| |
Public Act 102-0954 Public Act 0954 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
Public Act 102-0954 | HB4772 Enrolled | LRB102 25757 AWJ 35083 b |
|
| AN ACT concerning local government.
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| represented in the General Assembly:
| Section 5. The Counties Code is amended by adding Division | 5-45 as follows: | (55 ILCS 5/Div. 5-45 heading new) | Division 5-45. County Design-Build Authorization | (55 ILCS 5/5-45001 new) | Sec. 5-45001. Short title. This Division may be cited as | the County Design-Build Authorization Act. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45005 new) | Sec. 5-45005. Purpose. The purpose of this Division is to | authorize counties to use design-build processes to increase | the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering public | projects. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45010 new) | Sec. 5-45010. Definitions. As used in this Division: | "Delivery system" means the design and construction | approach used to develop and construct a project. | "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system |
| used on public projects that incorporates the competitive | bidding
process set forth in this Code. | "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | services as required and the labor, materials, equipment, and | other construction services for the project. | "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | project under this Division between a county and a | design-build entity to furnish: architecture, engineering, | land surveying, public art or interpretive exhibits, and | related services, as required; and the labor, materials, | equipment, and other construction services for the project. | "Design-build entity" means an individual, sole | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | design and construct any public project under this Division. | "Design professional" means an individual, sole | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural
| Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | separate phases of the selection process as defined in this |
| Division and may include the specialized experience, technical | qualifications and competence, capacity to perform, past | performance, experience with similar projects, assignment of
| personnel to the project, and other appropriate factors. | "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | with this Division. | "Public art designer" means an individual, sole | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | professional corporation, or other entity that has | demonstrated experience with the design and fabrication of | public art including any media that has been planned and | executed with the intention of being staged in the physical | public domain outside and accessible to all or any art which is | exhibited in a public space including publicly accessible | buildings, or interpretive exhibits including communication | media that is designed to engage, excite, inform, relate, or | reveal the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of a | topic or story being presented. | "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | county to solicit proposals for a design-build contract. | "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | for the public project, including, but not limited to, the | intended usage, capacity, size, scope, quality and performance | standards, life-cycle costs, and other programmatic criteria | that are expressed in performance-oriented and quantifiable |
| specifications and drawings that can be reasonably inferred | and are suited to allow a design-build entity to develop a | proposal. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45015 new) | Sec. 5-45015. Solicitation of proposals. | (a) A county may enter into design-build contracts. In | addition to the requirements set forth in its local | ordinances, when the county elects to use the design-build | delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent to receive | proposals for the project at least 14 days before issuing the | request for the proposal. The county must publish the advance | notice in the manner prescribed by ordinance, which shall | include posting the advance notice online on its website. The | county may publish the notice in construction industry | publications or post the notice on construction industry | websites. A brief description of the proposed procurement must | be included in the notice. The county must provide a copy of | the request for proposal to any party requesting a copy. | (b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each | project and must contain, without limitation, the following | information: | (1) The name of the county. | (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | contract. | (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of |
| funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | request for proposal is submitted. | (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | entities wishing to submit proposals. The county shall | include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | criteria by the county. | (5) Material requirements of the contract, including, | but not limited to, the proposed terms and conditions, | required performance and payment bonds, insurance, and the | entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals for | business enterprises established in the Business | Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons with | Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois
| Human Rights Act. | (6) The performance criteria. | (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | evaluation of Phase I proposals. | (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | the technical and cost evaluation phase. | (c) The county may include any other relevant information | that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity shall be | entitled to rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in | the development of its proposal. |
| (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | proposal. The county shall include in the request for proposal | a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II submissions after | the selection of entities from the Phase I evaluation is | completed. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45020 new) | Sec. 5-45020. Development of scope and performance | criteria. | (a) The county shall develop, with the assistance of a | licensed design professional or public art designer, a request | for proposal, which shall include scope and performance | criteria. The scope and performance criteria must be in | sufficient detail and contain adequate information to | reasonably apprise the qualified design-build entities of the | county's overall programmatic needs and goals, including | criteria and preliminary design plans, general budget | parameters, schedule, and delivery
requirements. | (b) Each request for proposal shall also include a | description of the level of design to be provided in the | proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, |
| will be required by the county to be produced by the | design-build entities. | (c) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared | by a design professional or public art designer who is an | employee of the county, or the county may contract with an | independent design professional or public art designer | selected under the Local Government Professional Services | Selection Act to provide these services. | (d) The design professional or public art designer that | prepares the scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | project. | (e) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | county to make modifications in the project scope without | invalidating the design-build contract. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45025 new) | Sec. 5-45025. Procedures for Selection. | (a) The county must use a two-phase procedure for the | selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I of | the procedure will evaluate and shortlist the design-build | entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate | the technical and cost proposals. | (b) The county shall include in the request for proposal | the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These factors are |
| in addition to any prequalification requirements of | design-build entities that the county has set forth. Each | request for proposal shall establish the relative importance | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | any weighting of criteria to be employed by the county. The | county must maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be | disclosed in event of a protest regarding the solicitation. | The county shall include the following criteria in every | Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: (i) experience of | personnel; (ii) successful experience with similar project | types; (iii) financial capability; (iv) timeliness of past | performance; (v) experience with similarly sized projects; | (vi) successful reference checks of the firm; (vii) commitment | to assign personnel for the duration of the project and | qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (viii) ability | or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith | efforts to meet the utilization goals for business enterprises | established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Women, | and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of | the Illinois Human Rights Act. The county may include any | additional relevant
criteria in Phase I that it deems | necessary for a proper qualification review. | The county may not consider any design-build entity for | evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary interest | in the project or has other relationships or circumstances, | including, but not limited to, long-term leasehold, mutual |
| performance, or development contracts with the county, that | may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible | advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, | evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or | that create the appearance of impropriety. No proposal shall | be considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply | with the requirements established in the Business Enterprise | for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for | both the design and construction areas of performance, and | with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the | county shall create a shortlist of the most highly qualified | design-build entities. The county, in its discretion, is not | required to shortlist the maximum number of entities as | identified for Phase II evaluation, provided that no less than | 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | Phase II proposals. | The county shall notify the entities selected for the | shortlist in writing. This notification shall commence the | period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | evaluations. The county must allow sufficient time for the | shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II submittals | considering the scope and detail requested by the county. | (c) The county shall include in the request for proposal | the evaluating factors to be used in the technical and cost | submission components of Phase II. Each request for proposal |
| shall establish, for both the technical and cost submission | components of Phase II, the relative importance assigned to | each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any weighting | of criteria to be employed by the county. The county must | maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in | event of a protest regarding the solicitation. | The county shall include the following criteria in every | Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: (i) | compliance with objectives of the project; (ii) compliance of | proposed services to the request for proposal requirements; | (iii) quality of products or materials proposed; (iv) quality | of design parameters; (v) design concepts; (vi) innovation in | meeting the scope and performance criteria; and (vii) | constructability of the proposed project. The county may | include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | it deems necessary for proper selection. | The county shall include the following criteria in every | Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | construction costs, and the time of completion. The county may | include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | it deems necessary for proper selection. The total project | cost criteria weighing factor shall not exceed 30%. | The county shall directly employ or retain a licensed | design professional or a public art designer to evaluate the | technical and cost submissions to determine if the technical | submissions are in accordance with generally accepted industry |
| standards.
Upon completion of the technical submissions and | cost submissions evaluation, the county may award the | design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45030 new) | Sec. 5-45030. Small projects. In any case where the total | overall cost of the project is estimated to be less than | $12,000,000, the county may combine the two-phase procedure | for selection described in Section 5-45025 into one combined | step, provided that all the requirements of evaluation are | performed in accordance with Section 5-45025. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45035 new) | Sec. 5-45035. Submission of proposals. Proposals must be | properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be reviewed | until after the deadline for submission has passed as set | forth in the request for proposals. | Proposals shall include a bid bond in the form and | security as designated in the request for proposals. Proposals | shall also contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost | information within the overall proposal submission. Proposals | shall include a list of all design professionals, public art
| designers, and other entities to which any work may be | subcontracted during the performance of the contract. | Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | request for proposal or they may be rejected as |
| non-responsive. The county shall have the right to reject any | and all proposals. | The drawings and specifications of the proposal may remain | the property of the design-build entity. | The county shall review the proposals for compliance with | the performance criteria and evaluation factors. | Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | cause. After evaluation begins by the county, clear and | convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45040 new) | Sec. 5-45040. Award; performance. The county may award the | contract to the highest overall ranked design-build entity. | Notice of award shall be made in writing. Unsuccessful | design-build entities shall also be notified in writing. The | county may not request a best and final offer after the receipt | of proposals of all qualified design-build entities. The | county may negotiate with the selected design-build entity | after award but prior to contract execution for the purpose of | securing better terms than originally proposed, provided that | the salient features of the request for proposal are not | diminished. | A design-build entity and associated design professionals | shall
conduct themselves in accordance with the relevant laws | of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | Administrative Code. |
| (55 ILCS 5/5-45045 new) | Sec. 5-45045. Reports and evaluation. At the end of every | 6-month period following the contract award, and again prior | to final contract payout and closure, a selected design-build | entity shall detail, in a written report submitted to the | county, its efforts and success in implementing the entity's | plan to comply with the utilization goals for business | enterprises established in the Business Enterprise for | Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and the | provisions of Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45047 new) | Sec. 5-45047. Exception. Nothing in this Division shall | prevent a county from using a qualification-based selection | process for design professionals or construction managers for | design-build projects. | (55 ILCS 5/5-45050 new) | Sec. 5-45050. Severability. The provisions of this | Division are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on | Statutes.
| Section 999. Effective date. This Act takes effect January | 1, 2023.
|
Effective Date: 1/1/2023
|
|
|