|
Public Act 094-0666 |
HB3678 Enrolled |
LRB094 05823 LJB 35877 b |
|
|
AN ACT concerning schools.
|
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
represented in the General Assembly:
|
Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing Sections |
2-3.25a and 2-3.25d as follows:
|
(105 ILCS 5/2-3.25a) (from Ch. 122, par. 2-3.25a)
|
Sec. 2-3.25a. "School district" defined; additional |
standards.
|
(a) For the purposes of this Section and Sections 3.25b, |
3.25c,
3.25d, 3.25e, and 3.25f of this Code, "school district" |
includes other
public entities responsible for administering |
public schools, such as
cooperatives, joint agreements, |
charter schools, special charter districts,
regional offices |
of
education, local agencies, and the Department of Human |
Services.
|
(b) In addition to the standards
established pursuant to |
Section 2-3.25, the State Board of Education shall
develop |
recognition standards for student performance and school
|
improvement
in all public schools operated by school districts. |
The indicators to
determine adequate yearly progress shall be |
limited to the State assessment
of student performance in |
reading and mathematics, student attendance rates at
the |
elementary school level, graduation rates
at the high school |
level, and participation rates on student assessments.
Unless |
the federal government formally disapproves of such policy |
through the submission and review process for the Illinois |
Accountability Workbook, the indicators to determine adequate |
yearly progress for children with disabilities shall be based |
on their individualized education plans. The standards
shall be |
designed to permit the measurement of student
performance and |
school improvement by schools and school districts compared to
|
student
performance and school improvement for the preceding |
|
academic years.
|
(Source: P.A. 93-470, eff. 8-8-03.)
|
(105 ILCS 5/2-3.25d) (from Ch. 122, par. 2-3.25d)
|
Sec. 2-3.25d. Academic early warning and watch status.
|
(a) Beginning with the 2005-2006 school year, unless the |
federal government formally disapproves of such policy through |
the submission and review process for the Illinois |
Accountability Workbook, those
Those
schools that do not meet |
adequate yearly progress criteria , as
specified by the State |
Board of Education, for 2 consecutive annual
calculations in |
the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
participation rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate ,
shall |
be placed on academic early warning status for the next school |
year.
Schools on academic early warning status that do not meet |
adequate yearly
progress criteria for a third annual |
calculation in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in |
their participation rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate
|
shall remain on academic early
warning status. Schools on |
academic early warning status that do not meet
adequate yearly |
progress criteria for a fourth annual calculation in the same |
subgroup and in the same subject or in their participation |
rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate shall be
placed
on |
initial academic watch status. Schools on academic watch status |
that do not
meet adequate yearly progress criteria for a fifth |
or subsequent annual
calculation in the same subgroup and in |
the same subject or in their participation rate, attendance |
rate, or graduation rate shall remain on academic watch status. |
Schools on academic early
warning or academic watch status that |
meet adequate yearly progress criteria
for
one annual |
calculation shall be acknowledged for making improvement and |
shall
maintain their current statuses for the next school year. |
Schools on academic
early warning or academic watch status that |
meet adequate yearly progress
criteria for 2 consecutive annual |
calculations
shall be considered as having
met
expectations and |
shall be removed from any status designation.
|
|
The school district of a school placed on either academic |
early warning
status or academic watch status may appeal the |
status to the State Board of
Education in accordance with |
Section 2-3.25m of this Code.
|
A school district that has one or more schools on academic |
early warning
or academic watch status shall prepare a revised |
School Improvement Plan or
amendments thereto setting forth the |
district's expectations for removing each
school from academic |
early warning or academic watch status and for improving
|
student performance in the affected school or schools. |
Districts operating
under
Article 34 of this Code may prepare |
the School Improvement Plan required under
Section 34-2.4 of |
this Code.
|
The revised School Improvement Plan for a school
that is |
initially placed on academic early warning status
or that |
remains on
academic early warning status after a third annual |
calculation
must be approved by
the
school board (and by the |
school's local school council in a district operating
under |
Article 34 of this Code, unless the school is on probation |
pursuant to
subsection (c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code).
|
The revised School Improvement Plan for a school placed on |
initial
academic watch status after a fourth annual calculation |
must be approved by the
school board (and by the school's local |
school council in a district operating
under Article 34 of this |
Code, unless the school is on probation pursuant to
subsection |
(c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code) and the State |
Superintendent of Education.
|
The revised School Improvement Plan for a school that |
remains on
academic watch status after a fifth annual |
calculation must be approved by the
school board (and by the |
school's local school council in a district operating
under |
Article 34 of this Code, unless the school is on probation |
pursuant to
subsection (c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code) and |
the State Superintendent of Education.
In addition, the |
district must develop a school restructuring plan for the
|
school that
must
be approved by the school board (and by the |
|
school's local school council in a
district operating under |
Article 34 of this Code) and subsequently approved by
the State |
Superintendent of Education.
|
A school on academic watch status that does not meet |
adequate yearly
progress criteria for a sixth annual |
calculation shall implement its approved
school restructuring |
plan beginning with the next school year, subject to the
State
|
interventions specified in Section 2-3.25f of this Code.
|
(b) Beginning with the 2005-2006 school year, unless the |
federal government formally disapproves of such policy through |
the submission and review process for the Illinois |
Accountability Workbook, those
Those
school districts that do |
not meet adequate yearly progress
criteria , as specified by the |
State Board of Education, for 2 consecutive
annual
calculations |
in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
participation rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate , shall |
be placed on academic early warning status for the next
school |
year. Districts on academic early warning status that do not |
meet
adequate yearly progress criteria for a third annual |
calculation in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in |
their participation rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate
|
shall remain
on
academic early warning status. Districts on |
academic early warning status that
do not meet adequate yearly |
progress criteria for a fourth annual calculation
in the same |
subgroup and in the same subject or in their participation |
rate, attendance rate, or graduation rate shall
be placed on |
initial academic watch status. Districts on academic watch |
status
that do not meet adequate yearly progress criteria for a |
fifth or subsequent
annual calculation in the same subgroup and |
in the same subject or in their participation rate, attendance |
rate, or graduation rate shall remain on academic watch status. |
Districts on academic
early warning or academic watch status |
that meet adequate yearly progress
criteria for one annual |
calculation shall be acknowledged for making
improvement and |
shall maintain their current statuses for the next school year.
|
Districts on academic early warning or academic watch status |
|
that meet adequate
yearly progress criteria for 2 consecutive |
annual calculations shall be
considered
as having met |
expectations and shall be removed from any status designation.
|
A district placed on either academic early warning status |
or academic
watch status may appeal the status to the State |
Board of Education in
accordance with Section 2-3.25m of this |
Code.
|
Districts on academic early warning or academic watch |
status shall
prepare a District Improvement Plan or amendments |
thereto setting forth the
district's expectations for removing |
the district from academic early warning
or
academic watch |
status and for improving student performance in the district.
|
The
District Improvement Plan for a district that is |
initially placed on academic
early
warning status must be |
approved by the school board.
|
The revised District Improvement Plan for a district that |
remains on
academic early warning status after a third annual |
calculation must be approved
by the school board.
|
The revised District Improvement Plan for a district on |
initial academic
watch
status after a fourth annual calculation |
must be approved by the school board
and the State |
Superintendent of Education.
|
The revised District Improvement Plan for a district that |
remains on
academic watch status after a fifth annual |
calculation must be approved by the
school board and the State |
Superintendent of Education. In addition, the
district must
|
develop a district restructuring plan that must be approved by |
the school
board and the State Superintendent of Education.
|
A district on academic watch status that does not meet |
adequate yearly
progress criteria for a sixth annual |
calculation shall implement its approved
district |
restructuring plan beginning with the next school year, subject |
to
the State
interventions specified in Section 2-3.25f of this |
Code.
|
(c) All revised School and District Improvement Plans shall |
be developed
in collaboration with staff in the affected school |
|
or school district. All
revised
School and District Improvement |
Plans shall be developed, submitted, and
approved pursuant to |
rules adopted by the State Board of Education. The
revised |
Improvement Plan shall address measurable outcomes for |
improving
student performance so that such performance meets |
adequate yearly progress
criteria as specified by the State |
Board of Education.
|
(d) All federal requirements apply to schools and school |
districts utilizing
federal funds under Title I, Part A of the |
federal Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965. |
(e) The State Board of Education, from any moneys it may |
have available for this purpose, must implement
and administer |
a grant
program that provides 2-year grants to school districts |
on the academic watch
list and other school districts that have |
the lowest achieving students, as
determined by the State Board |
of Education, to be
used to improve student achievement.
In |
order
to receive a
grant under this program, a school district |
must establish an accountability
program. The
accountability |
program must involve the use of statewide testing standards and
|
local
evaluation measures. A grant shall be automatically |
renewed when achievement
goals are met. The Board may adopt any |
rules necessary to implement and
administer this grant program.
|
(Source: P.A. 93-470, eff. 8-8-03; 93-890, eff. 8-9-04.)
|
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
becoming law.
|