Public Act 102-0011 Public Act 0011 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
Public Act 102-0011 | SB0642 Enrolled | LRB102 11506 LNS 16840 b |
|
| AN ACT concerning courts.
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| represented in the General Assembly:
| Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | Judicial Districts Act of 2021. | Section 5. Legislative intent. The intent of this Act is | to redraw the Judicial Districts to meet the requirements of | the Illinois Constitution of 1970 by providing that outside of | the First District the State "shall be divided by law into four | Judicial Districts of substantially equal population, each of | which shall be compact and composed of contiguous counties." | Section 2 of Article VI of the Illinois Constitution of | 1970 divides the State into five Judicial Districts for the | selection of Supreme and Appellate Court Judges, with Cook | County comprising the First District and the remainder of the | State "divided by law into four Judicial Districts of | substantially equal population, each of which shall be compact | and composed of contiguous counties." Further, Section 7 of | Article VI provides that a Judicial Circuit must be located | within one Judicial District, and also provides the First | Judicial District is comprised of a judicial circuit and the | remainder provided by law, subject to the requirement that | Circuits composed of more than one county shall be compact and |
| of contiguous counties.
The current Judicial District map was | enacted in 1963. | The current Judicial Districts do not meet the | Constitution's requirement that four Districts other than the | First District be of "substantially equal population." Using | the American Community Survey data available at the time this | Act is enacted, the population of the current First District | is 5,198,212; Second District is 3,204,960; the Third District | is 1,782,863; the Fourth District is 1,299,747; and the Fifth | District is 1,284,757. | Under this redistricting plan, the population, according | to the American Community Survey, of the Second District will | be 1,770,983; the Third District will be 1,950,349; the Fourth | District will be 2,011,316; and the Fifth District will be | 1,839,679. A similar substantially equitable result occurs | using the 2010 U.S. Census data, the most recent decennial | census data available at the time of this Act, with the | population of the Second District being approximately | 1,747,387; the Third District being 1,936,616; the Fourth | District being 2,069,660; and the Fifth District being | 1,882,294. Because of the constitutional requirement that a | District be composed of whole counties, and given that actual | population changes on a day-to-day basis, the populations are | not and could never be exact, but the population of each of the | four Districts created by this Act is substantially equal. | In addition to ensuring the population of the four |
| Districts are substantially equal, this Act complies with | Section 7 of Article VI of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, | which provides that the First Judicial District shall be | comprised of a Judicial Circuit, and the remaining Judicial | Circuits shall be provided by law, and Circuits comprised of | more than one county shall be compact and of contiguous | counties. To comply with Section 7 of Article VI and minimize | disruption to the administration of the Judicial Branch, this | Act avoids changing the compositions and boundaries of the | Judicial Circuits, while simultaneously creating substantially | equally populated, compact, and contiguous Judicial Districts. | To further avoid any interruption to the administration of | the Judicial Branch, this Act does not require that the | Supreme Court change where the Appellate Courts currently | reside. By Supreme Court Rule, the Second District Appellate | Court currently sits in Elgin; the Third District Appellate | Court currently sits in Ottawa; the Fourth District Appellate | Court currently sits in Springfield; and the Fifth District | Appellate Court currently sits in Mt. Vernon. Under this Act, | the Supreme Court is not required to change where the | Appellate Courts sit as those cities remain in the Second, | Third, Fourth, and Fifth District respectively. | To ensure continuity of service and compliance with the | Illinois Constitution of 1970, nothing in this Act is intended | to affect the tenure of any Appellate or Supreme Court Judge | elected or appointed prior to the effective date of this Act. |
| In accordance with the Constitution, no change in the | boundaries shall affect an incumbent judge's qualification for | office or right to run for retention. Incumbent judges have | the right to run for retention in the counties comprising the | District that elected the judge, or in the counties comprising | the new District where the judge resides, as the judge may | elect. As provided by the Constitution, upon a vacancy in an | elected Supreme or Appellate Court office, the Supreme Court | may fill the vacancy until the vacancy is filled in the next | general election in the counties comprising the District | created by this Act. | Further, nothing in this Act is intended to alter or | impair the ability of the Supreme Court to fulfill its | obligations to ensure the proper administration of the | Judicial Branch. For example, it remains within the purview of | the Supreme Court to assign or reassign any judge to any court | or determine assignment of additional judges to the Appellate | Court. Section 1 of the Appellate Act provides that the | "Supreme Court may assign additional judges to service in the | Appellate Court from time to time as the business of the | Appellate Court requires." Currently the Supreme Court has | three judges on assignment to the Second District Appellate | Court, whereas one judge is on assignment to the Third, | Fourth, and Fifth Districts. Nothing in this Act seeks to | alter any judicial assignments. | Finally, it is the intent of the General Assembly that any |
| appealable order, as defined by Supreme Court Rules, entered | prior to the effective date of this Act shall be subject to | judicial review by the Judicial District in effect on the date | the order was entered; however, the administrative and | supervisory authority of the courts remains within the purview | of the Supreme Court. | Section 10. The First Judicial District consists of the | County of Cook. | Section 15. Beginning on the effective date of this Act, | the Second Judicial District consists of the counties of | DeKalb, Kendall, Kane, Lake, and McHenry. | Section 20. Beginning on the effective date of this Act, | the Third Judicial District consists of the counties of | Bureau, LaSalle, Grundy, Iroquois, Kankakee, DuPage and Will. | Section 25. Beginning on the effective date of this Act, | the Fourth Judicial District consists of the counties of Jo | Daviess, Stephenson, Carroll, Ogle, Lee, Winnebago, Boone, | Mercer, Rock Island, Whiteside, Henry, Stark, Putnam, | Marshall, Peoria, Tazewell, Adams, Pike, Calhoun, Schuyler, | Brown, Cass, Mason, Menard, Morgan, Scott, Greene, Jersey, | Macoupin, Sangamon, Logan, McLean, Woodford, Livingston, Ford, | Henderson, Warren, Knox, Fulton, McDonough and Hancock. |
| Section 30. Beginning on the effective date of this Act, | the Fifth Judicial District consists of the counties of | DeWitt, Macon, Piatt, Moultrie, Champaign, Douglas, Vermilion, | Edgar, Coles, Cumberland, Clark, Christian, Shelby, | Montgomery, Fayette, Effingham, Jasper, Clay, Marion, Clinton, | Bond, Madison, St. Clair, Washington, Monroe, Randolph, Perry, | Crawford, Richland, Lawrence, Wabash, Edwards, Wayne, | Jefferson, Franklin, Hamilton, White, Gallatin, Hardin, | Saline, Williamson, Jackson, Union, Johnson, Pope, Alexander, | Pulaski, and Massac. | Section 35. Current Members of the Judiciary. Nothing in | this Act shall affect the tenure of any Appellate or Supreme | Court Judge serving on the effective date of this Act. No | Appellate or Supreme Court Judge serving on the effective date | of this Act shall be required to change his or her residency in | order to continue serving in office or to seek retention or | reappointment in office. Any Appellate or Supreme Court Judge | elected to that office prior to the effective date of this Act | who files to run for retention after the effective date of this | Act shall have the right to seek retention in the district the | Judge was elected from or seek retention in the district | created by this Act. The Secretary of State, not less than 63 | days before the election, shall certify the Judge's candidacy | to the proper election officials. |
| Section 40. Severability. To the extent that any provision | of this Act is found to be unconstitutional, that provision | alone shall be deemed of no force and effect and all other | provisions of this Act shall remain in full force and effect. | Section 45. The Judicial Districts Act is amended by | changing Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 as follows:
| (705 ILCS 20/2) (from Ch. 37, par. 1.2)
| (This Act was repealed by P.A. 89-719, which has been held | unconstitutional)
| Sec. 2.
Prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act | of the 102nd General Assembly, the The Second Judicial | District consists of the counties of Jo
Daviess, Stephenson, | Carroll, Ogle, Lee, Winnebago, Boone, McHenry, Lake,
DeKalb, | Kane, Kendall and DuPage.
| (Source: Laws 1963, p. 929.)
| (705 ILCS 20/3) (from Ch. 37, par. 1.3)
| (This Act was repealed by P.A. 89-719, which has been held | unconstitutional)
| Sec. 3.
Prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act | of the 102nd General Assembly, the The Third Judicial District | consists of the counties of Mercer,
Rock Island, Whiteside, | Henry, Bureau, LaSalle, Grundy, Stark, Putnam,
Marshall, |
| Peoria, Tazewell, Will, Kankakee, Iroquois, Henderson, Warren,
| Knox, Fulton, McDonough and Hancock.
| (Source: Laws 1963, p. 929.)
| (705 ILCS 20/4) (from Ch. 37, par. 1.4)
| (This Act was repealed by P.A. 89-719, which has been held | unconstitutional)
| Sec. 4.
Prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act | of the 102nd General Assembly, the The Fourth Judicial | District consists of the counties of Adams,
Pike, Calhoun, | Schuyler, Brown, Cass, Mason, Menard, Morgan, Scott, Greene,
| Jersey, Macoupin, Sangamon, Logan, McLean, Woodford, | Livingston, Ford,
DeWitt, Macon, Piatt, Moultrie, Champaign, | Douglas, Vermilion, Edgar,
Coles, Cumberland and Clark.
| (Source: Laws 1963, p. 929.)
| (705 ILCS 20/5) (from Ch. 37, par. 1.5)
| (This Act was repealed by P.A. 89-719, which has been held | unconstitutional)
| Sec. 5.
Prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act | of the 102nd General Assembly, the The Fifth Judicial District | consists of all the counties south of
the Fourth Judicial | District.
| (Source: Laws 1963, p. 929.)
| (705 ILCS 21/Act rep.) |
| Section 50. The Judicial Redistricting Act of 1997 (which | has been held unconstitutional) is repealed.
| Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | becoming law.
|
Effective Date: 06/04/2021
|