ill.2d  242  (1972),   Continental
      Illinois  National Bank and Trust Co. v. Zagel, 78 Ill.2d 387
      (1979), People ex rel. City of Canton v.  Crouch,  79  Ill.2d
      356  (1980),  and  County  of Kane v. Carlson, 116 Ill.2d 186
      (1987), that gubernatorial  action  be  consistent  with  the
      fundamental  purposes  and  the  intent of the bill, I hereby
      return Senate Bill 175,  entitled  "AN  ACT  in  relation  to
      criminal law," with my specific recommendations for change.
          Senate  Bill  175  amends the Criminal Code of 1961.  The
      bill makes a misdemeanor battery a felony aggravated battery,
      if committed in any  building  or  other  structure  used  to
      provide  shelter  or services to victims of domestic violence
      or committed within 500 feet while going to or  from  such  a
      building or other structure.
          Senate  Bill  175  is  a  well-intentioned  bill.  I have
      always been supportive  of  laws  and  programs  designed  to
      protect  persons  who  are  subject  to physical abuse within
      their household or relationship.   However,  I  am  concerned
      that Senate Bill 175 has not been well thought through.
          First,  the  bill  states that it covers "any building or
      other structure used to provide shelter or other services  to
      victims of domestic violence as defined in Section 103 of the
      Illinois  Domestic  Violence  Act...."  The definition in the
      Domestic Violence Act only defines "domestic violence," so it
      is unclear if the  bill  is  limited  to  a  formal  domestic
      violence  shelter  or  applies to any place a victim may have
      gone to seek shelter from an abuser, such as a parent's home,
      a motel room or other place.  In reviewing the debate in  the
      House Judiciary II committee, the sponsor stated the bill was
      meant  to  cover  "domestic violence shelters" and the debate
      went on to discuss whether a domestic violence  shelter  fits
      within   the   current  public  property  aggravated  battery
      provision.  The bill's vague language on this point may cause
      problems.   There  is  a  definition  for  domestic  violence
      shelter in  the  Domestic  Violence  Shelters  Act.  20  ILCS
      1310/1(c).
          Second,  the  phrase,  "or  to  the dependent children of
      victims of domestic violence" is awkwardly placed in the bill
      in a manner that makes it unclear if this is merely  part  of
      the  reference to the Domestic Violence Act definition, or is
      a  separate  aggravated  battery  provision  to   cover   the
      dependent  child  of  a  victim.  If  part of the Section 103
      reference, the phrase should read:  "any  building  or  other
      structure  used  to  provide  shelter  or  other  services to
      victims or to the dependent children of victims  of  domestic
      violence...."  This change would eliminate any confusion.
          I am proposing changes on the above-described issues.
          The  location  of  a domestic violence shelter is usually
      confidential   information   and   generally   not   publicly
      disclosed.  The Domestic Violence  Act  prohibits  the  court
      from  compelling  disclosure  of  the  location of a domestic
      violence shelter in a criminal proceeding, unless  the  court
      finds  there  is  an  imminent  risk  of  harm  to a domestic
      violence victim or other  person.   However,  the  allegation
      that  a  battery  was  committed  in  or within 500 feet of a
      domestic violence shelter now makes the location  an  element
      of  the crime, the presence of which makes a misdemeanor into
      a felony.  The defendant may base part of his or her  defense
      on  the fact that the building at "225 Elm Street in AnyTown,
      Illinois" is not a domestic violence shelter or  the  alleged
      act  did  not  occur  within  500 feet of a domestic violence
 
      shelter.   To  refute  this,  it  would   appear   that   the
      prosecution  would  have  to prove in open court and state in
      publicly accessible documents filed with the court that  "225
      Elm  Street"  is  a  domestic  violence  shelter.  While this
      information  may  already  be   otherwise   known   in   some
      communities  and  it  is  unlikely  that  persons will search
      through court filings to learn the  location  of  a  domestic
      violence   shelter;  nonetheless,  I  believe  we  should  be
      sensitive to public disclosure of this  information  and  ask
      the General Assembly to study that issue.
          Finally,  there  is  an  aggravated  battery provision in
      current law that would likely apply to  a  battery  committed
      within  500 feet of domestic violence shelter, which does not
      require  disclosure  of  the  shelter  location.   A  battery
      committed on the way to or from  a  shelter  is  most  likely
      committed  on a street, sidewalk, parking lot or other public
      way.  The current aggravated battery law covers  any  battery
      committed  on  or about a public way or public property.  720
      ILCS 5/12-4(b)(8).  Public way  includes  streets,  sidewalks
      and  parking  lots  (even  private  parking lots).  People v.
      Pennington, 172 Ill.App.3d 641,  527  N.E.2d  76  (1988)  and
      People  v.  Pugh, 162 Ill.App.3d 1030, 516 N.E.2d 396 (1987).
      Therefore, I question the necessity of including the 500 feet
      provision in Senate Bill 175; however, I am not proposing any
      changes with respect to that.
          For these reasons, I return  Senate  Bill  175  with  the
      following recommendations for change:
          On  page  3,  line  34, by inserting "or to the dependent
      children of victims" after "victims"; and
          On page 3, line 34, by replacing  "as  defined  in"  with
      "pursuant to"; and
          On page 4, line 1, by deleting "Section 103 of"; and
          On  page  4,  line  2,  by  replacing  "to  the dependent
      children of victims of domestic" with "the Domestic  Violence
      Shelter Act"; and
          On page 4, line 3, by deleting "violence"; and
          On  page  4,  line 3, by inserting "of such a building or
      other structure"; and
          On page 4, line 4, by inserting "Domestic  violence"  has
      the  meaning  ascribed  to  it in Section 103 of the Illinois
      Domestic Violence Act of 1986.  "Building or other  structure
      used   to  provide  shelter"  has  the  meaning  ascribed  to
      "shelter" in Section 1310 of the Domestic  Violence  Shelters
      Act." after the period.
          With  these  specific  recommendations for change, Senate
      Bill 175 will have my approval.  I respectfully request  your
      concurrence.
                                             Sincerely,
                                             George H. Ryan
                                             GOVERNOR

[ Top ]