Public Act 094-0117
 
SB0072 Enrolled LRB094 05111 RLC 35151 b

    AN ACT concerning criminal law.
 
    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
 
    Section 5. The Juvenile Court Act of 1987 is amended by
changing Section 5-401.5 as follows:
 
    (705 ILCS 405/5-401.5)
    (This Section may contain text from a Public Act with a
delayed effective date)
    Sec. 5-401.5. When statements by minor may be used.
    (a) In this Section, "custodial interrogation" means any
interrogation (i) during which a reasonable person in the
subject's position would consider himself or herself to be in
custody and (ii) during which a question is asked that is
reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
    In this Section, "electronic recording" includes motion
picture, audiotape, videotape, or digital recording.
    In this Section, "place of detention" means a building or a
police station that is a place of operation for a municipal
police department or county sheriff department or other law
enforcement agency at which persons are or may be held in
detention in connection with criminal charges against those
persons or allegations that those persons are delinquent
minors.
    (b) An oral, written, or sign language statement of a minor
who, at the time of the commission of the offense was under the
age of 17 years, made as a result of a custodial interrogation
conducted at a police station or other place of detention on or
after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 93rd
General Assembly shall be presumed to be inadmissible as
evidence against the minor in any criminal proceeding or
juvenile court proceeding, for an act that if committed by an
adult would be brought under Section 9-1, 9-1.2, 9-2, 9-2.1,
9-3, 9-3.2, or 9-3.3, of the Criminal Code of 1961 or under
clause (d)(1)(F) of Section 11-501 of the Illinois Vehicle Code
unless:
        (1) an electronic recording is made of the custodial
    interrogation; and
        (2) the recording is substantially accurate and not
    intentionally altered.
    (c) Every electronic recording required under this Section
must be preserved until such time as the minor's adjudication
for any offense relating to the statement is final and all
direct and habeas corpus appeals are exhausted, or the
prosecution of such offenses is barred by law.
    (d) If the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that the minor was subjected to a custodial interrogation in
violation of this Section, then any statements made by the
minor during or following that non-recorded custodial
interrogation, even if otherwise in compliance with this
Section, are presumed to be inadmissible in any criminal
proceeding or juvenile court proceeding against the minor
except for the purposes of impeachment.
    (e) Nothing in this Section precludes the admission (i) of
a statement made by the minor in open court in any criminal
proceeding or juvenile court proceeding, before a grand jury,
or at a preliminary hearing, (ii) of a statement made during a
custodial interrogation that was not recorded as required by
this Section because electronic recording was not feasible,
(iii) of a voluntary statement, whether or not the result of a
custodial interrogation, that has a bearing on the credibility
of the accused as a witness, (iv) of a spontaneous statement
that is not made in response to a question, (v) of a statement
made after questioning that is routinely asked during the
processing of the arrest of the suspect, (vi) of a statement
made during a custodial interrogation by a suspect who
requests, prior to making the statement, to respond to the
interrogator's questions only if an electronic recording is not
made of the statement, provided that an electronic recording is
made of the statement of agreeing to respond to the
interrogator's question, only if a recording is not made of the
statement, (vii) of a statement made during a custodial
interrogation that is conducted out-of-state, (viii) of a
statement given at a time when the interrogators are unaware
that a death has in fact occurred, or (ix) of any other
statement that may be admissible under law. The State shall
bear the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that one of the exceptions described in this subsection (e) is
applicable. Nothing in this Section precludes the admission of
a statement, otherwise inadmissible under this Section, that is
used only for impeachment and not as substantive evidence.
    (f) The presumption of inadmissibility of a statement made
by a suspect at a custodial interrogation at a police station
or other place of detention may be overcome by a preponderance
of the evidence that the statement was voluntarily given and is
reliable, based on the totality of the circumstances.
    (g) Any electronic recording of any statement made by a
minor during a custodial interrogation that is compiled by any
law enforcement agency as required by this Section for the
purposes of fulfilling the requirements of this Section shall
be confidential and exempt from public inspection and copying,
as provided under Section 7 of the Freedom of Information Act,
and the information shall not be transmitted to anyone except
as needed to comply with this Section.
(Source: P.A. 93-206, eff. 7-18-05; 93-517, eff. 8-6-05.)
 
    Section 10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by changing Section 103-2.1 as follows:
 
    (725 ILCS 5/103-2.1)
    (This Section may contain text from a Public Act with a
delayed effective date)
    Sec. 103-2.1. When statements by accused may be used.
    (a) In this Section, "custodial interrogation" means any
interrogation during which (i) a reasonable person in the
subject's position would consider himself or herself to be in
custody and (ii) during which a question is asked that is
reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
    In this Section, "place of detention" means a building or a
police station that is a place of operation for a municipal
police department or county sheriff department or other law
enforcement agency, not a courthouse, that is owned or operated
by a law enforcement agency at which persons are or may be held
in detention in connection with criminal charges against those
persons.
    In this Section, "electronic recording" includes motion
picture, audiotape, or videotape, or digital recording.
    (b) An oral, written, or sign language statement of an
accused made as a result of a custodial interrogation at a
police station or other place of detention shall be presumed to
be inadmissible as evidence against the accused in any criminal
proceeding brought under Section 9-1, 9-1.2, 9-2, 9-2.1, 9-3,
9-3.2, or 9-3.3 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or under clause
(d)(1)(F) of Section 11-501 of the Illinois Vehicle Code
unless:
        (1) an electronic recording is made of the custodial
    interrogation; and
        (2) the recording is substantially accurate and not
    intentionally altered.
    (c) Every electronic recording required under this Section
must be preserved until such time as the defendant's conviction
for any offense relating to the statement is final and all
direct and habeas corpus appeals are exhausted, or the
prosecution of such offenses is barred by law.
    (d) If the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that the defendant was subjected to a custodial interrogation
in violation of this Section, then any statements made by the
defendant during or following that non-recorded custodial
interrogation, even if otherwise in compliance with this
Section, are presumed to be inadmissible in any criminal
proceeding against the defendant except for the purposes of
impeachment.
    (e) Nothing in this Section precludes the admission (i) of
a statement made by the accused in open court at his or her
trial, before a grand jury, or at a preliminary hearing, (ii)
of a statement made during a custodial interrogation that was
not recorded as required by this Section, because electronic
recording was not feasible, (iii) of a voluntary statement,
whether or not the result of a custodial interrogation, that
has a bearing on the credibility of the accused as a witness,
(iv) of a spontaneous statement that is not made in response to
a question, (v) of a statement made after questioning that is
routinely asked during the processing of the arrest of the
suspect, (vi) of a statement made during a custodial
interrogation by a suspect who requests, prior to making the
statement, to respond to the interrogator's questions only if
an electronic recording is not made of the statement, provided
that an electronic recording is made of the statement of
agreeing to respond to the interrogator's question, only if a
recording is not made of the statement, (vii) of a statement
made during a custodial interrogation that is conducted
out-of-state, (viii) of a statement given at a time when the
interrogators are unaware that a death has in fact occurred, or
(ix) of any other statement that may be admissible under law.
The State shall bear the burden of proving, by a preponderance
of the evidence, that one of the exceptions described in this
subsection (e) is applicable. Nothing in this Section precludes
the admission of a statement, otherwise inadmissible under this
Section, that is used only for impeachment and not as
substantive evidence.
    (f) The presumption of inadmissibility of a statement made
by a suspect at a custodial interrogation at a police station
or other place of detention may be overcome by a preponderance
of the evidence that the statement was voluntarily given and is
reliable, based on the totality of the circumstances.
    (g) Any electronic recording of any statement made by an
accused during a custodial interrogation that is compiled by
any law enforcement agency as required by this Section for the
purposes of fulfilling the requirements of this Section shall
be confidential and exempt from public inspection and copying,
as provided under Section 7 of the Freedom of Information Act,
and the information shall not be transmitted to anyone except
as needed to comply with this Section.
(Source: P.A. 93-206, eff. 7-18-05; 93-517, eff. 8-6-05.)
 
    Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
becoming law.

Effective Date: 7/5/2005