|
The State construction agency shall include the following |
criteria in every
Phase I
evaluation of design-build entities: |
(1) experience of personnel; (2)
successful
experience with |
similar project types; (3) financial capability; (4) |
timeliness
of past performance; (5) experience with similarly |
sized projects; (6)
successful reference checks of the firm; |
(7) commitment to assign personnel
for the duration of the |
project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (8) |
ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith |
efforts to meet the utilization goals for business enterprises |
established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, |
Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section |
2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
The State construction |
agency may include any additional relevant criteria in
Phase I |
that
it deems necessary for a proper qualification review.
|
The State construction agency may not consider any |
design-build entity for
evaluation or
award if the entity has |
any pecuniary interest in the project or has other
|
relationships or circumstances, including but not limited to, |
long-term
leasehold, mutual performance, or development |
contracts with the State
construction agency,
that may give the |
design-build entity a financial or tangible advantage over
|
other design-build entities in the preparation, evaluation, or |
performance of
the
design-build contract or that create the |
appearance of impropriety.
No proposal shall be considered that |
does not include an entity's plan to comply with the |
|
requirements established in the Business Enterprise for |
Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for |
both the design and construction areas of performance, and with |
Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
|
Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the |
State construction
agency shall
create a shortlist of the most |
highly qualified design-build entities. The
State
construction |
agency, in its discretion, is not required to shortlist the
|
maximum number of
entities as identified for Phase II |
evaluation, provided however, no less than
2
design-build |
entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit Phase II
|
proposals.
|
The State construction agency shall notify the entities |
selected for the
shortlist in
writing. This notification shall |
commence the period for the preparation of the
Phase II |
technical and cost evaluations. The State construction agency |
must
allow sufficient
time for the shortlist entities to |
prepare their Phase II submittals
considering
the scope and |
detail requested by the State agency.
|
(c) The State construction agency shall include in the |
request for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in the |
technical and cost submission components
of Phase II. Each |
request for proposal shall establish, for both the technical
|
and cost submission components of Phase II, the relative |
importance assigned to
each evaluation factor and subfactor, |
including any weighting of criteria to be
employed by the State |
|
construction agency. The State construction agency must
|
maintain a record of the
evaluation scoring to be disclosed in |
event of a protest regarding the
solicitation.
|
The State construction agency shall include the following |
criteria in every
Phase II
technical evaluation of design-build |
entities: (1) compliance with objectives
of
the
project; (2) |
compliance of proposed services to the request for proposal
|
requirements; (3) quality of products or materials proposed; |
(4) quality of
design parameters; (5) design concepts; (6) |
innovation in meeting the scope and
performance criteria; and |
(7) constructability of the
proposed project. The State |
construction agency may include any additional
relevant
|
technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper |
selection.
|
The State construction agency shall include the following |
criteria in every
Phase II cost
evaluation: the total project |
cost, the construction costs, and the time of
completion. The |
State construction agency may include any additional relevant
|
technical
evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper |
selection. The total project cost criteria weighing factor |
shall be 25%.
|
The State construction agency shall directly employ or |
retain a licensed
design
professional to evaluate the technical |
and cost submissions to determine if the
technical submissions |
are in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards.
|
Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost |
|
submissions evaluation,
the State construction agency may |
award the design-build contract to the
highest
overall ranked |
entity.
|
(Source: P.A. 94-716, eff. 12-13-05.)
|
(30 ILCS 537/90) |
(Section scheduled to be repealed on July 1, 2009)
|
Sec. 90. Repealer. This Act is repealed on July 1, 2014 |
2009.
|
(Source: P.A. 94-716, eff. 12-13-05.)
|
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
becoming law.
|